User talk:Sohanpandey

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Faizhaider with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kick (2014 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kick (2014 film) was changed by Sohanpandey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860628 on 2014-07-19T14:56:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khaireni[edit]

The article Khaireni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GZWDer (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlie Burke[edit]

The article Charlie Burke has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie Burke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Commentator, Coach and WACA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Submission[edit]

@Sohanpandey: hello there!! How to upload an image in an article ?? Bindubimala (talk) 15:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manjinder Singh[edit]

The article Manjinder Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no body text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Karan Shah[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Sohanpandey, thanks for creating Karan Shah!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. ,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teeshay Shah[edit]

The article Teeshay Shah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sohanpandey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Sohanpandey (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit my article Teeshay Shah. Please someone attach a valid reference Sohanpandey (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sohanpandey, I will try and add some references; check the article after sometime. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sohanpandey, I have added few references however this article still needs to pass the WP:GNG and addition of references from me should not be taken as validity of the article. It appears to be a borderline case of WP:TOOSOON but I am yet to make up my mind on that and hence I am not taking this page to AfD now. Please improve the article by adding contents. Should you need help, please feel free to drop a message on my TalkPage. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sohanpandey. You have new messages at AKS.9955's talk page.
Message added 05:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Zahir Khan Aghan Cricketer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Zahir Khan Aghan Cricketer. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Zaheer Khan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Zaheer Khan – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. rayukk | talk 11:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rayukk. Check carefully. Spellings are different. Zahir Khan is from Afghan, Zaheer Khan is Indian player.

Proposed deletion of Zahir Khan Aghan Cricketer[edit]

The article Zahir Khan Aghan Cricketer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. rayukk | talk 11:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zahir Khan Aghan Cricketer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bowler and Chinaman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pratyusha Banerjee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 15:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it's true, please provide a reliable source! —SMALL JIM 15:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Your recent editing history at Pratyusha Banerjee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 15:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karan Shah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karan Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GreenCricket (talk) 09:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For asking an excellent question at the Teahouse[edit]

	Great Question Badge
	Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and the Teahouse! J-Mo 23:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leon Glen Carlo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naveen ul Haq[edit]

The article Naveen ul Haq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCRIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pushpendrakhadka/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sohanpandey, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naveen ul Haq[edit]

The article Naveen ul Haq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCRIC and does not otherwise show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yamin Ahmadzai

added links pointing to Bowler and First Class

Shamsurrahman (Afghan cricketer)

added a link pointing to Bowler

Tom Cullen (cricketer)

added a link pointing to First class

Zahir Khan (Afghan cricketer)

added a link pointing to Chinaman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sohanpandey. You have new messages at AKS.9955's talk page.
Message added 13:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naveed Obaid for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveed Obaid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Obaid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Shamsurrahman (Afghan cricketer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamsurrahman (Afghan cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamsurrahman (Afghan cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Nijat Masood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nijat Masood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nijat Masood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Karim Janat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karim Janat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karim Janat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Tariq Stanikzai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tariq Stanikzai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Stanikzai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Ikram Faizi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ikram Faizi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikram Faizi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Waheedullah Shafaq for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waheedullah Shafaq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waheedullah Shafaq until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Naveen ul Haq for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveen ul Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen ul Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Rahim Mangal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahim Mangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahim Mangal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Ghamai Zadran for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghamai Zadran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghamai Zadran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Leon Glen Carlo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leon Glen Carlo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Glen Carlo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cricket notability[edit]

Hi. Thanks for creating articles on missing cricketers, however all cricketers must meet the notability set out at WP:NCRIC. As a minimum they must have played either one first-class, List A or T20 match in a top level and/or league. Being part of a U19 squad and playing in U19 matches is not usually enough to meet the notability criteria. Those cricketers may be notable after the U19 tournament, if they then go on to play in a match listed above/at WP:NCRIC. Please do not create further articles for U19 players who do not meet the notability of WP:NCRIC. If you have any questions, please raise them at the Cricket Project. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muslim Musa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Musa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Musa (second nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for August 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clint Hinchliffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duncraig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New articles[edit]

To be blunt, the new articles you create are of pretty poor quality. Here's some pointers:

Right Hand is not a proper noun. It should be "John Smith is a right-hand batsman", not "John Smith is a Right Hand batsman".
Ditto with wicketkeeper. It's not Wicketkeeper.
It's first-class, not First Class or First-Class.
You rarely put the article into categories. As a minimum they should have year of birth, living people, country and team played for.

I urge you to take care in creating new articles, so others don't have to waste their time cleaning up after you. If you continue to create sub-standard articles, this could be viewed as disruption. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Rouse[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Harry Rouse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlie MacLeod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen ul Haq a player?[edit]

What does he play?Xx236 (talk) 08:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karim Janat[edit]

Please add your sources.Xx236 (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to create articles for cricketers who are not notable and have previously been deleted via AfD. If you create further articles that don't meet the notability requirements, this will be viewed as disruption and you'll be blocked from editing. Please reply here to state that you fully understand this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second Lugnuts' note above. If you continue this behavior, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 03:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Debuts[edit]

I don't know anythitg about criquet. However in any sport people start and then they perform, win. You write mainly about debuts. Strange.Xx236 (talk) 09:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rony Chowdhury[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rony Chowdhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Passengerpigeon (talk) 08:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dogodo Bau[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dogodo Bau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste move[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Colin Peake (cricketer)) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Colin Peake. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality (or lack of)[edit]

Now you've seemingly understood the notability standards for cricketers, you now create sub-standard articles at a rapid rate. Your new article for Clifford Isaacs is quite frankly, a joke. I have previously given you some tips on creating new articles, which you have ignored. Note that competence is required when editing, esp. when you create new articles of living people. In my opinion, your new articles are becoming disruptive, as others have to clean up the mess you're creating. Again, I've already pointed out the link to WP:DE on your talkpage once already. Your recent creations for Simon Lightbody and Ashley Barrow are not much better (basic core categories missing, no wiki-linking in the article, etc). Either create stubs of a good quality, or don't. Consider this a final note, as the next one will likely find you at WP:ANI facing a block for disruption. @SpacemanSpiff: - for info, as you commented on this user's talkpage in one of the sections I've linked to. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sohanpandey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbb23 can't this block be set for certain time ? ( upto 2-3 months ).

Don't want to create another user account.

Sohanpandey (talk)

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sohanpandey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any issue in using multiple accounts on the same device??

I use my Cellphone, sometimes my Wife & bro too use my Cellphone. Is there any issue?? Sohanpandey (talk)

@Bbb23: The editor is contacted OTRS to ask where to appeal this block. I started to respond that they should do so on their talk page but I see they did so for days ago. I don't know any of the details but I hope that discussion can continue.--S Philbrick (Talk) 13:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: He hasn't appealed his block. He left a couple of comments. What makes him think anyone will even notice? The only thing I believe about what he says is that he uses a cellphone to edit Wikipedia. It's funny how his entire family edit the same articles, create the same kinds of poorly written articles, and generally act like a single person. And this isn't the first time he's been blocked for sock puppetry, so apparently his cricket family has suddenly grown.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for a response. Thanks for responding.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Yes, I am using My cellphone. It's bit difficult to edit it that's why The quality of edits were poor.

Another thing is I was not aware of Wikipedia T&C. Sorry for that..... Sohanpandey (talk)

@Sphilbrick: :::@Bbb23:

Hi! Sorry I was not aware of Wikipedia rules.

I have some mistakes in the past as well by creating cricketers who hadn't played senior cricket. ( did it bcz I didn't have any idea of notability).

I will not create a new article from now on. Will just edit the existing article.

I make sure that Only 1 account will be used on my device....

Sohanpandey (talk) Sohanpandey (talk) 03:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sohanpandey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no reason provided

Decline reason:

There's no reason for an unblock provided, but you should be aware of WP:BROTHER. Also, see WP:OFFER for how/when you can be unblocked. —SpacemanSpiff 03:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Sohanpandey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harrison Powell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harrison Powell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Powell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 00:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Harrison Powell) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Harrison Powell, Sohanpandey!

Wikipedia editor Devopam just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please improve the article to avoid deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Devopam's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Adams (cricketer)[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ryan Adams (cricketer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Devopam (talk) 08:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neil Brand (cricketer)[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Neil Brand (cricketer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Devopam (talk) 08:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Ross (cricketer)[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peter Ross (cricketer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Devopam (talk) 08:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Thompson (cricketer)[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Henry Thompson (cricketer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Devopam (talk) 08:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashley Barrow[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ashley Barrow for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clifford Isaacs[edit]

Hello Sohanpandey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Clifford Isaacs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Davidson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Greg Davidson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simon Lightbody[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Simon Lightbody requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bob Stratford[edit]

The article Bob Stratford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication he passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phillip Gillespie for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phillip Gillespie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Gillespie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashraf Din for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashraf Din is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashraf Din until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rony Chowdhury for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rony Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rony Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Störm (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]