User talk:Sranjanm2002

I have no idea who is Abhishek or why he is taking your name? Lets forget about him & continue our work. Superfast1111 (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mishraji, I believe that you have come up with a good compromise for the speed. I have only corrected some spelling mistakes you made. But until the train board shows Gangaur Express, it is best to address it as an informal name for the train. You can check out irfca.org. They have a page dedicated for train names. So have a nice day. Superfast1111 (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why dont you create a new page for gangaur express?? Then we can both be happy. Fyi as per irfca.org, it is a UNOFFICIAL or proposed name. Superfast1111 (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Would you use a spell check before you post something. The correct spelling is BROADGUAGE. Superfast1111 (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Hey Genius, try to use a calculator when writing about train speeds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superfast1111 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sranjanm2002, if you divide 1159 by 18 you get 64.39 & when 1159 is divided by 17hrs 40 mins you get 65.60. Why are you hellbent on increasing the speed of the train when it is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE.Superfast1111 (talk) 16:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sranjanm2002, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Zoz (t) 19:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:DDD+.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DDD+.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Apna.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Apna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. the_undertow ^talk 08:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:INSAT4b.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:INSAT4b.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:DDdirect.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DDdirect.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:StarUtsav.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:StarUtsav.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jaipur Duronto Express[edit]

Well i guess you haven't heard about Photo editor. I can understand as it's your own product so you can not afford to listen any criticism about it. Your table on Jaipur Duronto doesn't match to the tables present on the links you have provided. Last not the Least Duronto IS a Rajdhani Type train. Don't believe it ? Open IRCTC Page->Select a jaipur Duronto Train from BCT to JP say on 20 Oct. -> Now click Fare Summery. -> Read Train Type. It's Rajdhani Type of Train. Hope you are not convinced even from IRCTC.

Let me clear up your points 1 by 1.

I never stated I have admin level privileges but I cannot be blamed if you have trouble understanding English correctly. What I have stated is that by undoing each other’s edits, WE (as in both of us) are running the risk of violating the policies of Wikipedia specifically 3RR. So that statement was a NOTE OF CAUTION.

How many articles have you authored to use foul remarks about mine?

The ugly table you refer to is use on these articles, Bhubaneswar Duronto Express, Secunderabad Mumbai Duronto Express, Ernakulam-Lokmanya Tilak Duronto, Howrah Mumbai CST Duronto Express, Ernakulam-H.Nizamudin Duronto, Secunderabad Hazrat Nizamuddin Duronto Express, Nagpur Duronto express, Chennai Madurai AC Duronto Express, Kolkata Shalimar – Patna Duronto Express, Bhopal Shatabdi Express, Lucknow Swarna Shatabdi Express, Kanpur New Delhi Shatabdi Express. There could be more but presently I am not concerned to look any further.

It does not matter how regularly you travel by a train. What matters is what factually correct information is. For example if you wish to claim Duronto’s are a version of Rajdhani then you need to provide some source of information because I also travel very frequently by train & I have never heard such a ridiculous claim.

My history as you put should be looked at as a lesson on what not to do. I have learnt things the hard way so be cautious.

As far as the EOG image is concerned, I can’t convert night into day as the time stamp on the image will show you, if you wish to look at it however sufficient clarity is still there.

As another user has pointed out, pls use correct spellings & grammar. Further it is you who is threatening me while I have tried to address my issue the right way.

Any issue I have regarding what the article is about, I have put it on the talk page. You may address your concerns there.

Superfast1111 (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all you are Not the admin of Wikipedia so don't give me threat of Block. I am unable to understand why are you so keen to put all the ugly looking stuff on this page. For example a dark picture which no body can appreciates and a ugly looking table of schedule. Why are you so interested to remove information about technical halt etc. I am a regular traveler of this train and i can give much better inputs. From your previous history i know that you are more interested to put your stuff whether it is a relevant or not and even if it looks ugly you don't care at all. Besides a dark picture of EOG you don't have any material of Jaipur Duronto. At least you could have enhanced it's brightness. Don't threat me with the code of conduct. Reach to some conclusion otherwise i will keep reverting it. (Satya Ranjan Mishra (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Before you choose to re-edit the Jaipur Duronto Express page, pls see the talk page of the article & put in your comments there else by going over 3RR, a block may be risked. Superfast1111 (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 15:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jaipur Duronto Express[edit]

Please stop immediately. The other editor is trying to discuss at the article talk and you are edit warring and removing talk page posts. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please use the article talk page before you edit the article any further. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Okay. I reverted to a version you probably won't be happy with. I did this because the other editor is giving rationale and trying to engage you in a talk page discussion. You, instead of responding, deleted the talk page discussion and then kept reverting at the article. That's not how this works. I don't know why you don't communicate at talk pages. There's nothing wrong with your language skills. I can see that from your edit summaries.

So, if you want the article the way you would like it, it's time to discuss it. If you don't, then the other editor may well say at the talk page "This is how I think it should be, so please speak up with your rationale against it or else I'll go ahead and make the changes I propose here" If you don't speak up, the editor is within his rights to make the changes he sees fit. What will not work is for you to simply try to force the article via edit warring. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE on Talk Page

I have posted my points on talk page. Now please let me know what should i do next. I would like to come up with more information and media which if i would allowed; would be added. Thanks. (Satya Ranjan Mishra (talk) 16:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

What you should do next is wait for the other editor to respond. Then you two can continue to discuss things and try to come to some sort of consensus about what should be in the article. Thank you for using the talk pages. It's a good thing. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about the September 2013 dispute[edit]

Please see User_talk:Superfast1111#The_Jaipur_Duronto_Express_.E2.80.8E_dispute

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Timetables - existence and convention[edit]

Please weigh in there. If you wish to have uninvolved editors give their opinions, please keep it brief, and to the point. Also, trying to convert your opponents hasn't worked at the article talks. Try to make your case to the community at large instead. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Sranjanm2002. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sranjanm2002. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jaipur Superfast Express[edit]

Template:Jaipur Superfast Express has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]