User talk:Sru111

Welcome![edit]

Hello Sru111! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

August 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Paladins (video game) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Paladins (video game) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/Paladins/comments/53qusf/a_brief_history_of_paladins_as_response_to/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Paladins (video game) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sru111 reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sru111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Paladins page's setting section was outdated and inaccurate. I proceeded to edit it to be more accurate, but was reverted twice, first by an automated bot, followed by ‎Praxidicae. I was given absolutely no reason why the latter reverted my edit, which included a source directly from a developer, yet they reverted the entire thing. I undid my revert, as I was given no reasons. I attempted to reach out on their talk page and solve the problem, but wasn't answered, with Jéské instead responding in their place, informing me the issue was the lack of sources, and telling me more more in-depth information should go on a Paladins wiki, despite the information I added not being super in-depth. Prax then undid my edits again (in which they removed a review of the game from the reception section because they personally didn't like it. Kind of seems a bit biased there), finally giving some sort of response, yet insulting my edit and calling it "cruft", while they deleted by response on their talk page while being an asshole and telling me to "learn to read instructions and sign messages". After getting Jéské's message, I began editing the page once more to now include sources, something the original page completely lacked altogether in the setting section. Despite that, Prax reported me for edit warring. I attempted to explain myself and ask why they never explained themselves, yet their responses largely only consisted of further aggressive behavior towards me, making constant insults and accusing me of attacking them on their talk page, which I never did, having barely even referenced them; they also kept telling me to "learn to read simple instructions", despite the fact them and Jéské didn't say to do anything beyond informing me of sources and Jéské mentioning more in-depth information should go on a Paladins wiki, yet the information I added wasn't any more over the top in-depth than was already on the page. I asked Prax to explain what their problems were in regards to insulting my edits by calling them "cruft", yet they conveniently refused to answer because I called them an asshole, with me being blocked before I could further respond and Prax proceeding to continue insulting me in their talk page. And now my sourced edits ‎were reverted by ‎לילך5 because I linked to YouTube, despite the fact said links were official trailers for the game uploaded by the developers. Prax has been unhelpful and incredibly rude, avoiding working things out with me at nearly every turn and completely reverting my edits, despite there being information such as outright sources directly from the developers being added. I find it ridiculous they get to act this way, yet me calling them out for being an asshole is unacceptable? I admit some of what I said wasn't the kindest, but it's still ridiculous they insult me far more, accuse me of things I didn't do, and edit war themselves, yet only I end up blocked. I also find it ridiculous I'm being blocked for adding sources literally directly from the developers and official accounts with the page being reverted to a version that doesn't even have any sources whatsoever. How is no sources more reliable than content from the official game channels and developers? Sru111 (talk) 20:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks will not be considered. stwalkerster (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.