Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demonsomnia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, SteinSonne!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 05:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOOSOON. Feel free to re-submit when it has been released and you can provide at least three independent sources that discuss this game.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Demonsomnia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I feel pretty confident rejecting this for non-notability, and it reads like advertising. Wikipedia is not for promoting the latest upcoming products, it has to be notable first.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
It's been 13 days, and I appreciate your message and thoughts. The free version of the game has been released and is active. As of now, Demonsomnia is one of the most played demos globally and is trending on Steam. In terms of current players, it's competing with Outlast Trials.
I provided both links to show that even the demo of Demonsomnia is on the verge of surpassing one of the most played games globally.
We respect your response immensely. We are not individuals who use Wikipedia for our own personal gain; our purpose and intent are good and 'humane'. Our interest lies not in profit but in receiving positive feedback from people and being able to help them. Could there be a more sincere life purpose than this?
