User talk:Sutherland4l

Hi Sutherland 41, Welcome to Wikipedia and the Opera Project! Great job on editing the purple prose in the Joan Sutherland article. Just a couple of things. I noticed that you've put the Opera Project banner on your User page. Actually, that's only for actual articles about opera-related subjects in the main space of Wikipedia, not for user pages. Adding that template automatically categorizes your user-page as an opera-related article. You'll find a selection of Opera Project user-page boxes here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/User and project boxes. Adding one of those will automatically put the page on the right category: WikiProject Opera participants. Also, when you add a comment to any talk page, either for an article or another user, make sure you sign your comment by adding 4 tildes (~), without spaces, after your comment, like this: ~~~~. That will automatically add your user-name (linked to your user-page) as well as the date and time of your comment. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Me again. I looked at the edit history of your user-page and saw that you were originally trying to add a user-page box, but the syntax wasn't quite right. I've taken the liberty making the switch for you. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Voceditenore, Thanks for the helpful info! Sorry about the confusion in icons et al and my anonymity. I've only had about 5 hours of experience as of now. I look forward to helping the project out as much as I can, even if it is only in small nit-picks. Talk with you soon. Sutherland4l (talk) 06:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoops! I forgot to add that if you want to change the background colour of the user-box, you can use one of these instead: {{ParticipantOpera2}} (beige background), {{ParticipantOpera4}} (plain white background) or {{ParticipantOpera5}} (lavender background). And don't worry, you'll get the hang of all minor the wiki-bits.;-) Best, Voceditenore (talk) 06:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi and editing conventions

Hi, I want to second the above welcome to Wikipedia. It's good to have fresh blood working on operas.

As you're a new user, I want to explain some of my recent edits to Tristan und Isolde. I think you've made a number of improvements but I want to draw you attention to Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. This says that once an article has developed in one variety of English it should be left that way unless there is a very good reason to change. One such reason to change, taking your favourite singer as an example, is if the subject is, say, Australian. The Joan Sutherland article should use the language conventions common in her homeland. However, Tristan is not associated with any one variety of English and should be left in the one it started in, or at least the one at which the variety of English being used first became clear. As Wikipedia is a multinational effort, we don't want to be seen to favour any one particular group.

There were also a couple of points where I preferred the original phrasing. The early Karajan recording from Bayreuth was not official but pirated off the radio and therefore I prefer the EMI being described as his first official recording. Also the Manual of Style prefers literal descriptions - Barenboim was the conductor of a later Berlin recording, not it was "under his baton". And I do want to change one of your edits earlier on. I think it was more accurate to say that Wagner was inspired by Mathilde W and by Schopenhauer in his compostion, not that the composition was inspired by them. He was, I believe, already interested in the subject before he read Schopenhauer and before he met MW; but they inspired him to approach the task in a particular way. However, I can't make that change for now as their is a WIkipedia rule that you can't make more than three edits undoing someone else's changes in a 24hr period.

Any way welcome to Wikipedia and see you around.--Peter cohen (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and sorry about the mishaps. I've reverted the language back, and I will also revert back to your suggestions. I'm very new to the entire editing process, and I'm sorry if I have stepped on toes in trying to find my way. I'll also revert my earlier edits to Joan Sutherland's article. I look forward to working with you, however, and the Opera Project! See you around! Sutherland4l (talk) 22:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't mean to frighten you into wholesale retreat. People are entitled to different opinions about what should be in articles and on the way they should be presented. Although I was aware of your edits to the JS article, I haven't actually looked at them and so can have no useful opinion one way or the other on what you have done there. What I do know is that another editor was pleased by your work on that article.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

That's good to know, thanks for telling me! I changed a lot of the TuI based on your suggestions. Thanks for the help etc...! Sutherland4l (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
  While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 17:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --17:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 14:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Project logo Welcome to the Opera Project!

Hello, Sutherland4l! We're delighted you've signed up to join us! Opera is a very active, medium-sized project with more than 4,400 articles - it's smaller than the mega-projects like Music etc, but it is also larger than closely-focused projects such as Richard Wagner. We have a discussion page linked to the main project page where you signed in. Participants work together on articles, see for example the Composer of the month, Singer of the month and Can you help? features on the Project page. Please take part! The scope of the project is huge: 400 years of history, many countries and many languages. For that reason the editing style of opera articles can sometimes be complicated, so we have detailed guidelines for formatting on the project page, covering the tricky points like opera titles, capitalization, categories etc. Please don't be too bothered if you make a few mistakes at first - we all went through the same thing when we started! Some opera editors use reference books such the New Grove Dictionary of Opera, New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, the Oxford Dictionary of Opera and the Viking Opera Guide. These are helpful for checking facts and providing the essential references required on Wikipedia. It's great if you can get access to these books. However if you don't have access to books, there are still many other ways you can contribute to the project: compiling lists of recordings, writing synopses of your favourite operas using CD librettos, translating texts from other languages, picture researching, writing biographies of contemporary singers from online sources etc etc - and see also the To do list for articles needing attention. We hope you have a great time on the Opera Project. Please don't hesitate to ask us if you have any questions! We are always here - here! Best regards!

Kleinzach (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008

The April 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008

The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 04:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Romeo and Juliet collaboration

Greetings! The current Shakespeare Project Collaboration is Romeo and Juliet. This project is currently going a thorough peer review and copyedit before moving on to FAC. The link to the peer review is Wikipedia:Peer review/Romeo and Juliet/archive1. Have a look! « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members

WikiProject Novels Roll Call

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 13:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJab843&diff=246795753&oldid=246795493 ? Seriously. Come on we are older than that. Later

WikiProject Shakespeare notice

There is currently a discussion going on regarding the project's policy on how information on characters should be represented in articles on Shakespeare's plays. Please take part by clicking Talk:Romeo and Juliet#Character Analysis. Further context, if needed, can be found by scanning the two previous talk sections on the page as well. Sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 04:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) per request of Wrad (talk)

Hello, Sutherland4l, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Simple English did you know there is a Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! -- Jab843 (talk) 06:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject United States History

Greetings, It was recently suggested that WikiProject United States History might be inactive or semiactive and that it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States.

I have started a discussion and will contact each of the active members for their comments and input on the suggestion. Please take a moment and add your comments to the discussion or feel free to contact me if you have any questions. --Kumioko (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

US National Archives collaboration

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

The Wagner article is in need of some help

We're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns what can be in the introduction and what not, should it be shortened and are the chapters in the right order? At the Wagner discussion page there is Edit War solution topic and at the end of it some courses of action that I was requested to list. Please help, it seems that the few old hags (me included) don't want to come to any conclusion. Just take a fast look. Thank you User:Major Torp (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Sutherland4l! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Survey about How Historical Knowledge is Produced on Wikipedia

Hi Sutherland4l,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)