User talk:Sword of St. Michael

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Sword of St. Michael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexual/paedophile tagging[edit]

Hi! In regard to your recent edits, there is normally considered to be a distinction between male-male paedophilia and homosexuality. There's a good discussion of some of the more recent literature at Psychology Today, if you are interested - it is possible for someone to be homosexual and a paedophile, just as it is possible to be hetrosexual and a paedophile, but a paedophile who abuses male children isn't necessarily considered to be homosexual. You would need additional evidence to make that claim. - Bilby (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling sources as "Jewish"[edit]

Your labeling sources as "Jewish" (as you did in 2011 Syrian uprising, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Parsifal) is very problematic. By adding such a label you are making a tacit claim that the source is unreliable and biased and that is not acceptable per our policies on WP:original research and maintaining a neutral point of view. I would strongly recommend that you review those policies. GabrielF (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP noticeboard[edit]

Hi, there is a report opened at the Biography of living people noticeboard in regard to your contributions, please consider joining in the discussion there, thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion?[edit]

I did not know that my IP was still blocked, I tried to edit under it and made an account and it worked, so I presumed it was over. I don't know is Dougweller, is a Talmudic Khazar, a homosexua or both, but perhaps there is some conflict of interest in the block? Sword of St. Michael (talk) 23:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PLease don't attack other users WP:NPA or you will lose your ability to post on your talkpage completely. Off2riorob (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But, I do not see what was wrong with the edits themselves, since they reported only facts, so I presumed perhaps the admin was backing a horse in the race? Sword of St. Michael (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just go away, your not welcome here, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, I'll stick around and contribute. If Zionists and Homosexual activists can't handle basic information, too bad, so sad. How about you just go away instead? Thanks. Sword of St. Michael (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page during the block has been revoked due to your abuse of your talk page. If you wish to appeal the block contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org.