User talk:Tete hastuti

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tete hastuti, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quebec Telemarketing Corp, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quebec Telemarketing Corp[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quebec Telemarketing Corp, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nopirosyadi (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tete hastuti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, wiki staff and patrol. Please unblock my account and give my content live again. i wrote about canadian stubs as well as many companies in stub directory. why my content is deleted otherwise, i think it is same criteria with other companies/corporation in canadian companies stub category. if it is not allow, you should look again for other canadian companies stub like;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alorica with no ref but it is live,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIC_Limited without any ref, etc please tell me so i get clear information related to company stub. i found this corporation with plenty of references or resources on the internet. you can check it one by one. if this company meet deletion page, i think others companies in company stub also meet deletion pages. you can call to the company is it is not real and i saw this company given significant effect to reduce unemployment rate in its country. looking hear forward from you--Tete hastuti (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. If you wish to be unblocked apply using your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The whole affair is absurd. Your corporate website is laughably rife with grammatical errors. There is not a single WP:Reliable source, zilch, that would establish WP:Notability for your company or your claims of a billion dollars revenue. However, what you've done with your behaviour here is establish a public track record of misrepresentation in these patent lies that you are all unconnected, independent editors working in good faith: that may prove very useful in anyone wanting to find out more about "Quebec Telemarketing," and you may wish to consider that before proceeding further in your attempts to exploit Wikipedia as a way to establish notability for your company. It is a campaign that will fail, I assure you. It's extremely easy to detect any other new articles you will create and have them deleted. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]