PROFILE · DISCUSSION · RECENT EDITS · ARTICLES CREATED · TOPIC SUBPAGES · TEMPLATES CREATED · IMAGES ADDED · EDIT COUNT · SANDBOX 1 · SANDBOX 2

Tags[edit]

Please do not remove tags unless something has been done to address the underlying issue. Scott Mooney is tagged as unreferenced because there are no sources to justify what is written. The tag should only be removed if sources are provided. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Lynch[edit]

The article Chris Lynch (Footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable football player

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 03:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Nicky Clee[edit]

I have nominated Nicky Clee, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Clee. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Big Dom 16:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mark Halstead[edit]

I have nominated Mark Halstead, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Halstead. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Big Dom 17:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Halstead[edit]

In reply to your query, I nominated Mark Halstead for deletion because the only team he has played for is Hyde United, in the Conference North, so he fails WP:ATHLETE, which requires that players make at least one first-team appearance in a fully professional competition. Cheers, Big Dom 17:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if he plays in a fully-pro match, there's nothing to stop the article being re-created. Big Dom 17:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I bet you think I've been picking on you somewhat this evening, but the fact is that ATHLETE is a long-standing guideline that football articles have to meet. Also, more seriously, regarding the pictures, you really shouldn't try to pass off images that you've found on the Internet as your own. Not trying to put you off editing or anything, new contributors are always welcome, I'm just letting you know for the future. Big Dom 17:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verification?[edit]

Do you have a source for all the nationalities that you have added on the Chester team, or is it based on assumption? Kevin McE (talk) 18:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should be aware that the standard for including "information" is verifiability, not personal knowledge, and certainly not "90%" certainty. You really should revert your posting of those nationalities until you can provide evidence if challenged. Kevin McE (talk) 05:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"I know for a fact" is not encyclopaedic verification. Did you read the link to that fundamental rule of Wikipedia? Kevin McE (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tomáš Kalas[edit]

I would assume so; he was a member of the first team squad last season and had the number 28 according to this, so I guess he'll have a number next season. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde United FA[edit]

Please do not add the {{Featured article}} star to articles that have not been through the Featured Article nomination process. If you really want to nominate the Hyde F.C. article (although I wouldn't recommend it at the moment because it's nowhere near meeting the criteria), follow the instructions here. Cheers, Big Dom 12:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde F.C. Good article nomination[edit]

I saw your GA nom of Hyde F.C. at WP:GAN. You were suppose to add a template to the Hyde talk page, but don't worry for I have done this. As for the article, it is likely to receive a quick fail due to the lack of sources (only four). Suggest adding sources to the article by the time a reviewer comes along. Regards. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the GA review, which you can see here. I haven't quick-failed the article but I have noted that there's an awful lot of work needed, particularly as Christopher Connor said above adding to the completely inadequate number of citations and tidying up the writing. The review is now on hold for seven days to give you an opportunity to do what needs to be done to meet the GA criteria. Malleus Fatuorum 18:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads[edit]

Are the images you have uploaded today, such as File:James Milner Debut.jpg and File:Sébastien Squillaci Training.jpg screengrabs from TV or somesuch? The information embedded in the files says they were taken using a cameraphone. If you have taken a photo of a TV broadcast, then these photos are not suitable for Wikipedia, as they are derivative works of a copyrighted TV broadcast. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shaun Whalley.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Shaun Whalley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Big Dom 09:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010–11 Hyde F.C. season[edit]

The article 2010–11 Hyde F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As agreed here and confirmed here, clubs lower than the Conference National are deemed below the notability threshold for season articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Half Price 18:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010–11 Hyde F.C. season for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2010–11 Hyde F.C. season, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 Hyde F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Half Price 15:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mark Halstead.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Mark Halstead.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Whalley[edit]

Hey, good work with the article so far. I'd recommend you start a peer review for the article (which you can look up about here, it's pretty simple to set up), which will allow users to leave comments about the article. I'd be happy to contribute and if you need any help with this give me a message. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I want to after this! But seriously, I should be able to leave some feedback tomorrow. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

Hi there, I've left a list of comments and suggestions on the Peer Review for Shaun Whalley. It looks like a lot, but they're mostly minor corrections that I've learned from my own experiences of writing Good Articles. Cheers, BigDom talk 19:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I have time over the weekend (I probably will) I'll have a go at expanding the Early career section. There's always a couple of things that can be added to any article. I don't know if it will help, but you may like to look at a GA that I wrote, Clarke Carlisle, to have a look at the sort of things that might be included and the kind of writing that the GA reviewers are looking for. Cheers, BigDom talk 20:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if I get time (should be able to tomorrow night) I'll do the lead as well. Once the rest of the article is written, the lead's pretty easy because you can just take a couple of sentences from each section. BigDom talk 21:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just started to expand the text, add a few sources etc. It's strange because I created the article over 4 years ago and his career's changed so much since then. Cheers, BigDom talk 20:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I will just haven't got much spare time at the moment but will get around to it, sorry it's taking a while. BigDom talk 20:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got a bit more done today, its coming along slowly but surely. Will expand the info about Accrington next and then see what I can do with the Wrexham and Droyslden bit but that will be harder because its non-league. Its taking a while but there's no rush really, its not like GA is going to close down or anything. BigDom talk 22:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Nev1 (talk) 15:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that IP block exempt has been removed as the autoblock should long since have expired. Nev1 (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Whalley[edit]

I've reviewed it. Please address the issues on the review page. KnowIG (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being lame. Busy week. Anyway. Lead should have 3 paragraphs accuatley summing up the article. You have one and then 2 paragraphs which are two sentences and a sentence. Think about it for yourself, if your stuck then I'll clarify what you have asked for. Considering that I have already given numerous suggestions through the rest of the article. P.s. I noticed you stuck a banner asking for it to be Copy edited. May I suggest that you remove the banner and make your request here as it will be delt with far quicker. KnowIG (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen more action on my talk page than on Whalley's page from you. You've done nothing to the article apart from an update of stats and upload and remove a banner. I suggest you have a go at some of the suggestions and apply some common sense. I.e. if you feel that you want to include a goal then great. From my view all I've seen is a bit of moaning/questioning and no action lets make it the other way round. KnowIG (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2 things before I'll promote the article. Firstly don't if this was you or from the copyedit but "Whalley scored his first goal of the new year in a 2–1 victory over local rivals Stalybridge Celtic[42] and in the quarter final of the Manchester Premier Cup against his old club Droylsden,[43] which proved to be his last for the club" doesn't read right to me. Full stop after Celtic. Then "Whalley played his last game for the club against his former team Droylsden in the Manchester Premier Cup".

Accrington Stanley, last third of the section needs a couple of refs for the specific games that you mention. e.g. the Peterborough game, the injury in 07 and the rovers return match. Thats all. Gateshead semi in the return to non league needs sourcing. 4 sources and the sentence above and your done. KnowIG (talk) 09:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Whalley GA[edit]

Well done getting the article to GA! I didn't mind helping out, and if there's any other articles you're planning to work on I'll have a look over them for you again. Cheers, Big Dom 20:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mario Balotelli[edit]

The article Mario Balotelli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mario Balotelli for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Balotelli[edit]

Hi

Just to let you know I have finished the copyedit. There are a few points on the talk page that may need addressing.

Chaosdruid (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monarch Photo[edit]

Hi. Epic picture of you Monarch wing view: please put it on Commons. If you can tell me where it was going to and what time (flight number would be ven better) then i can get the registration of the aircraft for you. MKY661 (talk) 21:31, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go to commons and type in Special:Upload and then write your details there. You can also use commons photos on Wikipedia as well. PS: what was the date of the flight, thought the flight was on 31 March. --MKY661 (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, i will struggle to get the reg then. Try looking on Monarch's website for details on their flight. (If the aircraft was an A320-200 then even better) --MKY661 (talk) 16:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that date is correct, the registration was G-OZBU, Monarch's newest aircraft (and youngest) --MKY661 (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can use www.libhomeradar.org to find the reg. Majority of flights are avalible from June 2008. --MKY661 (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leigh Athletic F.C.[edit]

The article Leigh Athletic F.C. has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delusion23 (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, TheHydeTiger. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jamie Stuart/1.
Message added 15:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copy/paste of your draft[edit]

Hi there, a new user, Jvanjonder (talk · contribs), has copy/pasted the contents of your draft article, User:Liamtaylor007/Dale Johnson, into article space (see Dale Johnson (footballer)). I've tagged the article for a histmerge so that the edits you have made are properly attributed. That being said, it's you draft, so if you don't want it in article space at all I'm pretty sure your allowed to tag it as a copyvio, but it looks like a pretty solid article to me (although I'm not sure he passes WP:NFOOTY; WP:GNG is, of course, another question). So yeah, it's your call really whether you want it out in article space or if you want it to be deleted so you can work on it more in your user space. Feel free to give me a shout if you think I've handled this the wrong way or if you have any questions (I'll try and answer 'em and if I can't I'll pass it onto someone who can). Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you response. Rather than PRODing and waiting seven days I've put it up for speedy deletion. Hope you don't mind, Jenks24 (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy[edit]

Hi, I declined the speedy deletion of SV 1936 Saasen as the article made a credible claim of importance or significance: 2007 Champion and promotion to the A-Bezirksklsse Alsfeld. The speedy deletion process is very specific, that only articles that make no claim whatsoever are eligible and this is not the case here. However, there is nothing to stop you taking the article to AfD or adding a PROD template. Cheers, BigDom (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think there's a good chance the article will be deleted at AfD. It's good that you learn from mistakes; I've seen you around since you first started editing and you've definitely improved! Keep it up, BigDom (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde F.C.[edit]

Hi, just to let you know I haven't abandoned the copyedit on the above article. I'm feeling a little unwell today and will restart tomorrow (China time). ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 02:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde F.C.[edit]

Hello, TheHydeTiger. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hyde F.C. at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!

Talkback[edit]

Hello, TheHydeTiger. You have new messages at Philg88's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you[edit]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit of Craig McAllister article[edit]

Per your request in the Guild of Copy Editors, I CE'd this article. Please note that this article is written in a heavily British English style, and I'm an American, so you may want to read through the article to check that the edited article reads smoothly from your perspective. I don't anticipate any objections, but I would appreciate your feedback here or on my talk page. Pine _(GreenPine) ^t 07:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michel Lorran for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michel Lorran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Lorran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Deserter1 08:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hyde F.C.[edit]

The article Hyde F.C. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hyde F.C. for things which need to be addressed. NapHit (talk) 20:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of SCAN numbers on 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season and change of table[edit]

I changed the table on that page so you can tell the difference between a player starting and a sub appearance as you can't do it with the table you have changed it back to. I also added the SCAN numbers to the players names because its unique to them and its something that only Stockport County do (recognising every player that has played for them) so I believe that it is necessary and makes the article more referenced and official. wna247 (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-addition of SCAN numbers on 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season[edit]

I have re added the scan numbers on the Stockport County season 2011-12 season page but as a bracketed number next to the players name with reference to them below the squad table. I have also added the forest green match score and updated the table references will be added when the officail report is added to the official website wna247 (talk) 22:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost[edit]

Salutations, fellow Wikipedian! I am Belugaboy (talk · contribs) of the Wikipedia Signpost WikiProject report and a few weeks ago I left a note on WT:NLF about an upcoming WikiProject report (due for publicaton 12 September) and I have yet to see a reply. I noticed you were a part of this project, so if you and a few other experienced members of the project could contact me, we could get the report running nicely. Thank you! Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 19:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hyde FC Logo.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hyde FC Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article promotion[edit]

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Craig McAllister a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk)

2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season[edit]

I am just wondering what you prefer would you like me to update the squad table and collapsible boxes after the game and do a write up that get fixed or, shall I update the squad and transfer tables and collapsible boxes and you do any write ups that are needed in any section. wna247 (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to reply about the above question...[edit]

OK, I will do the write ups and you can do corrections if they are needed. If I am unable to do any edit for whatever reason would it be OK if I contact you to see if you can do them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wna247 (talk 00:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Diagne[edit]

I'm afraid the most recent copy I own is the 2009-10 edition (which covers players from the 2008-09 season), so I don't have access to details for this player from the PFA books. I've just searched to see when the 2011-12 edition is due out and it seems the PFA has turned its hog out and won't be publishing one. Great shame. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 01:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ryan Burge[edit]

The article Ryan Burge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ryan Burge for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Teamwork helped to make Ryan Burge a Good Article. Echetus Xe 23:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eamonn O'Keefe[edit]

You got any info on him? Apparently scored 26 goals in 33 games for Hyde yet he makes barely any reference to the club in his memoirs!--Echetus Xe 11:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stockport season[edit]

Hey do you think I should add part of the league table and the goalscoring and assists stats to the season page that you reword for me. And if so should I put them in the summary section that already exists or make a new section for stats ( which would show goal scorers , assists, and discipline records) wna247 (talk) 23:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm Bailey[edit]

Any info on this guy? Cheers.--Echetus Xe 22:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season ideas[edit]

As you have probably seen when cleaning up the page , I have been adding multiple references lately. Now I know you are not a Stockport fan but I have an idea for the page and I wanted a second opinion on it.

I would add a player awards bit in the statistics section an reference the award the player got. For example if a player was in the team of the day I would put it in and reference that they were in it as well as write about it in the review section.

Also I have added a good article nomination to the page and I didn't know if it was suitable enough for one yet but considering 2010–11 York City F.C. season has good article status I though, well why cant the page I edit.

anyway if you can get back to me that would be great. wna247 (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hyde F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ellison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Liamtaylor007 for helping to promote Ryan Crowther to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 01:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Lawless[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that and will try and see if it can be fixed. It only started acting up after I resized it so I'll see if reverting to the original size fixes it (not that that should do anything, really). Anyway, I use a Canon PowerShot SX210 IS (14.1 MP, 14x Optical Zoom), although the quality of pictures in the dark is woeful without the flash on (see this as an example - and it wasn't even that dark by that time). Although judging by this picture, your camera seems to be coping fine in the dark. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GodwinAbadaki.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:GodwinAbadaki.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Whalley[edit]

I'm afraid not; Whalley didn't feature in any York-Southport games I've taken photos at. And a quick flickr search yields no appropriately licenced images. Sorry to disappoint! Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Hyde F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ben Wright (footballer) and Forest Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Hyde F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 F.C. United of Manchester season[edit]

I would like to have a chance to improve the article. It was only created ~~yesterday~~ two days ago, and there is way more that I'd like to do with it. Going to the links that you provided me with, it seems there are two seasons (at least), 2001–02 Newport County A.F.C. season and 2005–06 Gateshead F.C. season which are below the Conference National level, and yet those pages have survived the deletion process. And from a quick look at those AfD pages, there are several other seasons as well that have not been deleted.

While I do admit that the team is currently a semi-professional club in a level below the Conference National I believe that the page should be allowed to stay on the basis that the club has received a significant amount of coverage in the past, due to the circumstances surrounding its formation and their victory in the FA Cup over a League Two side. The club has been criticized in the past by Sir Alex Ferguson, manager of a Premier League side, and the club has received significantly more attention, both regionally and nationally, than lower league clubs.

I believe that the page should be allowed to stay (at least for the time being, to allow me a chance to develop it) based on the fact that the club has gained a reputation throughout the country and is perhaps today more notable than even some teams in the Conference National level, such as Braintree Town, for example (2011–12 Braintree Town F.C. season). Red Rebel 05 (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention the fact that the previous discussions occurred in 2009 and 2010. Would the article for the 2010-11 season be deleted as well? After all, that is the season that they gained a huge reputation across England for having defeated Rochdale (a League Two club) in the FA Cup, a prestigious tournament. That was the highest league finish in the short history of the club, and they pulled off a major upset that received a lot of attention nationally. Even though it was a season in a league below the Conference National, it was still a remarkable achievement that is very well documented. Red Rebel 05 (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I am fully aware of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. But I would like to add that 2012–13 Eastleigh F.C. season and 2011–12 Eastleigh F.C. season both exist, and those seasons were spent in the Conference South (below the "cut-off". The 2011-12 season page was created in November 2011. It has only just recently been up for deletion this past August, and it has also survived (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Eastleigh F.C. season). It was ruled as "no consensus" but the arguments seem to be that the article is sufficient if it is well-written, and prose, not just statistics. The page has 119 references. So the potential for a lower-league season article to be properly developed is definitely there.

I believe that the "consensuses" reached in 2009 and 2010 are outdated, and that there are more recent examples to support allowing 2012–13 F.C. United of Manchester season to stay. Red Rebel 05 (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1889–90 Sheffield United F.C. season is a good article, and the club didn't even play in an actual league that season. Only the FA Cup (eliminated in the same round as FCUM in 2010-11), some small regional tournaments, and a lot of friendlies. Red Rebel 05 (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Hyde F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princes Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Hyde F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ebbsfleet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using Hyde FC images[edit]

Hi, Liam

I'm writing on behalf of Together In Tameside. We're a young organisation seeking to bring the people of Tameside closer together, through sharing of local activities and events. Hyde FC (along with Staylbridge Celtic and Droylsden) therefore form a key part of our sports updates.

We're after someone to assist us in providing images as the season continues, and therefore would be eternally grateful if you would agree to us using your images in our posts (with full credit, of course).

Could you please kindly contact us to let us have your comments, and to discuss things further, if you'd like? We can be contacted at: togetherintameside@gmail.com.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes,

Together in Tameside. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TogetherInTameside (talk • contribs) 23:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Hi, just so you know a number of images you uploaded at Wikimedia Commons have been nominated for deletion. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 11:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're unaware the images have been deleted, for them to be restored you'll need to e-mail OTRS. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you indicate whether you will be e-mailing OTRS, so I know if I can sort out the images on the affected pages e.g. Alex Lawless? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 09:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if I have time I will do, i am very busy at the moment and haven't got much time for Wikipedia! So if I don't get around to it then i will sort it out at a later date and upload them straight from the camera. As putting them on my mates j-album seems to be a problem! cheers, --Liam Taylor 17:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luca Havern.jpg[edit]

Hi, do you know when this image was taken? Because the current date (24 August 2011) doesn't match with any Hyde matches around then. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Burke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Hyde F.C. season[edit]

There's a deletion discussion underway for the article you created and heavily edited - 2012–13 Hyde F.C. season at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Hyde F.C. season. It's been underway for some time. I'm rather surprised that the nominating editor failed to notify you. Nfitz (talk) 00:46, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TheHydeTiger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello TheHydeTiger! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adam Baker (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TheHydeTiger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hyde United F.C.[edit]

Template:Hyde United F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jellyman (talk) 13:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Scott Spencer vs Worcester.jpg[edit]

The file File:Scott Spencer vs Worcester.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JoshBrizell.jpg[edit]

The file File:JoshBrizell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John Paul Kissock.jpg[edit]

The file File:John Paul Kissock.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ReeceGrayHyde2.jpg[edit]

The file File:ReeceGrayHyde2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:AdamGriffinHyde.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AdamGriffinHyde.jpg, which you've attributed to Uploaded lists another user as author while claiming ownership in release. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Stockport County F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henroy Mitchell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henroy Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henroy Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hyde Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hyde Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]