User talk:TheLongTone/Archive 4

start page.

Review[edit]

Hi Dear, I am requesting you please review my contribution article Tanisha Singh and suggest. if i want add on this subject external link can i add ?. Kumarjisk (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can u tell me during talk time how any body delete the Article without read talk page. Kumarjisk (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

How can I add a reference? DynastiLNoble (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC) DynastiLNoble (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anticom Speedy Deletion[edit]

Please, go ahead and delete anticom. The group contacted me and requested that i have it removed for privacy reasons and that they requested a few edits. You can tell the page is blank as i have removed all the information/programming from it and just awaiting for someone to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basednormie (talk • contribs) 07:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MONT5 Article Speedy Deletion[edit]

Hi,

An article that I wrote recently on one of the brands from the country that I live in, got tagged for speedy deletion (MONT5). I have left a note on the MONT5 talk page and need your kind assistance. Please check as soon as you can. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farrukh.Jamal91 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women (picture)[edit]

Good afternoon Dear Sir,

I will try to complete this article in three days as I need to translate the planned text as piisiple correctly. If You have other critereas to delete it (due to picture is not famouse now or due to not author posted it), let me know please. I received permition from the author to photograph his pictures. Any way the main the explanations of this picture which I intend to write and can be shortly. Without explanation this picture is not so interesting.

Let me know if You do not need to write the explanations or other criteria.

BRGDS Грищук ЮН (talk) 16:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just why is the picture notable? Is the artist notable? has ir received serious critical attention??TheLongTone (talk) 16:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have information that this pictures (was two pictures withe same scene and various sizes) are in serious museums in various countries now and I am not sure 100% due to I was informed. I did not see the pictures in that countries and like one of them in England in privat collection, better to say in privat museum.

The main is not picture, the main explanations. I also in doubt if it will possible to refresh it my memory all text of explanation and translate it correctly on english due to was used words with double meaning during explanation.

I can say that the first thinking in Aveiro about this scene on the picture was not the main as this thinkings only pushed the others to friendly discussions later. And the audio recording of this discussions gave interesting result. Грищук ЮН (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found out the Internet information about the artist (the painter) of this picture. I have his photo also and he is on the Internet page. His degree in arts as per this Internet (the adress I mentioned in article in the References part):

awarded several times
represented in several private collections and foreign
member of the National ANAP-association of artists

And I have oral information only that his some paintings can be in serious collections. Грищук ЮН (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly all parts of the article completed except "Explanations after the sea voyage". Remain the more difficulty text for translation as it has double meaning sometimes. Can be small changes or additions. You can read and if it is not interesting let me know. I can post the photos of the painter Lopes de Sousa and the ship Ant also if it necessary. BRGDS Грищук ЮН (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice about the Tim Seelig Page[edit]

	Thanks for the notice about the Tim Seelig Page
	I'm still learning how to do this right in wikipedia. I'm starting to add links. Dengland123 (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

are you stalking my user contributions?[edit]

If you are, kindly stop. I'd love to see you try your antics at Beaumont children disappearance and Disappearance of Eloise Worledge Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I generally look at the contributions of suspect editors; those who have created one lump of muck have often dropped several. As was the case with you.TheLongTone (talk) 15:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been here since 2002 and served some time as an admin. One article of mine you sent to AfD has been closed as keep. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like a give a rat's ass. Prat. TheLongTone (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to brush up on WP:CIVIL. H.dryad (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grow up.TheLongTone (talk) 12:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Dan Allon[edit]

Hi, What criteria do you use to judge significance? Are exhibitions in internationally renowned museums enough? Thanks, Pavner (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ARTIST. One-man shows in major galleries, works in major galleries &c.TheLongTone (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added one museum show (not major museum, but also not negligble, for sure in the top 10 art museums in Israel after: Israel Museum, Tel Aviv Museum, Haifa Museum come the smaller ones which are all important: Ramat Gan Museum, Petakh Tikvah Museum, Herzliya Museum, Janco Dada Museum, Ein Harod, Negev, Ashdod), respected galleries in Tel Aviv, lots of Hebrew press, some international press. Is that ok? --Pavner (talk) 16:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Hey TheLongTone, thanks so much for editing and proof-reading my article on Alexio Kawara! ^_^ much appreciared :)

L7starlight (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wag! dog walking page[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for noticing my page and deleting it. I am a student working on a class project for an English class where we are suppose to create or edit a wikipedia page. Could you please tell me what I could change to make the page about the business seem less promotional?

Thanks

Pmkucer (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcasm will get you exactly nowhere. Fuller reply on talk page of article in question.TheLongTone (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Im really sorry I was not being sarcastic. This is all new to me I would appreciate your advice. I can no longer see your response on the page since it has since been deleted. Pmkucer (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy[edit]

Thank you for speedying "Some interactive maps". I created it by mistake, it was meant to be a user subpage. You were fast - I had wanted to G7 it, but you got there first. Maproom (talk) 13:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not often one gets tanked for slapping a speedy on something...TheLongTone (talk) 13:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected Article[edit]

Hi, TheLongTone, I created an article this morning, "Annabelle With Bells (Home Made Girl)," which was about a song that was reissued for Record Store Day 2016. When I returned to continue working on the the piece, I noticed that it was redirected to the article Lotti Golden. Because of this, the newly created article, "Annabelle With Bells (Home Made Girl)" no longer can be found. If you feel the article is not worthy, I don't want to argue. I'm disabled, and just sitting at the computer causes me considerable pain, so I have to prioritize. Please, I ask this of you. I will forget about the article--just please remove the redirect from the Lotti Golden article. It is unfair to the artist who has done nothing to deserve a blot on her page for all to see. Thank you for your help! Magdalamar (talk) 23:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Magdalamar (talk) 23:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected it because the recording did not seem to be notable. However your input is not lost forever; if you click on the

"history" tab and then on the date entry for the last edit you made before I changed it to a redirect you will bring up that vesion of the article; you can then copy/paste or whatever any content that you feel can be usefully be added to the biog of the artiste.TheLongTone (talk) 12:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,TheLongTone,

Thank you for responding to my post and for providing the information on how to retrieve the article if needed. My prime concern was to remove the "redirect" label on the artist's article. I understand that you do not think the recording was notable. I was working on the article because there are many pages on Google devoted to that song and single on which it appears, and because it warranted a reissue from Atlantic and Warner Bros. (who are selective in choosing re-releases) as well as the fact that the recordings on vinyl selected for Record Store Day, actually require a submission in advance to be approved by the commitee. It is an honor of sorts for a recording to be included in a given year, with historical.value. Clearly, the song was not a commercial success, but that was not why I chose to contribute the article. As I mentioned, I am disabled, so even little things, like retrieving the article from the history (thank you for the tip!) are difficult for me. If I should write the article in the future, can I contact you, and consult with you on the project? I don't want to contribute a piece that is offensive or below par. Thank youMagdalamar (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheLongTone,

I gave our conversation some thought, and decided I would like to contibute the article, "Annabelle With Bells (Home Made Girl)." I believe the song has historic value, as evidenced by the many Google searches, topic: *Sock It To Me Baby/It's Your Thing / Annabelle With Bells (Home Made Girl) (7", Single). The topic is on Google. The recording is: Atlantic Records 45-2687 /US 1969. The LP associated with this song (Motor-Cycle, Atlantic Records, 1969) was featured in numerous publications including Look magazine, Newsweek and The New York Times. I can provide the exact references if you'd like. If you feel strongly that this article has no merit, let me know. Perhaps we can find an impartial mediator to assist. My expertise on Wikipedia is my knowlege of music, contibuting new articles, as well as improving existing articles with editing, data and citations. Meanwhile, I can't write the article because it was redirected. A title now exists for that page, but it can't be located due to the redirect. And I can't create a new name for the article, because it's the title of the song. You mentioned how to reverse the redirect, but I am not tech proficient, and can't find the redirect in the history of the artist Lotti Golden's page. Can you remove the redirect from this artist's page, please? When it is removed, I will wait to hear from you before I write the article. Let me know if you object to my writing the artcle on the song, "Annabelle With Bells (Home Made Girl)." If you do you object, let's try to find a fair way to resolve this. I would be open to taking your suggestions as write the page, or we can find a Wikipedia Administrator to arbitrate. Thank you so much! Magdalamar (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louden Swain (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Replacements. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for teaching me a lesson.[edit]

I wasn't very bold when I did that PROD, which you have turned it into a speedy.

Thank you very much for explaining WP:BOLD by an action on Affan M Quddus. NasssaNser Talk|cont 13:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not much of a fan of the PROD, and only use it when there isn't an appropriate speedy rationale. Too often the creator of some autobiography or lump of witless spam simply removes it...TheLongTone (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Certain Scientific Railgun.[edit]

Yo! TheLongTone, could you tell me why you deleted the Eternal Reality page ? It's OK if you want to take it over but I just wanted to know so that I can know how to do better next time on other pages I hope to create. RailgunKirby 101 (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SONG. Article didn't say anyting not in the artiste's article & no reason given why this, in particular, example of their is worth an article.TheLongTone (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C-v detection[edit]

Hi TheLongTone. For copy-violation checks, User:The Earwig/copyvios.js works well. Install it by adding the following to your common.js: {{subst:js|User:The Earwig/copyvios.js}}, save and refresh. It will add a "Copyvio check" link to the tools portlet that runs the current page through Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Regards, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I actually had found something with at least some of the phrases...but there's a certain kind of writing that real human beings just don't make. It's all down to smell...TheLongTone (talk) 22:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twisted Kicks[edit]

Hi, I made the Twisted Kicks page. The purpose of the page is supposed to be encyclopedic rather than promotional. I read the Cards Against Humanity wikipedia page, and I tried to emulate the non-bias. If you have any suggestions to reduce the bias, let me know. Thanks! --Kbar100 (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page/DarcyOake[edit]

Okay you put a blp prod on Main Page/DarcyOake, which the way it put makes no sense. It seems to be the same as Darcy Oake, might want a redirect or something. Wgolf (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bratz: Motion Picture Soundtrack[edit]

IMHO personally, after considering the sheer number of available reviews, I do not believe that the suggested merge target Bratz (2007 film) could in any manner be thought "of very dubious notability". I think Tokyogirl79 did very well in finding a suitable solution. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Chernoff[edit]

Do know anything of Chernoff to be able to make your comment? - or if not what would persuade you - he is mentioned as a leader in a notable movement. If you could help out here I would be grateful. The :(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) template shows numbers of news and newspapers items that clearly show notability - in my view. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He's a total nudnok, and you know it.TheLongTone (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove page[edit]

Hi I'm trying to understand how to have a page removed. I was notified today that someone created a wiki page about me. How can I have this removed? I found a page that appears to be created by you that claims my accomplishments aren't notable. I agree and want the page to be removed. Is there anything I can do to expedite the removal process? Ryanmarfone (talk) 18:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crikey! Usually the problem is that people think they are notable! Unfortunately there isn't really anything you can do to get a page deleted outside of nominating it for deletion, but imo unless somebody searches out much better sources than the biog has at the moment it will in all probability be going down the tubes.TheLongTone (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFD comments request[edit]

Hey, it seems weird having to say this, since you appear to be a long-term, knowledgable editor, but do you think you could maybe tone it down a bit with some of your AFD comments? Your comments here are getting a bit unconstructive. I mean, come on, is it really appropriate to declare that an article creator "has a problem" in the nomination statement? You must know that has no bearing on whether or not the subject is notable. The "sicko" comment isn't very subtle either.

Please, follow the basic Wikipedia advice of "commenting on content, not editors". Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 20:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. The editor who created the article in 2007 hasn't edited since January 2014, so it seems peculiarly inappropriate to talk about them "having a problem".[1] But altogether, don't make personal remarks like that, against anybody. And it gets worse here, hinting that they're a "sicko" through the well-known and disreputable "I'm not going to say" rhetorical figure. Bishonen | talk 10:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Anybody who only edits articles about corpeses has a psychological problem. End of.TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article restored[edit]

I am contacting you in connection with the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Sided Amphora 63.1515, in which you took part. I closed the discussion as "delete", but an editor has now contacted me, providing new sources. All but one of the sources are not available to me, so I cannot comment on their content, beyond the fact that they show that a larger number of scholarly works mention the amphora than was shown to be the case in the deletion discussion. However, I have obtained a copy of the other one of those sources, and I believe it significantly changes the situation from that which existed at the time of the AfD discussion. (It is available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171394 if you have JSTOR access.) Because I believe that this information significantly increases the amount of evidence of notability, I have recreated the article, but of course anyone who disagrees is free to take it back to AfD. I am informing everyone who took part in the discussion. The article is at Two-handled amphora (Boston 63.1515), having been moved from the original title given in the AfD page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. I think it was an entirely proper ( accurate) nomination, & Johnbod has done a good rescue job. I'd certainly not vote delete now. I think a third ref would be good. Article writer should have done the attribution & date thing, rather than the description.

Proposal: New Page Reviewer user right[edit]

A discussion is taking place to request that New Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog[edit]

The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:

13 July 2016: 7,000
1 August 2016: 9,000
7 August 2016: 10,472
16 August 2016: 11,500
28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I hav'nt touched a computer for a long time...I'll have a go.TheLongTone (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning - Disruptive comments of others at AFD[edit]

It's once again been brought to me attention that you keep making disruptive comments about others at AFD, judging people for their interest in articles relate to death, murder, or disappearances. As I warned you before, this is not acceptable. If I catch any more comments like this from you at AFD or talk pages, you'll receive a block. This is unacceptable. These discussions are to be about the subject of the article, not the editors and your subjective opinions on their mental health or habits. These sorts of comments are off-topic and disruptive. You're free to feel however you want about them, but you need to keep it to yourself. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dresser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Foley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ID2 and ZONK[edit]

Hi TheLongTone, I would appreciate it if you would stop redirecting the pages, "ID2" and "Zonk" to Dimitri Vangelis & Wyman. These singles have played an important role in Dimitri Vangelis & Wyman's musical career, and for you to repeat the aforementioned actions of redirecting these pages would be the same as if you were to do so with two of Calvin Harris' singles or maybe, two of Taylor Swift's singles, and we all know nobody would because it wouldn't be necessary. So for the sake of what is right, fair and necessary, please acknowledge my request. Answer soon, (preferably on my talk page). Thank you, and have a nice day.

Infopage100 (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:SONG.TheLongTone (talk) 13:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If they are that important to the 'artist's careers of whatever, write about it there.TheLongTone (talk) 13:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On Jelly Jungle (of Orange Marmalade) -- That's an intriguing thought, but it looks like T.D. predates the song by a year or so. JGabbard (talk)!

Deletion of Bharti Axa Life Insurance[edit]

Hi TheLongTone,

Thanks for sharing the feedback. Bharti AXA Life Insurance page that I had created is actually one of the known brand in India. It is a joint venture between 2 top companies Bharti & AXA. They have many other articles on Wikipedia one of them being of Bharti AXA General Insurance and this Brand falling under them I thought of creating one. If you can help me where all the corrections are needed I shall work on the same. Looking forward for your help!

Thanks in advance for your support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixancrasto (talk • contribs) 07:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Tim McLelland, TheLongTone.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Not notable. No Ghits.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

New Pages Feed[edit]

...a variety of beetle who played half a season for some windwept non-place's soccer team who then, after an entirely non notable attempt to become a pop star, starts a mundane business, the Acme Spam Distribution Company. I like it ! I really, really do. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our aim is to please....TheLongTone (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TheLongTone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Datu Puti[edit]

You cannot delete the Datu Puti Wikipedia page!!! Admin report you!!! cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ₃at ^BULAGA!!! 02:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected[edit]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2[edit]

Hello TheLongTone,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Improve the tools: Vote here.
Reduce your review load: Vote here

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Hello TheLongTone. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Renal capacity. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No content exept a snecking spamlink. Some things are obviously not going to get better.TheLongTone (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but please don't be too hasty with CSD tags. That could been an newbie created it and you just WP:BITE a newbie. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not hasty with CSD tags. I come across many many crap articles and almost always give them the benefit of doubt, pausing only to iron out any particularly egregious lumps of peacockery or bad English. This was clearly not going to get better, and some @newbies' (what a patronizing term) deserve a nip in the ass.TheLongTone (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry![edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

File permission problem with File:Bleriot XXVII.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleriot XXVII.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect proposal[edit]

There is a proposal to redirect the recently created Far-left politics in the United Kingdom. As you previously commented on it you may want to [Talk:Far-left politics in the United Kingdom contribute] ----Snowded ^TALK 06:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Desorden Público[edit]

So it is better to have the albums' pages redirected to the band page (which doesn't have a lot of information either) than to at least list the tracks? Guess the policy here is to point our users outside of Wikipedia where they can at least find tracks information. alvarocarvajal (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re yours on my talk page: For the time being, I'm pointing the albums to pages outside of Wikipedia. If anyone reading the page in English requires more information, they can go to the Wikipedia page in Spanish (which doesn't point to articles with track listings or any other album information either). At least with this edit there's some way to find some album information without opening another tab and going to Google. alvarocarvajal (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re I just don't think it's a good policy to have articles with links redirecting to itself. alvarocarvajal (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly circular links are a bad thing. The solution in many cases is to delink, rather than creating flaky articles.TheLongTone (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ronald Rubin[edit]

Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ronald Rubin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor call, dude.TheLongTone (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foster mounting[edit]

Just in case you are interested (and have the time, of course) ...

I have a rewrite of the article on the Foster mounting nearing completion in my sandbox - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Soundofmusicals/sandbox which may or may not be of interest. In common with other articles I have worked on from (more or less) scratch like this I am basically writing the text first and will be adding the verifiability/links etc. later - appreciate if you could add any comments you might have, including any possible outright errors you might notice, either to my talk page or the one to my sandbox. Most welcome help of all would be usable references, anything you think I should read etc.

Thanks (and Hi!) --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Piyush Roy[edit]

Hi there - it appears that to create Piyush Roy you copied this revision of Draft:Piyush Roy. Could you explain why? Not only does that remove the attribution of the contributions, but you also left in the external links littered through the article... -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what you are on about. I simply made a few edits to a new page. I plead innocent.TheLongTone (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was an edit conflict of sorts - you were editing, I moved the page, you saved etc etc... such is life! Apologies for the inquisition! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) It seems you were saving an edit while the page was moved to draftspace, and the edit conflict made a mess of things. I've deleted your mainspace recreation as a technical copyright violation (copying within Wikipedia without attributions), you're welcome to continue making edits to the draft at Draft:Piyush Roy. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion[edit]

I knew this would happen, as the article hasn't quite expanded into a stub yet. I know it needs an infobox, for instance. I have it in my sandbox for safekeeping. I started the article because, while this person stays out of the limelight, he is the CEO of a very large (privately owned) corporation. I made that clear in the article. Is there a higher standard, such as citing sources which are considered more reliable than the corporate website? It is a work-in-progress which I started after reading the existing WP articles on the Bechtel family, and finding that, beyond his father, Riley Bechtel, the chairman and former CEO, who is in his mid-60s, there was no further information I could find. As I stated, speedy deletion was what I expected, but I thought perhaps one person on the planet might benefit from finding the article in the few hours the article was accessible. I now must read up on the process of article creation to make this thing stick. If there is anything vital I seem to be overlooking, let me know.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simply being the CEO of a large/notable business isn't really enough. You need to establish notability... what is out there & not self published about him. Some CEOs attract attention & some don't... they may be excellent at therir job but are simply another bloke doing their job.TheLongTone (talk) 15:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He may just be another bloke doing his job! If so, I won't do any more work on the article.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't do that. Try and find something that establishes notability.TheLongTone (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Time permitting, I'll see what I can uncover. Strange that I seem to be the only one on the planet wondering who this person is. His company is mighty notable.--71.36.99.131 (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And of course some business operators work very hard to avoid anything being known about them.TheLongTone (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day

Quality

Title

Tagged with…

35

Brooklyn Funk Essentials (talk)

Add sources

5

Hood Politics VI: Time Machine (talk)

Add sources

82

The Rasmus discography (talk)

Add sources

291

Tremendous Sea of Love (talk)

Add sources

13

Mysteria (The Rasmus song) (talk)

Add sources

9

Karsten Schubert (talk)

Add sources

71

France Joli (talk)

Cleanup

10,202

Saudi Arabia (talk)

Cleanup

9

David Roberts (art collector) (talk)

Cleanup

68

Paula Vesala (talk)

Expand

1,613

J Dilla (talk)

Expand

149

Terrorism in Saudi Arabia (talk)

Expand

If I have left a message on your talk page, please answer there rather than posting here: I will have put your talk page on my watchlist. Thanks.

Archives

no archives yet (create)

186

Foreign relations of Saudi Arabia (talk)

Unencyclopaedic

530

E-commerce payment system (talk)

Unencyclopaedic

519

Haifa Wehbe (talk)

Unencyclopaedic

14

Qasaba (talk)

Merge

170

Aerodynamic drag (talk)

Merge

362

Launch vehicle (talk)

Merge

2

David Byrne (playwright) (talk)

Wikify

146

Alan Sked (talk)

Wikify

22

MadC (talk)

Wikify

8

Battle of the River Forth (talk)

Orphan

88

Proposed return of traditional blue British passports (talk)

Orphan

3

Sibylle Pasche (talk)

Orphan

81

Madhan Bob (talk)

Stub

14

Saudi Emergency Force (talk)

Stub

26

House Shoes (producer) (talk)

Stub

3

Second Philippine International School (talk)

Stub

26

Peep (album) (talk)

Stub

12

Al Rajhi Tower (talk)

Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fulmen Batteries

added a link pointing to Clichy

Proposed return of traditional blue British passports

added a link pointing to MEP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
65	Camouflage passport (talk)	Add sources
618	Alphaville (band) (talk)	Add sources
20	East German passport (talk)	Add sources
44	Bristol city centre (talk)	Add sources
255	Gold Flake (talk)	Add sources
84	Classic filter kings (talk)	Add sources
41	T. M. Stevens (talk)	Cleanup
126	Pet passport (talk)	Cleanup
5	Keio Alpha (talk)	Cleanup
263	David Sanborn (talk)	Expand
14	Cinema of West Asia (talk)	Expand
365	Saudi Arabia–United States relations (talk)	Expand
52	Soviet Union passport (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,338	Richie Sambora (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
76	Fake passport (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
119	NUTS statistical regions of the United Kingdom (talk)	Merge
411	Environmental Performance Index (talk)	Merge
549	Microchip implant (human) (talk)	Merge
58	Bolland & Bolland (talk)	Wikify
50	Tobacco politics (talk)	Wikify
40	Jessica Lynn (talk)	Wikify
23	T Bone Burnett production discography (talk)	Orphan
19	Medical device connectivity (talk)	Orphan
6	Kid Bookie (talk)	Orphan
129	Holiest sites in Islam (talk)	Stub
16	Joe Dirt Car (talk)	Stub
8	Filwood (ward) (talk)	Stub
16	St Werburghs (talk)	Stub
23	Nanomagnet (talk)	Stub
6	Geoff Westen (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello TheLongTone,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 816 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Chak Merly, TheLongTone.

Unfortunately Sulaimandaud has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Please provide references for the article

To reply, leave a comment on Sulaimandaud's talk page.

Sulaimandaud (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anticom Speedy Deletion[edit]

Please, go ahead and delete anticom. The group contacted me and requested that i have it removed for privacy reasons and that they requested a few edits. You can tell the page is blank as i have removed all the information/programming from it and just awaiting for someone to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basednormie (talk • contribs) 07:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Goldstone Deletion[edit]

Rob Goldstone should not be deleted. Do some research. Save us all some wasted efforts. --Wikipietime (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NutsTheLongTone (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello TheLongTone, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

If I have left a message on your talk page, please answer there rather than posting here: I will have put your talk page on my watchlist. Thanks.

Archives

no archives yet (create)

|- style="text-align: center; height: 30px;" | style="text-align: right;" | 12 | | style="text-align: left;" | Al Rajhi Tower (talk) | Stub |}

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fulmen Batteries

added a link pointing to Clichy

Proposed return of traditional blue British passports

added a link pointing to MEP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Chak Merly, TheLongTone.

Unfortunately Sulaimandaud has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Please provide references for the article

To reply, leave a comment on Sulaimandaud's talk page.

Sulaimandaud (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anticom Speedy Deletion[edit]

Please, go ahead and delete anticom. The group contacted me and requested that i have it removed for privacy reasons and that they requested a few edits. You can tell the page is blank as i have removed all the information/programming from it and just awaiting for someone to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basednormie (talk • contribs) 07:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Goldstone Deletion[edit]

Rob Goldstone should not be deleted. Do some research. Save us all some wasted efforts. --Wikipietime (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NutsTheLongTone (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anthony_Slonim[edit]

I suggest reading up on WP:GNG and reviewing the links in the following table. You clearly do not know enough about notability to be nominating articles for deletion. I see that this is not the first time this issue has been raised on your talk page. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 15:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Local papers & trade journals writing about the job not the man, and in addition clearly a vanity article written by a paid editor.14:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Hyperloop in general; Arrivo in specific[edit]

Hello @TheLongTone. An article about Arrivo, a new competitor in the Hyperloop industry got the speedy delete. It is, to be sure, a new and unproven company in a field of dodgy competitors. The reason for the delete was insufficient information about what makes this company notable. I included what I thought was sufficient -- the cast of characters, who recently departed from the what appears to be industry leader Hyperloop One. We can argue about constitutes a sufficient story. You may win that one. An argument from authority is often compelling.

I refer you to the original article on Hyperloop One. It was 1600 bytes with two citations. If we use the same criteria for that article, it would have been deleted as well. The key player in both articles is the selfsame Brogan BamBrogan. The technology premise is the same. And as of the date of first publication, both companies chances for success were the same.

If you would grant me two more minutes and see what I wrote on my user page, I would appreciate it. Rhadow (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Akbar travels[edit]

Respected Sir,

Akbar Travels 40 yrs old brand in India. It is famous on offline channels and has a search volume of more than 1 million on Google.

Request you to please consider and request.

Thanks Ankit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankit97733 (talk • contribs) 11:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Fokker Scourge article[edit]

I am having a few problems with an enthusiastic but at times very dogmatic editorial colleague on the Fokker Scourge article. In fact, things have reached a pass where some second opinions might be useful. The specific question he is hammering at the moment is that we shouldn't ever say "No. 1 Squadron RAF" (in spite of that being the usual way of putting it) but "1 Squadron" (on the grounds that the "No." is redundant). I wouldn't object to an occasional omission of the "No.", if only for elegant variation, but he has been going right through the article wiping every instance and claiming that "Wikipedia is not a source" (which is true enough, but nothing to do with the case). The gentleman concerned has been making dozens of other (mostly very pettifogging) changes to the article - a few have been genuine improvements, and most at least acceptable alternatives but some of have made clear text obscure, even meaningless. I have let everything he has done that is at all acceptable stand, but the really bad ones I've had to change - usually with a new version rather than a provocative revert.

I was wondering, if you have a moment, if you'd like to have a little look at the Fokker Scourge talk page (go straight to the bottom if you like) and tell me, either here, on my talk page, or even on the talk page of the article if you want to actually buy into the discussion, if I'm being totally unreasonable and should just give up. This is (for a WWI aviation article) quite a high traffic one - and I'd like to leave it in reasonable shape. At least readable, and plain in meaning (two things I value far above brevity for its own sake). --Soundofmusicals (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keepsake [Heavy Heart album][edit]

You keep removing the content for the article I set up for the band Heavy Heart's album Keepsake and setting it to redirect to the band's main article. Please could you explain the reasons why you keep doing this before you just do it again? Jackworking93 (talk)

Because there is no reason to suppose that the album is notable enough to merit an article. As I said in the edit summary.TheLongTone (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that censoring the existence of things is a very appropriate attitude to have as a moderator on a globally adopted service for retaining knowledge regarding releases in art. I've donated money to Wikipedia because I respect the integrity of this idea - and I feel that your actions are undermining the value of creation and invention. This is a release from an upcoming band, with growing international interest, who I happen to be enough of a fan of to want to share this knowledge with others. Please consider this before removing the article on the basis of a very subjective idea. If there is anything you think needs to be added to validate the article, you should inform me prior to removal of the page. Jackworthing93 (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2017 (BST)

Censorship my curvy pink butt. Grow up. The snecking band are barely notable; add the information to that article, It needs a bit of content.TheLongTone (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Palace Foundation[edit]

You hit the nail on the head in the AFD. Earwig's Copyvio Detector had it at as a 98.9% suspected violation and it was basically copy and pasted from the site. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago School of Mold Making[edit]

@User:TheLongTone Thanks for the notification. It's a pastry school and specialty sugar sculpture school (and business) that I learned about and used as a resource during my time in culinary school and in my professional pastry career. It's one of the few silicone mold-making schools in the USA, but I didn't want to add that because I was afraid that some would say it was too 'adverty'. I think its notable, almost every pastry chef in the country uses their techniques and molds, reads their books, etc...so how can I go about improving it? For now, citation base is limited to what I found.Brittney Tun (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Akunin[edit]

Здравствуйте!

Пожалуйста, не трогайте страницы по произведениям Акунина "Смерть на брудершафт"! Мы делаем их с моим коллегой! ЗАЧЕМ ВЫ ИХ МЕНЯЕТЕ???

Ulugbeck1 (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speak English, please. I don't doubt the veracity of the plot summaries, but they sound like publishers blurbs, The tone is not encyclopedic.TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly disagree with you! These are not commercials, but a description of the plot. This is not a police protocol "he said she left", but a page dedicated to the ARTISTIC work! I reserve the right to file a complaint against your actions! At one time I FOREVER left the Russian Wikipedia precisely because Russian colleagues turned my articles into scraps and stubs. In the English-language Wikipedia until this day there was no one complaint about the style of my articles about art works and movies. Therefore, I ask you VERY - leave everything as is.

Ulugbeck1 (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complain all you like. My actions are legitimate copyedits. I assume that you are not a native English speaker: if you were the plot summaries would offend you as mush as they do me.TheLongTone (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Именно потому, что я не являюсь носителем английского языка, напишу вам по-русски, коллега! Существует гугл-переводчик, поэтому вы спокойно сможете прочитать то, что я написал. Во-первых, статьи мы делаем вместе с коллегой https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Er_nesto Он профессионально владеет английским языком. и поэтому окончательную редакцию выполняет он. После его корректуры претензий к правилам английского языка не возникает. Во-вторых, я снова взываю не к формальным правилам, а к вашему здравому смыслу. Неужели для англоязычной википедии будет хорошо, если мы с моим коллегой прекратим писать статьи о произведениях Акунина? Да, можно начать процедуру жалобы на вас, начнется разбирательство. Может быть, выиграете вы, может быть я. Но новые статьи-то от этого не появятся! В свое время я навсегда покинул русскую википедию именно из-за того, что меня стали учить, КАК надо писать статьи о художественных рассказах. Причем "учители" только критиковали мои статьи. но не один из них (!) так и не показал, КАК надо "правильно" это делать! Понимаете? НИ ОДИН! Я не знаю, какие статьи в англоязычной википедии вы создаете. Но ОЧЕНЬ сомневаюсь, что они посвящены русской литературе. Или я ошибаюсь? Но если вы создаете статьи по литературным произведениям, то неужели вам, лично вам, по душе больше "полицейские протоколы"? Прошу меня извинить не некоторую экспрессивность письма, но тема для меня очень болезненна. Да, у вас есть все права, но прошу вас не злоупотреблять ими!

Ulugbeck1 (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I presume that you are not interested in talking to me, so please leave no more of this Cyrillic Guff here.TheLongTone (talk) 12:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, If you think that I can not properly write pages about literary stories, then I sincerely suggest that you, personally you, have begun to do this. I'm not going to do it anymore. I hope you will do it brilliantly!

Ulugbeck1 (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

hi LongTone im rupa. Why should it be deleted? rupa$$$ (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read the justification in the deletion discussion. Fundamentally, it's just a random list, and a list of very stupid objects at that. These things are not cars: I've seen one of those McLaren thingies in Central London and the driver was obviously having a really miserable time and wishing he was in a Fiat 500.TheLongTone (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol thanks you.[edit]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For your contributions to NPP. Thank you for your reviews! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 22:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clark - Death Peak[edit]

You do realize that in the time that I had reverted your unnecessary deletion that the page was patrolled and deemed notable. Drneroli (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot imagine why anybody should think this recording is notable. The sources are weak and the article itself makes no claim of notability. And it was a redirect, not a deletion.TheLongTone (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the artist not sufficiently notable? Drneroli (talk) 00:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ther artist is, hence the article on them. The recording itself does not seem to be.TheLongTone (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TheLongTone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Know Yourself[edit]

...which you have very properly restored, I see.TheLongTone (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion declined[edit]

I have declined your nomination of DJ Zeke as starring in a television series produced by Netflix is a credible claim of significance. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings[edit]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

Hello TheLongTone, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livia De Paolis[edit]

Hello, as an FYI. The AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livia De Paolis that you started was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE then later contested and recreated. This does not preclude you from renominating the page. --J04n(talk page) 12:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Matcham[edit]

Hello TheLongTone. Just dropping by to what a nice surprise it was to have such a nice message posted on my talk page. It certainly makes a change to have someone pleasant visit my talk page. I've been working on both Theatres designed by Frank Matcham and Frank Matcham for many months. They were fun to do; I'm just gutted I couldn't finish them. I apologise for the expletive upon starting the new article, but I was in a bad place - still am - and I allowed my frustrations to get the better of me. Thank you so much for the compliment; having comments like that made in reward for work makes it more worthwhile. I only wish that there were more people who thought so because if there was, this place wouldn't be so toxic. Best regards, and with my very best wishes. Cassianto^Talk 19:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation[edit]

		Thank You
		Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nandagopalam[edit]

Hello TheLongTone. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nandagopalam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The artists have articles, so it is not A9 eligible. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poor call.TheLongTone (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blériot XI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aziza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection[edit]

Hi, it appears that you tried to create a redirect at Russian fifty-ruble banknote, but didn't do it correctly. I've fixed it now. For future reference, the correct redirect syntax is:

#REDIRECT [[target page name]]

Good luck.

Additionally, I shall point out that page/section titles are case-sensitive - in the case of a section title this includes the first letter. — Smjg (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this before; I'm just sloppy. But I did think I'd checked that one.

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queer Eye (2018 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kettlingur fyrir þig![edit]

This kitten is called Angel Bengal, you optimist you. :)

Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]