User talk:The Millionth One/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Bellum Stellarum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Moonraker (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garrus Vakarian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bust and Child's Play (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you. Your Garrus Vakarian article is very good too. Keep up the good work :) --Niwi3 (talk) 19:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Bellum Stellarum; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

re: Mass Effect comics

I agree, it's pretty awful. I think it should be merged with the Mass Effect series ASAP. By the way, you mean ME3: Citadel (not ME2: Citadel) right? It's cool you're working on it. My priority for now is to focus on ME2 related articles: I will try to promote ME2 to FA status and then probably work on Overlord and Kasumi - Stolen Memory, but first ME2 needs to be a FA. Regards --Niwi3 (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Nice work with Garrus Vakarian

I didn't read it to comment on it, but carry on. --Niemti (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Mass Effect (comic)#Move?

I suggest we have consensus supporting Talk:Mass Effect (comic)#Move? as a move. Are there other issues outstanding warranting further review? – Conrad T. Pino (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I think it might be wise to let Niwi comment on your opposition first. I'm still on-the-fence about whether it should be folded back in, m'self.

Aside from that, nothing immediately pressing comes to mind (though there usually is, knowing life), but I am pondering about adding a main image to Characters of the Mass Effect universe. If you have anything to say, it'd be appreciated. Currently, no one's responded at all and it's making me feel lonely. – Bellum (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Waiting is fine if pointless; one opposition amongst three fails consensus.

Already said. – Conrad T. Pino (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

re: Mass Effect 3 endings article

In my opinion, the ME3 article is a total mess. I think it's better to improve the main article first and then see if it's really necessary to create a separate article for the endings of the game (when I was improving the ME2 article nearly a year ago, I wasn't thinking of a list of accolades). Besides, I believe that a list of ME3 DLC has more priority because the table of contents is ridiculously huge. Also, weren't you working on a ME3: Citadel article? --Niwi3 (talk) 11:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is volunteer work and I'm not forcing you to work on anything specific, so take your time to work on whatever you think is most urgent :) --Niwi3 (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

I will help you with the list of ME3 DLC when I have time (if you let me edit your subpage). Right now I'm a bit busy. --Niwi3 (talk) 11:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I've just finished the article and I think it's ready. Also, I don't think it's really necessary to include the multiplayer store packs. Feel free to edit the page if there is a problem or something wrong. When you're done, you can create it. Cheers. --Niwi3 (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Just merged some sections. The simpler, the better :) --Niwi3 (talk) 13:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure, just make sure you have sources. You can also use high quality articles as examples (see Master Chief (Halo)). --Niwi3 (talk) 13:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Nice job with the DLC article. I can tell out put a lot of hard work into it and that is appreciated. Oldag07 (talk) 12:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Music of Mass Effect

Hi, I would like to hear your opinion on this. By the way, excellent work with Commander Shepard. I really appreciate your effort with these articles. Keep up the good work! --Niwi3 (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jennifer Hale may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

re: Tali'Zorah

No problem. And excellent work with the article by the way. I think the name "Tali'Zorah" is perfectly fine; the simpler, the better (as long as there is no ambiguity). Anyway, keep up the good work :) --Niwi3 (talk) 20:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Tali'Zorah review

It's up at Wikipedia:Peer review/Tali'Zorah/archive1. Good stuff. Let me know if there's any other way I can help. czar · · 04:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

re: Stolen Memory

Thank you for your excellent contribution to the Mass Effect 2: Arrival article, much appreciated! I've made some copy-edits, hope you like them. If not, this is a wiki and you can change them. As for Stolen Memory, yeah it's definitely going to be my next "major" contribution once the article I'm currently working, All Hands on the Bad One, is promoted to GA status. Actually, I already downloaded the logo that I will use for the article and was also finding some sources, so thank you for the information because I don't own the artbook. I'll definitely include that! I'm currently busy with work so the article might take me quite a while to complete. But if you find more information about other ME2 DLCs (including Zaeed, Firewalker, etc...), please let me know. Thank you.--Niwi3 (talk) 09:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

I've added the info about the Shadow Broker's face, which I though was interesting. Thanks :) --Niwi3 (talk) 11:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I think I would give it a B rating, mainly because it's pretty comprehensive and has really good references. Now, the main problem I see is that it contains some fancruft in several areas. For example, does the general reader really need to know that Tali's default appearance can be changed in both ME2 and ME3? If the content only has value to people actually playing the games, it is unsuitable. Also, I think the article has unnecessary plot details that need to be cut down. Always remember the bigger picture: an article should be readable and interesting to readers who are not familiar with the topic. But otherwise it's a fairly decent article, way batter that most VG character articles. Hope it helps :) --Niwi3 (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Tali concept art

Not sure this is usable for the article, but I thought you'd appreciate it: http://www.polygon.com/2013/7/24/4553258/bioware-artist-shares-early-headshots-of-tali-spreads-of-dragon-ages czar · · 20:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragon Age: Inquisition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PAX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review of Tali'Zorah

Hello there. Just to introduce myself and let you know I'm doing the review for Tali'Zorah. First impression is good. Expect comments from me soon on the article's GA page. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tali'Zorah

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tali'Zorah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tali'Zorah

The article Tali'Zorah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tali'Zorah for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

• Congrats on the GA, Bellum! czar ♔ 21:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:War Doctor.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:War Doctor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Elizabeth (BioShock)

Gatoclass (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Peter Capaldi's first full appearance as the Twelfth Doctor (Christmas Special 2013).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Capaldi's first full appearance as the Twelfth Doctor (Christmas Special 2013).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 22:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madison Paige, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Escapist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Cole MacGrath and Miranda Lawson

Hello, Bellum Stellarum. I've ended on your User:Bellum Stellarum/Sources after taking a look on your really, really impressive work on Elizabeth (BioShock) and on Madison Paige. And, I've noticed that Cole MacGrath and Miranda Lawson are articles that you plan to creat (if I deduced right). I'm talking about this two among many others because I have a similar page, and I've gathered sources to Cole and Miranda but I really don't know if will use those any day. So, I'm letting you know it and maybe you can find some helpful source (or not) to use. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

It's nice cause (as I said) I somewhat abdicated from trying to create such articles. And, it's good that at least someone can do it, and the sources I collected was not pure waste of time. I don't know Mordin Solus, and in fact I don't know virtually anything about Mass Effect (and that's one of the reason I gave up on Miranda), but I have sure you will do a great work. Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mordin Solus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garrus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Miranda Lawson butt shot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miranda Lawson butt shot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Characters of Dragon Age: Inquisition, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages DLC, Scotch and Gameplanet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mordin Solus

The article Mordin Solus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mordin Solus for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Erachima -- Erachima (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

re: Talk:Mordin Solus/GA1

Hey Bellum Stellarum, there's a message for you at Talk:Mordin Solus/GA1, when you have a moment czar ♔ 01:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miranda Lawson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lazarus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Isaac Clarke.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Isaac Clarke.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cassandra Pentaghast, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mage and Garrus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Kreia

Thank you so much for restoring the wikipedia page of one of the best Gray Jedi/Sith Lords in the Star Wars universe (other than Revan naturally). I think its a good thing to have this article back up again so that many fans or interested readers would have a better understanding of such a fantastic round character. I really appreciate the effort you put into it; so if you need any help, I'm willing to assist. If you don't mind though, I would like to start contributing to this article, if that's all right. Anyway, thank you again :) --- Zach Hontiveros Pagkalinawan (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kreia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kreia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kreia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Kadzi -- Dr. Kadzi (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kreia

The article Kreia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kreia for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Kadzi -- Dr. Kadzi (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kreia

The article Kreia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kreia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Kadzi -- Dr. Kadzi (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Liara T'Soni.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liara T'Soni.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Captain Phasma

Great work so far on that page. I just noticed this morning than Finn, Poe, and Rey were at the end of their eligibilioty for DYK, so I nominated them, and while I was at it, figured I should nominate Captain Phasma, too. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Madison Paige

So I just stumbled across this article that you made. Have you thought about taking this to GAN? Has potential, imo. GamerPro64 04:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Appreciate the thought, though as far as anything Heavy Rain related goes I just don't really have the personal interest. Best of luck to anyone who ever does take on any baton for Paige's article, though. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 06:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Captain Phasma

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Interview

Hey! Thanks for responding to my post on the Star Wars project page. Here's the questions I have. If you would prefer, you can email your answer to me via Wikipedia's email service. Also, if you are unsure of what one question means, feel free to ask for clarification, and if you don't want to answer one, you can skip it. Feel free to 'talk my ear off'; the longer the better! :)

1) When did you start editing Wikipedia and why?

So this account was created about the start of 2013, from what I remember, but I've been editing here and there for a while, and I couldn't really tell you when that started. It's not the first account I've had, actually, though the previous one I've pretty much retired. No worries there, by the way, you can probably take it implicit from me actually mentioning it that I was in pretty good standing, but, you know, I was young, and no one wants the things they said when young traced back to them, even if they said perfectly sensible things. Known fact of life. Maybe one day I'll retire this account and begin again. Again.

As for why, well, Wikipedia was there, I was bored, there were errors and incomplete things, and I like digging up info about things I like. Everyone else may as well see, eh?

2) Does Wikipedia play a big part in your life/identity?

It's not a major part of my identity, nor is it a major part of my life. I try to strictly keep it as a hobby, an ode (of love or hate or ambivalence) to whatever subject I'm working on.

3) What initially drew you to the articles that you edit? What draws you to edit “Star Wars” articles?

A lot of it is personal interest, and a love of fiction -- it's probably why most of what I've done has been character articles. Granted, I am limited somewhat by the need for actual sources and so on, which is why I've done more Mass Effect articles than, say, Dragon Age ones, despite me preferring the latter. But personal interest is important, and it's why I made the push for a fairly hefty article on Kreia (a somewhat controversial character I really love), rather than any of the myriad gaming icons. Writing a Wikipedia article gives me an excuse to find out a lot about the history, creation behind a character, and how they were received, while at the same time letting me process all my thoughts about it (and maybe gain some new perspectives).

So, as to Star Wars, well, simply: I like Star Wars. I'm also pretty knowledgeable about it, inescapably so. I was part of a generation, and probably a lot of future generations will be similar, where Star Wars was just there. Han, Luke, Leia, Chewie, "I am your father", scenes, visuals, twists, planets, pacing: I knew Star Wars before I'd seen Star Wars, hell, I may as well have always watched it before I could ever have seen it. The prequels were still coming out around this time, and I remember seeing Revenge in the cinema. So, it's interesting. A memory before I could have the memory, really.

Also the Lego Star Wars, Battlefront and Knights of the Old Republic games were pretty cool. True fact.

4) Why do you feel the desire to collect disparate info and then collect it into one (or more) article?

I think I kind of answered this in the previous question.

5) What does the term ‘canon’ mean to you?

Generally, at least as far as Star Wars goes, we tend to think of two "canons" -- the old Legends and the new canon. More personally, to most mainstream audiences I imagine there's simply the actual films -- they happened, and the rest of the stuff is just peripheral stuff out there that isn't as real. I'd argue that in the end it's actually more like an near-endless interlocking layers of canon, where each individual work has its own little canon, which are made up of both itself and various other elements of other works' canons.

See, Empire Strikes Back, right? It forms part of basically every canon to follow it, it's part of the overall film canon, and most of it is canon to Return of the Jedi. But, Return of the Jedi isn't canon to Empire. In Empire, Luke doesn't kiss his sister, he kisses Leia, who has neither been written as his sister, is not planned to be his sister, nor is by anything indicated within the film itself his sister. But in Jedi, Luke has kissed his sister, if that makes sense. Or, if you prefer, since it's never mentioned in Jedi, that didn't really happen according to the film, but it happened in the overall canon.

I might've made that sound more complicated than it was, but honestly it's something that most people do a bit. And I should note, this way I'm using the word "canon" is pretty divorced from any classical meaning canon held in literature.

Outside of Star Wars, another good example of just how flexible "canon" can be is Doctor Who. General character arcs remain consistent in Who, and so in theory do a lot of the encounters along the way, yet trying to look at it from a logical view, especially from over long time periods, will cause the whole thing to pop like a balloon.

6) When you’re making an article, is it important to ‘stick to canon’, or use only legitimate, canonical sources?

A character might exist in the overall canon, but they also exist outside that, both in whatever individual canons I just made up now, and in the public eye and critical view. So, I don't think it's that important to stick to canon. Noting where they stand in overall agreed continuity can be useful for offering complete information, but ultimately, characters are developed over time in all their appearances, new authors bring new takes, and that happens regardless of any canon status.

Example: Darth Vader. When introduced, he's considered and portrayed as this basically evil, threatening figure. And of course, Empire makes him Luke's father, and then Jedi introduces this idea of him having a good spark within him, making him a bit more a conflicted character. Fast-forward, and the general depiction of Vader capitalises a lot on elements of self-loathing and general denial, as well as whatever motives lie behind him. And you see this reflected in the newer canon works, The Clone Wars and the Star Wars: Darth Vader comic, but it's a characterisation developed and crystallised both in these and non-canon works (Darth Vader and the Ghost Prison springs to mind, though I've never had the chance to actually read it, so I might be off-base).

And, of course, that applies to most fictional concepts, not just characters, from locations to species to beyond.

7) In your opinion, what determines canon (or, “who has the final say”)?

So, I proposed there a kind of weird infinite canon, made up of books that make series that then are altered within other books to form some sort of weird mutant whole that's merely one aspect of all of them. So, back to the individual canon thing, that depends on the material, how it's made. In a Star Wars novel, that's probably primarily the author, though Lucasfilm probably oversaw things so ultimately the final say might rest with them. Dynamics are a bit different now, but essentially similar, the Story Group or whatever ensuring the post-Lucas canon remains consistent. But you can't really change the canon of previous books, you can only really change the future direction of books to come, their canon. To all the stories that interacted with the Republic Commando novels, they remain canon to them, even if TCW kind of blew up the series with its pacifist Mandalorians and they weren't really canon to any future stuff.

I'm still cracking up over that, by the way. It's a weird development, especially in Star Wars where generally a lot of the iconography stays the same or similar across eras, the Empire, the Republic, Mandalorians. I haven't finished TCW, but it's interesting, in a way.

8) Do some editors of pop culture articles guard their articles, (or “prevent the canon from being tainted”)?

Yeah, probably, at least to guarding the articles. It's very easy to feel a certain sense of ownership for anything you've written, even if not fully consciously. With Star Wars, the canon's always had a lot of questions, so I think there's been a bigger tendency by editors to sort of sidestep the issues. This was, after all, a massive franchise, with varying levels of canons, which weren't always regulated, and that was before the advent of gamechangers like the prequels. Still, there's a certain view that the new canon is "right", and I remember making this edit a bit ago, essentially changing "Sheev Palpatine" to an alternate name in one canon, and I stand by it. And this wasn't really ever reverted, per se, but over time one relatively uninvolved user might've made one edit, then another one made another, and now Palpatine is back to opening with "Sheev Palpatine", blankly.

9) If there’s an edit war and you want to get involved, generally, how do you determine what side to choose?

I generally try not to get too involved in edit wars. Obviously which side I take is going to be very case-by-case, and in edit wars over grammar or format I tend to not care overmuch, so this is a question that's hard to answer. Sometimes the best option lies somewhere in between whoever's warring (though not always), and if there's an edit war going over for example the addition of unsourced content, it can be worth just having a look for a source yourself.

10) In your opinion, do certain Wikipedia editors have more power than others? If yes, how so?

Naturally, yes. Obviously, an admin can block people (if not without reprisal should they go on some powermad rage trip), but on the general editing side there's little to stop the little implicit things. If a very new user or especially an IP editor makes an edit, it will come under more scrutiny than if I make one, and if I take any liberties with sourcing, it's more likely to be let slipped. If you get a bad reputation, for whatever reason, of course even edits that are probably alright might similarly end up under heavier scrutiny and reverted. And then of course very active and involved editors will probably get more leeway than me, and probably few want to revert an admin. And that goes into discussions as well, where people can kind of lay more weight to things depending on who's saying them.

It's not always fair, and it's not always something you can really blame anyone for, but that's the way it ends up.

11) How do you gain the trust of other editors?

Well, it helps to be polite. Not necessarily in the sense of being all formal and "ah, yes, madam, I will be on this Good Article review post-haste, if you will respect my pardons for I am off for the weekend". But, you know, assume the best on their part, don't get angry (there is very little that can be solved by ALL-CAPS, and even less that can be solved by calling people arsewipes), and be generally nice. Outright helping an article for something they like can get you some love, too. Don't really have one direct answer for this question.

12) How does an editor gain expertise/become an “expert” in a specific subject?

I'd be wrong to say there's any one thing, go do that, you will become an expert. It probably goes without saying that if you're working on a history related article, studying history isn't going to hurt. As far as Wikipedia goes, practice and observation are probably two key bits. Like I said, no real one thing to do, but actual editing is pretty informative providing you manage to not get scared off (which is easy to do -- Wikipedia is neither accessible nor always that welcoming), and checking out how other (good-quality) pages are set out and written can make for a good starting base. Reading the rules is, as you might guess, always nice, though I wouldn't ask anyone to have an academic knowledge of all the rules or spend hours poring over guidelines. But having a basic grasp of what "notability", "real-world perspective", and "verifiability" mean goes a long way.

Even better is to understand why those are there, the general principles. After all, policies are there for reasons, not to blindly followed simply because, and I'm all for a little rule-bending here and there when appropriate.

Thanks so much!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Responses in the indents. If you want to ask any follow-up questions or if you want any clarification or to debate me on whatever, feel free. Hope it comes in handy. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 20:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much for these very thoughtful and useful answers! I have one final question. Does Roland Barthes' idea about the death of the author mean anything to you in regards to canon? Put another way, what say does the author have in regards to their work?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

@Gen. Quon: Sorry for the late response, interesting times, also got a new game. So, death of the author. I think this depends a bit on the work itself. A lot of ideas tend to go for this one size fits all approach, ignoring that different works are made for different purposes. Now the exact purposes behind each and every work is potentially infinte, from being self-expressive, to existing as exploration of themes, to educate, to worldbuild for worldbuild's sake, to simply being there for entertain, etc. etc. (and obviously none of what I listed there was exclusive). So that can alter just how viable the idea of ignoring the author and their intent is (e.g. what if they write it in a first person perspective and allude to their own life?).

Now, with Star Wars, you're dealing with something that has, until fairly recently, been pretty creator-owned. That's not necessarily "George Lucas does everything", but even without being in the director seat for Empire and Jedi, Lucas has had a heavy control over it, and Lucasfilm is getting its name from him. However, Lucas has pretty clearly gone back and forth on things, from originally planning 9 episodes, no 6, yadda yadda yadda. There's probably a school of thought out there that would discard the new Disney films from this conceptual core Lucas canon, and it's honestly not one I can too heavily criticise. You can sell the franchise, but you can't properly sell an idea, right? Copyright, law, and artistic ownership don't always go together.

So, anyway, authorial intent can be useful in explaining or shedding light to the text, and if it's clear that the text was written with their interpretation in mind it can be pretty definitive, but later authorial intent can't override actual events in the text, or really retcon the work. And if the author somehow botches what they meant, and the work doesn't match their views, they can't change the text in hindsight (they could make altered new texts, but not quite the same thing) but we can say they did a poor job of expressing their ideas, and that the text has in a sense failed. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Very useful, and thanks for taking time to answer these questions. I really appreciate it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Illusive Man.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Illusive Man.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dishonored 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malibu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Tiffany Aching in The Wee Free Men.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tiffany Aching in The Wee Free Men.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Discworld Noir visuals.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Discworld Noir visuals.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Millionth One. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yuuzhan Vong.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yuuzhan Vong.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mercy Overwatch.png

Thank you for uploading File:Mercy Overwatch.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I originally uploaded a different image so I can't speak for what's there right now, but cheers for the heads up anyhow. Assuming no one else changes it or reuploads it in the interim, I'll probably look into it / find a replacement after I've got some more free time. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 23:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Millionth One. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:BioWare companions has been nominated for discussion

Category:BioWare companions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:14, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Millionth One. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deus Ex: Human Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Jensen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Adam Jensen in Mankind Divided.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Pages for Mass Effect Characters

Hi, thank you for linking me to your draft page and helping me with the source references for the Dragon Age characters.

I've noticed that you already have pending drafts which are work in progress for Liara T'Soni and Thane Krios. Would you like me to pick up where you left off and complete the character pages? Haleth (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

In all likelihood I won't be finishing them up any time soon, so you're welcome to edit/finish them as you wish. (That goes for anyone reading this and any of my drafts, by the by; I'm not particularly possessive of them.) My only request is that if you directly copy/paste what I wrote for Thane into another article, please link to the draft in the edit summary. Or if you accidentally forget to do that, no biggie but mention it on the talk page. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Endings of ME3

Hi there, long time no chat, I've noticed that you've been online again lately, and thanks again for sharing your sources with me. I've more or less finished up all of the viable articles for Mass Effect characters and races which could be created with existing sourcing. I just thought I'd ask if you don't mind me using material from your Endings of Mass Effect 3 draft, as part of a larger Controversies surrounding Mass Effect article I intend to work on. I'm not sure if the other editors will accept a standalone ME3 ending article due to content fork concerns, but I've noticed that there are a few articles which broadly cover controversies surrounding an individual video game or series are not only viable, but could be sustained as good articles. Haleth (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Genji (Overwatch).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Genji (Overwatch).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

A granola bar for you

		A granola bar for you
		Hi The Millionth One, I noticed you have been working on significanlty improving Discworld Noir. Thank you for your hard work on it! Here is a granola bar to give you more energy if you wanted to continue to improve it :-). Cheers. Al83tito (talk) 03:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emily Kaldwin.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emily Kaldwin.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Commander Shepard.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commander Shepard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cassandra in Dragon Age II.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cassandra in Dragon Age II.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adam Jensen in Mankind Divided.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adam Jensen in Mankind Divided.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)