User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I Got Your Back
And you've got mine. :) Thanks. Vicenarian (T · C) 23:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Sigh
Thanks for that. Tonywalton Talk 23:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I guess boredom is more of a threat than one would think. I appreciate the housekeeping. Tiderolls 23:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. It's 00:49 in my timezone, so I'm likely to go off-wiki very soon. I think enough eyes are on our Skitzo friend, though! Tonywalton Talk 23:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I have every confidence in those that support us. Rest well. Tiderolls 23:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- We got you
stalkedwatched. :) Vicenarian (T · C) 00:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- We got you
- Yes, I have every confidence in those that support us. Rest well. Tiderolls 23:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Thanks...
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Read the paper yet?
No longer underdog! As if we ever were. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- While I agree with his assessment, I'm never comfortable with relinquishing "underdog" status. The SEC is to volatile to start bragging. Wait 'till November or December....let the record speak. Still, ya gotta feel good about McElroy taking the reins. Roll Tide Tiderolls 03:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Almost everytime I go on Wikipedia, you're reverting vandalism! Alxeedo TALK 03:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC) |
Huggle
I wish you would let me revert something.. :-p. JavertI knit sweaters, yo! 03:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Cool...you asked for something in my power to grant. Go forth and edit :) Tiderolls 03:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Tide rolls, SparksBoy has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Keep Fighting those vandals! SparksBoy (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, SparksBoy...I appreciate that. Tiderolls 04:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Very much for restoring my User Page :-). - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 12:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Glad to do it. I probably owe you one, anyway. So many editors have helped me in the same way, I tend to lose track. I've seen your efforts while watching recent changes....keep up the good work. Tiderolls 17:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
User makes masive reverts to favor point of view to remove term "free software" to use only "open source".
Hello Tide rolls
There is a user "Yworo" who has been removing the term "Free software" as a valid description for the source model of software articles such as Ubuntu and the pages referring to its derivatives. You can check that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Yworo
The term has been used without any problem together with the "open source" option until now.
His behavior is very similar to that of another user known as Chris Cunningham "Thumperward". It is very possible they could be the same or at least acting in coordination to push their point of view which favors the use of their(his) favored terms.
I did try to correct his edits and kindly asked "Yworo" to cite his sources. Instead he has reverted more than once my edits. Together with another user who openly shares the same point of view (KimDabelsteinPetersen) they have unjustifiably threatened me with the 3 revert rule.
Please have a look.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandscribe (talk • contribs)
- I must tell you that I lack the technical knowledge to offer an opinion on the content issue you have raised. I will say that engaging the editors you mention in your message would be your best course of action. Developing consensus is the process by which information is added to Wikipedia. There are other means of dispute resolution, but pursuing them would be fruitless without attempting to obtain a consensus. Maintaining one's composure during discussion is essential to avoid straying into an edit war. It would be very counterproductive if you were to get caught up in a situation that is easily avoided. What chance would you have to get your information added if you were blocked or incurred other editing restrictions? If my input here falls short of your expectation, please accept my apology. Good luck Tiderolls 01:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
Looks like 68.96.170.78 is at it again. Could you block im please? Thanks. Jrcla2 07:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry...I had logged off before you posted here. I appreciate the compliment but I am not an admin. You seem experienced so you may already know about the most effective venue for reporting vandalism. As long as the vandalism is recent, ongoing and the user in question has been sufficiently warned, the admins that watch that board are very swift in their action. Of course, I will try to help wherever I am able so feel free to contact me if you have problems or concerns. Regards Tiderolls 10:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
McFadyen Page
I am the creator of a biography on Andrew McFadyen. Appears someone wants to have it taken down, but I believe only for political gain. Is there a way to ensure it gets protected? IP address on the edit attempt is 99.232.119.54
Many thanks! CheshireH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheshire H (talk • contribs) 04:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- My first suggestion would be that you contact editors at the biography talk page to make sure that your edits have followed the policies and guidelines for biographies of living persons. These policies are some of the most strictly enforced for obvious reasons. If you are able to have uninvolved editors check your work and give opinions that support your editing that would help. Looking over the article I saw nothing that should be a problem, but I am no expert....try to obtain views from editors that have experience with biographical articles. The user that tagged the article made no comment at the RfC that was initiated by placing the tag. I would take that to mean that the user has no opinion. I do not understand why one would tag an article and then not comment on their concerns. I saw that you had posted a message on the user's talk page...that was the proper thing to do. Attempting to initiate a dialogue shows your interest in collaboration. Good luck Tiderolls 05:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
THANKS! Very helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheshire H (talk • contribs) 05:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Why start over with a level-one warning? I've given the User a final warning. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm guessing the reason is I'm a mealy-mouthed editor. Tiderolls 02:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Heh. :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I was going to say something similar about this edit. I think it was a step or three beyond "appearing to be unconstructive". ;) Cheers! – ClockworkSoul
- I'm always hopeful that users are capable of finding some way to contribute. I'm often proven wrong. I've been wrong before...I'm old, so I've been wrong many times. "Unconstructive" seems tame in that particular instance to be sure. I've had the occasional user message me after a warning and inquire about the warning. It's given me the chance to pass on the pitiful bit o' knowledge I posssess on the workings of WP. It's led to some positive reaction. I hold on to that meager hope... Tiderolls 02:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Nah...you're not jaded. I'm still learning. That translates to I must be more careful in my response. As I gain experience I hope to be more discerning in my approach. That's my hope, anyway :) Tiderolls 03:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
No, I don't think it needed any in-depth research, considering the previous warnings on the guy's Talk page and the type of vandalism he was doing that you reverted, it looked pretty clear, to me, but then, I tend to assume bad faith more than others. :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 03:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Wow
Nice reactions there! Thanks Tide rolls! >:). Jeff M | Talk2Me | BNosey - 23:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Sorry for butting in but it was such a nice award. I didn't want to see it tarnished. Tiderolls 23:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Your revert on Pasta
How'd you do that? I've been trying ages to figure out how to revert edits by multiple IP's. Jeff M | Talk2Me | BNosey - 00:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Push the blue "back" button until the version you want is on the left column. When you puch the revert button you will take the article back to that version. If you're using HG lite the scrren appearances may be different as I'm using the full version. Hope that helps Tiderolls 00:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Remember that if you push the "revert and warn" button the warning goes to the user on the right column. You have to be careful because that user may be innocently trying to revert vandalism and just missed a letter or two. They may not be responsible for vandalism and may not deserve a warning. I've made that mistake before...thank goodness the editor was understanding when I explained my mistake. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry! Thanks for the heads up, wasn't watching where I posted!
70.215.151.27 (talk) 03:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Fast revert
That was one fast reverting you did to Pacific Place Jakarta. I wonder how you did that in seconds?--RuleOfThe9th (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Was it fast? My computer is old so it's difficult for me to tell. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
It was. Faster than a blink of an eye, the blanked page was back in its original form. 202.47.69.212 blanked the entire page and replaced the content with :"ja ja what do you know about pacific place stupid" (at least that's what he said). When I checked back a few seconds later I saw the page was back with the original contents.--ROT9 (talk) 08:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- My question was a weak attempt at humour. My edit was made with the assistance of an automated tool, so I had a bit of an advantage. I was not trying to mislead you. You seem experienced so I thought you might already have knowledge of the situation. Also, many editors have access to this (and other) tools, so speed is not that important. If I miss seeing such an edit as you mention there are others about that will catch it. Anyway, it's helpful knowing you are watching the page as well...the more eyes the better :) Tiderolls 13:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I see that. It seems that you are a Wikipedia administrator, since you had the assistance of a tool. Anyways, I'm not that experienced. Cheers,--ROT9 (talk) 03:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I always thought that you were a formal Wikipedia administrator, yet you're just an editor but with granted rights. Oh and tell me more about this feature in my talk page!--ROT9 (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For looking over my talk page. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 23:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Given in appreciation of your diligent service. Thanks Tiderolls 23:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks for watching over my page. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- No problem friend, we're all in it together. LeilaniLad (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for watching over my page. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your rivision to tidal power. I tried to revert a vandal but also reverted you at first. Sorry and thanks;)SchnitzelMannGreek. 22:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm positive your reversion was accidental. That's why I did not think it necessary to message you. That was one of the strangest things I've ever seen while using HG. The program should not have allowed your edit. I have (many times) hit the revert button without realizing that the version I was trying to revert was already changed. Thank goodness the system would not let my edit go through. Do you think we need to report this as a glitch? I'd be interested in your opinion. Regards Tiderolls 22:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know. It's not the first time it has happen to me though. I've seen other prominent users with the same incident happening. So I'm not sure really.SchnitzelMannGreek. 22:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Haha, beat you at least once. My laptop is too slow! Drmies (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm glad you're online. I know I'm missing a bunch. It seems very busy. Tiderolls 03:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh I don't know. Hey, Tide man, do you happen to have a copy of the William March biography by Simmonds? The article needs a reference or two, and it's on GA review. (You know he studied law in Tuscaloosa, and his Company K is a great book.) Good to see you too, but I'm signing off--it's bedtime. Take care, and keep up the good work. Can you believe we have to wait until September before we can watch some football? *Sigh* Drmies (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have that book. I'll do some searching...I have very few manual mainspace edits and would like to contribute to a GA nom. September 5th is just around the corner...patience :) Tiderolls 04:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- "Few manual mainspace edits"...are you a machine? I don't know if you know User:Alarob--he's gotten a rewrite of the Alabama article started (at User:Alarob/Alahist). A long time ago he and I were looking at that main article and were sad and disappointed, but then we never got around to actually spending time on it. Drmies (talk) 14:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have that book. I'll do some searching...I have very few manual mainspace edits and would like to contribute to a GA nom. September 5th is just around the corner...patience :) Tiderolls 04:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Rob was one of the first to welcome me here. It was kinda funny. He expressed the hope that I wouldn't mind "an Auburn denizen" posting on my page...lol I gave him a "War Eagle' on his page out of respect. Don't tell anybody...I wouldn't want that getting around :) Tiderolls 16:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
You do realize...
You do realize I was joking, right? I was saying that his disruption on the WP:AN3 (which led to you posting on WP:ANI) made it more likely that he would be blocked sooner rather than later. The rollback was fine. -- tariqabjotu 05:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, no worries. I took your meaning immediately. And don't take my reply on AN/I as sarcasm. I meant what I said...sometimes I believe I should stand aside and let the admins 'tend to business. See ya 'round Tiderolls 06:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Dethklok
Any time you see these kids adding the Tristan Peterson nonsense, it's vandalism. There's not a single reliable source anywhere online. It all started with a metal magazine article about Dethklok... the forum section began asking who each character might be based on, a bunch of fans said this nobody guitarist friend of theirs, and it's grown. the same twists seem willing to post it to every discussion forum, without any citation at all. No attempt to ask for citation has been successful. It's just twits having fun. Just revert and ignore. NO request for page protection will be honored either, I've tried. ThuranX (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
none of my business ...
... but I was just wondering why you weren't an admin? — Ched : ? 07:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- The main reason is that my contributions are very one dimensional. I'm very proud of my "substantive" mainspace contribs, but they number less than a dozen. If there were some type of "AIV only" admin I'd self-nom in a heartbeat. I can pretty much guess what the "oppose" comments would be at an RfA and if I ever get to the point where my contribs would answer those concerns I'll look for a nomination. That you'd ask is very complimentary...it tells me that I'm at least headed in the right direction. See ya 'round Tiderolls 10:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- You've been asked this before, Tide. Take it seriously! ;) You know, Pat Travers is in bad shape and he needs a discography too. Maybe you can catch him on tour somewhere and take some pictures. THAT would show dedication. Drmies (talk) 15:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're an evil taskmaster, Drmies. I'm trying to find info on William March bio and your're already finding me something else to do. Is William March a done deal yet? I guess I could look for my self. Nevermind. Good to hear from ya Tiderolls 16:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- You like Foghat better? Great Southern rock--from a British band. March, I don't know what's happening there. It seems the GA-(re)nomination is a three-man job: the editor who's reviewing it, and then me and one other editor who's been working on refs. But not much has happened there recently. Seriously, any help would be appreciated. Leave Pat Travers be, I was only kidding--though "Boom Boom (Out Go the Lights)" (on Live! Go For What You Know) is a great tune. My 3-yr old sings along with it. BTW, I did just learn that Travers was an asshole...hard to believe how much sex these rock and roll stars had back in the day. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're an evil taskmaster, Drmies. I'm trying to find info on William March bio and your're already finding me something else to do. Is William March a done deal yet? I guess I could look for my self. Nevermind. Good to hear from ya Tiderolls 16:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I can't seem to change my username.....
So can you tel me how to do this? Tell something about it on my talk page! Cheers,--ROT9 (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you..
..for the compliment! I appreciate the kind words. :) Best, →javért chat 13:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Do you ever sleep? lol ...oh, and you're welcome. See ya 'round Tiderolls 13:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. I iz bot. :) →javért chat 13:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've been suspected of being the same. Can one be a bot and not realize it? red pill/blue pill time? Tiderolls 13:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think that you can. I first came to the realisation that I was a bot do to this fact being pointed out to me by an IP. Ever since then I have embraced my "botness" and you should do the same. :p →javért chat 13:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've been suspected of being the same. Can one be a bot and not realize it? red pill/blue pill time? Tiderolls 13:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedian of the Day
Note: You could also receive the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week!
Happy editing!
[midnight comet] [talk] 00:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
A little help
Hi Tide Rolls I don't know what's going on but there was a war at Jodi her wiki, my link is deleted by I don't know who that person is, I'm really tired of it, can you please help me? Thank you Regards --BlackIdentity (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. It seems that your link has fallen afoul of the external links guidelines. This is not good news. It might be possible to get the link approved, but you will have to re-read this archive at the "Can you please help me" section. Your link must meet certain conditions to be included. I know very well this will be frustrating for you. I know the subject is a passionate one for you. That is a good thing, as long as you don't let it cloud your judgement. For example, this edit shows certain article ownership issues. And this edit will accomplish nothing constructive. You must try to maintain a calm approach, even if it means taking a break from editing. I know this from personal experience. Distancing oneself from the issue will allow you to gain some perspective. What can you do if you are blocked? That will certainly not help. Please try to keep your cool so you can continue editing. You have been editing in good faith and I would feel bad if you were to lose your editing privileges when that could be avoided. Put your frustrations on my talk page if you feel the need. That way you will not get in trouble. I'm sorry my help is so weak, but you need to follow Wikipedia's rules to get your edits added. Stay cool Tiderolls 01:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear Tide Rolls Thank you for response so quickly, I can tell you that I'm done with Wikipedia and also IMDb, it cost me too much energy, I have defended Jodi for more than a year now, it breakes my heart everytime when I see Not done things about Jodi or Untrue things or deleted things. So I have decide to delete the links from wiki and imdb at Jodi her website. Because this has no end. Everyone can edit and delete and write things.. and my energy to defend Jodi is gone. It break me also, I can not do that anymore. I have cried many times about the things that people write about Jodi, it makes me not happy at all. Her fansite will be forever online, but my support with other sites that place things about Jodi is gone. I keep it with my own site on facebook and my website about Jodi and that is it. If people want to edit, delete or whatever they do about Jodi, do it .. I want nothing to do with that at all
Best Regards --BlackIdentity (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I will respect any decision that you take, of course. However, I want to repeat that taking a break can be very helpful. You are correct; anyone can add or delete information. That is the central core of any Wiki. Please reconsider. Editors with passion and knowledge are too valuable to lose. Take some time to read the policy and guideline pages....read some user talk and article talk pages...especially in areas that are not associated with your interests. Try to rekindle your enthusiasm. Feel free to message me anytime. I will try to help in any way I can. Take care Tiderolls 02:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for response much appreciated! Best Regards --BlackIdentity (talk) 03:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Bourgeois personality
if you read the article you see its not vandalism. waht kind of wikipedia article says "Debatable is whether or not conspicuous unpretentiousness is a common feature of the bourgeois personality, and whether it should even be counted as a deceitful behaviour. What sort of statement is a financial personality worth $15 billion making when he lives in an un-pretentious house and drives an inexpensive car? Does he really understand that he's of little actual importance, or does he fancy himself being of such fantastic importance that he must follow the example of Augustus?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobgoblein (talk • contribs) 03:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have no issue with your opinion of the content. You opinion must be supported by sources and expressed in an encyclopedic style to be added to the article. If you wish to discuss the article's content or ways to improve the article then post to the article's talk page. Regards Tiderolls 03:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm planning to leave....
Tide rolls, I have told you on my talk page that I am planning to leave Wikipedia. I will now focus primarily on the Indonesian Wikipedia, and if possible, the Simple English Wikipedia. Can you say something before we part ways? Regards,--ROT9 (talk) 06:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
You have said one last word on my talk page. I thank you for your farewell message, but I have decided to stay, despite the fact that I have started to shift the majority of my work to the Indonesian and Simple English Wikipedia. I will now handle three Wikipedia pages. Regards,--ROT9 (talk) 01:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes I have. I will not leave Wikipedia before I transform into a true WikiWarrior!--ROT9 (talk) 07:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Best edit summary yet
"(Undid revision 308048073 by Jeffrey Mall (talk) rogue bot and rogue wiki user)" made me chuckle. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 01:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sometimes an edit summary would save some editors from a basket full of grief. Sometimes not so much. Tiderolls 01:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I've noticed recently some users trying to vandalize have been using fake summaries to try and hide the vandalism, well I'm guessing you've been on here a fair amount longer than I have, but is this a new thing or has it been round a while? Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 01:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Clothes hangers
Which are better: Wooden, plastic, or wire clothes hangers? Just your personal opinion, please. 99.250.227.96 (talk) 02:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting the spelling, now can you please answer the question? Thank you kindly. 99.250.227.96 (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
The reason I ask, is because I seek to inform the masses of the danger of wire coat hangers. Not only are they dangerous to clothes, they endanger the race of humanity. The human form, susceptible to hanging triangular objects must acknowledge and defend against this incursion of EARTH. I first learned of clothes hanger danger, especially the wire kind, in my first watched of Mommy Dearest, in 1984, at the age of 15. To imagine that the secret danger to EARTH was allowed to go unspoken until then boggles the universal mind. To fully understand this, I will present to most present danger, the wire hanger. Distributed by GOLOF's henchmen (THE CHINKS), through the laundromats of the world, the wire clothes hanger inhabits most, if not all homes on EARTH. It seeks to amplify the waves from GOLOF's transmitter, encouraging degradation of the mind's eye. GOLOF seeks to blind EARTH, so that invasion will be successful without much too unpleasant resistance. The production and distribution of these hangers, as well as they occasional use to steal the Freedom Machine (automobile), ensures that GOLOF will have no troubles conquering EARTH. The mind's eye is clouded by the distribution of these hangers, so much so that the average citizen doesn't see the plans of invasion. Wooden hangers are no better.
To make wooden hangers, one must cut down trees. Providing the pads to land the ships for the invasion fleet. The plastics use up our precious fuel and oils, moving resources away from the anti-GOLOF machines including the Freedom machine and Assault robots (Guns, firearms and rockets). Hangers are to be eliminated. Piles provide uneven mapping landscapes, clouding the invasion eye's eye, much as the hanger transmissions cloud the average eye.
Be wary of the Chinese and the laundromat, they are in league with GOLOF. 99.250.227.96 (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Call me. Please
Tide rolls, can you alert me when it's August 25, 2009? I was born on the same date 13 years ago in a hospital in Joglo, Kembangan, Jakarta Barat, which means that by August 25, its my birthday. However, I can't seem to find a perfect template for this matter. Can you tell some recommended related templates into my talk page? Oh, and thanks for assisting me along these days, by the way. Regards,--ROT9 (talk) 08:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
In case your interested
Are you going to sign up for this?--The LegendarySky Attacker 00:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. I don't think it's a bad idea, though. Since the aim of the project is pretty much all I do, it would seem redundant for me to commit to doing only that. Good seeing you on my page again, Sky Attacker, hope things are well with you. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting my user page while I was busy blocking that account. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Your edits
Is it normal that I feel useless when you are logged into Huggle? And I see vandalism reverted by you before I can press on that "Q"? OK, I'm being selfish. Keep up the great work, 2help (message me) 04:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Apologies for hogging the button. You must've caught me on a good night. My comp is old and slow and using HG is like trying to put fog in a bucket. I promise not to be such a glutton in the future. I appreciate all the help that's available. See ya 'round Tiderolls 10:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert
Thanks for the revert on my user page. The user who did this I think has gone from good to bad. Again, greatly appreciated. Chris (talk) 00:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Maybe there's hope for that editor...time and their contribs will tell. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting user 24.193.224.117's edit. He/She starting Sept 2 has been on PressTV's page tearing it in pieces... must be an unhappy employee or contractor! thanks again! User:Epw7889 (talk) 16:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Sorry!
I noticed that you were reverting a couple of my edits that you did not like. I apologize if you did not find these edits constructive, but, personally, I thought it added a nice touch to your user talk page. Anyway, I hope you accept my apology!--74.12.28.7 (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Invasion of Poland vandal
Why on earth have you not banned (or do you not have that power?) user 76.175.103.82 for his repeated vandalism in the "Invasion of Poland" article?Drichter53 (talk) 19:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- I do not have that power. However, someone that does have that power has blocked the user. That should prevent more trouble in the short run. Regards Tiderolls 21:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
AMG BARNSTAR
|
The Userpage Shield | |
| For beating me to reverting vandalism on my userpage. Falcon8765 (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC) |
Question
How was my change to "Transgender" offensive? I believe the original, "Transsexual" is more appropriate. It's not an offensive term at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroythebrainitstheonlyway (talk • contribs) 04:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on the "offensiveness" of your edit. The article is titled "Transgender", not "Transsexual". I would advise you to contact the editors on the article discussion page to determine the consensus for making your change as there already exists an article on transsexuals. Regards Tiderolls 04:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Question
Ok, makes sense. Thanks for your response to my quesiton. Have a great night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroythebrainitstheonlyway (talk • contribs) 05:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Great Job on Glenn Beck
You obviously didn't read any of the article or its history, before making your revert. If you had you would at least know that this article can't be edited by new users. Maybe you can explain to me why its constructive to have a "Life Events" section in an article, but it's not constructive to list important life events in that section, such as a surgery that Beck had given numerous interviews about and claimed changed his life?
Anyone who actually read the history of the article would see my previous edit summaries, and it would not be difficult for them to guess what the edit was in regards to, so I hope that they lack of an edit summary wasn't your only rationale.
Paglew (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your lack of an edit summary only served to catch my eye. I actually followed the link you provided and failed to see where Beck described the surgery as "botched" (your quotations). I may have missed it, I am capable of error. If I was wrong, I apologize. Your accusations and assumptions of bad faith do not go very far in convincing me of error, though. Regards Tiderolls 10:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
white tiger
The edits made by Bioextra make no sense. There is no point in adding general information on tigers which is available elsewhere on Wikipedia. Bioextra is confusing heterozygous tigers with golden tabby tigers. It makes no sense to have a section titled heterozygous tiger. 14:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)~I ex[plained all this on Cambridgebayweather's page.
- Thanks for your message explaining your action. All I saw was the blanking of info that appeared relevant to the article. I apologize for interfering with your good faith contribution. Regards Tiderolls 15:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
White Tiger
Thank you.72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
How did you make such signatures?
Yo. How did you make your current signature. I mean, how did you make such boxed signatures like that? Tell me!--BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 Contact Jakarta Center at 121.965 09:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- I borrowed the mark-up from another user's signature. If you click any of the "edit" buttons to the right, you will be able to see the mark-up. Oh yeah....it's the 24th here but it's probably the 25th in Jakarta. Happy birthday. Regards Tiderolls 10:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, but in Jakarta, it's still August the 24th :).--BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 Contact Jakarta Center at 121.965 10:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for reverting a personal attack on my talk page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I appreciate the hard work you do on the recent changes. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank You
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. That IP was still mad that I was being mean to him in the sandbox. Thanks AndrewEnns (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- I appreciate you letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. I'm sure you're capable of maintaining your own page, but I never know how often users log in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Pultost
Pultost: I supplied the correct translation, it was no joke, you reverted it to something that is not at all the actual meaning of the word... If the actual meaning is too hard for you to stomache, then it should instead be explained that the meaning is sexually explicit, and leave it at that. Not the stupid translation that is currently being shown... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.29.198 (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- If I made an error I apologize. I will not revert you again. That is, until I can confirm what you put forth is in error. Regards Tiderolls 03:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
decltype (talk) 04:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Pultost: here is a link to the verb "pule": http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Pule - Seems I've gotten a reputation as a vandal, because my second attempt was reverted as well. So perhaps you could do the honour this time? ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.29.198 (talk) 04:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't really give the urban dictionary a lot of credit. However, I have confirmed your position and will blank my messaage on your page. I'll also leave a note on the other editor's talk directing him to this message. Regards Tiderolls 04:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Until It Sleeps Wake me 00:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Someone vandalized my Userspace! 
But a little angel came along and fixed it! 
Thank you! Vipin Hari || talk 00:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- That is one of the most unique "thank you"s I've seen. You're welcome, of course Tiderolls 00:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
some advice?
Hey Tide, if you can pull yourself away from vandal-fighting for a moment, do you think that Lolita Lopez is speediable? I think there is no claim to notability, but admins might differ. Drop me a line when you can. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm gonna check some notability guidelines. The link listed on the article appears broken, but I have found this and this on the first page of a Google search. She may be notable enough. I'll advise further. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
<--Well...Looking at the "Creative Professionals" section of the notability guideline her notability would be difficult to justify. However, I think the two sites I found were legit and that should count for something. As in most cases there exists such a gray area that more opinions would be optimum. I would weigh in as a very weak !support for notability. I wouldn't have very firm arguments against any one who opposed, though. Wishy-washy enough for ya? :) Tiderolls 02:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, yes, plenty wishy-washy. But I note that you didn't answer the original question. Let's say you hadn't found those sources: does the article claim notability or can it be speedied? That's the line I'm trying to define a little bit. No worries: just speak your mind, as a future admin (haha). BTW, a colleague of mine just got a job at UA, and I'm jealous! Drmies (talk) 02:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
<--Um...apples and oranges :) Tiderolls 04:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- You're a good man, Tide. Have a good night fighting the good fight. Drmies (talk) 04:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedian of the Day
For your further kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user since the last time you were Wikipedian of the Day, you have been named "Wikipedian of the Day" once again, for today, September 4, 2009! Keep up the great work!
Note: You now have another chance to be Wikipedian of the Week!
Happy editing!
[midnight comet] [talk] 00:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
...no problem
I was in two minds, I have no idea what other Wikipedians get up to in their spare time, but just something about it screamed vandalism!! RaseaC (talk) 23:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For removing vandalism from my userpage! It is much appreciated! Marx01 Tell me about it 23:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
- I appreciate the recognition. I'm sure you'd do the same for me. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes, the Tide Rolls!
Woohoo! We're going to look good when the rankings come out. Good game man! Drmies (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yep...tough game. Special teams sucked but I was pleased that Bama didn't just give up. They used their depth well also. I dare to hope Tiderolls 13:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Reply
You are welcome! :) This is what you deserve from working hard from Day One:
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Congratulations! Keep working the hardest you can! Chevy Impala 2009 14:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revert not necessary
That's my account, unfortunately I don't have access to it anymore. And I don't want that information there anymore, the Google cache lists a guy I used to date, and he doesn't know I put him there...so yeah. 72.222.147.24 (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for coming here to explain. I apologize for butting in. There was no edit summary on your blanking of the page and I interpreted that as vandalism. I will not make any further revisions to that page. Regards Tiderolls 01:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Argh, sorry! I forgot :( I meant to, but after I edited it, I logged off due to a massive headache, and now I have another one. :( Regards. 72.222.147.24 (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
|
The Userpage Shield | |
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! Alan (talk) 01:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
Wow
I saw someone vandalize the same sex marriage article, and before my computer could even load the history page, you already reverted it! speedy! Tdinatale (talk) 03:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Some days the electrons go faster than other days. Sunspots, I'm guessin'....certainly no talent on my part. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
For my good friend...
BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj to all.
- It has been a long time since I talked to you, so I decided I would give this special prize for ya!--BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Ferry is incorrect spelling of furry just trying to help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.244.248 (talk) 01:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Looks as if I'm going to have to put a temporary block on my talk page. Thanks for watching my back, bro. Best, PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- No worries...I know you have done the same for me. Keep up the good work. Tiderolls 01:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nice teamwork
Hi there TIDE, VASCO here,
Ty very much for your assistance in dealing with this poor excuse for an editor (especially as seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julio_Cardeñosa&action=history); i reported him once and he did not like it one bit. Since, he tends to edit - with a seemingly neverending supply of IPs - in articles in which i worked in mere hours/days before, writing all kind of lies/foul language. Charming...I also see he did not like one bit that you reverted his "contributions", and wrote according summaries while re-reverting. EXTRA-charming...no, no, what's that other word? Ah, found it, "pityful"!
Thanks once again, have a nice weekend from Portugal (will this "user" also vandalize this message? He could),
VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Don't let the drive-by vandals affect your calm, Vasco. There are many editors that watch for users that do not wish to contribute constructively. Also, there are editors like you that watch pages so as to ensure that articles are maintained properly. The conscientious editors will be able to maintain the encyclopedia. Thanks for all your help and keep up the good work. Tiderolls 22:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Ta
Thanks for reverting that edit to my userpage :), looks like my bot's getting me into trouble ;) - Kingpin13 (talk) 13:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ha! I had to check the edit to make sure you were joking. You're welcome, of course. You must be busy...haven't seen you on recent changes lately. Hope you're doing well...see ya 'round Tiderolls 13:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Reply
Not a problem. Anything for a fellow vandalism fighting partner. I must admit, you've beaten me to about seven reverts in the last hour already ;). Oh, and if he had asked me I would have said....let me think about this first....okay, no!--Sky Attacker Here comes the bird! 21:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- I ran a registry clean-up program and it has made a difference in proceesing speed. Almost 800 registry errors :o\ ....is that a lot? lol Tiderolls 21:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
You are nominated!
- Good. Hey, did you see the game? I hate PPV games. See you at the RfA--if you accept. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
<--Wow, Javert...that means a lot to me. However, I can imagine the oppose comments and I have nothing to counter them. I will not be accepting on this go-round. However, when I feel that I am ready I will definitely come to you for support! See ya 'round Tiderolls 21:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I respect your decision of course, but please drop me a line when you reconsider. :) Regards, Javért ☆ 21:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- And when you re-consider your decision, please, notify the other users on the RfA ASAP, so that they would be aware of such conditions.--BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 (talk) 03:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Revert
Thanks for that revert on my userpage. In addition, when I've been vandal-fighting the last few days, the person I've edit-conflicted the most with has been you! Keep up the good work. Best. Acalamari 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- It's reassuring seeing your name on the reverts while I'm watching recent changes. Always good having help...and you're welcome, btw. I know you'd do it for me, if you haven't already. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Much appreciated! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Protection?
Given the vandalism of your talk page tonight, would you like me to temporarily semi-protect it? If so, let me know on my talk page. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern, Kralizec, but I'm signing off soon and those "editors" will move on to greener pastures. Thanks for all your help at AIV. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!!
I'm so glad that you fixed my talk page! In all my interactions with you, you've been a great example, and I really appreciate all the help you give. Thank you again, Saebjorn! 04:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind words. I'm always glad to help with vandalized pages. I'm sure you are capable of watching after your page, but I didn't know if you would be around to fix it. Thanks for letting me know I didn't transgress. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Do I Know You?
Tide Rolls just shot up a red flag for me (no pun intended...haha). The names David Alphin and I noticed that you reverted vandalism on the Pinecrest High School Wiki page. I'm wondering if I know you, or someone related to you. Currently a senior there. If you want, you can continue this discussion on my talk page. :D Cheers. Oh, and Roll Tide Roll!!! GO BAMA!! :) ArmoredPersonel (talk)
- The Pinecrest edit was a coincidence as I usually watch the recent changes page looking for vandalism. I'm glad you watch the school's page because we need all the help available from conscientious editors. I actually live in Alabama and, as far as I know, have no connection to North Carolina. I do appreciate the "Roll Tide"...very neighborly. Nice to meet ya....see ya 'round Tiderolls 00:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hah. My dad went to Alabama and he was born there as well. Reason I asked was a friend of mine, his brother goes to Alabama. So seeing Tide Rolls on the PCHS page said to me, "oh, maybe that's him." Haha. Been a fan of Alabama since I was a little kid, so go Bama! :D ArmoredPersonel (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Ironic that a sock puppet would do that huh?
Ironic that a sock puppet would do that huh? Only one edit. Ikip (talk) 00:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah...the red linked talk page kinda told me something might be amiss. Tiderolls 00:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- When I executed my revert I was not aware of this. My use of rollback might have been misapplied in this instance, but I took note of the admin userbox and pulled the trigger. Anyway, the matter seems resolved, as far as the user page is concerned at least. Regards Tiderolls 11:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User page. Much appreciated... ttonyb (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Thanks for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Damn
Trying to beat you is like worse than trying to beat Cluebot :P. Soxwon (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pffttt...whatever...I'm recovering from the flu and I'm making manual undos with edit summaries. There's no way I can outrun a seasoned pro. Keep up the good work :) Tiderolls 05:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Your RfA page
Notification will be posted. Would you like to do so?--BoeingRuleOfThe9th-700 (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure what that means. I notice the page link no longer exists. I have considered the nomination closed since I posted my regrets on your page. If I knew a bit more about the subject I could probably offer an opinion. I hope things are going well for you. Regards Tiderolls 18:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tide Rolls! Last night you and I were using Huggle at the same time and were reviewing and reverting many of the same edits. Sometimes your reversions would get in before mine and vice versa. Yet, I also noticed that Huggle would occasionally put both of our warnings on an anon’s talk page even though, of course, there had only been one reversion. In those cases, I reverted the warning issued under my name leaving yours, regardless of to which of us Huggle attributed the reversion, since WP’s rules do not permit the deletion of another editor’s edits from talk pages. (See here for an example.) 
Question: Is this a common occurrence with Huggle? If so, how do you deal with it? Thanks! (P.S. Please answer here since I will have your page watchlisted.) — Spike (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, Spike. I've experienced quite a few minor glitches with HG, but this is the first instance of double warnings. I find this one particularly worrisome and will check on the HG talk page. I'm at work presently so it will be a few hours before I will be able to address the issue. I'll keep you in the loop if anything turns up. I would have no problems with you refactoring any of my warnings, though, as long as you would be so kind as to let me know the situation. For some reverts I may choose to leave no warning (a random smiley face or character left on a page) hoping the user was just on a lark and my warning may only antagonize them into further action. Purely a personal choice. But, two warnings for the same edit would make anyone mad. I'll be sure to check the talk pages so that the risk of two warnings will be minimized. Thanks for bringing this to my attention and I appreciate the help on working the recent changes. See ya 'round Tiderolls 17:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with your analysis. It could be annoying to receive two notices for the same edit. But then, should we really care about annoying a vandalizing anon? Also, there was one instance last night where HG reverted an edit and placed a warning, and then subsequently reverted, for you, a different edit for the same article and placed a second, elevated warning on the anon’s talk page. In that instance, it was two separate acts of vandalism, but to the same article, so HG’s actions would seem appropriate. The other instances to which I was referring above, were two separate warnings, but at the same level, for the same edit where only your, or my, revert actually occurred. The fact that it happened more than once to you and I might suggest either that we work at roughly the same speed, and/or that we were the only ones Huggling! Oh, and by the way, I do not use HG exclusively. If, while using HG, I come across blatant vandalism, I might then manually search that anon’s other edits for the day and see if s/he has been doing it elsewhere and then manually revert and manually warn. — Spike (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nope...I have no pangs of conscience regarding the feelings of anyone that has no interest in contributing constructively. While watching recent changes, I come accross many changes that need to be made that would either be rude to Huggle or downright prohibited by policy to Huggle. Those I perform manually as you describe. Regards Tiderolls 17:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Rolls! I have a couple of Huggle questions for you:
- When I press the history button, nothing happens. How do I get the History for an article?
- If I could get the history, how then could I use rollback to edit all of an editor's edits?
Thanks! — Spike (talk) 01:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have resorted to having three or four Wikipedia tabs open to access article history. I first started using HG a couple of versions ago and the "history" button was too slow to be of use to me. When you strike the rollback button, though, that will rollback all the user's edits. If there have been intermediate edits that may have missed something, I "blue button" back until I find the last "correct" version and strike the "rollback with no warning" button (as some of the edits may have been trying to fix the vandalism and I do not want to warn an innocent party). You may also have to go back and re-insert edits that were legit. You can always go back and warn the user that inserted the vandalism. If I've missed the point of your inquiry, let me know. See ya 'round Tiderolls 10:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- You’ve been very patient with my HG questions. Such patience will be your eventual downfall! ’Cause now I have another questions for you:
Question: Is there a way from within HG to go to a specific page rather than the one that it is presenting to you? The reason that I ask is that sometimes I come across vandalism that I would prefer to use HG to deal with rather than do manually. Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk) 22:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- You’ve been very patient with my HG questions. Such patience will be your eventual downfall! ’Cause now I have another questions for you:
- I copy and paste the article title into the title box at the top of the HG page and hit enter. Works like a charm. As far as questions go, that's how I learned as well. Don't worry, I'll be coming to you for help. That's how we get things accomplished. Depend on each other. Regards Tiderolls 00:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I’ve tried that, or at least I think I have. I put the name in the little box below Browser and Help, the box immediately to the right of Page. I then press <enter>, but nothing happens. Hmmm … Btw, I can’t imagine there’ll ever be anything you’ll need help from me on! — SpikeToronto (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I can't think of any reason that wouldn't work. Unless there is some difference in the way we have our HG configured. Mine is all default settings, I have not changed any settings since download. See, I don't know everything...alas. You can always post on the HG feedback page. I've found lots of smart folks there. Tiderolls 06:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Smarter than you?! I somehow cannot imagine that to be possible! :) I’ll try it again. I must have done something wrong … er … stupid. Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
I got it to work! It finally started going to wherever I typed in the Page box. Thanks again! SpikeToronto 06:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
"new" user
Hi tiderolls, You saw my anonymous edit/vandalism correction over at "String Theory." Thanks for the message. I have had this account for a while already, but I'm not much of consistent editor. Maybe I could become one though. Any tips?Mullin.mm (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Everyone has different interests so I have little to offer in the way of tips. I just hope that you find something that holds your interest here. There is always a need for editors that care about the way facts are presented in Wikipedia. There are very many tasks that are necessary...it should be easy for you to find one (or more) that pique your interest. One place to start may be here. It's a list of projects that are active on Wikipedia. There are many links at the community portal that lead to help pages and tasks that need to be done. I hope this will help you in some small way. Thanks for your kind reply and I wish you well Tiderolls 00:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
My edit is satire, but constructive.
I actually was the prom king of my school, and everyone finds the addition to the page both funny, and acceptible seeing as how it ISN'T slander. There is no reason to keep reverting it, seeing as how the edit doesn't offend anyone.
- "...everyone finds the addition to the page both funny, and acceptible... It's my opinion that your estimate is a bit high. If you'd like a third opinion, feel free to check with any of the administrators listed here. Regards Tiderolls 10:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring my pages
Cheers. I appreciate it. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 02:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure you're capable of maintinaing your own page. I just didn't know when you might log on again. Thanks for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think it help to instantly respond to vandalism. A United front. Happy hunting and good editing. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 02:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Opinion
I'm sorry that I want to take a hammer to that terrorist's head until his brain is nothing but a fine, pink mist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.75.18 (talk • contribs)
- Is there a reason you’re not reverting this vandalism and putting a warning on his/her talk page? I’d be honored to do so for you … — Spike (talk) 04:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nice
Been awhile since I've seen a direct request for a ban [1]. I'm just looking up the right template, and I'll grant it. -- Pakaran 01:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Slow-poke...j/k. Are you serious? There's a template for self-request block? wow Tiderolls 01:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't actually think so, but I did see the rather cute thing near the bottom of User_talk:24.118.99.21. -- Pakaran 01:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Protect?
Does the Youkilis page deserve a semi-protect from IPs, at least through the Red Sox participation in the playoffs? There has been a lot of IP vandalism (including the 3 vandal edits today by the user who had been warned before many times, and got off with a warning again just now). Tx for considering it.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Protection would certainly not hurt. The edits I've seen have mostly been drive-bys and not that serious, though. If you're requesting my involvement, I must let you know that I'm not an admin. Regards Tiderolls 02:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. Sorry. Thought you were! Would you know how I would go about requesting that? Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- No worries..I'm flattered. Asking an admin is not a bad idea. You may get faster results making your request here. Good luck Tiderolls 02:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- No worries..I'm flattered. Asking an admin is not a bad idea. You may get faster results making your request here. Good luck Tiderolls 02:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
I made the request there at [2]. Thanks again. And feel free to leave your thoughts (with whatever modification you may have in mind-- I may not have been that artful in the way I worded it). Best, --Epeefleche (talk) 02:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page.--SKATER Speak. 20:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Always glad to help. Thanks for letting me know that I didn't overstep. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't trying to Vandalize...
Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emoticons#Western
I had added the definition of a--hat to the emoticon <3. It was a subject of discussion and confusion between a few friends and we thought it would be good to document. Please pardon my multiple attempts to edit - I was still learning proper etiquette on Wikipedia. It was not an attempt to vandalize. So sorry, and please forgive.
IsThereAnyUniqueUserNameInThisDatabase (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I will gladly take you at your word. I reverted your edit due to the fact it was commentary and appeared to be graffiti. Article mainspace is not to be used for messaging. Regards Tiderolls 23:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. The original edit was to include the phrase 'a--hat' to the definition, and without immediately understanding how the etiquette works, I thought it the only way to convey my true intent. Won't happen again - and thank you.
- By the way, was my original submission inappropriate because of language, or was it just that it was my first edit?
- IsThereAnyUniqueUserNameInThisDatabase (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware that this symbol was used to mean "asshat." Do you have a reliable source to verify it? There are lots of newspaper and magazine articles about emoticons; is this meaning mentioned in any of them? Personally, I reverted it because I didn't think it was a legitimate usage, but if I'm incorrect, I'd be open to changing my mind. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- IsThereAnyUniqueUserNameInThisDatabase (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Once again you reverted vandalism to my userspace. You are a vandal-fighting machine.--Sky Attacker Here comes the bird! 02:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| To Tide rolls for consistent anti-vandalism efforts. Keep it going!--Sky Attacker Here comes the bird! 02:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC) |
You have been been rewarded Wikipedian of the Day!
Note: Add {{User:Impala2009/Wikipedian of the.../UBX WOTD|October 1, 2009}} to your userpage to identify you as a Wikipedian of the Day!
Happy editing! Chevy Impala 2009 (Sign me!) 21:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for editing my talk page. I love you youa re better than User:SMC. 75.141.100.115 (talk) 22:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Cripes~!
Yo! First off, you have been thanked by a confirmed vandal (75.141.100.115). Second, appreciate your quick response on my page, sure helped me chalked up another two notches! =P --Dave1185 (talk) 22:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it's always good to be politely messaged. You're welcome for the reversion...I'm glad you let me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
why revert my edit
why revert my edit to a talk page? completely uncalled for really eh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.154.136 (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I still don't understand
How do you make one of those complicated signatures? Like the ones made by Midnight Comet, as an example.--7107delicious (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Midnight Comet's sig is one that's too complicated for me to understand. I would copy and paste the mark-up onto a sandbox and experiment until it displayed correctly. That's how I came up with mine. I'm not technically proficient with regards wiki mark-up. Regards Tiderolls 14:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Well, thanks anyway. Wonder how he made that type of signature...--7107delicious | ngopi di Warung Cinere, yuukk... 14:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award | |
| For tireless and thankless work in helping to keep Wikipedia vandalism-free! Alan (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks, Alan. Recognition from someone that puts forth the effort you do is high praise. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Did I ever pin one of those on your lapel? I apologize--you deserve an anti-vandalism star in the Huntsville walk of fame. Which reminds me: are you ready for tomorrow? Are you going to sub for Hightower? I predict the people's ovation and fame forever for Julio Jones. Woohoo! Roll Tide! Drmies (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Leonardo's inventions
You recently reverted a vandalism at this page. The problem is that there were three separate edits which all needed reverting. You only changed one of them, leaving some text deleted from the intro etc. This type of reversion, while good in itself, can make a problem worse rather than better because people presume the job has been done and don't look further. This is particularly the case when some material has been deleted. One third of Fra Angelico's life went missing for about six months until I did a complete read of it (which I do periodically to articles that I've written) because the deletion was buried by a later edit. Before reverting, please check back to the last reliable edit. Amandajm (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your polite message. In an attempt to set your mind at ease I'll let you know that I do check back from the edits I revert. If I see that I have reverted to a version that was last edited by an editor I recognize, I usually do not check earlier versions. In this instance I overlooked a missing period which would've let me know something was amiss. In looking back now I don't think I would've replaced the missing text; I would've considered that a content issue. Yes, we can all improve our efforts here and, no, none of us will ever reach one hundred percent accuracy in our editing. That in mind, I do feel that I am making a positive contribution to the project. Thanks again for your thoughts on the matter and I hope you will feel free to come here anytime to share. Regards Tiderolls 01:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, there was, a few months back, a particularly insidious vandal attacking architectural pages. It was hard to spot because it all appeared to be in good faith, and when other editors recognised and corrected alterations, he actually thanked them with a great show of courtesy. One of the things he did was rip through the Castle page and delete every reference to Italy, including a list of Italian architects. He replaced "Italy" with "Spain" and inserted unwarranted slabs of info about Spanish building, so that where a couple of brief examples were given to illustrate a point, it was replaced by a detailed description of a specific building that interrupted the text and did not illustrate the point. He also made other subtle changes that are hard to pick up. It was all very very cleverly done and must have taken quite a bit of time to thoroughly sabotage a good article. I don't watch Castle. Perhaps I should check its current balance! Amandajm (talk) 02:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, having dedicated editors watching articles is invaluable. I am mostly watching recent changes and am constrained by Huggle rules to confine my reversions to blatant vandalism. I know that I miss much in the way of users playing with facts in an effort to sabotage articles and the project in general. I have ventured into fixing articles by supplying references and addressing cite tags, etc. I find that work most rewarding but there are folks (such as yourself) much more qualified for the substantive contributions. It makes a difference knowing that there are editors watching articles and catching the changes that I miss. Thanks for all your efforts. Tiderolls 02:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Appreciate the revert on my user page. Nice that I could return the favor! Jusdafax 04:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
RE : seeking your input
Probably someone trying to use some leverage on a closed arbitration case/remedies in which I clerked, and pretty well exaggerated. Feel free to ignore and revert. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)