Jump to content

User talk:Timeagain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image tagging for Image:Powerwheels-digger.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Powerwheels-digger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

i am a representative of fisher-price wanting to add images of our toys to our brand pages. i added Snorky-1960.gif to the Little People page today. what license designation should i use for images such as our toys and our brand logo? Timeagain 16:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commons:Commons:Licencing is a description of the free use licences you can use for images you own the copyright for. Note that images on Wikipedia have to be licenced to allow distribution and modification (creation of derivative works) to anything by anyone, which you might not be willing to do. You can look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to discover the coding for an unusual licence that isn't listed in the drop-down box, or use a licence under 'self-made' from the drop-down box. As for your brand logo, in practice companies never licence those as free-use, but you might be able to put in an argument to demonstrate it to be fair use; see the fair use criteria. Hope that helps! --ais523 16:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest[edit]

Based on your assertion above, it appears that you should not be making edits to pages related to Fisher-Price. See this guideline for additional details. HokieRNB 21:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:FP LP Character Logo 4C 350.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FP LP Character Logo 4C 350.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Only previously published images are acceptable under Wikipedia fair use. This logo doesn't match the LP logo from fisher-price.com. Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate paid editing on Wikipedia by Intrapromote[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.


Accounts

Probable:

Possible:


Additional domains


See these edits in search engine optimization directories

--A. B. (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Articles edited by likely client

Daniel E. Bosley:

oceanbridges.com:

Donald Gardner:

EHarmony:

Honda/Acura:

BattleAgainstBald:

Road & Travel Magazine:

satimagingcorp.com:

Four Seasons Hotels:


Toys (at least two different clients -- Fisher-Price and Radica)

Health (JournalWatch + other healthcare clients)

Reference

--A. B. (talk) 19:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timeagain&oldid=1085572040"