User talk:Tkech

Filthy Thirteen

To answer your question, that was my soul source. I am sure there are others but this book seems to be the definitive source.

Feel free to add or edit the article as you see fit.

Piercetp (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

OH, and I will look for more information. Please give me a little time to do so. Piercetp (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1632 writers

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1632 writers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 writers. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

1632 deletion list

You said you wanted a list of the 1632 articles that are being deleted on the 1632 places deletion discussion. I have been keeping one on the Alternate History WikiProject talk page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternate History/Archive 1#1632 Series AFD Notices. Hope that helps. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Gazette articles

Restored here

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette IV

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette V

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette VI

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette VII

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette X

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette XIV

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette XV

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette XVI

You may want to read WP:Userfy for details about what is allowed in userspace (this should be fine, although that doesn't mean they are immune from re-deletion). Let me know if I can do anything else to help. Best Regards. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

1632 writers

1632 writers was closed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1632 writers as a redirect. Talk with User:Spartaz as he did the redirect here. Otherwise, I think I listed everything I know of here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: the Ship Who Sang

I don't quite understand what 'please post on discussion page' is supposed to mean. Post what there? The sentence I removed is irrelevant, partly because fans of pretty much anything tend to use internal-fandom phrasing. It could be that noteable people used the phrase, but then in that case, it needs citations. Lots42 (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Citing Wikipedia

You are correct, of course, about neither citing, nor using otherwise uncited material from Wikipedia. I do not seem to be able to locate a pure [[WP:NAME]] however. WP:RELY may have what you want "somewhere" but I couldn't pin down a specific page.

Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference because it is tertiary, not secondary, as needed for important or controversial material. We cannot cite Britannica or an Almanac for the same reason (done for non-controversial material or even uncited for that matter!).

The material itself can be brought over with imbedded references and used that way, but should give attribution about importing. "Taken from article ...."

But I cannot write an article about "Student7" saying that "everyone thinks he is the best guy in the world" (uncited!  :) then, reference that article in yet another article saying the same thing! bs piled on bs!

I occasionally notice well-referenced material someplace and import it to another article. But not unreferenced unless it seems non-controversial or maybe the illusive "common knowledge."

Sorry I couldn't be more precise. Good luck! Student7 (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Notes for myself, I can never seem to find my way to WP manuals etc.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fancruft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28writing_about_fiction%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:H.P._Lovecraft#

St. Gregory

Well, I found one cite there and downgraded the tag to "needs more refs." People will leave the section. It has been there awhile and seems non-controversial.

But thanks for the thought! Student7 (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, that was wrong. They just erased it! Student7 (talk) 01:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Zombie

I noticed you've edited the Zombie entry and thought you should be aware of this new documentary on Haitian zombies. Ethnobotanist Wade Davis, author of 'The Serpent and the Rainbow,' is interviewed throughout. I think it could be helpful in the "Zombies in Voodoo" section as a reference. CorridorX (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette IV listed for deletion

Tkech, I'm listing all the Grantville Gazette pieces you have had in your userspace for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tkech/Grantville Gazette IV. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tkech. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tkech. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tkech. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Runaway Pond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Kickboxing reference in ‘One Night in Bangkok’

The song’s official music video makes it very clear that the “kicks above the waistline” line definitely refers directly to kickboxing. Immediately after Murray Head utters this phrase, at two minutes into the video, a scene depicting men practicing Muay Thai appears. — 108.39.42.73 (talk) 01:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

The Girl from Hollywood

Hi, when you have time, can you check a recent date change to the above article? Thanks, Denisarona (talk) 12:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. I was bit afraid to delete their edit as I don't know anything about the subject. Denisarona (talk) 09:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Again, thanks. Enjoy!! Denisarona (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercedes Lackey bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cody Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)