User talk:TooHuge

Regarding edits made during January 7 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hungary. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. John254 04:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greensborough College, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Greensborough College was changed by TooHuge (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-13T03:36:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Greensborough College, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chasingsol^(talk) 03:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Craigieburn, Victoria, you will be blocked from editing. Melburnian (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Jimmy Savile, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. We know what you're trying to say, but if you haven't any evidence, just don't say it. --Rodhullandemu 03:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Sasha Grey. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Sasha Grey, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 2 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Andrew Demetriou. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. The-Pope (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Kathrine Knight

Please provide evidence there were two meals. Please explain the phrase "he police". And most of all please do not deliberately provoke me. The other vandal has copped a TOS complaint to their ISP. Your actions are not substantially different. MartinSFSA (talk) 08:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Any issues with what's written? READ THE REFERENCE WHICH WAS ALREADY PROVIDED!

Yes; if you don't want to see it reverted you add the cite to the relevant passage. The way you may have noticed other people do. MartinSFSA (talk) 06:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I haven't been banned, and nor will I be. MartinSFSA (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Civility

Please don't make uncivil comments, as you did at Suer talk:MartinSFSA. While I realise that you seem to have been in a dispute with this editor, remaining civil is important here, and personal attacks can lead to sanctions. - Bilby (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Naomi Robson, you will be blocked from editing. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muttiah Muralitharan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Chanaka L (talk) 04:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

February 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Water memory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)