User talk:TriiipleThreat/Archive 5

Dredd Video Clip -> Here

Hey T to the Trizzle, I wanted to add a clip to the Dredd page to demonstrate the Slo-Mo effect including the color satuation and underlying theme of the people tkaing the drug because it makes the world more beautiful and such. I added a few clips to the talk page but noone is participating, was wondering if when you had time you could take a look at them, see what you think? If you've seen the film I could also use the ending slo-mo scene, I'm just not clear on how gory you can have a clip and while to me it isn't gory, I know that to others all that blood would be. I got a job so won't have as much free time and Id like to try and take it to FA as soon as Prometheus and Arkham City either pass or fail. Thanks for reading. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy new year to you too. I think a clip is important in this case because if you say slo-mo, you might think of Matrix style bullet time, but as far as I'm aware this is a unique film use of extreme slow motion, nature show style video capture with complete colour saturation and other effects and it is intended to (paraphrase) "make excessive violent appear beautiful". So I think it is a good case for Fair Use, IMO.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, tried to move CAp to see if I could do it, sometimes I seem to be able to move over a redirect and sometimes not. For some reason its adding Wikipedia to the start of it. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Can I ask for your informed input Talk:Dredd#Poll: value of crediting unnamed characters when you have a moment. uKer is causing me untold grief again over a non-issue because I undid his edit where he removed some of the cast because he doesn't believe they are important (He initially thought they were completely separate characters and oh god, the discussion has gone on and on) or he's alternatively argued they aren't explicitly named in the film even if they're named in the credits. He's trying to argue they are indiscriminate and I think they are far from it, they have names, they are in scenes involving main characters, they have dialog, they're not "Diner #1", the actors were fine for months until he decided he didnt know who they were. I mean Jaspet Sitwell doesn't do anything in Avengers, I didn't even know who he was, but I wouldn't try and argue against his inclusion.

Honestly he's just depressing me, do you get this many ignorant and unrelenting people on the articles you edit? I always seem to get them and its over such a minor issue that has no policy support that I can see but he just keeps coming back with another excuse to prolong it. I need to just go into full retirement I think. Can't take these people anymore. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WP:PROTAGONIST

I just spotted that you referred to this in an edit summary, and thought you may like to know that the guideline has been WP:BOLDly changed and any reference to the usage of protagonist and the like is no longer mentioned! There was a discussion a couple of months ago, which died out. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Dying Wish

The ending of 50-years of continuous publishing of The Amazing Spider-Man and starting The Superior Spider-Man establishes real world notability for the new Dying Wish article. Please help me expand it. Thank you!! Spidey104 02:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

SS in the MCU films

Sebastian Stan is in both Captain America: The First Avenger and Captain America: The Winter Soldier, he also sign for multiple films in the MCU. Lg16spears (talk) 17:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, he is in multiple films but has yet to cast in multiple franchises.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Mind MGMT

I'm hoping to get this article up to GA or better quality, and any help or suggestions you could give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Argento Surfer (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I have plans to add its position on "Best of 2012" lists soon. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Captain America: The Winter Soldier

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Man of Steel

I've noticed the supreme research and dedication you devote to numerous superhero film articles on the site. I'm wondering if you could provide Man of Steel with similar dedication. RAP (talk) 20:10 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. My plate is pretty full right now, but I might give it a shot later. In the meantime, I suggest using the resources at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Comic book films task force#Resources for development news. Many of the sites have tags to help you comb through backstories.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Half Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting your edit on List of Avengers members. I appreciate your productive editing, and your cooperation with others who hold an opposing viewpoint! Fortdj33 (talk) 01:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betty Ross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Chris Claremont photo

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the discussion on whether to include a 1990s photograph of Chris Claremont in his article? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice

As a veteran WikiProject Comics editor, you're invited to a discussion at Talk:Marvel ReEvolution#Merger proposal. --Tenebrae (talk) 10:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Comics characters: F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asgardian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

The Hangover 2

Hi, I added a change to The Hangover 2 page. The name of an actor, Brody Stevens, appearing in the film was removed. I understand that the amount of screen time is limited. But, this is a prominant role in the film, widely discussed in the media. Stevens is also a well known comedian, so the performance almost works as a guest spot. Would it be more appropriate to add his name in a different section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christie Bell (talk • contribs) 13:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Notability is determined by coverage in reliable sources. If his role was widely discussed in the media, please readd it back with the appropriate references.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Issue template

I'm not sure we need the issue template after every paragraph there, so I reverted it. If it's that much of an issue, maybe discuss it on the talk page? That many templates clutters the article. –TCN7JM 23:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

I think you got the wrong person.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

It showed you as doing this once, but I found out that it was mainly an IP. You're fine, I already discussed it with the IP. –TCN7JM 03:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Red tabloid

Hi. Would you part me some time to explain what did you mean by "tabloid" while doing this revert? KP is a newspaper from Moldova. Gikü (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Komsomolskaya Pravda is a tabloid, not a reliable source.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

So what RS should I search for to reference the info? That thing really happened and KP seems to be the only online resource to have it published. Gikü (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Just because it happened, doesn't make it notable. If it were truly notable a RS would pick it up. Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Marvel merge

Excellent work!~ With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 15:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Original Barnstar
		As a thanks for all the good work you do on Wikipedia!Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 19:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Guardians incubator

Hey, now that the Guardians incubator has 25 refs, do you think it's time to move it to mainspace? -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I think between 25-30 used refs, one can make the case that it exceedingly passes GNG in case it goes to AfD. Keep in mind, this is not a guarantee.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the input. I'll move it then. Cheers. -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on a photo in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Likewise, might you offer you opinion at this RfC and the various sections that followed it, the latest being "This discussion". The topics are whether we open with Publication history, and whether citation format should be consistent. --Tenebrae (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

List of MCU cast members

Hey, how long do you think we should wait before closing that peer review and starting up the FL nomination? -Fandraltastic (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

If there are no additional comments after a week, I would say its safe to close.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, it's been a week. I'll nominate it for FL status now if you're cool with that. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The nomination is now up. -Fandraltastic (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit war on Guardians of the Galaxy (film)

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Guardians of the Galaxy (film) .

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Guardians of the Galaxy (film) or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the concern, my last edit was a self-revert and am seeking resolution through discussion. Cheers.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

unrelated thing but didn't want to create a new section, I noticed that the various MCU articles that are GA are not listed as part of a Good Series like the [of the Caribbean] films are, how do we do this? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Per WP:GT, all articles included in a good topic must be of Good Article-quality or higher. MCU is still growing with new articles, so I doubt it can be considered also it makes it difficult when people create articles like Iron Man's armor (film) and include it in this topic.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

OK, nevermind then, thanks for the info. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Actually there is a three month grace period after the release of a new film, for example the James Bond films were left as a good topic while Skyfall was still developing. To get the MCU up to a good topic we would need to get the cast list up to FL, the main article up to GA, and the Marvel One-Shots page up to GA. I don't think we would have to include all the soundtracks and video games as long as we specify that the scope is the film series, although it would be nice to make those articles a bit better. -Fandraltastic (talk) 22:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Can we limit it to the feature films? I likewise foresee Marvel One-Shots being problematic.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I think so, yeah. I just looked through all of the current and former film series good topics and it looks like they only included the feature films. -Fandraltastic (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Red Dawn box office gross

Hey look man you don't know this so I'll inform you. The gross on box office mojo is wrong. BOM basically contradicts their own box office gross and here's the proof please click on it and carefully check all the information on this link(http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=reddawn10.htm). As you can see in their foreign box office gross summary it has given the box office gross for many countries however it has stated that the foreign boxoffice gross is n/a. The actual worldwide box office gross came near $50 million when I added all the numbers manually. The site is contradicting itself. This is not the only example. Foreign gross and total gross of may movies has been show wrong on BOM. Some exaqmples are Dredd(2012), Bullet to the head, Man with the iron fists and Safe haven. I don't know why it has started doing this. It's basically contradicting it's own results. Therefore this source that you have used does not qualify as a reliable source since it itself cotradicts it's own information. So I ask you again not use it. Boxoffice.com is however a much more reliable website since they update their box office figures regularly and their numbers are backed up by TheNumbers.com. Please do not use Box office mojo on the article again. I'm not using boxoffice.com because I personally interpret it as a reliable source, but because other users have proved to me that box office gross for some movies on Box office mojo is incorrect and therefore it does not qualify as a reliable source. KahnJohn27 (talk) 12:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Very well, but you don't need to fully cite the same reference twice.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I understand and thank you for understanding. KahnJohn27 (talk) 11:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Psylocke-20050603013519041.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Psylocke-20050603013519041.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Avengers awards

How is accessibility fine? Lady Lotus (talk) 00:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:ACCESSIBILITY, does not cover rows spanning multiple columns and vise-versa.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Iron Man's armors merge discussion

Wow, I've never been asked before to close a discussion! Is it permissible for someone who participated in that discussion like myself to close it? I see now that I forgot to sign my message in that discussion; I've just added it. Is this okay? Let me know. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Jack the Giant Slayer

Hello again Triiiple Threat. You recently reverted my edits at the above films. I don't know what you mean by imprperly formatted refs. First of all that is no reason to revert my edits. Also when you said cannot verify I think you should know that both the sources are reputable news websites. Boxoffice.com's budgets are somewhat inaccurate. Only BOM mentions the budget to be $195 million while all other sources state it to be $200 million. Either the budget of BOM is inaccurate or the budget of all other sources is inaccurate. The latter is completely impossible. Either way the budget difference is very small. So I can't understand why you reverted my edits. KahnJohn27 (talk) 03:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

If you see anythinh wrong in formatting of sources then please correct it. Also using multiple sources is always much more acceptable than using a single source. Instead of straight away reverting your edits I've formatted the budget as $190 - $200 million since no website can accurately confirm the budget of a film. Thank you. KahnJohn27 (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Lead sentence in The Avengers

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Talk:The Avengers (2012 film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iron Man Armor Merge

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Favre1fan93's talk page.
Message added 16:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics

Hello,

I removed your PROD tag on Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics because the article seems to be at least somewhat notable.

Uberaccount (talk) 21:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Mandarin

Hi there - I've noticed all the character work you have been doing. I have been having the hardest time keeping up with the Mandarin article, especially the "Films" section, since the film's European release. Could you help me keep an eye on it? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Disney issues

Hello, TriiipleThreat. I'm here to ask you for your assistance in resolving a few matters in some Disney articles. Below, I've provided links to the respective talk pages where the two main contentions are being discussed and a brief description of the issue at hand.

A. Issue #1 - Whether or not Disney Enterprises, Inc. exists as its own functioning entity, operating as the parent of The Walt Disney Studios but simultaneously as an active subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company.

B. Issue #2 - Whether the studios' distribution unit as a whole or one of that unit's specific film banners (e.g. Disney, Touchstone, etc.) should be identified as the distributor in the respective infobox parameter for all film releases.

I would greatly appreciate your input since neither discussion has gained any traction without there being disagreements and edit reversions erupting every now and then, hindering the chances of a consensus ever being reached. I'm also asking the same from other editors, in an effort to gather as much diverse opinions as possible, in the hopes of reaching a consensus that satisfies every editor's concern. Thank you, ~ Jedi94 (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thor: The Dark World Page Protection

Just wanted you to know that I just request semi-protection for Thor: The Dark World, as all the recent edits have just been IP vandals and myself, you and a few other editors just reverting them. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. title reverting

Please knock it off and use the discussion page. You should know better. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics

Corrected, apologies. The of merge targets is probably incomplete on Marvel Cinematic Universe Official Tie-In Comics, feel free to fix or just perform the merge then tag the resultant article for speedy deletion or poke me and I'll delete it. LFaraone 14:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Aw thanks friend! Lady Lotus (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

A request

Hello mate. You had once given a Good Article Barnstar for my contributions that helped in promoting The Avengers (2012) film to GA status. I want to make you a request. I contributed to List of Academy Awards for Walt Disney, which has been promoted to FL status. Is there a Featured List Barnstar too? If yes, can you present me with one.

The thing is I am going to retire now. I start going to my job after three says, and so I will no longer have time to edit Wikipedia. And before retiring it would make me proud to have a Featured List Barnstar. Thank you so much. Surge_Elec (talk) 09:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for presenting me with the barnstar. I am grateful. Now, I can retire happily. Surge_Elec (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for being so kind and presenting me with that Barnstar for FL status. I can retire happily now. Surge_Elec (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Iron Man in film

Dont get rid of my edit I made the Iron Man in film page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 14:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Dont delete my editing I made the Iron Man in film page. I can ban you from the page if you keep on doing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 14:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

There were numerous mistakes in your edits, including original research, adding non-free content without sufficient fair use rationale, over categorization and adding unsupported navboxes. Also do try and follow WP:BRD.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

...

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Favre1fan93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)

Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

organized by Wiki Project Med

On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

TreCoolGuy

I am kinda annoyed at his edits. Even though I don't mind articles like Iron Man in film and Captain America in film existing. I do wish they could be their own words not obvious copying and pasting from other parts of Wikipedia. Hopefully it will be sometime. Still waiting for that Hulk in film. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 18:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I just redirected Thor in film and thinking about PRODing Captiain America in film. Iron Man in film, was an exception because of its length and number of films. But the other two are not necessary especially Thor in film. It seems he thinks that Iron Man in film greenlit they way for every XXXX in film.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Yep that's my problem. Although Captain America does appear in quite a few films so I am not totally against it. Outside of that I think Hulk is the only one who needs it. He appeared in animated films the most and had three films along with a crossover cameo etc. At least three feature films should still be the extent. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 20:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

MCU continuity

Just curious. Does MCU have an official continuity thing going on with it. An MCU administrator on facebook is like we don't focus on video games on our page (yet the tv series counts in it) because they aren't official MCU continuity. Do you know anything about this? Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 22:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge, what we do have is RSs that say something is a part of it. In case of the video games, they are the ones that were marketed with the films, though Marvel Avengers: Battle for Earth is a stretch, and probably can be removed.-TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Iron Man and Hulk: Heroes United

Changing the subject of my previous comment. Instead I am surprised about not finding this on Wikipedia.

• http://screenrant.com/iron-man-hulk-heroes-united-trailer/
• http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/175289-cover-and-release-date-revealed-for-iron-man-and-hulk-heroes-united
• http://www.ign.com/movies/iron-man-hulk-heroes-united/blu-ray-144466 Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 23:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

That is weird. Well, you always be WP:BE BOLD.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Iron Man villains at navbox

I am having a discussion on deciding what villains belong on the Iron Man navbox and what doesn't. I invite you to join if you feel like it. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 15:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Have time on Saturday?

I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej (talk) 03:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Thor: The Dark World

I'm living in Austria and the film is coming 31. Octobre 2013 in german (and austrian) cinemas, so I'm the reference :D. (Sorry, for my not so excellent english.) H8149 (talk) 19:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia policy, all content must be verified by a reliable source. For how to write citations, see citing sources. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 19:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Avengers: Endless Wartime

Hey, do you think it's worth making an article for this graphic novel at this point? I've never made an article for a publication before, but there seem to be a bunch of sources and interviews about this, even though it doesn't come out until October. Stuff like this and this. -Fandraltastic (talk) 03:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

If you think there are enough sources to atleast create a decent stub, then I think so. The book is already in production, so that should settle any WP:CRYSTAL concerns. And you can argue that you plan to expand, once it is released.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. -Fandraltastic (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Falcon in Cap 2

Here's the link. It's page 3 of the article: http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/06/18/captain-america-the-winter-solider-anthony-mackie-falcon/3/

"Over the decades in comics, the backstory of the Falcon has been revised and retooled but in the Marvel Studios universe he is an agent of S.H.I.E.L.D., making him a professional peer of Black Widow and Hawkeye although his sense of duty makes him less cynical and closer to the salute-the-flag sensibility of Rogers."

I changed the description in the beginning from "A Harlem native" to "A SHIELD agent." Hope that clears it up. Richiekim (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!

	Great American Wiknic DC at Meridian Hill Park
	You are invited to the Great American Wiknic DC at the James Buchanan Memorial at Meridian Hill Park. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :)

Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.

Harej (talk) 15:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

World War Z

		The Original Barnstar
		Your bold contributions to World War Z amidst an unproductive discussion is very much appreciated. Keep up the great work! Erik (talk | contribs) 21:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

episode article

How good do you think you can do on creating tv series episodes or digging up some sources for it? Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 20:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Depends, what do you have in mind?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure you ever watched it...but The Spectacular Spider-Man tv series was off to a good start with having good articles on almost all their episode articles. See here on how far it went. Although the user who was making those articles then got less active so we never had it done complete. It still feels incomplete that we got almost all the episodes of season one have their own article but not the rest of season one and definitely season two. Can we hopefully fix this? Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 20:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I would try using the sources he used to find information for the remaining episodes. And try to emulate his style as much as possible.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh goodness. I agree. Although it does look hard by myself. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 21:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I really don't much about the show so I can't help much but remember there is WP:NORUSH. Work at your own pace, it'll get done eventually.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Infact you can start it in your own userspace until you are ready to take it live.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Personally it is one of my favorite superhero animated series. I am digging for sources on "Persona" right now. Some of those sources he used are dead now unfortunately so that doesn't help. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 21:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Avengers TreCoolGuy

Look if you look on Marvel's The Avengers - Trailers, Videos, and Reviews ComingSoon.net Movie Database you will clearly see that Paramount is listed as one of the studios that helped make the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 20:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes they are listed but did not work on the film. This is covered extensively in the article and the article's talk pages.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Why cant we put Paramount in Avengers its on every website it promotes the film and got box office money from Avengers — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 20:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Disney is contractually obligated to list Paramount. Wikipedia has no such obligations. Paramount did not distribute the film, Disney did.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Jack the Giant Slayer GA review

I began the GA review for Jack the Giant Slayer this morning. It looks largely solid, but some plagiarized text seems to have sneaked in early on; I'm not sure yet if this is a superficial problem or a deep one. Let me know your thoughts at the review page when you get a chance. -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avengers vs. X-Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Molina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:Jack

Could you please revisit Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fictional_characters#Template:Jack.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, July 13!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, July 13 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 00:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Thor

Thanks for correcting that in my impatience. I was on my way out the door but I knew I'd forget. Good work 24.191.232.2 (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

You're Invited: Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian

File:SAAM facade.jpg American Art Museum

Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian American Art Museum You're invited to the Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon, part of a series of edit-a-thons organized by the Smithsonian American Art Museum to add and expand articles about American art and artists on Wikipedia. This event will include a catered lunch and special tours of the Luce Foundation Center for American Art and the Lunder Conservation Center at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. 9:15 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2013 Smithsonian American Art Museum Meet at G Street Lobby (9th St. & G St. NW, Washington, D.C.) Capacity is limited, so please sign up today! If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from our distribution list. Message delivered by Dominic·t 03:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC).

Luce Foundation Center

Interview

It went really well — he's articulate, passionate about directing and really down-to-earth. I can't really send a transcript since that'd be jumping the gun on publication, but I did ask him about themes as you suggested, and I'll stay in touch with you about that! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Electro image

You have already seen that TobyMazhar's edits are not always helpful. Most of his edits seem to be in good faith, but he doesn't follow Wikipedia guidelines. Can you check out the Electro image he uploaded (File:TobyManElectro.jpg) to be sure it properly conforms to copyright standards? Thank you. Spidey104 00:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I reduced the image and cleaned up the FUR, however a bit more info about character's design in the Electro article could be useful to help justify its use.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

avengers 2

Dont get rid of Avengers 2 page I credited you for helping make the page that I got some information on — Preceding unsigned comment added by TreCoolGuy (talk • contribs) 20:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

YOUR WOLVERINE POSTER. PROTECT IT

YOUR WOLVERINE POSTER KEEPS GETTING CHANGED. PEOPLE ARE MESSING AND CHANGING IT. YOU SHOULD PROTECT IT. YOUR SHOULD HAVE A PROTECTIVE LOCK ON IT SO USERS CAN STOP CHANGING IT. THERE IS A EDITING WAR HAPPENING. THANK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.105.61.222 (talk) 06:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Vin Diesel - FYI

Hey TT. Just wanted you to know, that I have just added into my sand box, here, sources about Marvel requesting a meeting with Vin Diesel, and him reacting to it/dancing around the question. Not sure if anything will be said later at their Comic Con panel (I'm going to try to watch the live blog, but don't know if I'll be available), so if anything is, I wanted you to know that I have those for sourcing. Feel free to go in there and grab them. At the moment, this info doesn't really fit anywhere until we know what role it is for and for what film. (Saw your revert on the MCU page, hence this post.) - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reference, lets wait to see what film if any he will be involved.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Exactly. Just wanted you to know they were there, to grab them quickly if you need them. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Age of Ultron logo

The Newsarama page that was live blogging has the logo for the film. Can incubators have images? [1] - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, only free images are allowed in the incubator.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Drat. Okay. Well it's there and seems to be of good quality. Thanks for the info. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wolverine-Film-Teaser.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wolverine-Film-Teaser.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

You have a new message....

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Favre1fan93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work fostering The Avengers: Age of Ultron in its incubated state, so it would be good to go once it was moved in to the mainspace. Here's to more teamwork efforts on the page! Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Evans

Evans has a deal with Marvel to do four films! Including Avengers 2 thats the last film he's in! So technically he's confirmed to be in the film.

Yes he has deal but Marvel does not have to execute that deal. They can still replace him or not use the character.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Images from comic-con

Hey, great work uploading all the free images from comic-con. Did you happen to notice one with a good profile look at Frank Grillo? I think he's the only cast member to appear on one of the Marvel panels that we have 0 images of. Cheers -Fandraltastic (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Actually, I have seen one but the Flickr user hasn't responded to my request yet.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guardians of the Galaxy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gunn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender

Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, again. Sorry to bother you, but another photo (more like a new set of photos) has been found and uploaded, and added to the choices in the discussion. A new issue is which photo those who participated before that photo was added would have favored had they seen it, so I'm requesting that all those who did so view the photo and indicate whether or not their favored photo has changed. Thanks, I really appreciate. Nightscream (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Avengers: Age of Ultron

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Guardians in MCU cast table

Just thinking about this, and then I remembered Richiekim added this on ThorTDW page a little bit ago: [2] (1:37 in the video is the question, mention is at 2:14) Is this enough to go on for including del Toro in the table? Is it similar at all to how a set photo of Senator Stern was taken on the CapTWS set, confirming his involvement in the film, but the studio has not officially stated he was in the film? Or no rush? Wanted your thoughts, as this may solve our dilemma. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

That's right, he is in both. You can just the same ref in the Thor 2 article.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thor The Dark World poster

I noticed you uploaded the lastest poster with the caption "North American release poster". However this poster has a release date of October 30, which I'm assuming is the UK release date. The Entertainment Weekly poster has the NA release date. http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/9757/pdvr.jpg Richiekim (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Someone else changed the caption. I did see the date, I'm waiting for a good NA poster without a watermark to show up and I'll switch it again. Also is it just me or has the cache on the article not refreshed yet?--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Cache has not updated for me on my Mac, but the image is loading correctly when I go to the page on my iPhone. Also, have not found any NA posters without the watermark (as I'm sure you haven't either). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, dude! I didn't know it was you who made that edit at Cobie Smulders! If I had, my summary would have been friendlier and less cut-and-dry-just-the-facts-ma'am. You know how much I dig your work! --Tenebrae (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

No, its fine. The original edit was not mine. I removed it then self-reverted.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Has this page's cache updated for you yet? I'm still seeing the old poster. I tried purging the page the few times, as well as the image page, and had no luck. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

I can see it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 03:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

It's good for me too now as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:26, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Avengers 2 cast

How is he correct when the refs I gave clearly state that Jeremy Renner AND Scarlett Johannson will be in Avengers 2? Lady Lotus (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

The quoted portions of the article that the author is referencing only mentions the characters, the rest is just the author's speculation.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

"Whedon shared that Scarlett Johansson’s character would be heavily featured in the follow up to ‘The Avengers’" ... "Natasha is a huge part of the sequel because you do want to concentrate on the people who don’t have their own franchises. Although she's in [‘Captain America: The Winter Soldier’, and] she’s great" - Joss Whedon.

He talks about her being in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, which would be referring to Scarlett. I again don't see how this is just speculation? Lady Lotus (talk) 13:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

He is talking about the character "Natasha", only the author says Scarlett Johansson. He is making an assumption, though probably true.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Bah! If you were anyone else I'd continue to argue but I'll just wait patiently for a more solid source ;) Lady Lotus (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

You and me, both!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Second set of eyes

Hi Triiiple. I would very much appreciate if you could lend your knowledge and eyes to this edit that I did, and then the subsequent revert. I would like to know if you see any fault in my editing as I haven't had some good encounters of late with said reverting editor. A note here, or on my page, will be fine, or if you feel compelled to edit, by all means go ahead. Thank you so much. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll take a look into it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Just so you know, I don't mind if my formatting (with the headings and tables) is challenged. It is the other (what I considered) improvements I was mainly looking at. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, August 24!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, August 24 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 03:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Ant-Man (film)

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Ant-Man (film), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Ant-Man (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Ant-Man (film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Captain America: The First Avenger

Please visit the film's talk page and offer your version of the final sentence that will both include the already described scene and will mention it as part of the next film's teaser (which it actually is). Gevorg89 (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Vin Diesel as Groot

Why did you revert? It says right here http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Vin-Diesel-Confirms-He-Voicing-Groot-Marvel-Guardians-Galaxy-38981.html. I even provided it in the edit summary and text. It's a full fledged confirmation. Rusted AutoParts 02:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

It was a mistake, apologies.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kick-Ass 2 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hit-Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

DC Cinematic Universe

Hey ;3

The reason I brought that topic back, as due to the recent information we currently have of the sequel to Man of Steel being developed, not to mention it's date of release with that including The Flash and The Justice League and apparently a Wonder Woman film, not to mention the Lobo film that's in development. There is vastly much more information than there was, due to the reason for the topic being closed was lack of information, but there is plenty of it than there was in June. --Bartallen2 (talk) 11:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

There is still only one released film, thus far which is what counts. As of now there is no film series much less a "universe". Also the entire article seems to be based on WP:SYNTHESIS of different published reports. Even the title qualifies as WP:Original research.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Are you free on Wednesday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of Wednesday, August 24 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill ^[talk] 11:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Fast Five

This is neutral notice of a discussion concering the box-office section of Fast Five. Spinc5 (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Meet up with local Wikipedians on September 14!

Are you free on Saturday, September 14? If so, please join Wikimedia DC and local Wikipedians for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages are welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please visit the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill ^[talk] 18:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hello dear, could I get your input? Talk:Scarlett_Johansson#Awards_section, please and thank you :) Lady Lotus (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Awards

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring The Avengers (2012 film) (estimated annual readership: 5,058,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring The Dark Knight Rises (estimated annual readership: 4,530,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing The Avengers (2012 film) to Good Article status.

This editor won the Million Award for bringing The Dark Knight Rises to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

You're one of the few people to win two of these so far, btw. Well done! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you free next Thursday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next WikiSalon, which will be held from 7 to 9 PM on Thursday, September 5 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon is an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill ^[talk] 14:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wolverine-Film-Teaser.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wolverine-Film-Teaser.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Christopher Eccleston as Malekith.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Eccleston as Malekith.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ant-Man (film)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Since you've been gone...

Welcome back! Here are somethings that you missed that you may be interested in:

• TreCoolGuy ended up being a puppet master. Who knew? Here is the SPI discussion. "They" were blocked, although I'm not sure the lengths of each, so they may pop back up. He also vehemently denied it.
• Discussion regarding the proper name of Age of Ultron, as seen here. (Will expand below).
• Ant-Man was moved to the main space (as you must have known). I did some clean up, along with Richie, on the page, Ant-Man#Film and any other necessary pages. Worked to create the DYK with Fandral and Richie, which was discussed here and submitted here and then posted to the front page on 9/11 (as you must have known from the DYK template above this).
• Users still tried validating moving Groot and Rocket around on the Guardians page. Tried to quell any further changes here. It got really bad with the whole Vin Diesel thing, but it seems to now be confirmed.

That's about it. Obviously minor stuff, usual IP edits, the norm. If you come across anything in your viewing that I missed let me know. Now for AoU. In the discussion I posted, it has been proposed that the "Marvel's" and the "The" be taken out of the title, and in the lead. I'm hesitant, but looking at Marvel's revamped site, here, they only list it as "Avengers: Age of Ultron". And third-party sources are all inconsistent, using with and without the "The" and with and without the "Marvel's". As comparison, on the Marvel site, The Avengers is listed as "Marvel's The Avengers". So far, the official press release is the only one that seems to officially use both. Let me know what you think, or chime in on that discussion.

- Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hiddleston picture

Hey, what do you think about me switching out the infobox pic with the one in his awards section? The one in the infobox his eyes are all squinty and the one in the awards section shows his face better. Yes? Lady Lotus (talk) 16:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I'd say the current image is much more of a head shot but I'm not that particular so go for it, if you feel that that strongly about it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Lol ok thanks Lady Lotus (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Asgardia

Thanks -- I did some checking and was about to undo my edit, but then I saw that you'd already done it. Sorry about that; I really should've done my research before editing, but that really sounded like a mistake to me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

No problem.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hatnote vs in Lead - MCU

Just thinking about this, and if we decide to move all the hatnotes to the lead, what should the wording be? I was thinking that using "commonly called" for Thor DW and CapTWS would not really apply, because it's more a case of formerly known as. Would that wording work better, "formerly known as (name)" or maybe "formerly referred to as (name)"? Or can this wording be used in the hatnotes with either {{Hatnote}} or {{Redirect3}}? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I would say 'commonly called' is accurate as it is still being referred to as such in publications and in the vernacular. The hatenote template would work but I don't know if it is better there or in the lead.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you free next Thursday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next WikiSalon, which will be held from 7 to 9 PM on Thursday, September 26 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon is an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill ^[talk] 05:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Hulk Avengers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Hulk Avengers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Pictures

Hey, so the reason I put the Hemsworth pic with short hair and took down the other one was because I was told that that was the point of putting up different pictures was to show them with different hairstyles at different angles and what not and to not put a bunch of pictures up that all look the same. Otherwise it would be considered "decoration" and I was told that's a no no. Same reason I added those pics on Hiddlestons page, different hair/angles and whatnot. Now you're saying to NOT to do that and do the opposite, well now I'm just confused lol Lady Lotus (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

I added the image back. The thing I was getting at was cramming images in where they do not necessarily fit. Yes it good to have a variety of looks, but its not meant to be a gallery of haircuts. We don't need to include an image every time an actor slightly changes his/her hairstyle.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Archenemy

I disagree with a lot added in the Marvel Comics and DC Comics section and am worried that it consists of many original research. I invite your opinion on the discussion page if you feel like it. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 15:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Mass protection

Hey Triiiple. I've been thinking about what I'm about to propose to you for a while, and wanted your opinion. (I also don't know if this is possible.) I'm been thinking of requesting indefinite semi-protection for all pages related to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Is this a bit rash? For all the film pages, and even Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. now, any IP edits have been vandalism, unconstructive, or against previously gained consensus or policies. As all of these pages are high profile, I just keep seeing this as a budding problem. If this is possible, would I have enough to back up my request? Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Heh, as nice as that would be, it will never fly.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Like I said, I wasn't sure or if it had been done before. But it was a thought. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

So, I got the idea and process started, by going to Mark Arsten, who has been very helpful and accommodating to me, here. As you may have seen, he semi-protected most of the pages for a month, and said to go back to him once those have been lifted if vandalism continues, and he will reevaluate, which may lead to the pages getting indefinites. So it's a step! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm concerned that after awhile someone will challenge the infinite protection and the ones that really need it like the MCU article will be unprotected.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Well I will be sure to proceed and monitor cautiously, even bring it to multiple admins if I do. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Actually would it be possible to extend the protection for Thor: The Dark World since its about to be released and these pages are usually protected at release time anyway. Having it protected now through release would save us from having to go through it again later.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I had noticed that, and can approach Mark about that, stating that per trends on the other pages, once the protection goes down, someone will be requesting for it to be put up again. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

....and it has now been done. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

MTV Geek

Did you see this post? It appears MTV Geek is no more. The MCU pages should be checked to make sure if any use articles from them, they have been archived, in case they remove the info from their servers. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Good catch, that's why Im always saying to archive sources. Atleast it appears we still have MTV Splash Page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

The Hobbit release dates in infobox

Could you please view and comment on the explanation I've given for this edit you reverted earlier? Talk:The Hobbit (film series) Thanks! 82.139.86.180 (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice

Hey 3T, sorry to bother you, this is a neutral notice that a discussion in which you were previously involved at Dredd has been resurrected and requires outside input if you have the time. Thanks for reading. - Talk:Dredd#Assuming_fail.2C_versus_accepting_fail. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Jeremy Renner

There are multiple sources listing Renner as being in the cast of Avengers: Age of Ultron as Hawkeye. Remember, Wikipedia presents what our sources present, not what we think actually is (the latter is original research. Please also read WP:NOTTRUTH. —Locke Cole • t • c 21:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Take to Talk:The Avengers: Age of Ultron#Renner, also I would like to remind you that you are now at WP:3RR.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Are you free on Sunday? Join us for a special Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for a special WikiSalon at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library's Digital Commons Center. We will gather at 3 PM on Sunday, October 13, 2013 to discuss an important topic: what can Wikipedia and the DC area do to help each other? We hope to hear your thoughts and suggestions; if you have an idea you would like to pursue, please let us know and we will help!

Following the WikiSalon, we will be having dinner at a nearby restaurant, Ella's Wood Fired Pizza.

If you're interested in attending, please sign up at the event page. We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill ^[talk] 01:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Phil Coulson

I started a discussion on the talk page asking you to explain what you mean there. Please participate in it. JDDJS (talk) 03:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Watching

Don't know if you watch Tre's sandbox, but he is prepping a The Avengers (series) page, much like he has done with Iron Man and Cap. Same style, same everything. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Its his userspace so we can't do much about it but if he creates the article, just redirect it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

I know. I just wanted you to be aware that it may be forthcoming. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Superman/Wonder Woman

Nice job on the Superman/Wonder Woman article! I was gonna work on my draft of it (I created one in July...gosh, I'm lazy), then noticed you created it when I looked at my user page! (red links mysteriously turning blue...) Good job! || Tako (bother me) || 19:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Superman/Wonder Woman

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Infobox photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo would be better for the Rebecca Housel Infobox in this discussion? If you are unable to, I understand; you don't have to reply to this message. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel NOW!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Walsh and Garry Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Thor TDW

Hey. Just wanted you to know that I'm taking the page off my watchlist until after I have seen it, so I don't get it spoiled. Luckily, that heading on the talk page was info that we already know - somewhat. But if you need me for anything on the page, just let me know. I'll assist again once I've seen it, which will hopefully be on November 7. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll be too. I was hoping to get through the premiere though and adding any relevant that comes out of it.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

I know things got a little unsettled recently, and would like to apologize. I appreciate the work you do to keep gossip and rumor out of our articles. I feel like there's a chance we can reach a compromise in our debate, and perhaps my experience and understanding of our policies and guidelines would be useful. I would be happy to help you if you have any questions on what makes a good source, what qualifies as original research, and how we handle verifiability. If you have any questions or want to discuss further, please let me know. —Locke Cole • t • c 10:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Captain America The Winter Soldier.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Captain America The Winter Soldier.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

A (very belated) response...

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Favre1fan93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MCU stuff

A few quick things. Would the image on this site be acceptable to use on the One-Shot page? I was trying to figure what would be best to have on the page other than the Item 47 poster, but this was the only "logo" image, per se, I could find. Not sure how official, as the site does not seem to be the most reliable. If not at the moment, that's fine. Second, any desire still to try to get the main MCU page up to GA status? I'm still willing to get it set for a review. As well, I'm (tentatively) planning to take a wikibreak (or at least reduce my time on the site) probably from the end of November until after the new year, so if you want to do it before than, that'd be great. Otherwise, I can assist when I get back. Lastly, same question for Iron Man 3. Any plans to get that up to GA status either? Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

There's nothing indicating that it is an official logo, so I wouldn't us it. I still want to get the MCU to GA status but I keep getting sidetracked by other articles. I didn't have as much of a hand in the IM3 article, so I'm less familiar with it needs but I'll be happy to help out. If you want, we can just nominate the MCU article now and see how it pans out. And fix any concerns as they are brought up. But in my experience that is a very lengthy process, which you might not have time for.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay about the image. Had the suspicion, thus I came for your opinion. I'm not going to be "gone" completely, so I say we just go and nominate the MCU page. The only thing I'd say possibly to do, is flesh out the ThorTDW development section a bit. Otherwise I think it's good to go, until any issues come up in the review. And didn't realize you didn't have much of a hand in IM3, but that really isn't a priority, just wondering and something that can be done at a later time. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to submit the MCU page now for a review for GA status. I've given it a run through and correct a bit of stuff, so if you'd like to do the same, feel free too. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I hadn't noticed, I actually took it off my watchlist for the time being (worried about T:TDW spoilers) same with the list of MCU cast members.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh okay. No worries! You can give it a look when you readd them. Those have not been that bad in terms of spoilers. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thor

Will do. I guess it opens in England in another six, seven hours or so! --Tenebrae (talk) 04:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Good planning ahead — it's the IPs that always cause problems with a newly released superhero film. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marvel Cinematic Universe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• were just cross-pollinating our superheroes. It happens to be a scene where I basically approach [actor [[William Hurt]]'s character General Ross, and we may be considering going into some sort of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Ditko

Hi, Triiiple T. Just a neutral notice to a fellow Comics Project member that you might want to keep an eye on the Steve Ditko article. With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 23:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Seems Nightscream is already involved but I'll watch the page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ms. Marvel (Kamala Khan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain Marvel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

GotG Diesel

Hey Triiiple. Was wondering if you saw (or could look), at my proposed statement on the GotG talk page here, regarding Vin Diesel. Looking at the most recent MTV source regarding the Collector in ThorTDW, he is still not confirmed, contrary to what he has been saying. Please let me know, or comment there, if you think what I added at the bottom of that section is a good compromise. Also, I have seen ThorTDW, so I will be editing there once again. Notice since I stopped, that a lot of ref archiving needs to be done. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 07:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Thor: TDW

Not at all! And thanks for the kind words! --Tenebrae (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Ms. Marvel (Kamala Khan) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Matty.007 17:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

IMdB

Regarding this, I find it surprising that you think "we don't use IMDb as a reference." In fact, we do, although its use as I did for credits is disputed. I request that you self-revert and initiate a discussion on the article's talk page.--~TPW 18:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

IMDb is most certainly a source we don't use regarding casting and orders, per taking WP:Citing IMDb a step further for our specific WikiProject, here. That is the guideline followed for films, and has been followed on Thor (film). Triiiple was not in error in reverting your edits. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ms. Marvel (Kamala Khan)

Allen3 ^talk 16:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Film notability

Let me ask you a question, what qualifies a film to have it's own wikipage before it even goes into principle photography like the new Avengers? It's against WP:CBALL but it has it's own page now. The new Guillermo Del Toro film Crimson Peak is literally set to start filming in February, they already have it set up with Legendary Pictures to start shooting, they even have the house set up that they are going to use. So is that enough to publish the page or do I need to wait until they actually start filming? Lady Lotus (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

What it takes is "significant coverage" by reliable sources as described by WP:GNG. Now what qualifies as significant coverage is debatable. To play it safe because of WP:NFF, that usually means more than the normal amount of significant coverage that any other article might need. Articles like The Avengers: Age of Ultron are meant to be exceptions to the rule, so they should theoretically be pretty rare but not impossible. If I were you I would develop the article in userspace or at WP:AFC, then ask the community if it meets that criteria. In the past some editors have used 25+ independent sources as a marker, but theres no policy or guideline for that.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Here's what The Avengers: Age of Ultron looked like at the time it was moved to articlespace. Hope this helps.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Also I just noticed that there is a proposal for a new Draft namespace.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

So is that basically like taking AI and everywhere else that people go to create a new page to work on before it's allowed will go to one place? That's kind of the gist I got from it. Well right now, Crimson Peak is in AI until further notice :) Lady Lotus (talk) 13:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, technically AI is supposed to be for deleted articles but I don't see why it cannot be used for any article that fails to meet our notability guidelines. Perhaps this will solve that dilemma.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your reversion of my edit to "Tom Hiddleston"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit of the Tom Hiddleston article. I made the edit because, in browser windows of approximately 700 pixels or more, the image overlaps into the References section, causing the citations to be less than the full allowable width. IMHO this is suboptimal. Would you please be so kind as to move the image out of the Awards section to an earlier/higher section so that it does not so interfere (I don't have preference as to which)?—DocWatson42 (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Sure and thank you for the kind response.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! ^_^ —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:55, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Image opinion

I was wondering if you could give your opinion on an image I am questioning adding. Could you let me know which image you feel represents the Batman: Arkham page better: the one currently on the page, or this one at the top of the article? The one on the page now is more neutral, thus applying generally, but the one in the article, I feel, is a better representation of the main games, as it incorporates the design used by each. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For the knowledge that, when we see your signature alongside an edit on our Watchlist, we know the article is in good and responsible hands. You continue to do great work through the years. -- Tenebrae (talk) 17:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Likewise and thank you!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

All-New Marvel NOW! announcement

It was announced today that Daredevil will be given a new Volume as part of the All-New Marvel NOW! event. I need some help setting it up on the Marvel NOW! page so here is the source link you can use. http://www.nerdist.com/2013/11/exclusive-mark-waid-and-chris-samnee-talk-daredevil-1-for-marvel-now/ -50.137.10.10 (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thanks!--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikibreak

Hey Triiiple. Just wanted you to know I'm taking a wikibreak. Had an issue with my laptop so I took it as a sign to not find ways to get on here and take a break. I should be back before the new year, if not, definitely by the end of January. As I know you will, just keep tabs on the MCU pages. If you get enough on the main page and want to try renominating it for GA, by all means go ahead. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Rashida Jones

Hi! I noticed that you removed my addition of Rashida Jones as the Wasp from the Marvel Cinematic Universe article. I was wondering why you removed that and not the mention of Paul Rudd - both are equally common (Google 'Rashida Jones ant-man' and you'll see what I mean) and equally unconfirmed, and, unlike with the JGL rumor, no one has denied that Jones might play the Wasp. If you want to remove the Paul Rudd rumor also I understand, but if not I'd like to put the Rashida Jones report back. Nadhika99 (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Actually most sources, are reporting RJ as a rumor (examples: [3], [4]), where as PR is not (examples: [5], [6]).--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Those sources are from October. More recent sources mention Rudd and Jones with the same level of probability: ([7]), ([8]), ([9]). Also, the initial report about Jones came from the same source as Rudd ([10]).Nadhika99 (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Those are mostly blog sites, whereas THR and Variety are industry trade publications. They're not considered equally reliable. But I agree that being a front runner in general is not sufficient for inclusion in the MCU article, including Rudd. Only casted players should included there.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

That sounds fair. I'll remove him now. Nadhika99 (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Publication Date

Hey you reverted my changes which i made to marvel now! dates section. Listen for rebranded titles you have put dates like starting month to pre-rebranded month for example in case of Avengers you have written December 2012-November 2013. How??? because the marvel now! tagg on Avengers was removed after #17 which was released in August 2013. You are reverting my changes i have no problem with this but kindly do put correct months in that section just not pre-rebranded months. I will edit that section again in few minutes. Let me know if you have a better suggestion. Regards --Shoxee1214 (talk) 13:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Fine, correct the dates as you see fit but do not remove them.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I think only a month in which its debuted should be written for series which are being rebranded. writing a ending month there give an impression of series being ended. What do you think? Don't you think only starting months are enough ?? --Shoxee1214 (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

No, the entire run of the wave should be reflected.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

SHIELD cast page

Hey Triiiple. Just wanted you to know that I had begun something in my sandbox regarding the AoS cast members, as well as the One-Shot ones. Don't know if it will be a help (I was doing it mainly for the MCU cast page if it ever wanted to get integrated there). But I like what you started and its formatting. Still have limited computer access for the time being, so I still will not be as active as I have been. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I think the pages should be separate, the AoS list is notable in its own right and I see fitting the characters in the continuity of the rest of the list as being problematic. Perhaps the new Defenders series might be worthy a separate list as well once it gets going.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Crimson Peak

Hey, I need your opinion on whether you think it was too soon for this page to published since they haven't started filming yet? And yes this was the film that I was asking you about whether I could publish it before they filmed or not. Looks like someone beat me to it lol. Lady Lotus • talk 12:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Technically yes, but it is well written and well cited. But it's up to your discretion of you want to pursue removing it. The Man of Steel sequel doesn't even gave an article, which I could find tons of sources for. If you do decide to follow though with an AfD or such, suggest to incubate it or merge it Guerilllmo Del Torro instead of outright deleting it, so the author doesn't lose all his work.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I might just combine my sourced stuff with his. Lady Lotus • talk 15:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TriiipleThreat. You have new messages at Lady Lotus's talk page.
Message added 20:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lady Lotus • talk 20:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday Cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

Peggy Carter

Maybe I am a little biased because I liked her in the movie...but I am thinking I want to create a article on her. What is you're thoughts? Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 14:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) If you have sources, that can cover her involvement in the comics, as well as in other media (not just the Marvel Cinematic Universe), then go ahead and start drafting up a page. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

I am actually testing out her page right now. I think she is one of those characters that probably got more notable when introduced in the MCU more than the comics books. I have a lot of sources talking about her getting her own tv series spin-off too. Those could probably help. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 21:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately I am busy. Can either one of you copy edit what I have done before I return? Thank you. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 22:05, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

In no way I am done...but I am done for today. (It's late where I am at) Also I might be done for a while since it's almost Christmas time. I have a holiday trip starting tomorrow. Anyways I worked hard and yet not in full completion. I have a lot of bare urls that any editor can fix. (Even you guys. I encourage it.) Also one of them is there just because I am going to use it. I just haven't written the information down. I feel she is a character mostly notable because of MCU. She would of just because a random (maybe considered minor character) comic book character outside of that universe IMO...but it seems like they are planning big things for the actresses's version of her. Also I am leaving stuff like this here for maybe better sources for the comic book version and so I can remember it because that part still needs some. Thanks you, Favre1fan93 too for your advice. My only problem with creating a userspace draft is I hardly wanted do a seperate contribution to copy and paste to another. I wanted my contributions connected and shown on the article itself. I want to know both of your thoughts on it's general state right now. I know it's not perfect now but a good start? Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 02:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I especially encourage your contributions on the fact if we get it mostly well cited. We can probably make it a DYK article. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 02:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm pretty busy right now as well but you could always userfy it then have a WP:HISTMERGE done.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Topic ban

Do you think it is worth investigating a topic ban for TreCoolGuy? He consistently adds his own ideas/research to comic-film related pages, as recently seen by him claiming that Paul Rudd would be in the third Avengers and adding that an Indestructible Hulk movie was coming in 2016 because "he believes there is a very possible chance" (this is on his talk page now). We already had the issue with him being a sock and he does not seem to have learned what constitutes constructive editing. Let me know. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm probably the wrong person to ask, I'm not familiar with the prerequisites for such an action.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Okay. I don't know much either, besides what is said on the policy page. I'll ask around. If we aren't in contact over the next few days, have a great holiday! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)I can't stand his contributions either some times. He is not a vandalizer by any means enough to be blocked full time. But he does unconstructive enough edits to maybe have a weekly enough block from someone like User: J Greb if you request him to keep an eye on him. If you think he is a sock puppet though. Go request a a sockpuppet investigation though. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 20:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

The aggressive edit warring could warrant indefinite ban. He refuses to listen to anyone. Rusted AutoParts 03:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: I hate to have to do something like that but in light of his recent edits perhaps you're right.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 03:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

It's just such a consistent thing when they edit that I do think it has to be brought to ANI's attention. I try really hard not to flip out when I converse with them, but I always (in what I believe is an acceptable way) try to bring it back to the fact that they have been on here for quite sometime so they should at least know what constitutes acceptable editing and I've suggested to them to read up on policy, but it seems to go on to deaf ears. And they could be socking again based on this IP's contributions (very similar pages). If the style of edits had continued into the new year I was going to go to ANI with a case for a comic and film topic ban. I'm currently busy with an FL review and will be going on an actual wikibreak due to a vacation next week so I will not be able to do anything then. I hate it to come to this, but between these edits, the original research, that bot revert now, and (from the past) those mass page creation on things not necessarily needed (Iron Man in film, Cap in film, Hulk in film), the edits are more hindrance than help. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

I saw the edit warring at HYDRA today, and thought about protecting the article but decided against it. If I see any more such activity, I have no qualms about taking this user to AN/I. BOZ (talk) 06:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

		Holiday Cheer
		Fortdj33 talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer, by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - Chad inspired by this - you could do the same!

Argento Surfer (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Thanks!!

Thank you!! Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you too!! Lady Lotus • talk 15:17, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you, my good friend and wonderful colleague! And very best wishes to you as well. Keep up the great work! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Favre1fan93 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you very much! To you as well! Happy Holidays, and looking forward to continue working with you in 2014! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Re:Merry Christmas!

Thanks! Same to you. Merry Christmas! Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 23:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: The wolverine

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. Been busy with overtime and christmas in real life. It looks like Mark Arsten protected the page for a month about two hours ago, so hopefully that will help. Thingg^⊕⊗ 19:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

I assume you're old enough to drink, but if not, here is one anyway! Merry Xmas. DWB (talk) / Comment on Dredd's FA nom! 21:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Photo Discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion regarding the better photo for an article Infobox? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

TreCoolGuy

Something needs to be done. He won't stop reverting every edit that's reverts his edit. Rusted AutoParts 03:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

I brought TreCoolGuy to ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Rusted AutoParts 19:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)