User talk:Biblioqd

Recent edits to Dorothy Hill

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dorothy Hill, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Dorothy Hill page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Priestley (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Priestley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 06:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Priestley (mathematician) has been accepted

Henry Priestley (mathematician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spencer Routh (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Uql earthsci/sandbox/Spencer Routh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I looked at this also. since he received the Order of Australia, he is notable and should have an article. However, it's write in too personal and too laudatory a tone. And here also, some of the material looks like its been copied from other sources. check andrewrite--and cut down on some of it. DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Uql earthsci/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Heywood Bryan (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Heywood Bryan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thee are two major questions:

First, the documentation of his son;s career needs a reference, or must be eliminated. Second, some of it reads as if it were copied from other sources, particularly the first and second references. Please double check that there ie neither exact copying nor WP:Close paraphrase. If there is, rewrite those parts in your own words. After you check it, resubmit. DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Uql earthsci/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Uql earthsci, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Henry Priestley (mathematician), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• Simple introduction
• Help pages

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Please compare to the copyrighted source here. ServiceAT (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Heywood Bryan has been accepted

Walter Heywood Bryan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest James Goddard (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Ernest James Goddard may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 06:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Some copyright information

Hello Uql earthsci, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Draft:Ernest James Goddard has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wia /tlk 06:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest James Goddard has been accepted

Ernest James Goddard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor

Hi! I noticed that almost all of your recent edits are marked as minor. When I spot-checked a few, many should not have been marked as minor. Please read the policy to learn which edits are considered truly minor—and why. Otherwise, keep up the good work! — Gorthian (talk) 06:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Queensland Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Clive Selwyn Davis, from its old location at User:Uql earthsci/sandbox/Clive Selwyn Davis. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Uql earthsci, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to University of Queensland Library has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spencer Routh (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spencer Routh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clive Selwyn Davis has been accepted

Clive Selwyn Davis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ethel Raybould, from its old location at User:Uql earthsci/Ethel raybould. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ethel Raybould has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ethel Raybould. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Raybould has been accepted

Ethel Raybould, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Nesta Marks has been accepted

Elizabeth Nesta Marks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Account name - concern

Hello, I've just been reading your Seismology Station article - looks really interesting. However, I'm a bit concerned about your username and Wikipedia policy.

One of Wikipedia's policies, WP:USERNAME, is that usernames shouldn't sound sound like they're the property of an organisation or shared, and together with the fact that a lot of your edits are on University of Queensland topics, that means your username sort of sounds to me like people might look at your edits and think you represent a University of Queensland department in some official capacity. So this is just a suggestion, but you might want to take a look at that and see if you think changing it would be a good idea? Let me know if you have any thoughts. Blythwood (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spencer Routh (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spencer Routh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heron Island Research Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Oswald (Ted) Marks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AIF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/kruttschnitt-julius-7001

Even though you change the text, you are not to copy and paste text into Wikipedia at any time. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kathleen Campbell-Brown

The article Kathleen Campbell-Brown has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beryl Nashar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenton Stewart Wall Campbell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Barwick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greg Clark (born 1965)

Hello, Biblioqd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Greg Clark (born 1965), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Greg Clark (born 1965) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Tiven gonsalves 10:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup

Come along! Kerry (talk) 04:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

	Brisbane Meetup Next: To be decided (watch) Last: Saturday 13 January 2018
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Biblioqd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Arnold Ripper

Hello, Biblioqd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Elizabeth Arnold Ripper".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ted Emery

The article Ted Emery has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margaret Cribb

The article Margaret Cribb has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tompop888 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Clark (born 1965)

Hello Biblioqd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Greg Clark (born 1965) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 13:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Early Australian female aviators

Hello, Biblioqd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Early Australian female aviators".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Explaining my reversion

In this edit

you changed:

earth's rotation was slowing down.

to

earth's rotation around the sun, had been much slower in the mid-Devonian period

which changes it from a correct statement, to an incorrect statement.

I am reverting it to the original. It may well need to be improved, but it is (prior to my edit) wrong.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Spencer Routh concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spencer Routh, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Biblioqd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elizabeth Catherine Usher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biblioqd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Biblioqd (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As below, without your IP - we have nothing to unblock. SQL^{Query me!} 23:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to tell us your IP address. If you want privacy, you can use WP:UTRS. PhilKnight (talk) 22:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC) {{unblock | reason=your reason here Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. 137.59.252.161 Biblioqd (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

sz, not zs

Professor Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop:

• https://smp.uq.edu.au/profile/204/halina-rubinsztein-dunlop
• https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/60
• https://people.smp.uq.edu.au/HalinaRubinsztein-Dunlop/

Etc. Pdfpdf (talk) 05:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Biblioqd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clare Foley (lawyer)

The article Clare Foley (lawyer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidewnce of notability. Directory listings only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

some comments

I've just been seeing your excellent work on Australian scientists. One of my projects is going back to the drafts on scientists and other academics that have been deleted because they weren't worked on in time (I have a list of a few thousand to try to restore), and I've found some of yours in that list. In the process, i've looked at some of your other bios, and I've been making a few of mu usual changes for conciseness in line with what I think is the standard format: such things as reducing the amount of family detail and indications of early interest in the field, removing adjectives of praise or importance--the career itself shows it better than the adjectives--systematizing the sequence of positions in their career--it's usually enough to give the years without saying also the length of time, changing such expressions as "she was to work on this for the rest of her career" to "she worked on this for the rest of her career." and making red links for thesis advisors and journals that we need to have articles about. Another thing I like to do is to list the 2 or 3 most cited publications, as this gives an objective statement of the importance of their work, but I don't always have time for that. Your work here is important, and if there's anything in particular you might want any assistance with, just let me know. DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Clare Foley (lawyer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Foley (lawyer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Foley (lawyer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJRC (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Otto Hirschfeld (physician)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Otto Hirschfeld (physician).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

could use some more sources

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JC7V7DC5768}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JC7V (talk) 18:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Clare Foley (lawyer)

Hello, Biblioqd,

Thanks for creating Clare Foley (lawyer)! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Per the no consensus AfD, I'm approving the article for mainspace but adding a notability tag.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Arnold Ripper

Hello, Biblioqd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Arnold Ripper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 02:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Spencer Routh

Hello, Biblioqd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spencer Routh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Albert Hall, Brisbane

Just to explain further, take a look at File:Albert Street Methodist Church and Albert Hall, Brisbane, ca. 1904 (4969961724).jpg and you will see a couple of things. First there is the edge of another building to the left of the Hall and that the frontage of the Hall is narrower than that of the Church itself (which combined would be insufficient to extend through to Turbot Street). However because the site for the SGIO was said to be bought from the church makes me wonder if the church did own the land through to Turbot Street but had other buildings (less important than Albert Hall) on the corner with Turbot Street, which is why nobody mentions them. I am overseas at the moment but when I get home, I might check through my old Street directories and see if I can work out what was on the corner of Albert and Turbot. Kerry (talk) 01:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

see also File:Q16821228 Albert St Uniting Church - 20181014e.jpg, which suggests that Albert Hall was on the open plaza area now on Albert Street in front of the SGIO building. If so, the SGIO theatre replaced the Albert Hall in terms of its function as a theatre space but not in a strictly geographic sense. Down the rabbit hole we go ... Kerry (talk) 02:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	I always appreciate the way your edits are so well-sourced. Thank you for making Wikipedia's content verifiable. Kerry (talk) 06:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve William N. Robertson

Hello, Biblioqd,

Thank you for creating William N. Robertson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Need more RS to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 06:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

WikiAviator, the sources present seem reliable enough and more than enough to establish notability. What were you hoping for? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: In the revision at the time of my review ([1]), facts are largely unsupported and there are only three sources, which passes the "reviewed" criteria but needs improvement, since all content heavily rely on these three sources. The problem has now been solved. WikiAviator (talk) 03:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Wiki - will continue at your talk page so as to not annoy Biblioqd. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Biblioqd

Thank you for creating SEQEB strike of Queensland, 1985.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Well scribed article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 05:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, Thank you for creating Mike Minogue (actor). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Mike Minogue), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 10:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)