User talk:Vardion

Archived: Archived from 2003, Archived from 2004, Archived from 2005, Archived from 2006, Archived from 2007, Archived from 2008-2010, Archived from 2011-2014

My presence around here is a bit erratic at present, and there are periods where I don't check my account very often. As such, I'm afraid I can't guarantee I'll see any messages directed towards me. (Feel free to leave a message anyway, though.)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I appreciate the freedom to use your work EnAshok (talk) 02:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Auckland Rail Map

Hi. On the page List of Auckland railway stations, I have made use of the file File:AucklandRailMap.png. The map looks like this:

NOTE: THE MAP NOW DISPLAYS THE VERSION AFTER VARDION EDITED IT, NOT AS IT FORMERLY WAS Akld guy (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The map is a little outdated, but I lack the skills to edit it. Things that need fixing are:

• The Onehunga Line has been fully operational for some time. It is not a simple branch off the Southern Line at Penrose, but a dedicated route all the way from Britomart. It needs a purple line starting at Britomart and continuing south between the green Western Line and the red Southern Line, then continuing left of the Southern Line until it branches off at Penrose. At that point the dotted line should be made continuous to Onehunga.
• "Planned Reopening of Onehunga Branch" needs to be relabelled "Onehunga Line".
• "Suggested Underground Loop" needs to be relabelled "City Rail Link (CRL) under construction".
• Parnell Station is nearing completion and needs adding just north of Newmarket station.

Perhaps you might oblige by editing the map. Thank you for reading. Akld guy (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much!!! The new pic is just what was needed. It seems though, that the caches haven't updated yet, as the old pic is still showing. Or can you suggest some other reason? Akld guy (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I have managed to get the new version into service by doing a purge. That is done by inserting purge with 2 curly brackets on each side into the section where the call to the map file exists. It forces an immediate update of the cache. A further little ask: if you can spare the time, could you change the colours of the dots for the fare stages from gray to some other colour to distinguish them from ordinary stations? Also, Parnell's dot is larger than the other ordinary stations, perhaps giving it more significance than it ought to have? Many thanks again. Akld guy (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

That is very good work indeed!! Thank you very much. Akld guy (talk) 06:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Vardion. Would you please be kind enough to swing the names Westfield and OTAHUHU over to the other side of the Southern Line. Historically the Southern came into existence before the Eastern. The way those stations are named makes it look like the Southern Line joins the Eastern, whereas it is the Southern that is the older and more significant. Akld guy (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I think nobody would disagree that that is an improvement. Akld guy (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

NIMT map

Hi again Vardion. The article North Island Main Trunk has a map that shows the NIMT route with coloured stages to show diesel and electrified sections. The map hasn't been updated since 2007, and the user who created it, Jorg Muller, hasn't edited since 2008. The map is here: .

Was wondering whether you would be interested in inserting Papakura station just north of Pukekohe station and changing the colour of the Auckland-Papakura section to red to indicate electrification. I'd also like different shades of red to differentiate between the 1500V DC section near Wellington and the 25KV AC sections elsewhere. Perhaps the current dull red for the Wellington section, and bright red for the higher voltage sections. Thanks for reading. Akld guy (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:NewZealandNewLabourPartyLogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:NewZealandNewLabourPartyLogo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freedom Party (New Zealand)

The article Freedom Party (New Zealand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, external link is a 404.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vardion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vardion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anton Foljambe

The article Anton Foljambe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable politician. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AotearoaLegaliseCannabisPartyLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AotearoaLegaliseCannabisPartyLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LibertarianzLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LibertarianzLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WorkersPartyofNewZealandLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WorkersPartyofNewZealandLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Westfield Railway Station has closed

Would you be kind enough to remove Westfield station from the map (above). I have no idea how to do it. Thanks for your time. Akld guy (talk) 06:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Also, all the black dots that represent fare stages need removing because there are no longer fare stages. Auckland has 13 fare zones, with some zone overlap areas. Akld guy (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and done the above, using Paint, but it doesn't look as good as it would if you did it with the proper program. Another thing that needs doing is renaming Boston Road station to Grafton. Akld guy (talk) 23:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Another thing: the fare stage stations are still shown in upper case. They need to be lower cased because fare stages no longer exist and the present state might mislead readers. Akld guy (talk) 20:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

CentreGold listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CentreGold. Since you had some involvement with the CentreGold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewZealandTwentyDollarNote2.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewZealandTwentyDollarNote2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vardion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Auckland Railway Map

Hey, what font did you use for the station labels on the map? I was going to replace Boston Road station with Grafton but couldn't find the right one. VerySunday (talk) 04:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@VerySunday: I'm watching with interest. I tried updating Boston Road to Grafton a couple of years ago, but Paint doesn't seem to allow sloping text and there's no way to fit horizontal text to the line. Akld guy (talk) 05:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello -- the font is Liberation Sans, I believe. Since I happen to have the original file on hand right now (which is not always the case), I've gone and uploaded a SVG version of it at File:Auckland_Rail_Map.svg. I don't know if it's any use, and the file is probably a bit messy, but it might make it easier for other people to edit the file when I'm not able to. -- Vardion (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@Vardion: Thanks for that. And @Akld guy: If you want something a bit more powerful than paint I'd recommend paint.net It's an open-source photoshop, essentially. VerySunday (talk)

@VerySunday: Thanks for the suggestion. I'll check it out. And thanks for changing Boston Road to Grafton. Akld guy (talk) 08:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Jeanette Fitzsimons

On 6 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jeanette Fitzsimons, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of New Zealand politicians

The article List of New Zealand politicians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Better left as a category

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of New Zealand politicians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of New Zealand politicians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New Zealand politicians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 03:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Faroese parliamentary election, 2011

A tag has been placed on Template:Faroese parliamentary election, 2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Stay Behind

What source did you use to add the 3 stay behind operations for France? I could not find such a source. But that is interesting. 89.87.161.129 (talk) 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, it has been so long since I edited Stay-behind that I don't remember what sources I was using at the time. (I wasn't very good at recording that sort of thing, fifteen years ago.) I may simply have added them based on the references to them in the Operation Gladio article -- if so, the references seem to be:

• Kwitny, Jonathan (1992-04-06). "The C.I.A.'s Secret Armies in Europe". The Nation. pp. 446–447.
• Cogan, Charles (2007). "'Stay-Behind' in France: Much ado about nothing?". Journal of Strategic Studies. 30 (6): 937–954.
• Cook, Bernard A. (2001). Europe Since 1945: An Encyclopedia, Volumen 1. Taylor & Francis. p. 510

I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, however -- perhaps the mentions of them in Stay-behind should be removed until someone more knowledgeable than me can confirm things. -- Vardion (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Castaway Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castaway Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castaway Entertainment (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rorshacma (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:STV Election box candidate2 with custom party

Template:STV Election box candidate2 with custom party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1Law4All Party/meta/shading

Template:1Law4All Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ban 1080 Party/meta/shading

Template:Ban 1080 Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expatriate Party of New Zealand/meta/shading

Template:Expatriate Party of New Zealand/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NZ Independent Coalition/meta/shading

Template:NZ Independent Coalition/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Civilian Party/meta/shading

Template:The Civilian Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Chester Borrows

On 27 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chester Borrows, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2023 Netball World Cup

On 15 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Netball World Cup, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 03:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jill Ovens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jill Ovens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Ovens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PicturePerfect666 (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phoenix Party

The article Phoenix Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)