This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
User:Versus22/Archive 5 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Versus22/Archive 5's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Versus22/Archive 5!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
(march 27 for you, I was sick) — Rlevse • Talk • 23:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! :-) Versus22talk 19:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[1] - Guess I forgot to use the template. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Heh, I was actually going to comment (using {{Note2}}) but I edit conflicted with you. ;-) Versus22talk 18:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter released its first issue a year ago. The newsletter is meant to help connect editors, keep them up-to-date with the activities of the VG project, and improve the knowledge of our members. We've compiled a list of questions to help gauge the effectiveness of the newsletter's first year.
Answers will be accepted for a three week period following the deliver of the March 2009 issue on Wednesday, April 1, 2009. Just to clarify, this is not an April Fools' Day gag, and we would really appreciate honest criticism. Information obtained from this poll is intend to alter the newsletter for the better. So don't feel you should hold back or give answers similar to everyone else.
The VG Barnstar is an award given to Wikipedians recognized for efforts and contributions to improve and develop video game related articles.
The VG Barnstar is one of many Wikipedia Barnstars designed to be given to editors that have helped further the overall quality of Wikipedia. It was created in February 2006 by Jacoplane—see past discussion for details—and has been given to numerous editors since. Sometimes editors with multiple Barnstars use an alternative way to display them: ribbons.
Barnstars are designed to be given by anyone, so don't be shy as everyone enjoys appreciation. If you have noticed or have been impressed with the work of an editor, feel free to let them know by placing {{subst:Barnstar VG|"message" ~~~~}} on their talk page. The template uses a parameter to include a message expressing the reasons behind the award.
Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Reverting
Hiya, when reverting edits made by users with attack usernames, if you could not use rollback but rather use 'undo' (and then blank the edit summary and replace with 'rvv' or similar), it'd be much appreciated - that way, oversight doesn't need to go back through and wipe your edit summaries from view (which in turn requires another edit to the page you reverted for it to work). Cheers, Daniel (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
OK sorry, I'll do that next time. Best, Versus22talk 10:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Pondering adminship?
After watching how you arm the vandal whacking stick, I was wondering if you would like to be an admin? I could write a nom for you (going on a little nomming spree ATM). --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 12:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh, sorry. I totally forgot (I was busy for awhile, but not now). Anyways, I think I'll give this a try. Thanks! :) Versus22talk 22:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Cool! My guess it that you would use the tools as components to your vandalgun, am I right? Dylan620Wishes you a Happy Easter! 23:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, I would also be using it at WP:XfD, if I had admin tools. Versus22talk 23:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Dylan620 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Dylan620 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Versus22 . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
Semi-protected
Since you are being targeted for trolling, I semi-protected your user talk page for awhile. If you want me to release the protection, just drop me a note. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Gogo Dodo. Versus22talk 04:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I also protected your talk page archives, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Your pages
Just so you know, that you can request your pages be restored if you so desired.---I'm Spartacus!NO! I'm Spartacus! 07:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Your RfA
Sorry to see that you had to withdraw. A bit more experience and you should be well on your way. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 16:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Don't think that you aren't appreciated. If you worked on a few more content related pages, dealt more heavily with AFDs, and put forth some more elaborate answers about dealing with disputes and various problems I am sure you will pass next time. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I think the big key is diversification. Anti-Vandal only candidates have a very difficult time passing RfA's...it's the nature of the area where they work. Fighting vandalism is imperative, but not being able to see the user behind the tools becomes an obstacle.---I'm Spartacus!NO! I'm Spartacus! 18:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
