User talk:Weneedwikipedia/Archive1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Weneedwikipedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sloersloersloersloersloer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! My Chemistry romantic (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sloersloersloersloersloer[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sloersloersloersloersloer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is an encyclopedia, the content of which is efficiently policed. Vandalism articles are destroyed very quickly, as yours has been. Repeated vandalism will result in your being prevented from editing here. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is sorry for things they have done in the past on Wikipedia, and is determined to make things right.

We need wikipedia!(Talk) 02:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Template:Hong Kong weatherbox, you may be blocked from editing. CaradhrasAiguo (talk) 13:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is sorry for things they have done in the past on Wikipedia, and is determined to make things right.

We need wikipedia!(Talk) 02:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mitribah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mitribah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 12:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User:DoctorWho42/Userbox Toast Sandwich without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess... I made a mistake? Weneedwikipedia (user talk:Weneedwikipedia) 07:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FNQ. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cloncurry,_Queensland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FNQ (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the record temperature 53.1C in 1889 so I changed it. --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 11:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SlivkiShow[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SlivkiShow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PK T(alk) 12:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement![edit]

Hi Weneedwikipedia, please allow me to get in touch because you have stated sympathy with environmental causes on your user page. I would like to invite you to check out the Environmental impact project page on Meta, where I am trying to create some momentum to reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. My first goal is to have all the Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy. Maybe you could show your support for this project as well by adding your signature here? Thank you, --Gnom (talk) 22:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well OK I guess Weneedwikipedia (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you! Could you add your signature to this list of supporters? Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 10:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We sure do[edit]

Yes. In the "post truth" era of "alternative facts" we really do need Wikipedia. Keep up the good work.Charles (talk) 11:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikpedia is essential for life. We need wikipedia!(Talk) 02:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]