User talk:Weneedwikipedia

<User talk:Weneedwikipedia/Archive1


	Please Sign Your Posts

vn-1

This user talk page has been vandalized 1 time.

(DO NOT LET THE NUMBER OF VANDALISM TIMES IN THE UBX INCREASE!!!)

Speedy deletion nomination of Npkytck[edit]

A tag has been placed on Npkytck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T*U (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poccnnckar[edit]

A tag has been placed on Poccnnckar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T*U (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boaka[edit]

A tag has been placed on Boaka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T*U (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of extreme temperatures in Russia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of extreme temperatures in Russia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of extreme temperatures in Russia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --T*U (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohe Railway Station for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohe Railway Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohe Railway Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

February 2017[edit]

File:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Verkhoyansk. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it was sourced! I went to the cited web http://www.pogodaiklimat.ru/climate/24266.htm and I saw "Снежный покров"(Snow cover) and I edited Verkhoyansk by following the "Снежный покров" section. We Need Wikipedia!^{It's essential!!!}(Say what?) 09:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the access date for the source when you use it. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But how to update? We Need Wikipedia!^{It's essential!!!}(Say what?) 13:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made the change to the article. Please look at the article's history. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pyccknn r3blk[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pyccknn r3blk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T*U (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cp6nja[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cp6nja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T*U (talk) 13:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice[edit]

Hi! You will have noticed that many of your edits have been reverted. That may not necessarily always be because your edits were directly wrong, but may in many cases be because they do not conform to the standards and guidelines of Wikipedia in one way or other. You should take some time to get acquainted with the rules and workings of Wikipedia. A few points connected to some of your edits:

The presentation style of Wikipedia is supposed to be encyclopedic. That means that words like "Wow" here, use of exclamation marks like here, use of subjective descriptions like "amazing" and "awesome" here and expression of personal views like here should be avoided.
When editing climate tables, you have to make sure that the new values really are consistent with the rest of the table. The existing table will usually have one or more sources that lists the data for one specific station in one specific period of time. You cannot then add a value that comes from another station like here, nor can you add a value outside the time range of the table like here. Obviously you also cannot add values that are contested like here or unsourced like here. Regarding your edit to Cloncurry, Queensland here, the value you added is from another station (obviously no airport in 1889), is from far outside the time range and is contested. Please also note that it does not help to change the time range like you tried here, since there is no way to know which other values would have to be changed if the time range was another.
Wikipedia is based on co-operation and consensus, which you can read about here. Many problems and conflicts are solved by discussions in the articles' talk pages. So far you have not participated in any such discussions. My advice is that you involve yourself in talk page discussions in order to learn more about how Wikipedia works. You should also read about the BRD cycle here. When you are reverted, like here, your next step should not be to make the same edit again, but to go to the talk page and start a discussion in order to get a consensus for your version, if possible.
Finally: You are marking many of your edits as minor. Please read WP:Minor about when to mark and when not to mark edits as minor.

Happy editing! --T*U (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 06:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An update from the Sustainability Initiative[edit]

Hi, Weneedwikipedia! Thank you again for supporting the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. Over the past two years, more than 200 Wikipedians from all over the world have come together to push the Wikimedia movement towards greater sustainability.

What's new?

We are writing you this message because there is great news: The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has finally passed a resolution stating that the Foundation is committed to seeking ways to reduce the impact of its activities on the environment. Also, we have created a cool logo and found a nice name for the project which you can see on the right :-)

What's next?

Currently, we are working with Wikimedia Foundation staff to make sustainability a key priority for the selection of a new location for Wikimedia servers in Singapore. Also, we have presented the Wikimedia Foundation with a green energy roadmap to have all Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy by 2019.

Please help!

Let's keep this project moving forward – and there are several ways in which you can help:

Ask other Wikipedians to sign the project page as well – this way we can show the Wikimedia Foundation that this is an issue that the community really cares about.
Talk to Wikimedians you know about the importance of reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement.
Improve and translate the project page on Meta.

If you have any questions, you can contact us on on Meta. Again, thank you very much for your support! --Aubrey and Gnom (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please[edit]

I wish you would stop putting singular "record" entries into weather boxes. The weather box tables are supposed to consist of well-sourced data, preferably from official sources. If there are any singular events of special interest, they are better presented in plain text outside of the weather box. Only make sure that the source is good enough (please read WP:RS), and that the presentation only states what is covered by the source (please read WP:SYNTH). --T*U (talk) 07:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: advise please waves[edit]

I noticed you were most recent non-anon editor of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(temperature) and since I am very new to serious contributing on WP, I just added a small update to that page and so I ask please look at that edit & let me know if, however insignificant, there might be any fault thereof in my several-byte addition to that article. Yes, a bit paranoid regarding such milli-edit, but I am one who overly treads carefully wherever I may. Thanks for attention to this minutiae.Sinsearach (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Um ... OK? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 04:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Repulse Bay (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Repulse Bay (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS; hatnotes are quicker and easier for the reader

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Maria Sharapova. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I edited her name according to this and the transliteration(The transliteration of Cyrillic "Мария Юрьевна Шарапова" is "Mariya Yur'yevna Sharapova"), I didn't add unreferenced or poorly referenced information! --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 09:13, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

... --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 03:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Weneedwikipedia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 23:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tunguska event[edit]

I undid your page move. There was no need to move it and I can't see any discussion about it. --John (talk) 09:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of supernova candidates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cygnus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fixed:[1] --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 10:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Weneedwikipedia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Your edit added false information. It may have been the end of the 14th baktun, but no Mayan ever proposed it as the end of a calendar or era . — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

I tried my best already, probably I didn't know that fact --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 04:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Although I find it difficult to believe that anyone could believe the statement you added, it is important that you only add material which is taken from reliable sources.

I have ~~not found any~~ found few of your edits which (IMO) improved Wikipedia, nor ~~any~~ many edits which have been retained. Perhaps you should restrict yourself to suggesting edits on talk pages, until you match expectations for article edits. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of weather records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message in my talk page[edit]

Hi Weneedwikipedia! You may remember that we had some contact when you were new to Wikipedia a couple of years ago. Among other things I gave you some advice here in your talk page. Since then I have come across your edits now and then, and have seen you making some good edits. But I have also stumbled across edits that were far from encyclopedic, so I have followed your edits a bit closer recently. I have reverted quite a few, but certainly not all, and I have tried to always give an explanation. I have also not been the only one to revert you, just as others have been trying to give you advice here above. My additional advice would be to think one extra time before you post your edits, and ask yourself if it really is encyclopedic. Also consider suggesting your changes in the article talk page first. Regards! --T*U (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shashlik, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing.~~

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

~~If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]
I don't think so, do my edits even look like disrupting? Also why green precipitation chart rather than blue? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 06:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Template:Weather box/doc. Green precipitation and rain is recommended and should be used. If you want to change it, please provide a good reason, or your edits will be reverted. However, this warning does not mean you will be blocked if you reverse your actions and start making constructive edits. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I prefered blue was that I was trying to blend in the colors of such charts in the same article so that they look even. Referring to this article, seeing that most of the charts in the precipitation section are blue. Though charts like Moscow, Ulan Ude and Yakutsk have green precipitation section and are their own templates. So what do you want me to do? Would you rather swap out the templates for blue or all precipitation charts in the climate of Russia article be all green? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 05:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. In the Template:Weather box/doc I don't see that it mentioning green precipitation is recommended and should be used.

Please do not change any more articles. There is a discussion about the color going on right now. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Come on man[edit]

You can do better than this. I just removed some climate data you added to the Kyusyur article a few days ago which showed a temperature of 43°C in northern Russia in November . You know that is obviously a false reading. Please think before you type. —Soap— 01:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OOOOOOOOPS, I got that already. But where does that record -1 degrees come from, or who came up with -1 in the November record? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 02:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can only assume that -1 was the reading that appeared in the source before it got corrupted. Every now and then a source will expire and we trust that the people who worked with it earlier were accurate in reporting it when it was live. I dont really feel like looking for another source or using archive.org but if someone really truly doubts the original figures we typed up in 2014 we could go down that route.

As an aside, I agree with TU above that we should not be adding in record highs and lows that took place outside the time window of the table, even if they are verifiable. For example the record lows in early America like -44°C in Bath, Maine and -34°C in Boston, both recorded in the 1850s, are outside the scope of our climate charts, interesting though they may be. Youre certainly not the only person who's ever done this though, and I wasnt even aware it was considered a problem until I thought about it just now, so dont let me put you down. Best regards, —Soap— 19:57, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think the source you used here would pass WP:RS. Its a political site. I dont feel like getting involved at this point, though, and in fact I was coming here to show you another user who added in a record high temperature outside the time window, but I noticed your edit first. All I'll say is, use your own judgment. Thanks, —Soap— 18:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry for being such a pest, and I should have seen this myself, but .... the graph on the site you posted shows a near-constant dew point that is significantly higher than the temperature. That alone suggests to me that the temperature readings are far from accurate and should be discarded. —Soap— 20:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What if the dewpoint graph is just broken or glitched? It could be a computer error at the weather station. Or maybe that the dewpoint meter at the station stops functioning below a certain temperature and cannot go lower? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 04:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Itd still fail as a reliable resource just on that. But I need a new hobby, as this climate editing project is causing me a lot of stress, and it's especially frustrating for me because I have no way to explain to people I know in person why I'm so stressed out during a period in my life where things have been mostly turning in my favor. Sure, I break promises all the time, so maybe I'll be right back at it in a few days, but for the meantime I am excusing myself from all climate-related editing except for maintenance of edits I've already made. So I advise against restoring the Greenland edit, but I'm not going to jump in and revert it again. Best wishes, —Soap— 13:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Klinck[edit]

Dont know if youre still around but I thought you might like this:

Temperature of −69.6 °C discovered at Klinck AWS, Greenland. It's going through the pop science media now but I went ahead and looked for the original source. It's not clear that Klinck is the same station we currently have records for, but it's likely people will add it to the article at Summit Camp or somewhere else soon.

Best regards, —Soap— 00:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weneedwikipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is my friend's account. I listen to his every instructions he gives me, including word by word and paragraph by paragraph and editting on this account and I replacing him on temporary basis because he go back to Mainland China where using Wikipedia is illegal. Also he told me he will give this account to one of my and his friends but recently he said that he will not be giveing this account to my and his friends

Decline reason:

Accounts cannot be shared, they are for the exclusive use of single individuals. Since you did not create this account, it will need to remain blocked as compromised. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So if he comes back to HK in future will this account be unblocked? --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 09:50, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]