User talk:Wittylama/Archive12
This Month in GLAM: February 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Disambiguation link notification for April 3[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the arts and cultural heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:National Emergency Library.png[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:National Emergency Library.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on the arts and cultural heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical score (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list
The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.
The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.
- On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
- The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
- an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
- a rich-text visual editing option, and
- other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.
To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch 
these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.
– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks![edit]
Hi, I have no idea how I ended up on your user page a few days ago, but it inspired me to create some articles about your former place of work on pl.wikipedia. Here is one of them, that picture really made me dig deeper about this building. I've been to the British Museum a few times, but I've never known that there is a building with such interesting history right in the middle of it! Thanks! Nadzik (talk) 13:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Issue 38, January – April 2020[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
What?[edit]
Can you explain why you restored a spelling mistake ? DS (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- DS: Because I was looking at the article history on a tablet and mistakenly brushed the 'rollback' button with my finger. It's a one-click action and doesn't ask for confirmation. As you can see in the edit history, I reverted myself - back to your version - less than a minute later.[1]. The rollback and subsequent self-revert both happened an hour before your message to me here. Wittylama 20:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds (TV)[edit]
Hey. Why did you remove Star Trek: Strange New Worlds (TV) right after creating it? I think it's a valid article. I wrote the [מסע בין כוכבים: עולמות חדשים ומשונים Hebrew version] which has some more info, and can no longer be considered a stub. GHA (talk) 20:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Dear GHA, originally I created the article at that title, and built it to this state. I then discovered that the article naming convention should have the qualifier "TV show" (not just "TV"), so I redirected "my" article to that title which, I discovered, user:DownAirStairsConditioner and user:Obi-WanKenobi-2005 had already begun in parallel to me. I pasted the text which I had written at the first title over the top of what was there, since mine was more detailed. I had already added a hatnote to Star Trek:Strange New Worlds (the book) and also to the ST navigation box pointing to my original article title, which I then retargeted to the new title. That article was then extended by several other people, until user:Adamstom.97 blanked and redirected the page with the edit summary "We generally do not create articles for films and TV shows until they begin filming, per WP:NFF. Redirecting for now." Fair enough. If/when the show DOES begin filming then the article will be restored, as per standard procedure. In the mean time, if you wish to compare your article on the Hebrew WP with the English WP, this is the version of the article as it stood before being redirected by Adamstom.97. I hope that helps, Wittylama 10:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi guys, FYI there is also a draft article for this that you can help with until we can have the article in the mainspace again. You can find that at Draft:Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. I meant to mention it when I redirected the article but I must have forgotten. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list
This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.
- Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing
@. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months. - New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
- New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
- Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for helping to create the Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy Recommendations[edit]
|
Wikimedia 2030 | |
| Thank you very much for everything you did to help create the Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy Recommendations! I am especially grateful for the enormous amount of work you did in the Resource Allocation working group and all the care and commitment you brought to the process. --Nicole Ebber (WMDE) (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC) |
Editing news 2020 #3[edit]
Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:
- The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
- More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
- Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
- The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
- Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
- On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
- In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Nomination of Langford Wellman Colley-Priest for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Langford Wellman Colley-Priest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langford Wellman Colley-Priest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettlerhello 22:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Editing news 2020 #4[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Reply tool[edit]
The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.
- More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
- Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
- Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[2]
The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).
The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.
New requirements for user signatures[edit]
- The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
- Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.
Next: New discussion tool[edit]
Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: August 2020[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: September 2020[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: October 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 41[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
- New partnership: Taxmann
- WikiCite
- 1Lib1Ref 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2020[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: December 2020[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: December 2020[edit]
| ||||||
Editing news 2021 #1[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Reply tool[edit]
The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.
- The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
- It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.
Research notes:
- As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
- There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[3]
- The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[4] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
A large A/B test will start soon.[5] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.
New discussion tool[edit]
The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[6] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.
Next: Notifications[edit]
During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 42[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2021[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: February 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Invitation to comment on Julia Margaret Cameron article[edit]
As someone who has contributed substantially to this article, I invite your input on an RfC asking: Should the infobox use the original photograph of Cameron or a version modified by a Wikipedia editor?
Thanks in advance for your input. Qono (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 42[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
- New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
- 1Lib1Ref
- Library Card
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
It appears that you skipped over creating the deletion nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigar Saraswat. I am not sure what went wrong here, but please make sure to complete the nomination if you want the page to be deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Metropolitan90. I've now done so. I used the Wikipedia:Page Curation tool to create the initial nomination and I thought that the nomination statement I wrote inside that tool would populate the nomination statement. However, it just sent it to the original author creating the article, not to an AFD page. Wittylama 14:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
- New Library Card designs
- 1Lib1Ref May
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Amazing Work[edit]
|
An inspiration to us all. |
| Kudos. Mechachleopteryx (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC) |
Precious anniversary[edit]
| |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Editing news 2021 #2[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Collaborate on a workshop on WikiCite at Wikimania 2021?[edit]
@Wittylama: @Fuzheado: Might you care to collaborate on a workshop on WikiCite during Wikimania 2021?
In 2019 I proposed one for Wikimania Stockholm, then asked Lydia Pintscher if she'd like to collaborate. When she asked what I wanted her to do, I said I wanted her to tell me what I could do to make that workshop most useful for her.
She just emailed me saying she would be willing to collaborate on one this year, but a better collaborator might be Wittylama. However, I do NOT have an email for him and so could not officially name him as an "Additional Speaker".
Similarly, I hope to recruit Fuzheado as an "Additional Speaker", because he said, "It would be good to have a session on the state and future of citations."
Please click here to see the proposal I submitted. I'd be happy to modify this in almost any way you think might make it more successful. If the proposal is approved, I'd be happy to have your collaboration in managing the workshop to maximize the benefits that you, Lydia and the movement derive from this.
Comments? Spencer Graves, aka DavidMCEddy (talk) 14:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Dear DavidMCEddy, it seems your proposal overlaps with the topic submitted by by user:Mike Peel. search the published submissions] page for the keyword “ Cite Q “ to see, and perhaps get in touch with him? The proposal you have written seems to imply that “wikicite” is a separate or specific database or piece of software in its own right, which is a common misconception. Wittylama 22:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Dear User:Wittylama: Thanks for the reply.
- "Mike Peel, Andy Mabbett" have proposed a "lecture" (30 minutes) on how to use WikiCite / Cite Q. We need that.
- I've proposed a "Workshop" (45 minute) / bitch session to try to understand concerns that people have about using WikiCite / Wikidata, similar to what I did two years ago, as mentioned above. That's different from the tutorial that Peel and Mabbett are offering. We need both.
- In particular, why isn't template:Cite Q available in Spanish and German? It is available in French and other languages. Why isn't it available in Wikimedia and Wikiquote? The tutorial proposed by Peel and Mabbett will only be a source of frustration for people who want to use it in the Spanish and German language Wikipedias as well as Wikimedia and Wikiquote.
- I think we need to understand the obstacles to wider use. What would you suggest we do to make WikiCite / Cite Q available in the Spanish and German language Wikipedias as well as Wikimedia and Wikiquote? I think we need a workshop, preferably led by you and Lydia -- with help from me and maybe Fuzheado, Peel, and Mabbett. I had the audacity to suggest a workshop on this, but I'm confident that you and Lydia can make it much more useful for the future of Wikimedia Foundation projects and humanity more generally. I'd be happy to edit this in almost any way you think would make it more attractive to the review committee and the audience I hope to attract -- or to authorize you to edit it.
- Thank you for showing me how to find presentation proposals. When I checked just now, I did not see the proposal I submitted for this roughly 8 hours ago. If this deficiency is not a timing issue, I could use suggestions on what I might do to make more visible my proposal.
- DavidMCEddy (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- DavidMCEddy, thanks for the ping. I'm happy to let Mike and others carry the weight of this effort, as I'll have plenty to do with GLAM submissions. Happy to help in any way. -- Fuzheado | Talk 13:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DavidMCEddy: There's no technical reason why it won't work on the German and Spanish wikipedias - it's designed to be completely multilingual. This is part of what we would cover in the tutorial/presentation. It needs someone that's local to the wiki to make sure it works, and to use it, though. I think the general question links in with whether wikis use Wikidata or not, for part of that see the 'Integrating Wikidata into the Wikimedia projects' panel I proposed. If your workshop is accepted, I'd be happy to participate though. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- DavidMCEddy, in terms of the "obstacles" to having more wikipedias with this template, there is no technical impediment. You would need to localise the documentation, and adjust the way the template formats the footnotes to meet the local wiki's standard styleguide, but it doesn't require new software per se. It just requires people who want to do that implementation work, and to obtain community editorial consensus that footnotes driven by data stored on Wikidata rather than inside the text of the article itself, is acceptable. That is: the task is one of community politics, not one of software development. So, perhaps your best bet if you would like to have CiteQ functions on a new language wikipedia, is to start a conversation on the relevant discussion page for editorial policies on your wiki. I'm not sure what a workshop with me, or Lydia, would achieve in that regard, as it's a local editorial decision.
- In the submission software for wikimania - Pretalx - there is a field that lets you select to make the proposal "public". Someone on the wikimania committee will manually copy the abstract onto the wikimania wiki for public viewing - it's not automatic as fas as I can tell. Wittylama 08:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I just checked: The proposal for a Workshop on "Making it easier to cite sources using WikiCite" says, "This content will be shown publicly" right below "Proposal title". A completely different proposal I filed (as "Spencer Graves") the day before the deadline appears on that list. ??? Thanks again. DavidMCEddy (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- DavidMCEddy, on a separate but related note, the title + description of your proposed session seem to imply that “WikiCite” is a database of content and/or a type of software. Neither is the case… like “1lib1ref” or “GLAMwiki” or “women in red” it is a brand. It is cute name to support an community project to improve citation information, but not a separate project or special software itself. One cannot ‘use WikiCite’ as the title says. Rather, Mike Peel et al. had a grant under the WikiCite program to improve the effectiveness of the citeQ template, and, Wikidata is a repository of structured data - including many millions of items about citable works. Does that clarify things? Wittylama 09:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I just checked: The proposal for a Workshop on "Making it easier to cite sources using WikiCite" says, "This content will be shown publicly" right below "Proposal title". A completely different proposal I filed (as "Spencer Graves") the day before the deadline appears on that list. ??? Thanks again. DavidMCEddy (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 45[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
- Library design improvements continue
- New partnerships
- 1Lib1Ref update
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2021[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: August 2021[edit]
| ||||||
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trove screenshot.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Trove screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 46[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
- Library design improvements deployed
- New collections available in English and German
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2021[edit]
| ||||||
November 2021 backlog drive[edit]
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Nomination of Princess Charlotte of Cambridge for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Charlotte of Cambridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
JeffUK (talk) 22:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 47[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2021[edit]
| ||||||
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This Month in GLAM: November 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of acronyms: N, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFS.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2021[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: December 2021[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 48[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Liam, sorry I am new to this platform and made corrections to the page relating to my Great Grand Aunt. I have all the documentation but now need to figure how to upload it. Much of it is also detailed in the book published in 2020 called Radio Girl by David Dufty. We will also be adding substantially more info to this page as there is about to be an event commentating Florence next month. I appreciate your interest in Florence but there is no need to be concerned with my corrections to the page rather I need to include the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SWallace880 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- Dear SWallace880, I'm so pleased you have come over to WP to help improve this article even further. Welcome! I was not aware of this Duffy book, I'll try and get my hands on a copy. Based on the excerpt published on the publisher's page[7] I was able to add in a footnote about the confusing variety of names (especially of her father).
- I originally wrote this Wikipedia article in 2011, building substantially on the text published by Catherine Freyne in the Dictionary of Sydney, and had it peer-reviewed by other Wikipedians to be able to be classified as one of the better quality articles in the project. That does, however, mean that it has a bit more complex code behind the article to make all the pretty formatting (such as the quote-boxes and elaborately structured footnotes.
- If you are planning on doing more wikipedia editing in order to expand this (or other) articles, I can help provide training if you'd like to have a chat, or the local affiliate organisation Wikimedia Australia also has various events and activities.[8]. If you want advice in general - e.g. if you've got some sources such as physical newspaper clippings and want to get them included here as well-formatted footnotes - you could also leave a message on the Australian Wikipedians Noticeboard.
This Month in GLAM: January 2022[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: February 2022[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 49[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
- New library collections
- Blog post published detailing technical improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2022[edit]
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: April 2022[edit]
| ||||||
New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 815 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Editing newsletter 2022 – #1[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.
23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 50[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
| |
| Nine years! |
|---|
Precious anniversary[edit]
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2022[edit]
| ||||||
New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
- Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
- Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. 
Barnstars will be awarded.
- TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
- Misc
There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12077 articles, as of 16:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
- Notes
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on![edit]
| New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2022[edit]
| ||||||
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Wittylama
Thank you for creating Phoenix Ghost.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 51[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
- New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
- Backlog status
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
- Coordination
- MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
- Open letter to the WMF
- The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
- TIP - Reviewing by subject
- Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
- New reviewers
- The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2022[edit]
| ||||||
NPP message[edit]
Hi Wittylama,
- Invitation
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Editing news 2022 #2[edit]
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: August 2022[edit]
| ||||||
October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive[edit]
| New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 52[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
- New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2022[edit]
| ||||||
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022[edit]
Hello Wittylama,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
This Month in GLAM: October 2022[edit]
| ||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 53[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
- New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
- Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
- New feature: Outage notification
- Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2022[edit]
| ||||||