User talk:Wizardman/Archive18
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Some questions
About the RFC on bogdangiusca [1]: you said "Due to inactivity, I'm closing this case" - Whose inactivity? Ours? We presented the case which I believe is pretty simple. Were we supposed to do more???
About "Romani people and supposedly related ethnic groups" [2]: What exactly should we take to mediation: the relation between Romanies and other ethnic groups, or the terminology? AKoan (talk) 11:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'm kinda confused. For example, if somebody makes a RFC on me, and I don't respond then I get away with it?!? Anyway, he responded here: [3]. I think that case is simple and I don't know what else could be said. And the essence was not the terminology, this is already under discussion here [4] and people have a civilized attitude there. The problem is that bogdangiusca, who is also an admin, moved that page in a "illegal" way. And it is not the first time that he has a biased position because of his nationalistic agenda. We hoped that he gets a warning or something in order to avoid such "accidents" in the future. AKoan (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of page Podbharti
Recently noticed that the page was deleted. Funny to see that some editors said it was not notable. Its so strange that Wikipedia finds a porn site Savita_Bhabhi notable and worthy of listing and deletes pages like Podbharti and Indicast. Its a shame really, just thought I would tell you that I admonish this notion of Wikipedia and wonder why the admins don't even bother to notify the authors of the deleted pages even once before taking such drastic steps. Mere 2 votes from total strangers to the topic and they just delete the page. Huh! --Debashishc (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I wish to add a request to take a look on my talk page for the message left by Chirag who nominated then page (for no good reason) for deletion. Its not difficult to see that he is on some sort of deletion spree. He even offers me advise to nominated pages for deletion. The page deleted had enough citations in the article to make it notable. --Debashishc (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for re-listing the deletion request. I have re-worked on the article to add more citations and links from other pages. Hope it would survive this time.--Debashishc (talk) 13:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Chrisjpatrick
Thanks for blocking him. i hope you don't mind me putting the block notice over there. --SkyWalker (talk) 04:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Michael Jackson
What was your reason for deleting the page entitled "Michael Jackson's forthcoming studio album?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.19.124 (talk) 23:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Alastair Haines/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Alastair Haines/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 02:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI
Something of a discussion went on in Wknight94's talk page about Olympians. Thought you'd care. Also, did you see the way the discussion went on Anthony Slama? In my opinion, I got another one of my articles saved.
I really don't feel like doing this for all of them. The key ones to me are Robert Delaney, Brian Dinkelman, Jeff Manship, Wilson Ramos, Anthony Slama, Danny Valencia, Rene Tosoni, Alex Burnett & Cole Devries. I've gone to enough of their games to have decided that they have the greatest star potential.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
For the record, I think you have the wrong impression of me--Johnny Spasm (talk) 20:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
wonderbra
Hi, found you while recent change patrolling. Just a quick question if this can be used as RS? This reference is used in the article Cleavage (breasts) for the Annual celebration section. Can it be used as primary source? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi there
If you keep on publicizing your political aspirations, you're going to get opposes from people who think you're wayyyyyyy too eager to enter the firepits. :) Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Frank Doljack
Hi, Just wondering why you moved the page? Is that some sort of biography guideline to remove the middle name? The reason I ask is because Frank Doljack is also a living person, related to Frank Joseph Doljack. --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 23:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombina and The Skeletones - Deletion Review
Hi Wizardman,
It seems I'm supposed to contact you (the deleting administrator), before going through the deletion review procedure...
I wasn't actually informed of the deletion (typical! Even though i had quite a few edits to them (Was noted about the dispution of license in response to the images)), so didn't actually know they were up for deletion until they were gone (was not really on WP much at that point)
I am after seeing if you would agree to undelete the article (and probably the albums, however, the notability of those is a bit more iffy). I am happy enough to do the undeletion myself.
You didn't actually comment in the deletion, just close and delete the articles.
To counter the first 3 points regarding notability of the band. Per WP:MUSIC
"A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:"
The Band at least meets these 2 criteria:
- Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
- Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network.
And possibly some of the others. [5] - They were a feature band of a Radio 2 session back in 2005. The BBC itself asserts enough notability and international credability, and with the tracks being played, it therefore means they meet the criteria.
They have also been featured in various magazines, and played at large festivals around europe
Granted, i will agree that the articles werent brilliant, and not the best sourced. If we can get it undeleted, I'm going to work on improving it, getting it better and properly sourced. And then for images, the band have said they will deal with the licensing, and sort that out if necessary
Thanks
—Reedy 19:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Any updates? —Reedy 19:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Wizardman, thanks for closing this MfD, as well as the other one. However, I wanted to clarify that since IL7Soulhunter has moved User:IL7Soulhunter/Bored/More/Special/Bored/More/Secret/Guestbook to simply User:IL7Soulhunter/Guestbook, I am okay with allowing him to keep that page, per Blow of Light's rationale at the MfD. Thanks. :) GlassCobra 22:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO
According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Billy Pierce) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Your entry in the Five-million pool
I have removed your entry in the Five-million pool, since at the time of entering the Wikipedia article count had already reached 2,500,000, so the pool was closed. If it is any consolation to you, I am fairly convinced that by the end of 2012 the count will still be less than 3,500,000. --Lambiam 22:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Joe Connor
Don't quote me on this, but I think this is the 2,500,000th article. Sceptre (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
RFA nom
Hi, Wizardman,
Thanks very much for asking me about a nom for adminship, which I'm happy to accept. Rlevse had asked me the same thing a few weeks ago, so if it's ok with you, I'd appreciate your conom, as discussed here: User talk:JGHowes#Admin.
The RFA to be transcluded is at: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JGHowes
Again, thanks very much for thinking of me. JGHowes talk - 23:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
USA Olympic Team
I made a roster for the US Olympic Baseball Team, but I have no idea where I would post it.
| Players | Coaches/Other | |||
|
Pitchers
|
Catchers
Infielders
Outfielders
|
Manager
Coaches
| ||
Could you let me know where or post it for me.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 00:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Error
Thank you. I posted the following on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball
I noticed an innaccuracy on Wikipedia. In 1979, it says:
- September 26 - Phil Niekro of the Atlanta Braves earns his 20th win of the season in a win over the Houston Astros. the losing pitcher is his brother, Joe Niekro who picks up his 20th loss of the season. Joe is the last pitcher of the twentieth century to earn both 20 wins and 20 losses in a season, and is the first National League pitcher to do so since 1905. The Brothers Niekro also join brothers Jim and Gaylord Perry as the only brothers to both win 20 games in the same season.
In actuality, Phil was the brother who lost 20 games that season. I don't know how to correct that particular entry. Would it be correct to change it to read:
- September 26 - Joe Niekro of the Houston Astros earns his 20th win of the season in a win over the Atlanta Braves. the losing pitcher is his brother, Phil Niekro who picks up his 20th loss of the season. Phil is the last pitcher of the twentieth century to earn both 20 wins and 20 losses in a season, and is the first National League pitcher to do so since 1905. The Brothers Niekro also join brothers Jim and Gaylord Perry as the only brothers to both win 20 games in the same season.
My guess is yes, but again, it is just a guess. I opt for removing it entirely.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I removed it entirely--Johnny Spasm (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Mall Police
Please engage with me in a chat about mall police!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mall Police (talk • contribs) 06:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
2.5 million
I came up with am (diagraph) by looking at the figures in Special:NewPages> I guess I forgot to account for deleted articles so it is probably wrong. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'll try to calculate it again, but I'll take account of deleted articles. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
No one spotted that when I explained the mothods on IRC, I've unpublished the Wikinews article temporarily. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I give up, the Wikinews article is going to be deleted as author request. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I've restored the article and I will work on creating a version that does not name the article. Anonymous101 (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Joe Connor
You beat me to it with your talk page response -- I was typing the same thing. Do you think Joe Connor will be the 2.5 millionth article? It would be nice if it were a ballplayer, but I've had a tough time finding info on him so far, other than his brother being famous. According to the 1920 and 1930 census, he was a salesman after he left baseball, but I'm not sure how to cite that (or if it counts as WP:OR). Coemgenus 17:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Nice person
Hello. You seem a nice person. I was just looking for other user opinions on my edits and you seem to have gotten around. How long have you been here for? :) --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 17:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
And what level of work did you put in to gain access to admin tools? Hope I'm not sounding desperate. I'm just slightly curious. :) --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 18:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah right. Well I'm doing that for nearly two years (as this user - longer anonymously) so I guess I'm doing OK. Have a nice day. :) --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 19:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, just wondering if you could verify a fact from an article I created a couple of days ago? I was hoping it might be included on the Main Page and thought this might be an area that appeals to you. It is currently second from the bottom of its section (the 10th). Cheers. :) --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 22:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just question. The article had several images, but a concern was raised in FA nom that these images were fair use, so I have removed much of the images. Compare the present version with this version. I am not sure if one of the images can be brought back or not. There was also a graph, but I am not well-versed in making graph or chart. Is there any project in wikipedia which can make graph for articles? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 01:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Michael Jackson AfDs
Poor you, sorry that you have to re list all these articles, I've been giving the wikiproject a clean out, so much rubbish in there that needed deleting. Still, I won't nominate Michael Jackson's health and appearance like some other admin did recently. :-) — Realist2 02:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Possible DYK of Joe Connor
Hi Wizardman. I've expanded Joe Connor, said to be the 2,500,000th article, to have a chance at appearing on the Main Page. I've decided to try and expand Roger Craig also, since it's not entirely clear which is the 2,500,000th article. I just thought I'd let you know. I think it would be a good idea for Wikipedia's 2,500,000th article to appear on the Main Page. -- RyRy (talk) 22:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, don't worry, I've created/expanded many baseball articles to DYK status, and it's rather easy to get it over 1500 characters. :-) Anyway, I'll nominate it now. Feel free to tweak the hook when added if needed. Cheers! -- RyRy (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I need your help
When I originally created the USA Baseball Olympic Team roster, I accidentally spelled Stephen Strasburg's name Steven Strasburg. He pitched a one hitter in the Olympics today, so I created an entry for him. I didn't notice it until after I already created it. Either this required an administrator to fix, or I just plain don't know how.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Learned something new. Thanks.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 23:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
RFAQ
[6] eh, you mean you wouldn't consider unblocking? –xeno (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Just FYI it's not a hypothetical situation and the vandal is now one of my brightest and most constructive adoptees. The reason I think that making them wait the week isn't helpful is that whereas if you show forgiveness and unblock right away, they're more likely to keep their promise of being constructive. If you make them fester the week, they're more likely to just return to vandalism as payback. Of course, that's speculative. –xeno (talk) 22:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
A claim that a "moderator" "apologized" for deleting this article at the AfD (I think) has been made on my Talk page. I'm trying to figure out who that "moderator" is. Was that you, perhaps? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: Thanks. It sounded rather suspicious to me, but I thought I would check around anyways. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Johnny Beall
|
On 15 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johnny Beall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Mifter (talk) 19:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Category renaming
Since you successfully moved to shift major league players by position to Major League Baseball players by position (I have no problem with that), maybe you could make a somewhat similar nomination to move Category:American Major League Baseball players by home state and its subcats to Category:American baseball players by home state and appropriate subcats; ideally, this could fold in all the Negro leaguers as well as the relatively few players under Category:American baseball players. The only potential drawback I can foresee would be a tendency to add more articles for non-major leaguers than would be ideal, but I think the advantages outweight the negatives. (It would also agree with cats like Category:American basketball players by state and Category:American football players by state, both of which need to be filled out - though I think they both should also specify home state.) MisfitToys (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Forgot to mention that the move would also allow folding in some of those under Category:Female baseball players (such as players of the AAGPBL), though they would presumably still remain in that cat as well. Also, it appears that Category:Major league baseball players by team should be retitled Category:Major League Baseball players by team. MisfitToys (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the WP:ANI discussion.
I am really not arguing here or trying to be belligerent, but do you have any guidance on what pages this ban actually includes? Obviously it includes William M. Connolley. Does it include edits to RealClimate which have nothing whatsoever to do with WMC, or not? Does it include edits to Lawrence Solomon as Raul wants it to, or not (assuming that they have nothing whatsoever to do with WMC)?
Any guidance you can provide will be greatly appreciated.
--GoRight (talk) 00:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
I have another question. User:Ncmvocalist created the following page, User:GoRight/Community sanction, which is fine but I note that he altered the text of the ban from what was actually !voted on. For example:
From my topic ban proposal:
GoRight topic-banned from William Connolley-related pages - this is not to be confused with edits regarding User:William M. Connolley.
From the editing restrictions page:
GoRight is topic-banned from William Connolley-related pages - this is not to be confused with edits regarding User:William M. Connolley.
From the community sanction page:
GoRight is topic-banned William Connolley-related pages, broadly construed. This is not to be confused with making edits concerning User: William M. Connolley.
Strictly speaking, a broad interpretation was discussed but so too were a lot of other things. The language that people actually !voted on did not include the "broadly construed" language so I sort of object to this change of language by User:Ncmvocalist after the fact. Is this legitimate? --GoRight (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm just letting you know that I'm unblocking this user that you blocked as a result of the AfD drama. It seems (based on the discussion I've had with the user in deviantART, see my user page that the user in question seems to behave more or less rationally; I'm pretty convinced that this user isn't fundamentally here to stir trouble, as could be discerned from the slightly panicked behaviour in AfD and elsewhere. I'm pretty sure all inappropriate behaviour can be tutored away in this case. I've given the user an appropriate Lecture to go with the unblock. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:55, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Michael Cremo AFD
Would it be possible to relist this discussion? It doesn't seem that any of the participants took notice of the sources I found. Zagalejo^^^ 16:33, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
Wizardman, thank you for your contribution to the discussion at my recent RfA. If ever you have any concerns about my actions, adminly or otherwise, don't hesitate to let me know. Best wishes, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 17:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Busy?
Hey, are you busy at the moment? -- iMatthew T.C. 17:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- I was just wondering if you could give your opinion at this discussion. -- iMatthew T.C. 18:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Question of Appropriateness
I posted the following on the baseball discussion page, but I figured I'd ask you as well. I thought it might be cool to add flags to indicate foreign born players on the Miracle roster, but I wasn't sure if that was something that was acceptable for Wikipedia. This is just here; I did not change the team template. I'm at the stage where I like to check these things first--Johnny Spasm (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
The closing of my RfC by User:Ncmvocalist
I want to thank you for addressing the changes to the language of my topic ban by User:Ncmvocalist. While you had indicated that you were intending to review my RfC and close it, User:Ncmvocalist decided to take it upon himself to do so. I object to the language he has used in the summary thereof because he is clearly trying to bias the results there against me by implying that my topic ban was a result of the RfC which it was not. The discussion on WP:ANI which lead to the topic ban was clearly independent from the RfC discussion and not a result of any discussion that occurred there.
I have raised this issue with him on his talk page and he refuses to address my concern, [7]. There is also discussion of this on the talk page for the RfC, [8].
I tried placing my own comment explaining this fact in the summary, [9], but he subsequently reverted it, [10].
While I wish to put this entire episode behind me, [11], I object to User:Ncmvocalist's attempts to bias the record against me. I believe that he has become biased against me since he is the one that opened the Topic Ban Proposal against me, [12], and he has made biased charges against me without explaining them in any way, [13] At this point I can only assume that he is disappointed with the outcome of the topic ban and is now using his administrative authority to inflict as much damage as possible after the fact, specifically by altering the language that was voted on in the Community sanction page he created, as you saw, and attempting to link the WP:ANI result to the RfC when the two were completely independent of one another. As it stands now, his closing remark makes it appear as though an RfC was conducted and as a result thereof an WP:ANI discussion was held to institute a sanction against me. Obviously this is not how the events unfolded and I object to his attempts to make it appear so.
What is to be done here? I don't want more wikidrama but I won't let the closing of my RfC stand as it is without complaint. If necessary I intend to raise this issue on WP:ANI as I consider these actions on User:Ncmvocalist's part to be harassment after the fact and abuse of his administrative position. Your advice and assistance in resolving this matter would be greatly appreciated. --GoRight (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for University of Windsor Students' Alliance
An editor has asked for a deletion review of University of Windsor Students' Alliance. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymone Bain - No consensus
What should I do at this point? Am I allowed to nominate it again? Should I wait some time? Should I just forget about it? I've seen people renominate articles that were no consensus just a week later. I wouldn't want to do that as I think it's kinda bad faith to re nominate so quickly. Advise appreciated. — Realist2 16:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I frown upon it myself. OK will leave it a while, will probably forget about it. :-) — Realist2 17:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Joe Connor
|
|
On 18 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Connor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 23:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I intend to submit a deletion review for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Perdew (2nd nomination)
There was no consensus in the discussion, that is why I relisted it. I find your immediate closing as delete was sloppy and hasty. Sheer vote-counting might lead one to find a case for deletion, but the only participant who contributed to the discussion aside from the nominator actually made a good case for keeping the article. There was need for more discussion, and so you should not have closed it yet. I will submit this for deletion review tomorrow if it is still closed. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your cooperation, I appreciate it. I regret that I did not envision the possibility that you were unaware that it was relisted... goes to show that one can't assume too much good faith. Sorry if my tone was unduly harsh. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Howard Perdew
Why did you delete it then change your mind? It clearly fails WP:N given the utter lack of sources, so I don't see any point in dragging it out any longer. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind, I should've looked right above. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Bambina (Idoli song) signgle deletion
Hello, the article Bambina (Idoli song) signgle by Idoli you have deleted was fully standard as the deletion tag was placed before I edited it and added aditional information. A user called Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 00:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC) confirmed that the article was fully functional and wanted to remove the deletion tag. Please restore the deleted page and remove the deltion tag. Thank you in advance.
Milos
Relisting AfDs
Hi. I noticed you are relisting AfDs which have failure many votes. I'm not trying to challenge you on this—and perhaps this practice is official policy, perhaps you've already explained this several times before—but it seems to me that AfD nomination that has failed to attract much attention and has no "keep" votes is essentially equivalent to an uncontested PROD and could be closed as "Delete" rather than relisted. Certainly if there are few votes and a least one of them is "keep" then relisting makes senses, but relisting undisputed AfDs seems to me like unnecessarily adding to the AfD backlog. What do you think? Yilloslime (t) 19:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
DYK
Hey Wizardman, I see you're currently active. If you could slap the T:DYK/N over to T:DYK really quickly, I can go ahead and do the thank yous. I'd be much obliged. --JayHenry (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Doh! Nevermind, Gatoclass got it a few minutes after I posted. Sorry to bother you. --JayHenry (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Hernán Rodríguez de Monroy y Orellana, 6th Lord of Monroy
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hernán Rodríguez de Monroy y Orellana, 6th Lord of Monroy. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 13:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Moved from user page by —Wknight94 (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Saw your note at DRV. Mystery solved! Hernán Rodríguez de Monroy y Orellana, el Bezudo, 6th Lord of Monroy, subsequent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hernán Rodríguez de Monroy y Orellana, el Bezudo, 6th Lord of Monroy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
lathander afd
hi :) just wondering why you didn't delete this article when no secondary sources were provided. surely these are essential for an article to be kept...? xxx Jessi1989 (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- hmm i see what you are saying. in my opinion though, as none of the keep voters supported their vote with policy then the fact that there was no clear consensus is irrelevant. afds aren't ballots. as i understand it, a no consensus closure should only be used if there was a confict between voters both supporting their votes with policy... anyway, thanks for getting back to me xxx Jessi1989 (talk) 17:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Admin
Hi, thanks for the message (and for the reminder). Yes, I would be happy to help out with the mop. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, have sent you an email. Regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- The deed is done! Let's see how the RfA goes. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 31 | 28 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 32 | 9 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 33 | 11 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 34 | 18 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Help wanted | ||
| WikiWorld: "Cashew" | Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
RFCs
Because the dispute was resolved by way of the user who had stopped editing - part of the reason why there was insufficient third party input. Your administrative warning for the future still holds - but it is not what resolved the dispute at hand. Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you (re. OAFD bot link)
Thanks for adding the link to the page update function of the bot that maintains WP:OAFD. I was not aware of it in the past (and actually only just got yelled at for not using it). However, mathbot studiously reverts you. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Doru Bratu
Why you deleted Doru Bratu? jjmihai (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I not understand, this player is professional player. He debutante in this year for Rapid, check official site of Rapid. Sorry for my English. jjmihai (talk) 06:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Igorevich Yakovlev
Thanks, it had slipped my mind. –Black Falcon (Talk) 23:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)