User talk:XtremeFanatic

Narwhal

I see you have added the claim that this species has the largest known canines. It seems plausible but records are definitely the sorts of claim that requires a citation. Ideally this would be added in the body of the article, rather than adding uncited claims to the lead, which is supposed to reflect the article's existing contents. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

July 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Opel Regent. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 15:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Please don't create a separate article where one is not needed, especially one that is unreferenced and full of original research. --Biker Biker (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Opel Antara GTC, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Biker Biker (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Once again you persist in adding badly-written, and unsourced content. Do you need any help to understand how referencing works? You are obviously keen, but your current attempts result in much cleanup work for regular editors. Apart from WP:V, which you will have been pointed to numerous times on your (recently erased) talk page, I would also draw your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions‎, which dictates how automobile related articles should be written and how units of measure should be used. If you need help understanding this then please ask. It would be helpful if you acknowledged these messages and indicated that you intend to be a better Wiki editor using the help offered by me and others. --Biker Biker (talk) 16:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:God, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pass a Method talk 07:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Love Chaser, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Kraft (band) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kraft (band). Since you had some involvement with the Kraft (band) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Safiel (talk) 00:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Sabre-toothed seal listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sabre-toothed seal. Since you had some involvement with the Sabre-toothed seal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk  17:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

B.P. Marine Academy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of B.P. Marine Academy, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Training Ship Chanakya. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm Mahensingha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yadav have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MahenSingha (Talk) 18:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, XtremeFanatic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Facebook. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui ^雲_水 09:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, XtremeFanatic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nigel Tempest listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nigel Tempest. Since you had some involvement with the Nigel Tempest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 19:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, XtremeFanatic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sperm whale— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 10:09, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Killer whale. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indian cuckoo, you may be blocked from editing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

What diruptive editing...please explain

. 09:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok i didn't notice this warning please unblock me because im unable to disscus on the Talk pages . 12:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sushant Singh Rajput. I am giving you only 1 warning due to your account history and evident WP:CIR issues. Please stop your disruptive editing immediately. Ed talk! 13:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Killer whale, you may be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

"Vauxhall Alex" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vauxhall Alex and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 19#Vauxhall Alex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 04:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

"Majin cat" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Majin cat and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 28#Majin cat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Andrewsarchus. Mr Fink (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I only added "see also" . 07:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XtremeFanatic (talk • contribs)

• Alright, I was just about to ship your ass to AIV for this little stunt, but I figure you are due one last warning. The next time you intentionally disrupt the encyclopedia to enable your little jokes and/or obsessions, you will be reported and very likely blocked. Do you get that? -Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

how much wikipedia is paying you . 14:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XtremeFanatic (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for vandalism and/or erratic edits, and failure to communicate, after a long history of ignored warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

• This block is for one month because I'm hoping this can impress upon you, when nothing else has so far, that this is a collaborative project, and you need to expect to be held accountable for your edits. You have been here for ten years and have been cut a lot of slack for unsourced edits and for edits that were either vandalism or indistinguishable from vandalism. If after the end of this block you return to making those kinds of edits, you can expect the next block to be of indefinite length. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok I'm sorry it was my mistake I'll use the talk page first to suggest better edits now please unblock me and revert my edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by XtremeFanatic (talk • contribs) 11:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I previously blocked you for a month for this. You didn't respond to the block at all, and started making the exact kind of edits on your return. Why should I believe that you will start citing sources and communicating with others now, when nothing has made you do so so far? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

It says on Wikipedia that don't be afraid to edit articles as they will be reverted by moderators . — Preceding unsigned comment added by XtremeFanatic (talk • contribs) 11:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

That's not at all what we say. We say to be bold but be careful. You've definitely been bold, but you haven't been careful. People have communicated concerns about your edits, and you haven't responded to them. And when 179.34.42.164 reverted your edit to On Through the Night, you made the same edit when your block ended. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 11:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

How to delete my Wikipedia account?

. 11:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't warned to use the talk page first . 12:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I have read the guide to appealing blocks . 11:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

I cannot add topics to talk pages i request you to unblock me

. 04:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I want to add links to reliable sources . 04:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Are you a robot or real human being . 05:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I want to discuss on the talk pages of which im unable to disscus because I'm blocked

. 04:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm unable to disscus on the Talk pages because Im blocked . 12:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request I've read the guidelines to be unblocked . 09:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for unblocking me you are a very sensible human being . 02:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #66267

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

What is closed . 04:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm unable to disscus on the Talk pages . 04:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

"Bandya" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bandya and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 1 § Bandya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

"Neo-amphibia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Neo-amphibia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 23 § Neo-amphibia until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Why am I blocked I haven't been issued a warning

Why am I blocked I haven't been issued a warning . 14:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Request to unblock I want to discuss on the Talk pages

I am unable to discuss on the Talk pages . 11:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

If I'm any judge of your little pecadilloes, you are already block-evading as an IP, and in the previous non-constructive manner, so I'd suggest - no. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

"Proto-Artiodactyl" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Proto-Artiodactyl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 19 § Proto-Artiodactyl until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

"Cete (clade)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cete (clade) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 19 § Cete (clade) until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 21:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

"Bird like reptile" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bird like reptile has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 20 § Bird like reptile until a consensus is reached. Plantdrew (talk) 01:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

I cannot discuss on the talk pages as I'm a person of good faith

I cannot discuss on the talk pages as I am a person of good faith . 03:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
3. Update your signature to fix the error.
4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)