User talk:Yaarann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Yaarann, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Nick Moyes (talk) 08:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Yaarann, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Yaarann! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yuvraj Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been adding names to lists of Notable alumni in articles. Wikipedia policy is that unless there is an existing Wikipedia article about a person, that person's name should not be added anywhere as a Notable alumni. David notMD (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurdwara Koohni Sahib (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Broccoli and Coffee were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 05:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurdwara Koohni Sahib (May 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
See WP:Markup for how to mark section headings. Section headings are delimited by equal signs (=), which are used to construct the table of contents of a page.

Please edit this draft as specified before resubmitting.

This draft is duplicated.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gurdwara Koohni Sahib has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gurdwara Koohni Sahib. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Yaarann! You created a thread called Article Submission Permission on Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of Battlaxe[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battlaxe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Information icon

Hello Yaarann. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yaarann. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yaarann|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You have also been copy and pasting content written by others.. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually, I was blocked for creating a page for a persona named Kevin George and the reason given to me is that I have created this page in exchange of money, which is not correct. I created this person's page after being impressed with his personality. I follow him on social networking and this is reason I tried to create a page for him. I don't know that it violates Wikipedia's policy. I request you to change your decision of blocking me from editing existing articles. I promise you that I won't give you a chance for a complaint in the future.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your copyright violations. You state on your userpage that writing is your profession, so it is difficult to believe that you were not paid in this instance. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stated writing as my profession, which is true, but I create articles for Wikipedia to improve my writing skills not for gaining money as I generate enough income from my writing job. If I am here for earning, then why would I right writing as my profession. I am here to develop my skills and learn from other Wikipedia writers, I humbly request you to review your decision of blocking me and give me one chance.

Decline reason:

You have still not addressed your copyright violations. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Frankly speaking I didn't know that it was a copyright violation as I just copied an image from someone's profile from social networking. Please treat this mistake of my mine as first and last.

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yaarann, are you seriously not a paid editor? GSS (talk|c|em) 03:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have admitted that I have made a copyright violation, which I was not aware of. It is my humble request to you to review my unblock request. I assure you that I won't repeat it in the future.

Decline reason:

Your draft reads like you were paid to write it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You said that my drafts looks like that I am paid to write it. But have you checked it thoroughly as it was written for a Gurudwara, a Sikh religious place. Why would I be paid to write for a religious place? Why would they pay me to write for them. They don't need it at all. I request you to review your decision and unblock my account as I want to contribute to Wikipedia, which is beneficial for me as well as Wikipedia. In case, the region I gave is not enough to believe then please tell me the solution to get my account unblocked

Decline reason:

Having looked at the off-wiki evidence and compared it to your deleted contributions, I am convinced that you have been editing for pay on Wikipedia without disclosure. Yunshui 雲水 06:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Note to reviewing admin. I'll be happy to share some off-wiki evidence on their paid editing status through email so, please let me know if required. Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 15:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me in detail how I can unblock my account. 

Yaarann (talk) 07:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia and I appealed so many times to unblock myself but I haven't been unblocked and that's why I have been forced to create a new Wikipedia account. I can't edit my own user page to add paid user tag to my page. I request you to unblock one of my accounts and delete the other account. I would be happy if you allow me again to edit and follow my passion.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yaarann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin, Kindly unblock this Wikipedia account of mine or otherwise delete it and activate my other Wikipedia account ContentNerd, where I have disclosed that I also do paid editing. If this is not the solution, kindly tell me what I need to do to unblock one of my Wikipedia accounts. Yaarann (talk) 07:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 10:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for acknowledging your sockpuppetry after earlier going out of your way to blatantly lying about it, over on User talk:ContentNerd. However, this is your sixth (!!!) unblock request here and it demonstrates a profound lack of any understanding of what lead to your block. Given that you've worked extremely hard to destroy the trust the community had in you, I have revoked talk page access. Acknowledging your lies from earlier this month is a good step, but it's nowhere near sufficient. If your unblock request is declined, your best chance, though it's slim, is to wait six months with zero edits then apply under WP:SO. At that point, you'll need to address your inappropriate edits, your sockpuppetry and block evasion, your lying, and almost certainly, you'll have to fully disclose your conflicts of interest and agree to a complete topic ban around any paid editing whatsoever. In six months, and not before, you can use WP:UTRS to apply. You will have to make zero edits, or this option will be removed from you and you will have no path forward. --Yamla (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Post Graduate Government College – 11, Chandigarh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post Graduate Government College – 11, Chandigarh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Graduate Government College – 11, Chandigarh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurdwara Koohni Sahib has been accepted[edit]

Gurdwara Koohni Sahib, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 08:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yaarann&oldid=1043822092"