Jump to content

Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Donwarnersaklad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Case Filed On: 20:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Questions:

[edit]

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer:

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer:

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer:

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer:

Summary:

[edit]

Discussion:

[edit]

Oy, most of this as I understand it surrounds this edit to Talk:AIDS - [1]. It was followed by removal from a few different users (I was the first), and from a few different article talk pages. After a very short while, he started this process. Read his talk page for a little more. I and others tried our best to explain it. After this matter {{Template:off topic warning}} was placed on the AIDS talk page, and probably some other places where his live journal thought experiment was thrown (check Special:Contributions/Donwarnersaklad).

If there is a follow up response to this, I may not be able to get to it until Thursday night or Friday. I'm on a work/school spiral M-Th, and really I should be doing term papers right now. ;) I will still keep this on my watchpage. JoeSmack Talk 05:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Joe. I'm getting the picture now. You tackled Donwarnersaklad on his contributions, and he doesn't quite understand why his contributions were not acceptable. I'll speak to him. SilkTork 16:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followup:

[edit]

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

[edit]

Case Status: closed


Advocate Status: