Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/August 2019

1988 Pacific hurricane season[edit]

1988 Pacific hurricane season

4 articles

Hurricane Uleki

Tropical Depression Seventeen-E

Tropical Storm Miriam

All storms of the 1988 Pacific hurricane season have become good articles, so I have nominated this for good topic. I did a brief run-through of all four articles and found them to be in good shape. As such, I think this merits good topic. Noah^Talk 02:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Fixed the dead links, should be good to go. ~ KN2731 {t · c} 04:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Well-defined topic and scope, with all articles in the category at GA. The lead section of the overview article could stand to spell out the notable storms for the year. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 23:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bryanrutherford0: I added in information regarding deaths... Just note that this year was not very notable. Only 3 storms caused deaths and none had damage totals severe enough that they were reported to global organizations. Noah^Talk 23:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I just mean that those three storms' names should probably be stated and wikilinked in the lead section; Seventeen-E/Debby isn't currently named or linked, as far as I can see. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 12:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bryanrutherford0: Included something about Joan and Debby being successful Atlantic crossovers and stated what their names were after they did so. Noah^Talk 21:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 01:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adelophthalmidae[edit]

Adelophthalmidae

7 articles

Adelophthalmus

Bassipterus

Eysyslopterus

Nanahughmilleria

Parahughmilleria

Pittsfordipterus

A family of eurypterids, one of the most diverse, numerous and longest lasting of them. I'm not sure what to do with the genus Unionopterus (also a GA), which may or may not belong to this clade. Super Ψ Dro 12:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Well-defined scope, with all the genera covered at GA quality. I'd leave out Unionopterus unless and until it is more clearly established to belong to this group by subsequent studies. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then I won't include it. Super Ψ Dro 14:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As the author of Adelophthalmus and reviewer of Bassipterus, Nanahughmilleria, Parahughmilleria and Pittsfordipterus I think the Adelophthalmid eurypterids are pretty well covered on Wikipedia, certainly better than in any other easily accessible encyclopedia. Ichthyovenator (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Clearly a high-quality grouping of articles. Enwebb (talk) 00:57, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 03:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian Eurovision Song Contest entries[edit]

Romania has participated in the Eurovision Song Contest 20 times since its debut in 1994, and has placed in the top ten six times. Its best results were achieved by Luminița Anghel and Sistem in 2005, and by Paula Seling and Ovi in 2010, who both finished in third place.

Romanian Eurovision Song Contest entries

22 articles

"Dincolo de nori"

"Eu cred"

"The Moon"

"Tell Me Why"

"Don't Break My Heart"

"I Admit"

"Let Me Try"

"Tornerò"

"Liubi, Liubi, I Love You"

"Pe-o margine de lume"

"The Balkan Girls"

"Playing with Fire"

"Change"

"Zaleilah"

"It's My Life"

"Miracle"

"De la capăt"

"Moment of Silence"

"Yodel It!"

"Goodbye"

"On a Sunday"

Contributor(s): Cartoon network freak

All articles have been passed to GA status throughout the past 2 years. --Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Seems to include all the singles that made it into the final round at GA quality, with a FL main article. As a comment, I think the songs in the topic box are out of order, since, according to the list, "Zaleilah" should come before "It's My Life". Also, I find it confusing for the sequence to run across rows rather than down columns; I would arrange the entries the other way. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bryanrutherford0: Entries rearranged :) Cartoon network freak (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Remarkable job, well done!--N Ø 16:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support A masterpiece. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - brilliant work -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support 22 articles? Amazing! Super Ψ Dro 14:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aoba47 (talk) 20:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stellar work bringing these Eurovision Articles to GA status. Seriously, kudos. Jerry (talk) 02:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 00:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

London station group[edit]

The London station group is a group of 18 railway stations served by the National Rail network in central London. Most are terminal stations, either serving major national services or local commuter routes. A small number are through-stations that are considered terminals for ticketing purposes. All current stations in the group fall within London fare zone 1. A ticket marked "London Terminals" allows travel to any station in the group via any permitted route, as determined by the National Routeing Guide.

Contributor(s): Ritchie333, Amakuru

We had an abortive attempt at a good topic a few months back, because I'd only taken the current set of London station group entries to GA, and some of you wanted the entire lot. Well, with great assistance from Amakuru, we've done it. Everything ever legitimately classed as a London terminal station, past and present. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - awesome work -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Looks like the full set, all at GA or better. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - my "great assistance" was to work on one of the GAs and review one other, so most of the kudos has to go to Ritchie for this excellent set, but it was fun and I'm glad to have played a part anyway! — Amakuru (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:12, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support They all seem to be there. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 00:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Torpedo cruisers of Italy[edit]

This topic comprises all of the torpedo cruisers built by the Italian Regia Marina from the 1870s to the 1890s. They are in most cases, experimental vessels, and all were superseded by later light cruisers that provided the same torpedo armament with better speed, armor, and gun armament. Many of the vessels were either in reserve or scrapped outright by the time Italy fought its first major war of the period, the Italo-Turkish War of 1911–1912, but a few of the vessels saw action, primarily as gunfire support vessels. Several were still in service during World War I, albeit mostly in secondary roles like minelayers and training ships, and all were discarded in the early 1920s. Thanks to all who take the time to review the topic. Parsecboy (talk) 11:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Seems to be a well-defined topic, and all the classes and ships are present at GA quality. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Comprehensive and includes all the classes and individual ships. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Bryan and Peacemaker--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support That looks like the full set to me. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this topic has all torpedo cruisers, they all have a GA-class and all the cruisers are in chronologically order. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 23:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]