Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 01:10, 7 July 2007.

Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express[edit]

This article has brilliant prose, is comprehensive, is out-of-universe for the majority, has citations, is in many categories, and is thouroughly deserving of FA-status.Paaerduag 12:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - nominator has obviously poured a lot of time into this series of adventure games; well-written and thorough, as well as nice formatting. Therefore support. --Tjkirk 07:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support — well-referenced, well-expanded and deserving article. ···巌流^{? · talk to ganryuu} 11:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The plot ... is extremely similar to that of Agatha Christie's novel of the same name. Who says? Isn't it original research to claim that they are the same? hbdragon88 18:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a statement in the intro which is thoroughly explained and sourced in the main body. I don't think there is a problem here at all. Wrad 19:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That is a lot of footnotes. Many are unnecessary, see Wikipedia:When to cite. You can combine some, like the 11 footnotes (all to reference 8) in the "Plot" paragraph can be made into one footnote at the end of the paragraph. It will be taken to mean that the entire paragraph is sourced to Same with the 6 footnotes (all to reference 2) in the fourth "Development" paragraph. That is my only complaint. This is really well done. So I support. --maclean 04:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MOE box.jpg missing fair use rationale for use in this article. --Durin 18:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

changed it to fit article.Paaerduag 08:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Written, structured and sourced to a high standard. Comprehensive but focussed. You've done a great job, Paaerduag. Rossrs 13:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.