Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Balto (film)/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 17:08, 17 January 2009 [1].
Balto (film)[edit]
Thi article basically passes WP:FAC criteria, it cites and references stuff, the plot isn't too long/short, it links to other pages, there aren't ny edit-wars, the page isn't biased, and the lead section covers the whole page. Elbutler (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose big fat needs references banner at the top, only two inline citations. Strongly suggest a Peer Review. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Insufficient inline citations per WP:CITE. Gary King (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose The plot summary is way to long, there aren't enough refs, and the critical reviews section is based entirely on 11 reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Not sure File:Baltocd.jpg is a justifiable use of a non-free image. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would suggest that the editor read this dispatch on non-free images. Awadewit (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Insufficient citations and nothing about the production, casting, awards, influences... Bisbis (talk) 04:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.