Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jama Masjid, Delhi/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Graham Beards via FACBot (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2015 [1].

Jama Masjid, Delhi[edit]

Nominator(s): RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Jama Masjid, India's largest mosque which was built by Shah Jahan, the builder of Taj Mahal. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For "the largest mosque in India", and one with such a long history, the article's surprisingly short. Is this really all the information you could get on it? Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 10:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Welcome to FAC, Royroydeb. While you have a great start on this article, it looks quite deficient in terms of depth of information and quality of sources. A quick library search reveals numerous high-quality journal articles and news sources covering this mosque. Tourism books and web sites such as Delhi: 14 Historic Walks and Cultural India should be used lightly, if at all. I recommend this be withdrawn. --Laser brain (talk) 11:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As others have said, this just doesn't have the depth of an FA (I have visited the building btw). The section on the architecture is very inadequate. Frankly I think it was a bit lucky to get GA. A pity, as Islamic architecture is under-represented generally, and has no FAs at all, and this is a major building. I hope you will develop it further, but I'd suggest taking it to Peer Review first next time. Of the 5 External links, only the one to a Flickr search worked when I tried! Johnbod (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – Clearly fails criteria 1 (a), (b) and (c). Suggest the nominator to withdraw the candidate. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Beards (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.