Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Qalaherriaq/archive1

Qalaherriaq[edit]

Featured article candidates/Qalaherriaq/archive1

Nominator(s): Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is on Qalaherriaq (AKA Erasmus Augustine Kallihirua and many, many other names), a young Inughuit lad who served as a interpreter (after an essential abduction) in the 1850s, converted to Christianity, and tragically died at around 22. This was my first article in a series on Inuit interpreters. I have tried to squeeze as much as I can out of these sources, and it's the kind of story I'd like to run at TFA down the line :3 Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Why two copies of the same image?

File:Qalaherriaq, 1850s, Inughuit hunt (cropped).jpg is missing alt text

File:Qalaherriaq_signature.svg needs a US tag. Ditto File:Qalaherriaq,_1850s,_Inughuit_hunt_(cropped).jpg, File:Qalaherriaiq_map.jpg, File:Qalaherriaq,_Buried_Esquimaux.jpg. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Alrighty, licensing and alt-text should all be fixed. I originally had two of the same because I wanted to show both angles of the double-portrait but also thought the front-facing was the best image of him... but I was able to find a good-quality scan of an 1855 drawing of him, and that I think is a step up. Generalissima (talk) (it/she)

- - When and where was File:Qalaherriaq_signature.svg first published? Ditto File:Qalaherriaiq_map.jpg. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Signature is from a letter which was later stored in archives, which I guess counts as unpublished. The map I realize was not included in the book about the subject and is also unpublished. Corrected this. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sawyer777's comments[edit]

will be back later; ping me if i seem to have forgotten about it! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 05:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(in Wolstenholme Fjord section) especially during an era marked by severe hardship for the Inughuit. some context may do well here - what was particularly hard about this era, compared to other periods of Greenlandic history? ... sawyer * he/they * talk 08:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A short biography, Kalli, the Esquimaux Christian, was published by Reverend Murray in 1857, becoming the main primary source on Qalaherriaq's life. i'd like to hear a little more about this biography, if there's more to write about it - what kind of impact did it have? how did it reflect the relationship between Murray & Qalaherriaq? ... sawyer* he/they * talk 03:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources elaborate on this a little - I added some context. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The crew encountered several abandoned igluit at the site of Uummannaq, now Pituffik. Inside one igloo, the crew found a heaped pile of seven bodies, the survivors were assumed to have fled the area without burying the dead due to an epidemic. presumably the seven bodies were victims of the epidemic, but this definitely took me a second to figure out, especially as the immediate context is looking for victims of a violent massacre. edit: it's also a comma splice

... sawyer * he/they * talk 03:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- Oops, fixed.

sawyer777's source review[edit]

incoming! (disclosure: Generalissima asked me to do a source review) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 04:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyriax 1962 could use archiving.
- I don't think it's possible to archive, as it's paywalled by T&F. I archived the museum source tho. - G
- side-note, i often wish the archiving parameters didn't strictly require the URL, so that we could avoid URL-DOI redundancy. (OR if we had DOI archiving parameters??)
also don't think the "via" parameter helps much here, and it's given inconsistently.
no issues with the sourcing quality; primary sources are designated as such and the secondary sources are mostly academic. the non-academic sources (Nunatsiaq News, Canadian Encyclopedia which is marked green, & maybe Malaurie 2003?) don't give me much pause, and seem perfectly good for what they're cited to.
spot-check:
- ref 1a - yep
- 3b - also good
- 7a - yes
- 11a - yes
- 16 - yes
- 20 - a lot packed into this one, & it all checks out!
- 26 - i assume this is supposed to say p. 994, in which case it checks out (& can be merged with ref 28). poor guy :,(
  - Oops, fixed. - G
- 33 - yes, and could probably be changed to just p. 986
  - Fixed. -G
- 37 - page does not mention an autopsy but otherwise good. (the autopsy is mentioned on p. 994, so you could just add that to the citation!)
  - Fixed. - G
in general, not many complaints! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 06:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sawyer777: I think everything is fixed up! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
all checks out for me; good work. with the context of the other reviews, support! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 06:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Pickersgill-Cunliffe[edit]

Suggest including the "HMS" in the ship links, looks awkward splitting it up
- Fixed. - G
Forsyth was a commander, not a captain
- Fixed. - G
A word or two introducing what Prince Albert and Assistance were doing in the area when first mentioned would be useful. They're currently thrown into the text a little haphazardly
- Added context here.
John Ross should be Sir John Ross - also maybe a word to note that he wasn't actually part of this official search party?
- Fixed. - G
The text raises some confusion over the different groups of ships looking for Franklin. Initial reading suggests that Penny and the Assistance groups (you should also note who was leading this, because it's currently unclear with the first mention of senior officers being both Forsyth and Ommanney) were separate, but we then get "Ommanney and Petersen returned..." which suggests otherwise. The text should more obviously explain the makeup of this group of ships, what it was doing and who was a part of it
- Added context as above.
Considering there's no link, a word or two prefacing what exactly Prince Albert is would be useful
- Fixed. - G
"Snow's" - give his full name and explain who he is, why should the reader find his account impactful?
- Done. - G
Link brigs
- Done. -G
Per above, if you're going to preface a ship with its type then do that for all of them
- Okay, done. - G
Suggest redlinking ship names where appropriate, e.g. HMS Sophia
- Done. - G
Do we know anything about Lady Franklin? She isn't showing up in any of my lists of Royal Navy ships
- Ah, she's not Royal Navy it turns out! Private ship built for the purpose. Corrected. - G
"the life of the party" is there a particular person attributed to this quote?
- I knew I saw this somewhere talking about him, but I could not find it again. I took the quote out. - G
"and do not reflect"
- Fixed. - G
Link midshipman
- Corrected. - G
"an Assistance midshipman" suggests there were others, when actually Markham was the only one in the expedition
- Oh, good point. Corrected. - G
"of the Franklin expedition"
- Fixed. - G
"Qalaherriaq was placed in St Augustine's College"
- Fixed. - G
"Qalaherriaq had suffered"
- Fixed. -G
"~~Captain~~ Ommanney"
- Fixed. - G
Split out the links for Edward Feild and Bishop of Newfoundland
- Fixed. - G
Suggest adding a conversion for the £25
- Added. - G
"Memorial University.)" Move full stop outside of bracket
- Good catch, fixed. - G

Some initial comments here. I will look to come back at a later date for another read through. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: I'm sorry that it took a while (and that I finished during a time where you assuredly quite busy!) But I added context and implemented your suggestions. :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SC

Putting down a marker for now. - SchroCat (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IB

In the article you list numerous variations of his name, but only include two here. Any reason?
- There are so many that I had to trim it down a little bit; Qalaherriaq and Kallihirua are the only ones common in modern academic sources, and the latter is luckily contained within his baptismal name. The other ones are mostly minor spelling variations from period accounts. I added a brief efn here, inspired by other articles of figures with numerous names.

Lead

"victim to a British abduction": "victim of a British abduction" would be more common in BrEng, (or, even better, "victim of abduction by the British"), but is your form okay in CanEng?
- I think "victim of" is more universal anyhow, so I'll use it. - G

Search for Franklin's expedition

"the Admirality launched": Spelling: Admiralty
- Fixed, thank you. - G

Interpreter service

In the quote box: "Ethnology, 1875 [13]" there's a naughty little space crept in before the citation
- Oops! Fixed. - G
"of the HMS Resolute ... the HMS Pioneer": we're not supposed to use the definite article before ships are introduced: just HMS will suffice
- Oh, TIL. Fixed. - G
'uncivilised life."': should be 'uncivilised life".', per WP:LQ
- Ooh yep, fixed. - G
"a adolescent son": "an adolescent son"
- Fixed. - G

England

"Eskimaux and English vocabulary, for the use of the Arctic expeditions": as this is a book, it should be in title case
- Oops, yep. Fixed! - G

That's my lot. Interesting article which I enjoyed. – SchroCat (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: I think I have responded to everything! Thank you so much. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. All good for me. - SchroCat (talk) 02:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from PMC[edit]

Committing to a review, throw popcorn at me if I don't get to it within a week. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Joeyquism[edit]

Also committing to a review here. Should get to it when I wake up. joeyquism (talk page) 07:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What an incredibly unfortunate and sad story. Nevertheless, it's very interesting and you've written it beautifully overall. Some things that I've noted are listed below; feel free to refuse suggestions with justification:

Upon the officers' return to their ships, Beck became notably distressed. - What I'm thinking here is the use of "notably" in the case of fame or being worth paying attention to, which is technically not incorrect if applying the latter definition, but I think "noticeably" is a bit better here.
When the same information about the North Star was repeated to the explorers and denied any violence against the British, Petersen was convinced that Beck had confused the information about the North Star with Franklin's expedition. - Missing a clear indicator as to who denied the violence; was it the officers/interpreters, or the Inughuits (both of whom are also assumedly explorers in this case)? Might be pedantry, but may be worth bringing up IMO.
... where the Inuk is depicted as praising European civilization ... - Is "Inuk" the antecedent for Qalaherriaq, or are the Inuk people in general depicted as praising Europeans? Within the context, it's clear what it means, but could be made a bit clearer.
Add {{American English}} template

Otherwise, I'm not seeing anything glaring that needs to be fixed; of course, let me know if I'm being a pedant above. Very well-done; I am personally feeling a lot sadder now having read the accounts of that poor boy :( Thank you for your work in wonderfully telling the story of a young man who definitely deserved a much, much better life. joeyquism (talk page) 15:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeyquism: I think I fixed everything you've mentioned here. Thank you very much for your review. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Looks great! Thank you for all your hard work on this article; it was a great read. joeyquism (talk page) 18:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]