Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S.S. Lazio/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 02:34, 13 December 2007.

S.S. Lazio[edit]

It's an important voice It's an important voice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laziale93 (talk • contribs) 21:23, December 8, 2007 UTC

Strong Oppose Sorry, if you think this is an FA, you should quit Wikipedia and go play football. This is not even a GA.
The article is not comprehensive. It needs a "Stadium" section and a section about the reserves/ladies team. "Lazio participate in thirty-seven sports disciplines in total", so can I have a section about the other sports?
Many sections and paragraphs have no references.
References 2, 3, 5, 17, 21 and the one after "In 1901" have formatting problems.
Not well-written. "Foundation to post-World War II (1900-1949)" and "1950s and 60s" sections have too many short paragraphs. Tomorrow I will look for spelling and grammar errors.
--Kaypoh (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures are problematic. Not only do they lack critical details (like who took it), but at face value they appear to be publicity shots whose GFDL tag is questionable. Raul654 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you should quit Wikipedia and go play football. Ouch. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- (to Kaypoh)- Kaypoh - please read WP:CIVIL--Keerllston 14:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose there are loads of issues to be solved first. No way, not even a GA as Kaypoh noted: if you really want this article to become a FA, please consider a peer review first. Pictures are clearly not GFDLs, but quite blatant copyvio, so I am going to delete them. I also suggest to speedy close this nomination. --Angelo (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just take a look how much better the Italian version is, and I don't even speak Italian. Peanut4 (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very Strong Support Excelently written, defintely deserves FA status. 38.106.99.202 (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please note this is not a vote. --Angelo (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Kaypoh, looks okay - not eFAy.--Keerllston 14:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Too many issues in prose to deserve an FA. Needs a cp-edit and a peer review. Citations too are lacking.. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 08:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: not complete. Look at it:Società Sportiva Lazio : it's 120 kB long. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 12:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.