Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/PFA Young Player of the Year
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted 23:26, 6 April 2008.
PFA Young Player of the Year[edit]
This is based on the same basic format as PFA Players' Player of the Year, which looks to be on course for FL. I've incorporated any issues raised at that FLC into this article before listing it..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Hi Chris, good list, just wondered if you could expand the lead a touch to discuss non-British winners, the fact that only three have won it? Also, were any of the players from outside the top division? If not then could be worth a mention too... The Rambling Man (talk) 10:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Both points now covered in the lead ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Two consecutive sentences now start "Although..." which don't read too clever. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I already noticed that and changed one ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I love it. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I already noticed that and changed one ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Two consecutive sentences now start "Although..." which don't read too clever. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Both points now covered in the lead ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Can't even find a typo to bring up! -- ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ• @ 16:52, 28 March, 2008
- Support coupla bits and pieces.
- In the Winners by... tables, if you narrowed the Number of wins column and increased the overall width of the tables, they'd look less lumpy.
- Your external link has a misplaced apostrophe. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Both points addressed ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.