Wikipedia:Peer review/Walter Donaldson (snooker player)/archive1

Walter Donaldson (snooker player)[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see whether it has a reasonable chance of getting through the featured article process. If it's a no to going for FA then comments here will be used to improve the article anyway. Thanks, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My views on where the article is at, against the FA criteria:

1a. Well written? Better than it was, due to the GA review, but worth putting in for a GOCE review before any FA nomination.
1b/1c. Comprehensive/well-researched? Hopefully. Any sources that I've missed or any used that don't seem to be suitable quality?
1d. Neutral? I believe so.
1e. Stable? Yes.
1f. Compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing? I believe so.

2a. Lead/Lead? May benefit from improvements.
2b. Appropriate structure? "World championship finals and later professional career" is a bit of a wall of text. Any ideas for improving structure? The balance between article sections was raised at the recent Steve Davis review. Any rebalancing needed for this article?

This will be the thing. I thought we got the Davis article into a well written article, but it sounds like it needs to be consistent across the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2c. Consistent citations? May be some amendments needed, but hopefully generally OK.

3. Media? Not much available for use here, as far I can see.
4. Length? Seems reasonable to me, given the coverage in sources.

Is this likely to attract sufficient reviewer interest if nominated for FA?

I wouldn't worry too much about this. I have a few favours I can call in. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]