Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 July 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would really like some feedback on this article, and if there are any relevant articles or web pages I could link to so that it isn't an orphan. Any comments would be appreciated.

219.89.20.32 (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have written this wiki article about the renowned Oriya Art movie director Bijy Ketan Mishra. How can it be published as a Wikipedia article? Please help.

Boybayoke (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I requested feedback on this page a few weeks ago but I still haven't received a response. I've created pages for the ThinkPad X Series and ThinkPad T Series and would like feedback on this one before I move it to live Wikipedia.

I'd appreciate anyone letting me know what I can do to improve the article and get it ready for live Wikipedia.

Trevor coelho (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote an article on Hong Kong-based publishing house Earnshaw Books. In the article I mentioned what the publisher prints, a brief history of the company's founding, and information found in the news. I cited each section with references. This is my first article, so I'd be grateful for any feedback or comments on the page. Thanks!

Turtle PH (talk) 09:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To whom it may concern, I previoulsy added this article but then it was deleted because of some format mistakes and so on. I tried to change all my mistakes and I hope It will not be deleted again. Is it possible for anybody to review my article and give a feedback on it? I would be pleased if you can inform me about my mistakes in a detailed way so that I can improve my article. Thank you! ,)


Aysinpir (talk) 11:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About to tentatively publish my first page to Wikipedia, but would like a bit of feedback/support before I do.

It's basically details about the first concert video release of pop duo Erasure (band). Is it comprehensive enough? Too comprehensive? - Am I adding irrelevant information? Have I formatted correctly? And are my references 'good' enough?

There are places where I've added that citations are needed. I think I know this content probably cannot be included, but I'd like an opinion nonetheless. Or is it okay to leave that way for now? But it's also possible I may need guidance on other areas that may need citation that haven't occurred to me.

But if nothing else, it'd be good for it to get a proof read!

I've made a couple of comments on the page's discussion page that may offer more details.

Cheers.

Opwerty (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if someone could give me some feedback on the changes I made to my page @radical.media. I am trying to use more neutral language. I would love your comments! Also check out the current page as some of the Headings have changed since the link I gave you. Thanks!

Cpirrung (talk) 16:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like a review of my recent Wikipedia post. Thanks!

Jessrae (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Article. Thanks!

Nigelshaw (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New article :) Ko0022 (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New article :)

Ko0022 (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make sure that this article is ready to be posted.


192.249.47.163 (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I presented an earlier draft of this page here before and was advised to add an explanation of the genre and cut down on a then-excessive number of sources. After making those changes as well as a few others, I personally think the page is ready for the mainspace (except for a few sources that need to be added in the second paragraph), but I would like another evaluation just to be sure. Invisiboy42293 (talk) 00:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]