Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 40

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 35 ← Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 → Archive 45

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1991.PNG

Used in Icon bar - will include valid fair use rationale if file is undeleted -Trevj (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refer to above (6 June) comment at #File:Arthur Icon Bar 1987.PNG. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 09:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1999.PNG

Used in Icon bar - will include valid fair use rationale if file is undeleted -Trevj (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refer to above (6 June) comment at #File:Arthur Icon Bar 1987.PNG. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 09:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

File:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png

Used in History of the graphical user interface - will include valid fair use rationale and clarify source if file is undeleted. I'm aware that History of the graphical user interface is tagged with {{non-free}} but feel it would be better to judge the overall article with this screenshot included. Alternatively, I have a full screen version of File:Arthur Icon Bar 1987.PNG, which I could include as a new upload. -Trevj (talk) 12:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Also reinstated at RISC OS#Arthur, where it is described in context. --Trevj (talk) 09:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refer to above (6 June) comment at #File:Arthur Icon Bar 1987.PNG. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 09:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Eliza Doolittle

See Talk:Eliza Doolittle: there was originally an article about the character and target for numerous links from actor articles; this was then "usurped" for an article about the singer who came to prominence in 2009, and deleted (presumably by an admin who forgot to check the history). I would like the content restored to Eliza Doolittle (character) so that disambiguation can proceed sensibly. -93.96.136.249 (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

You're missing that in 2006 the article about the character was changed to a redirect to Pygmalion (play) for the reason that it duplicates existing content there. Cheers. lifebaka++ 10:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sending_Orbs

Sending Orbs was and will be a "notable" record label -129.125.216.67 (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. lifebaka++ 17:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

London Heathrow Terminal_3

No idea why this was removed, there are pages for each of the otherterminals -sailor iain (talk) 15:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - This page has never been deleted. If you want to write an article there, just write one. Cheers. lifebaka++ 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love)

single has now been released -sailor iain (talk) 15:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. lifebaka++ 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
  • As my close indicated, you can move this article back to mainspace as soon as it charts. Please remind me on my talkpage to undelete the history once this has been done. Spartaz Humbug! 01:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Network Suggestion Plan

This wiki post: "Quality Network Suggestion Plan" is a factual account of how the General Motors Employee Suggestion Plan was re-written, and the results that resulted. Every name mentioned, and every fact included, can be documented upon your request. The GM Quality Network Suggestion Plan was not only retianed during the 2009 government take-over of GM, but it in fact contributed to the further economic stability of GM by providing almost $1 Billion in additional savings over the old program from 1942 to 1991. LoneWolf55 (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quality Network Suggestion Plan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Protonk (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Multimedia Australia

School students often do essays on this company for their HSC course and rely on this article for historical information. -124.148.48.60 (talk) 01:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Islamic center and mosque of grand rapids

It appears it was deleted maliciously and on hatred for the faith of islam -74.88.32.200 (talk) 02:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

  •  Done Restored as a contested prod. Though it was prodded by a sock puppet of a banned user I don't think it had anything to do with hatred toward Islam. Please assume good faith. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Correction, the sockmaster is not technically banned but has been blocked indefinably. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

billain

It is not a spam, this warning appeared in the process of editing, because of the mistake of two windows for editing opened in mozilla firefox. As all other information we provided about the certain person it is all 100% reliable by providing aditional links -BillainPR (talk) 03:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done The article was a massive unsourced BLP. It may be possible to write a sourced npov article on the subject but since your username suggests that you have a connection to the subject, that article will need to be written by somebody other then you. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

the mad maggies

current active band -64.170.135.132 (talk) 03:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Imagin my surprise when I went to check on our page and it had been deleted without any warning to me.

what to do now?

this is what I saw when searching:

This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

06:45, 18 May 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "The Mad Maggies" ‎ (WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection: reason was "non-notable (i'd speedy it but it seems to have been around for a while).")

Smencils

i used this alot, i feel like its a necesary topic to have an article on. Please bring it back! -24.210.216.126 (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smencil, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. This article was clearly promotional (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Fein.jpg

This is a public domain file which was deleted as an orphaned image. The page it was being used on, Benjamin Fein, was blanked by a sockpuppet. -71.184.53.15 (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

nomadesk

The last time the page was deleted I had added in a sentence or two that gave an overview of Nomadesk. None of the information was from the website, simply off the top of my head... as a user. I have reviewed many other pages and I think I have a better feel for how the article should be written. I wrote a sample in the talk:nomadesk page. -Jessicamart (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done This is an encylopedia of knowledge about notable topics, and not a listing of utilities and/or products. There is nothing yet notable about this specific application, and additional attempts to create this as a live article could lead to being blocked. If you wish to try to draft something in your userspace, feel free, but I cannot find any sources that suggest there's even a hint of ability to have an article about this. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • As the talk page was a draft, I've moved it to your userspace at User:Jessicamart/Nomadesk. Cheers. lifebaka++ 15:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Restoration

This page was not created by me, but more than 50 high school students will be needing the page to complete the summer work given to them and myself for a college course class- A.P. U.S. History -75.51.75.123 (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Everett "Small" Coleman

The article Everett "Small" Coleman" was deleted because it did not "indicate the importance or significance of the subject," however such a reason seems inappropriate. Coleman is a member of one of the top professional Halo teams, Str8 Rippin, and has a history as a member of the pro gaming community not dissimilar to that of other gamers whose pages have been reviewed and allowed to stay. At which point, I'd strongly urge reconsideration of the deletion. -Resser123 (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

You are mistaken. Coleman is and has teamed and competed alongside many of those that hold articles on Wikipedia. There is no more notability to many of those individuals that have articles. For example, Everett "Small" Coleman is currently teaming with Tom "Tsquared" Taylor. They are on the most well known competitive gaming team in Major League Gaming and they just recently placed second (12,000$) at a MLG event in Columbus OH. It is quite apparent that if many of these other professional gamers are worthy of Wikipedia space, then this article is plenty worthy.

I haven't received a response on here in quite some time. -Resser123 (talk) 15 June 2011

File:Kingom song 45 sample new song book of JW.ogg

This file was deleted as unused non-free media. However, it's actually used at Kingdom songs, except that someone broke the link by correcting "Kingom" to "Kingdom". (I've left the spelling fix in the article for now, because I think the file should be renamed if it is restored.) -Zundark (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Golden State Pops Orchestra

This article was deleted somehow about a year ago, and I cannot find any record of its deletion. Please restore it so the links from other articles will go somewhere. -Steve Fry (talk) 01:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Clicking "logs" above shows that this article never existed. Was it spelled differently? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for answering. Are you an administrator? Yes, I looked at the log and could find no record of the article, but I know I'm not crazy, and that the article did exist, because I linked to it from other pages, for instance "Pops Orchestra". If you go to that article you will see a link to "Golden State Pops Orchestra", which I added, and which used to work. --scfry

To answer your first question "yes", to the second, I see where you added the link to Pops orchestra here. However, clicking that red link brings up an edit box without the pink bar that would tell you that a previous version of that article had been deleted. The external link works though. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_(programming_language)

It was linked-to by an interesting article and seemed to contain some useful, interesting information about concatenative programming. -206.205.176.253 (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

This has been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat (programming language) (2nd nomination) so we can't simply restore it. As pointed out by the administrator who closed the discussion and deleted the article, User:Ron Ritzman, it needs some good references about the subject. If you have them and are interested to work on a draft, post here again or let him know.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Rasipuram Railway Station.jpg

reasoning -Kaviyarasan Ramalingam 11:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done. Kavin, you need to provide the source and license status of images you upload to Wikipedia. Without this information, we cannot undelete your file. lifebaka++ 23:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Korean Pop Music Scandals

your reasoning for asking to undelete it -Frazerrazor (talk) 04:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I have made some edits to the "Wonder Girls" wiki site based on factual information that was published in one of Korea's best newspapers.

A person keeps deleting my edits and is treatening me.

I created a new page called: Korean Pop Music Scandals

This is a LEGITIMATE page.

There are numerous korean pop music scandals almost every week.

I began the page with the Wonder Girls Scandal and I intended to add other notable scandals.

I believe that an employee of JYPE is paid to monitor wikipedia - the same person who has been deleting my FACTUAL information about JYPE and the Wonder Girls there has demanded that my new category be removed.

Everything on my new category is true and verifiable.

Please do not do the will of a person who wants to misuse wikipedia and use it as a promotional tool.

I am trying to put the OBJECTIVE truth out here and this person is trying to conceal the truth.

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. lifebaka++ 13:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Interra International

I was working on a page for a project I've been working on at school. I created my page for Interra International; however, it got deleted. Is there anything I can do to make it where it will not be deleted? -Egarland3 (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

57th Signal Company (United States)

source for general knowledge and history of unit -Zionop (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

57th Signal Company (United States)

Kyle Schole

The article was deleted with suggestions that the content may also be merged with other articles instead... however since the original article and the references in the article and its history log are gone, this is difficult. Could this article be restored to my userspace as indicated is possible in Wikipedia help files, so that I can work on such edits. --GGG65 (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC) -GGG65 (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:GGG65/Kyle Schole. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Ince_logo.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media. However, it is used in Ince & Co.. (At the time of deletion the image was unused as the article had been blanked during WP:CP processing.) -Zundark (talk) 08:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done Skier Dude (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:ITunes_Exclusive_-_EP.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Iron & Wine iTunes Exclusive EP. -Zundark (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done Skier Dude (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Budanov.jpg

recent death, reading the deletion rationale, it's a quick fix -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Done You know the drill for the source & Fur & etc. Skier Dude (talk) 06:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Aye-aye, done and done!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:International Hockey League (1945–2001) logo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in International Hockey League (1945–2001). -Zundark (talk) 08:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done Skier Dude (talk) 22:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Bridgefm 1.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in 106.3 Bridge FM. -Zundark (talk) 08:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Bridgefm 2.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in 106.3 Bridge FM. -Zundark (talk) 08:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Samar Chatterjee

reasoning: This deletion is quite unfair and unjustified. There are many many similar intellectuals, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arindam_Chaudhuri who are already on the wikipedia. Samar Chatterjee's achievements and contributions are far superior to many scientists and technologists who are already on the wikipedia. Deleting this article is arbitrary and shows the ignorance of the person deleting it. No substantive rationale has been presented by the person deleting it. In fact, Samar Chatterjee's unique contributions to Environmental Science, Nuclear Waste Recycling and International Peace is extra-ordinary and exceptional. If you need more justification and supporting information, please feel free to contact me. Nishit S. Roy, Email: -redacted- -Sushila69 (talk) 19:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samar Chatterjee (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. The second time aroud the article was basically a press release announcing a paper of his. This is not what an encyclopedia is for. In any case a userspace draft still exists: User:Nshuks7/Samar chatterjee sandbox. Independent references are needed to show the notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Nmatavka/N0rp

Several years ago, I created a user page with various images, most of them with some degree of erotic content, to use for research. Recently (approximately six months ago), the page (User:Nmatavka/N0rp) was deleted, as Wikipedia is not a repository for image galleries with no encyclopaedic purpose. I had long since ceased using that particular page for the purpose I had written it for, as I am no longer a constantly-aroused male adolescent. The tongue-in-cheek introduction at the top of the page, however, remained. I had no problems with the page being deleted, as I was no longer actively researching vintage erotica. It is worth knowing, though, that many of the images linked to on that page were orphaned. I am now considering creating a page, similar to the bad image list, its purpose being to maintain surveillance of certain images to prevent abuse. A good starting point for such a page, I think, would be User:Nmatavka/N0rp. Therefore, I would like to have that page restored, so I could move the gallery to the new page I wish to create; this new page would be a superset of the old one, as it would not now be restricted to erotica. Would it be possible to temporarily restore the page, or e-mail it to me, so I can accomplish this? -Nmatavka (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I'd be happy to email it to you, but you don't seem to have email enabled. Is there an address that I (or another admin) should use? Cheers. lifebaka++ 14:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Done - User supplied email at my talk page. lifebaka++ 17:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Damian Brown

reasoning -203.62.223.24 (talk) 05:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done The deleted page was a short stub poking at someone. If you'd like to see an article about the sports person, its still needs to be written. Otherwise please clarify. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:HABANA BLUES.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Habana Blues. -Zundark (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 08:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:I've Got My Own Album to Do - Ron Wood.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in I've Got My Own Album to Do. -Zundark (talk) 08:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 08:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dad - soft dogs.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Soft Dogs. -Zundark (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dad - helpyourselfish.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Helpyourselfish. -Zundark (talk) 08:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Frankly a Cappella.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Frankly a Cappella. -Zundark (talk) 12:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Na Na Na (Dulce Niña) single cover.JPG

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Na Na Na (Dulce Niña). -Zundark (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Proper Records

Rationale was based on this record company being a "Reissue-only label", which was contradicted by the article's list of well-known artistes with first-issue releases and by the referenced BBC News article on the company's operation, which also discusses the Music Week awards won by the company (hence at least arguable as meeting WP:CORP). The existence of that BBC News article also contradicts the last part of the rationale, that the article has "no non-trivial sources" - the first time that I have seen BBC News classed as trivial. -AllyD (talk) 16:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Carry On Cabby (film).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Carry On Cabby. -Zundark (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Prince Joél I

This article has References -MusicWorldExecutive (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: I've blocked this user as another of the many sockpuppets of User:Prince-au-Léogâne. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Not done. This has been deleted under too many other titles, by too many admins. lifebaka++ 03:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Stuart Smith

I do not know why this page was deleted -Stuguitar (talk) 03:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

If you're referring to the "Stuart Smith" described on your user page, I see no evidence that there was ever an article about him. The current Stuart Smith article is a disambiguation page that has existed since 2006. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Arthur Icon Bar 1987.PNG

Used in Icon bar - will include valid fair use rationale if file is undeleted -Trevj (talk) 09:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Note: rationale propsed for this file (and the related ones listed below) will be based on that for Iconbar ro5 256col 640w apps.png. --Trevj (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

You'll also need to provide a source for these, as that's lacking as well. Skier Dude (talk) 02:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for considering the requests. I have source info, which was included in an email to me from the original uploader regarding the files. In each case, the files were self-made by named persons. This information will be included. Undeletion has been requested because it avoids unnecessary duplication of the files if I were to re-upload the copies I have. An alternative would be for me (or another editor) to screengrab the information from various machines again over the coming months. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 06:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Is there any chance of a Done/Not done on these, please? I'm concerned that they'll drop off and be automatically archived soon - or perhaps this comment will bump them up and retain them for further consideration. Thanks. --Trevj (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
It's just occurred to me that the archives may get checked every now and then, so not to worry. --Trevj (talk) 11:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Done. Please add the appropriate source and FUR. Protonk (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
     Will do this asap... Sorry - only just spotted this. --Trevj (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
    Thank you. Rationale in place. --Trevj (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File:That'll be the day.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in That'll Be the Day (film). -Zundark (talk) 09:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 01:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:ORARI logo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Organisasi Amatir Radio Indonesia. -Zundark (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 01:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Mogwai.4.satin.EP.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in 4 Satin. -Zundark (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 01:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Eyes Set to Kill - All You Ever Knew (Single Cover).jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in All You Ever Knew. -Zundark (talk) 13:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. I've also uploaded a smaller version of the file. lifebaka++ 01:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Qaisar.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Qeysar (film). -Zundark (talk) 13:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 02:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Andalusian Party logo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Andalusian Party. -Zundark (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 02:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

LESLIE KENTON

reasoning -Ray Oliver, Esq. 18:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: LESLIE KENTON The article on Leslie Kenton, was immediately after I entered the preliminary biographic information. I am concerned that Wiki editors are too quick to interject / interfere with topics in which they have no special expertise.

LESLIE KENTON is the widely published author of more than 30 books on well being, beauty and health. She is the daughter of "famed jazz great, STAN KENTON." Ms. Kenton published a 2010 memoir entitled LOVE AFFAIR, describing her incestuous relationship with her celebrity father.

The article on LESLIE KENTON will be linked back to the article on STAN KENTON.

Wiki editors should not "immediately" delete article content, before there is sufficient time make the links to sources and expand on the article.

Lastly, I ask that certain administrators & others follow the policy guidelines of Wikipedia and present themselves as being helpful to newcomers. Wikipedia has more content than editors. Wiki encourages as much help as it can get; from knowledgeable potential editors. I advise that editorial actions be limited to subjects in which an editor holds a special expertise. Editorial actions on subjects unfamiliar to editors should be exercised with caution. Lastly, my contributions to Wiki comes to me at a loss of $490.00 an hour for billable legal time. If this deletion is a preface to what I can expect for donating my time, then I will refrain from donating my time and expertise in the future.

Thank you. Ray Oliver, Esq. Ray Oliver, Esq. 18:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:RAYOLIVERESQ/Leslie Kenton. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact JohnCD (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.

Please note: it was JohnCD who userfied the article to your userspace. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

newworldgroup

we were removed for "blatant advertising" but we just didn't know how to properly set up the site. We are an advertising company, that has been in business for 15 years, with a lot of major clients. I think that might be the problem with why we were removed. We would like to put a wiki page about our accomplishments, history, etc. Please let us use the name New World Group. Thanks! -NWG - New World Group Inc (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia accounts must be for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them. Accounts whose names are those of groups or companies are not allowed. So I have blocked this account, but you are welcome to set up an individual one. However, if you want to write an article about your employer, you would still be subject to our rules on WP:Conflict of interest, see also WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest - in summary, you should propose any articles or changes, and let uninvolved users decide. Read the WP:FAQ/Organizations and WP:Your first article for general advice. The most important thing for you to realise is that Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind - if you write about your employer you must put absolutely out of your mind any idea that you are doing it for their benefit. You would be writing, from outside, a neutral observer's description, plain facts backed up by reliable sources, with no "peacock terms". Experience shows that advertising/PR people in particular find this extremely hard, but it is essential if your article is to be kept. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

metis transit

Untrue information posted

The following was posted as to why Metis Transit should be deleted.

Defunct transit system. Googling for this transit company indicates that it barely ever existed at all. It is not clear how the single bus operated actually ran, but it can't have been more than a month. At current time, it lives on only in the form of the very broken website, and there does not appear to be any actual plans for it to resume operating. As it was almost non-existent from its conception, it isn't particularly notable or encyclopedic.

The person who requested this was 100% incorrect. The company has other divisions as well that are fully active but the writer could not see this and only commented on the transit division.

I am requesting that the listing for Metis Transit be restored. -Metistransit (talk) 03:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Wikipedia accounts must be for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them, and accounts whose names are those of groups or organizations are not permitted. So I have blocked this account, but you are very welcome to set up a new one which represents only you. You will need to update the article, which at present only describes the transit division, and you will need to cite reliable sources for what you say. The article may still be nominated for deletion under the WP:Articles for deletion process, which would start a debate lasting seven days: if it is to be kept, you will need to demonstrate notability by means of references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. See WP:Your first article and the WP:FAQ/Organizations for more advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:FederalUniversityofUberlândia30Logo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Federal University of Uberlândia. -Zundark (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Time on Earth alternate.jpeg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Time on Earth. -Zundark (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Cambodian Children's Trust

We would like the article undeleted, because the NGO Cambodian Childrens Trust (CCT) would benefit from the presence it would gain by having an article on Wikipedia. We will provide all the necessary information stated in Wikipedia's policies. -CCTmember (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user JamesBWatson (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you could contribute. Please read Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause and the WP:FAQ/Organizations: if the article is to be kept, you will need to establish notability by means of independent references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Omegaprime.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Omega Prime. -Zundark (talk) 10:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:FitDay Logo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in FitDay. -Zundark (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Done. lifebaka++ 16:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Falling In Reverse

The reason for this article to be requested for undeletion is because the article was of a notible band WP:BAND the article was put into the Article Incubator were contributors worked on the article the article passed because it cited enough infomation regarding the notible band Falling In Reverse. The article was moved from the incubator on the 12th June 2011 and the article title/name was renamed from Falling In Reverse (Band) to Falling In Reverse to resemble the notible band on Wikipedia. Although there has been previous version on this article which where deleted through AfD the article was recreated and passed the WP:BAND dated above to only have been deleted again by user User:Jayjg who is believed to be a Moderator on wikipedia. Although he has deleted severeal times he has not put valid reason why he had deleted and locked article Falling In Reverse without researching why the article was moved from the article incubator to wikipedia the article met WP:BAND there was no valid reason to the deletion but G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse) even though a discussion was created for multiple articles of the band these article kept moving around and swapped, blanked and destory by guest edits. Therefore a request was made that the article was made semi protected and that only members could edit parts of article Falling In Reverse this faild the conclution in the discussion and there was no contribution by any moderator is regards of the article's that had been put up for AfD & MfD. I believe that the article Falling In Reverse should be undeleted and that the article to remain the main wikipedia article for Falling In Reverse to avoid the confussion of the article beiong deleted the article should be semi - protected to avoid page blanks or any kind of article destruction. Mikey 17:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC) -Mikey 17:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikeyy (talk • contribs) — Smikeyy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 18:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Employment Law Alliance

reasoning -Mabond17 (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC) I understand that the reasoning cited for the deletion of "Employment Law Alliance" is criteria G11 indicating that the page was "unambiguous advertising or promotion." Nothing about the content of this page was meant to entice a company or individual to engage the Employment Law Alliance for services. Rather, the page was strictly informational with all claims linked to sources per Wikipedia's guidelines. Over 3,000 lawyers in six continents and 120 countries are members of this alliance. These are simply the facts, and they can be accessed by viewing the member directory page on the Employment Law Alliance's website. This is not promotional or advertising. It is, rather, simply a ressutation of fact. As primary curator for the Employment Law Alliance's wikipedia page I can attest that a more in-depth, yet fully encyclopedic narrative was just days away from being implemented. I would greatly appreciate your reconsideration of this deletion. ~ mabond17

  • Done But at this point the notability of the organisation is unclear. References will be needed from completely independent publications, not the web site of the org and its members. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Kameelion

The singer/songwriter was just starting out when article was created, and the article lasted a decent amount of time on Wikipedia before a deletion policy came into action. Kameelion has now finally signed a deal with Sony BMG and is recording his album for a release in 2011. A quick restore and a clean up with new references and this article will be back on track. -90.202.157.86 (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kameelion, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Phantomsteve (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 08:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

File:SOTA seal.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in San Francisco School of the Arts. -Zundark (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Pitbull - M.IA.M.I..jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in M.I.A.M.I.. -Zundark (talk) 10:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Done --Tikiwont (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Screenshotlivemusicarchive.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Live Music Archive. -Zundark (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Karin Ahlbäck in 2010.jpg

as the uploader, no notification was given that this file was up for deletion. This kind of laziness gets old. With proper notification I can make the proper requests, several bad deletes have been undone this way. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Response for deletion left on my user page. Rationale for deletion is that the file has been up for deletion since March 17th, Kintetsubuffalo| later wrote on the file page on March 28th, after image first restored, that he attempted to contacted the uploader for permissions, but was not able to reach them. Neither Kintetsubuffalo or anyone else can not release permissions on the uploader's behalf, and without said permission, we need to assume they wish to retain either some or all their copyright protection. The tag was never removed, reason for deletion disproved or rebutted, and this core issue of lacking a proper license since the file was restored. Unless I'm mistaken, user:KallistiMan was the uploader of the file not Kintetsubuffalo and again was aware of the issue. That the tag was neglected over the last several months and not deleted again earlier is not a valid reason to say this action was being lazy On the contrary, I took the time to ensure this deletion was valid. Ask that deletion says until such time that a valid license is obtained. Kindly Calmer Waters 19:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

K/d ratio

OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011061410017684. This applies to the revision deleted prior to the most recent one deleted, the one marked as a copyright violation, for which the article did identify its subject. -– Adrignola talk 14:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Radio_Citizen

I am an editor who is willing to edit the article if necessary. The subject of the article, a band named Radio Citizen is currently getting airplay on KCRW, a Los Angeles radio station with a very large audience. I suspect that I am not the only person currently interested in the subject. -Astonzia (talk) 15:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Astonzia/Radio Citizen. (though there's not much in it). See WP:BAND for what you need to show, and please check with NawlinWiki (talk), the deleting admin, before you return it to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Andrew Bird-Fingerlings.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Fingerlings. -Zundark (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Sythe.Org_Forums

you allow articles about comparably large sites. What gives? Is 250,000 members not enough to take notice of? -60.241.109.119 (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Daniel Case (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. To clarify: Numbers don't matter directly and the question is indeed whether people outside of the site have taken notice of and written something substantial about it. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Pegasus Workflow Management System

Need to make changes to bring page up to code. -Rajiv.mayani (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Rajiv.mayani/Pegasus Workflow Management System. I've also posted a few useful links on your page. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Ciplex

Requesting a copy of its last revision to be emailed to me. No-restoration in its mainspace needed. -Phearson (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 09:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

The Secret Door

reasoning -Rperin1973 (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Boing! said Zebedee (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Or Movement

Active NPO in Israel -85.250.180.146 (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Are you sure this article has already existed? In any case being an active organization is by itself not a sufficient reason to have an encyclopedic article. See WP:ORG for further information. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Foundation for the Development of Ukraine

please undelete this page so that it is revised according Wiki rules -Orekhova (talk) 05:58, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Orekhova/Foundation for the Development of Ukraine . You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Fastily (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Chaka Khan et al - Echoes of an Era.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Echoes of an Era. -Zundark (talk) 07:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Ray++Anita+rayanita.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in In da Name of Love. -Zundark (talk) 08:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Twelth Man - Bill Lawry... This is Your Life.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Bill Lawry... This Is Your Life. -Zundark (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 10:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:RedditchUnitedFCCrest.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Redditch United F.C.. -Zundark (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 17:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Operators GSDF.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Operator (Ghost in the Shell). -Zundark (talk) 13:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

A Tale of Two Kingdoms

The page was PRODded for lack of sources, but the game has been mentioned in several magazines, which I believe qualify as independent secondary sources. The mags are offline but screenshots are here: http://crystalshard.net/?f=magazine ; the game is also on IMDB here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1300599/ 17:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

 Not doneThe company's website is not a reliable source for any claims like these, aside from the fact that mere mentions do not constitute the requisite substantive coverage; and an IMDb listing proves nothing: heck, my 15-year-old has an IMDb listing, and she's certainly not notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
That webpage shows a scan of several magazines talking about the game. You could also locate the physical magazines themselves, of course. I thought PRODs were supposed to be cancelled if one person objects, and AFD was the place to discuss whether something is notable enough? 18:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Scans can be faked, and those supposed scans, if accurate, are blatant copyright violations. Nonetheless: you are right about the challenge to the PROD. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_40&oldid=1171579438"