Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 45

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 40 ← Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 → Archive 50

Zhi Gang Sha

Page has existed for several years without question of notability. I'm not sure how it looked before deletion. Reliable sources were included and do exist. I believe with some neutral editing concerns can be addressed. -Stillwaterising (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

File:ConquistadorsLogo.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in San Diego Conquistadors. -Zundark (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 22:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Alien Shooter

A legitimate article about a real game, the article had minimal information because I did not know how to add more. I learned how to add information, but it was deleted before I could update it. -Ajsafavi (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Shiny Red Tuning

page is linked from SRT page to show a common result for this query. Company is world renowned and a record holder, bringing many innovations that have previously not been seen -Pickle i po (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


editted...sorry , thought previous request had not gone through.

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user UtherSRG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Dracoria

I was simply making this page so that players of the game Nation States who are located in the region of Dracoria could more easily access their region. And, if you still believe that this page deserved to be deleted, I would like to know hwy this page in the http format listed below isn't deleted. They are doing the same thing as me: making easy access to the region, and all it has to offer.

http://wiki.conquestofabsolution.com/wiki/Main_Page -Riolu7777 (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Alexey Chuklin

The article was deleted because the person is not noticable in Administrator's point of view. I think this racer is a noticable and prospective. There aren't many Russian drivers in Formula championships, so he deserves attention, especially for Russian and European motorsport. The article didn't violate any rules -Olegbv (talk) 20:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Heron Cross Pottery

-Duncanogi (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

May I politely propose that you review the deletion of Heron Cross Pottery. Many Staffordshire potteries:

  • Have their own Wiki pages, and
  • Were founded in the great potteries expansion period of the 19th century, and
  • Were and are successful, and
  • Are active now.

I have listed a dozen or so potteries that satisfy these criteria on the Staffordshire Potteries page. I suspect there are other Wikipedia pages for such potteries.

I feel that Heron Cross Pottery should be reinstated as it was established in the 1870s, has an interesting history, and is still active 125 years later. It is unclear to me why some potteries should have pages and others not.Duncanogi (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heron Cross Pottery, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Shiny Red Tuning

linked from SRT page. This tuner is world renowned and recognised and has recently become the first to tune a street legal scooter to do over 100mph (101mph to be exact) from a standing start over 1/4 mile drag-sprint. They are well known and becoming a part of history in the scooter scene and deserve recognition. This is not intended as promotional, as there is plenty about them available on the internet, but just to clarify when people search for SRT that this is what they are often searching for. The original article was a speedy deletion, with no course of redress other than because it was about a company, but there are plenty of wiki pages describing other successful companies. The page needs thorough editting and updating. SRT have brought innovation and deserve recognition -92.26.212.163 (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user UtherSRG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


Please can you tell me if I have put the deletion review in the correct place (discussion tab) as I have had no response? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_review/Log/2011_July_25 Pickle i po (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Chuck McCoy

Prod expired (and another article has since been moved over it), but as a long-time disk jockey, it seems likely there are sources out there. I am contesting the prod and request undeletion. -Powers T 13:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

I've informed User:Jafeluv about this since he did both the deletion and the move. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck McCoy, feel free to comment there. Jafeluv (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Strategies of terrorism

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

It was deleted for being 'an essay' which is completely inaccurate. Any issues or constructive criticism would be much preferred to wholesale deletion with zero feedback or justification -Twyn3161 (talk) 00:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

If you bothered to read the references you'd see it's clearly not original research. It's not in the format of an essay. There's no wikipedia page on the rational-strategic causes of terrorist violence... there should be. Now there is but it got deleted! Bogus.Twyn3161 (talk) 00:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

It 'looks' like a school paper? Deletionists with no academic credentials in the field. What a ridiculously conservative stance for the people's encyclopedia. In fact 'Toddst1' your article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansar_al-Jihad_al-Alami is based on news articles and bogus sources whereas this article is actually researched. Since when did Wikipedia prefer easily accessible faff to legitimate academic sources? That's the difference between making Wikipedia an ENCYCLOPEDIA and any other google search.Twyn3161 (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Ansar_al-Jihad_al-Alami is not my article (I don't WP:OWN any) and more importantly there is no original resarch in that article.
Even more importantly, we have this thing about assuming good faith and working on WP:Consensus. Kind of important. Try it. Toddst1 (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is no research at all because that particular group doesn't exist. Surely this is something Wikipedia would want to avoid? This is the importance of peer-reviewed academic joural sources.Twyn3161 (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:LinkTochigiBrex.gif

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Link Tochigi Brex. -Zundark (talk) 07:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Sheila Scribner

She is a foreign artist living in Egypt with limited references -Fira243 (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Tim DeChristopher

OneEvent is not sufficient to declare non-notability when subject was the sole instigator of the event and the judgement has important implications for civil disobedience in the United States. Article should be restored and updated to reflect DeChristopher's conviction and sentence -199.67.140.44 (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim DeChristopher, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

EufameMaclayne

This is an article about a very important historical person who died in 1591. I don't know why it was deleted but it may be because it is an embarrisment to theists. -OptoDave (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

What is the exact title of the article you mean? There has never been an article EufameMaclayne, and I cannot find any record under any of the likely variants like Eufame Maclayne or Eufame maclayne or Eufame MacLayne. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Friday_(Rebecca_Black)

An article was speedy deleted there and apparently the page has been blocked, but it seems to me that the page would be more useful as a redirect to Friday_(Rebecca_Black_song). Would it be possible to lift the block and create this redirect? Thanks! --a3_nm (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC) -a3_nm (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Seems reasonable. JohnCD (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Kernersville Medical Center

No advertising. Awards were presented in a neutral tone. Same style as other hospitals in the greater Charlotte network. -Cw0140 (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Global Innovation through Science and Technology

The reason the information is accurate, you may look at the information on our website which coincides with the information on the post http://gist.crdfglobal.org/ a page for this initiative also exists on Facebook, twitter and YouTube There have also been numerous press releases about our activities -GISTinitiative (talk) 18:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user RHaworth (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and press releases are not enough for a Wikipedia article: it is necessary to establish notability by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Brodie Van Wagenen

to allow me to edit the entry to get it up to standards -Edmprice (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Userfied for you by Alexf (talk) to User:Edmprice/Brodie Van Wagenen. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Harwood, Dallas

Harwood, Dallas is a location in Dallas (a district) so therefore it needs to be included with the other districts in Uptown Dallas (ie State Thomas, West Village, McKinney Ave. -Jayoung1 (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - the article was copied and pasted from a press release. If there are reliable sources that deal with the topic such that it meets our general notability criteria, you are welcome to create an original, non-promotional article about it. However, copying and pasting content from other websites is not permitted, nor is publication of press releases. If you represent this location's government or chamber of commerce or some such thing, please see also our guideline for writing about topics where you have a conflict of interest. --B (talk) 22:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Ateret Yerushalayim

The page was deleted with the stated reason being "Non-notable Yeshiva program, not clear if it's part of another Yeshiva or independent. Location can't be found in 3rd party sources.".

I have to object to this because Ateret Yerushalayim, otherwise known as AJ, is an independent program, having no affiliations with any other Yeshivas or programs. Furthermore, it is just as 'notable' as several other Yeshivas that have their own Wikipedia pages, such as Eretz HaTzvi, Lev Hatorah, Netiv Aryeh etc.

Furthermore, I'm fairly sure I provided a link to the Yeshiva's (active) websites (http://ajstaff.posterous.com/ ; http://ateret.org/photos/index.php) which should qualify as a 3rd party sources. Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC) -Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Question ... how would either of those two websites be considered to be third party, reliable sources when they appear to be directly associated with the subject? I mean, ateret.org is their own website, right? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
A fair point. See the below three 3rd party websites that should qualify as both independent, and reliable: http://www.masaisrael.org/Masa/English/Programs/Yeshivat+Ateret+Yerushalayim.htm http://findayeshiva.org/Yeshiva7_Ateret-Yerushalayim-Jerusalem-Eretz-Yisroel.aspx http://www.yu.edu/cjf/israel_yeshivot/page1.aspx?id=15888 Let me know if anything else is needed to undelete. Ezzi386 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
None of these still meet the definition of reliable source? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
why not. One of them is a governmental organization. And honestly, do you really think I or these three sources conspired to fabricate a yeshiva? Is your real objection just a lack of notability? Ezzi386 (talk) 04:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
How does this work? Does a lack of response indicate agreement. Can I restore the page?Ezzi386 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Zuzana Snow

reasoning -Katiastein (talk) 15:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Zuzana Snow

This article is related to the top model Zuzana Snow and includes many references to her work, to her clients, to her agencies and also to articles in magazines about her career, interview in "Vivre l'art" among others. I have followed all the Wikipedia rules to write this article and therefore it was already for more than two years on line on Wikipedia. This bio of this model who gets a very particular and strong image is a contribution to the fashion world history. Zuzana Snow is represented by more than ten model agencies in the world and is currently shooting for the best magazines and brands, she appeared in lots of interview and TV shows, recently she was the guest star of America Latino top model... It is also easy to find news about this model on internet and in library. For exemple: her portrait appeared recently on the cover of the French fashion book "Univers Mannequin" written by Patrice Villa and her biography can be found page 167. Would you please have the kindness to undelete this article and I would be more than happy to update it with the last news-Katiastein (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Clayhill

Why delete it? -82.9.15.243 (talk) 23:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. but it will need more independent references to survive a deletion debate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Iasta

Refers to the software company Iasta. Page was defaced/editied sometime around July 2010 and all content was deleted, replaced only by a forwarding page to "Freedoms of the air" for the "International Air Services Transit Agreement." Request that the page be reinstated with information about the company Iasta also. Thanks! -GoHals (talk) 12:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done the page was very promotional, and it would have needed to be completely rewritten. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Bruce_Alvin_Kock

Both Wiki and Obit articles written by same person - the daughter, Arlene Kock -216.113.168.146 (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done , Arlene Kock would have to use the procedure at WP:Permit to prove copyright ownership. But in any case there were no references, and no indication that it would be a WP:BIO satisfyer either. This article looked to be an obituary duplicate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Michele Wallace Campanelli

Michele Wallace Campanelli is a notable (Check Wikipedia link with her name already there) American Author, Singer and Entertainer. She was born on October 24, 1971 in Melbourne, Florida. Published internationally, her written works have appeared in Chicken Soup for the Soul books and have sold millions of copies.

She has also penned numerous novels, screenplays, magazine and newspaper articles in both fiction and non-fiction and been published by Simon & Schuster, Chronicle Books, Florida Today Newspaper,Fictionwise, Fireside, Adamsmedia, HCI and America House Publishing.

Written Works include: Chicken Soup for the Teenage Soul III, Chicken Soup for the Nascar Soul, Chicken Soup for the Teacher's Soul, Chicken Soup for the Soul of America, Cup of Comfort for Christmas, A cup of Comfort for Weddings, Chocolate for a Woman's Heart, Keeper of the Shroud, Margarita, Jamison, Hero of Her Heart

-Mcampanelli (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

ref chicken soup for the soul wikipedia
ref www.michelecampanelli.com official website
ref Florida Today Newspaper article on Michele Wallace Campanelli

  • Done You have supplied some references which would counteract the prodblp, so I have restored the article, but the references need to be improved to be specific and show that independent writings on this author exist, otherwise the article will get the chop again. Notability has a specific definition on Wikipedia, and appearance in another Wikipedia article is not part of it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Shannon James (Playmate)

{{subst:refund| Shannon James |This pg was active for yrs. She is still active w/ playboy & modeling. She is still listed underneath playmates yet no longer has a page of her own.

Shannon James is now a redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 2007#May. No big claim of notability here, but nothing to undelete either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Tahoe Mountain Resorts Lodging

I am the Director of Sales for this property management company and would like to have my company listed in Wikipedia. -Tanstedt (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Delicious Flat-Chest

The deletion was not argumented, and as it contains several "errors" in its use of words, it could be improved to meet Wikipedia's standards. -84.85.189.88 (talk) 08:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please improve this into an article otherwise it will not last much longer Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:44, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Anjela Lauren Smith

This actress appears on other pages in relation to the films that she has appeared in- the previous entries were invalid, so hopefully someone will follow the correct proceedure for an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.4.159.17 (talk • contribs)

  •  Not done She may be notable enough for an article but the version deleted was an unsourced BLP. However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youssef_Biaz

No reasoning given. -74.171.251.49 (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The Lexington School

Not Copyright infringement. The page I created about The Lexington School included factual information about the location of the school, its mission statement, philosophy of education, and admissions information. If parts need to be rewritten to make it reflect an encyclopedia entry, I'll be happy to do that. The information that closely matched that of another site is not the other site's information to copyright. If anything, they are copying and reposting the same info from the school, but they do not hold copyright on the info. -Jlassman (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done The article was deleted under CSD G11 as an advertisement. On top of that significant portions of it were a copyright violation. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Puffalump

Puffalumps are definitely notable! There was a short animated film made about Fisher-Price's Wild Puffalumps line that still has an article, so it's only fitting that the toy line itself has an article, too. They were popular enough in their heyday (late 1980s/early 1990s) that Fisher-Price brought them back for a little while in 2006. Googling "Puffalump" brings up fans' videos, a whole site devoted to identifying Puffalumps for collectors, as well as Puffalumps for sale. Puffalumps were popular enough that several companies made similar toys, and toy sellers often refer to any soft stuffed animal made out of parachute material as a "Puffalump" anyway. -184.7.99.12 (talk) 01:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

File:PNB-logo.gif

Deleted as orphaned non-free media. Now restored at Philippine National Bank. -Bluemask (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Aotpritualofbattle.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Ritual of Battle. -Zundark (talk) 10:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Done January (talk) 16:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Veritaphobia

reasoning -Ceredigion (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


It is a true phobia and Tnxman307 is obviously veritaphobic

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. January (talk) 16:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

List of fictional companies

Deletion seems a bit arbitrary, I am specifically looking for this information and to find that it exists but someone has arbitrarily deleted it was disapointing. -Thirtyfootscrew (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done Article was deleted pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional companies (4th nomination). LadyofShalott 14:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Turbonegro-GrungeWhore.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in (He's a) Grunge Whore. -Zundark (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Scum of the Earth Church

Article deleted via WP PROD citing Notability and Spam. Scum of the Earth Church is a legitimate topic deserving it's own page verifiable via works originated by other Wikipedia articles Mike Sares, Craig Blomberg, Leanor Ortega, Reese Roper, Five Iron Frenzy and via independent media such as the Westword(Denver Newspaper/Zine) cover article O' Scum all ye Faithful 12.21.2010. Does not belong to an established denomination and is not a denomination unto itself, therefore needs a seperate article from ambiguous or similar religion. -162.115.44.103 (talk) 17:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Wes Cowan

All the other 4 presenters on his tv show, History Detectives on PBS, were considered important enough to have their own articles. He is as notable in his field as they are in theirs, as evidenced by the fact that he was selected as 1 of the 4 panel members to appear in every episode of the long-running PBS series. His name appears first in the credits. It seems unreasonable to say that only 1 of the hosts of the show is unimportant and not worthy of a mention. In particular it seems remiss since he's one of the original hosts, and therefore nobody else has appeared in more episodes than he has. -108.56.219.166 (talk) 01:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. but this seriously needs work, including references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

David S. Rose

The page was a legitimate, fully-sourced, verifiable, biographical page about a notable living person, which had been in place for some time. I am not aware of any discussion on the article's talk page about the deletion other than the proposer's. The subject is a notable person, at least in his industry (honorary doctorate from Stevens, associate founder of Singularity University, profiled or quoted in BusinessWeek, Crains, RedHerring, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, etc.) I believe the article provided 3rd party reliable sourced references for every fact stated, was written in NPOV and was linked to from several other pages in Wikipedia. Since a comment has been made about puffery in this article, I will undertake to edit and tone it down if it is reinstated.Yorker (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC) -Yorker (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Key Fitness 24/7

First Gym in Tasmania to provide Internet Access on gym equipment, and brands itself as an alternative to the "big box" fitness centers, First and only club in Tasmania to offer the Technogym range including the VisioWeb option, one of the first 24 Hour fitness club models in Australia to go against the typical franchising based model, 2011 Key Fitness 24/7 was the fitness club of choice by the visiting Gold Coast Football Club nicknamed The Suns, is an Australian rules football club based on the Gold Coast, which began playing in the Australian Football League (AFL) competition for the first time in 2011. In particularly Assistant coaches: Shane O'Bree and Ken Hinkley -Dytas (talk) 13:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Article has not been deleted, currently at afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Fitness 24/7. Arguments for keeping this article belong there. This is not the venue. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

James Spector

the information contained on the page for James Spector (i.e. his acting, writing and producing) could be verified by his profile on IMDB -69.193.222.173 (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

our planet centre

The Our Planet Centre is a world first. It is an educational centre and ALL profits are going to local environmental programmes. The article was not an advertisement - it is meant to explain to anyone who is interested what this unique place is and what it is there for. The German Government support it because of its 'innovation and creativity of this new means of raising awareness around the environment.' I really don't see why the article was deleted. -Andylci (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Tnxman307 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Diary of a Bad Man

Article was delete several months ago for failing to establish notability from a credible source. This is article concerns online webisodes and has attracted the attention of BBC News in July 2011 (Muslim comedian Humza Arshad becomes internet sensation ---- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-14222093). Ergo, I feel that this article should be revived from the deleted pages. Opinions welcome add to the discussion. -InExcelsis DeoTalk 18:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Bad Man, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Postdlf (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:27, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Cprime-Project Management

An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. This page includes neutral point of view facts about our company. -CPrime-Project Management (talk) 18:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Additionally, this account has been blocked as a spamusername. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Vicky Nizri

Vicky Nizri is a very well known writer, she has won 2nd place in the Best Mexican Novel and won the Ezra Jack Keats prize in New York -72.54.253.26 (talk) 21:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Roaring Lion energy drink

a terminated employee of the company falsely requested the page's deletion -98.154.98.200 (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done The article was deleted at the request of the author of the article, the only editor who had done any work whatsoever on the article. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

It was put in again later as Roaring Lion (energy drink) and deleted as an advertisement. You should approach user JamesBWatson (talk), the deleting administrator, but please note that he would not have deleted it unless he agreed that it met the criteria for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:WikiprojectAdmin TheFix.png

The principle editor (User:Alecmconroy) of the page this image and the ones below were hosted on is attempting to vanish. I can respect that, but it shouldn't have an effect on a Wikiproject page. The page itself, with these images, is highly useful in demonstrating real problems with the WP:RFA system and adminship in general. Without the files, the page is considerably lacking. Other files are:

All images were deleted under CSD G7. Thank you, -Hammersoft (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Done Someone undeleted them. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Twisted Spoon Press

your reasoning for asking to undelete it -90.179.46.211 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Spoon Press, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Sankranti Cart.jpg

this was not copy from any web site it was original by us from the same village. hence no need any copy rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephan.grace (talk • contribs) 09:11, 4 August 2011

This file has not been deleted, but if it is to be kept you must add a File copyright tag to explain who owns the copyright (usually the person who took the picture) and how it is released for use on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Image use policy. There is a note about this on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Zhuotebazhapu

He's an Inner Mongolian WWII general of fairly clear notability. I created an article on him recently under the spelling Jodbajab and redirected Zhuotebazhapu to that. Just curious if the history of the deleted article contains any useful information that could be merged. -Eric Baer (talk) 10:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Probably not as it was only a 1 sentence stub but I went ahead and restored the history anyway. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Winhostings on Japanese Wikipedia

http://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winhostings&action=edit&redlink=1. There is many entries in wikipedia but admin of japan keep deleting this entry. They are requesting money for not to delete -Ibrahim yener (talk) 12:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Each Wikipedia is separate: we can do nothing here about an article deleted from Japanese Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Mark Cripps

political candidate in upcoming province-wide election and prominent local figure -Echidnaokapis (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

So what? Neither of those makes him notable enough for an article. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
See in particular WP:POLITICIAN which, to discourage use of Wikipedia as an election billboard, provides that being an unelected candidate for political office does not contribute to the notability required to have an article. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Casey Donahew Band

I was tyring to learn more about the band and can't because someone deleted the page. I have used this site for a long time but will cease to do so if something is not done about this. -69.131.153.155 (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Donahew Band, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Shereth (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

radion automatic

reasoning -Jamessyms (talk) 20:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 

i would really like to read it!
  •  Not done though deleted by PROD, the article in question was a poorly sourced BLP. However, you or any other editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Miley Cyrus - The Time of Our Lives.ogg

This audio file was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in The Time of Our Lives (Miley Cyrus song). -Zundark (talk) 20:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

TradeMark DDM

Contents for this ARTICLE will be change or it will be updated according to the guidelines or to the house rules. Can you please undelete it and let me change or update it so that will be fit to the site itself. Cheers -Mr mverar (talk) 03:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

  •  Not done Your first version was blatant adcopy, the second was a little better but still only said the company exists, not why it's important. (see CSD A7). Also, you speak of "house rules" and one of our most important ones is conflict of interest and your username suggests that you are "Mark Rowell Verar". If we are to have an article on your company, it will need to be written by a neutral editor with no connection to TradeMark DDM. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Constantinos Fotios Apokis

reasoning -94.11.95.72 (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I placed the article on line before I had completed all the information and recieved the messaged that sources were required. I had completed the article including sources and citations but it seems the article was deleted anyway.

 Not done. Yes, despite the sources you added the article was deleted because it was not considered to make a sufficient claim of importance or significance. Read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people) and then, if you think you can meet those requirements, ask user Peridon (talk) the deleting administrator, whether he will userfy the article - undelete it into a user sub-page for you to work on. I presume you are user HTApokis (talk · contribs), the article author: if you are related to the subject, please read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 09:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:ISIH cover.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in It Snows in Hell. -Zundark (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Mike Dooley

Mike Dooley AKA Michael Dooley is a world famous, NY times best selling author who deserves to have a page in Wikipedia. He is also featured in the film The Secret by Rhonda Byrne.

It appears that a page was started, and then gone. We have been told that the page for Mike Dooley is in "quarantine" and cannot be edited. We would like to have this reversed, so his page can be properly and professionally added.

Mike Dooley's BIO and history can be found on the web for verification purposes. www.tut.com He is also listed in IMDB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishenanigansd (talk • contribs) 13:42, 5 August 2011

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. He is not world-famous; he is not a bestselling author; there is a long history of vanity-stroking pseudo-articles about him being created here, so the name has been blocked from recreation: what we call "salted". Who is the "we" in the above paragraph, by the way? --Orange Mike | Talk 13:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Maghroumah.jpg and File:NajwaKaram-MaghroumehCover.JPG

These images were deleted as unused non-free media, but are now used in Maghroumeh. -Zundark (talk) 08:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Done - both restored. Take care, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Mark Howell (ice hockey)

Contested prod -Dolovis (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. lifebaka++ 15:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Bahram nouraei

this article had 6 credible source to confirmed its materials -Hiphopforlife (talk) 14:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok, since it has some sources I have removed the speedy tag and sent it to AFD. You can make your case in the deletion discussion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Invensense

I would like to have the last revision of this article emailed to me. No mainspace restoration required, thank you. Phearson (talk) 22:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC) -Phearson (talk) 22:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done - let me know if you do not receive the email. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Ending-start/Guestbook

I'm not sure if this qualifies or not, but I'll give it a shot. I'd like to retrieve my guestbook back. All I'd like is an undeletion, I originally requested its deletion by myself. Thanks, -℥nding·start 04:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! :) ℥nding·start 04:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Knievel_shark_jump_promotional_photograph.jpg

The photograph is a promotional photograph issued for free use but I did not add a non-free use rationale. I went back to add the rationale, but I did not remove the tag. If the removal took place because the tag remained (my error), could the photograph be restored? - Docob5 (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done and image re-added to article. You may want to fill out the missing information in the image's non-free usage rationale, however. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

diachronic (software)

can I have some valid justification of the act of censorship about diachronic (software)?

There are facts in reality. Dolby is a fact. Delay is a fact, and Diachronic is a fact. How you can explain it differs from other facts? Do you need the registration number of the european patent office?

isn't this unambiguous advertising or promotion?

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technics_SL-1200 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DJM http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_Digital

just explain me that.... or maybe my page doesn't works because Diachronic is still not famous? So how people can learn there are new instruments to do music? NEW instruments, I mean, not "a different kind of...", really NEW, as we italians can do.

word -Pollution6 (talk) 16:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

☒N Hello there Pollution6. The article you speak of is not currently deleted, but rather is only under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diachronic (software). Please feel free to voice your reasonings there. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Cory Basil

Not understanding why someone would delete an entire person's existence from wikipedia. The page "Cory Basil" or "coryBasil" the artist was deleted. Please reactivate this page. -209.181.77.92 (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:37, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
I've opened a discussion regarding the subject's notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Basil. Feel free to contribute. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thorbjorn Paternò Castello

independent Phd research is deleted because Yopie does not like its outcome -77.166.105.8 (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Question? Nothing to do This article has not been deleted. This looks like an edit war and therefore needs to be settled on the article's talk page or through dispute resolution. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Please Restore wordpress.com in pt.wikipedia

Hello, I'm trying to create WordPress.com in pt.wikipedia, thanks for any help. Dianakc (talk) 00:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, each Wikipedia is separate, we can do nothing here to help with problems on :pt. You may be able to get help at the Portuguese Help desk. JohnCD (talk) 09:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Nick Webb, author

Nick Webb published Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy for Pan Publishing. He then wrote a biography of Douglas Adams called Wish You Were Here -174.18.17.22 (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. This page was deleted after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Nick Webb (author) so, as stated at the head of this page, it will not be restored here. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user Cirt (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if your concern is not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Stormwind (band)

Page appears to have been deleted due to challenged notability — however Googling "Stormwind"+"band" brings up a number of reliable third party sources covering the band. -94.193.67.19 (talk) 12:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

  •  Done While deleted at AFD in 2005, (with the closer saying he counted votes, in those days it was "votes for deletion") a later version was deleted as an "uncontested PROD", I've restored that version. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_45&oldid=1141881527"