Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 18 July 20 >

July 19[edit]

Template:Taxonomy/"Palaeornis"[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kosovo (UNMIK)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Audio-pipe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly used template for the purpose which other templates such as {{Audio}}, {{Audio-IPA}} and {{IPA-all}} fulfill. Nardog (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's not clear how the mentioned templates can replace this one, which takes a symbol, a link to a defining article, and a link to a sound file. −Woodstone (talk) 13:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 4th SS PD[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An excessive cross categorisation. The corresponding list articles have been deleted for failing WP:LISTN; pls see sample AfD:

Additionally, I'm nominating the following templates; the concerns listed above apply equally to them as well. Likewise, the corresponding lists have been deleted where they existed. Please see the AfD above on the lists for: 1st SS Division; 2nd SS Division; 3rd SS Division; 5th SS Division, etc:

K.e.coffman (talk) 03:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since, it's a batch nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WP Gambia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. May need some editing to fix issues. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and deprecated Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it "deprecated" please explain? This is supposed to be a shortcut to the Africa/Gambia template. Every country should have a { WP CountryX } shortcut for Talk pages. If it's not reproducing the correct Africa/Gambia Talk page result then needs fixing, not deleting. WP Gambia is a reasonable shortcut for anyone to type on a Gambia article, like WP France shortcut. etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and mark as subst-only. A bog-standard template that aids in the project tagging of articles. – Uanfala 12:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram in Algeria[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Townsville Crocodiles roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Townsville Crocodiles is defunct Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tourist attractions in Thrissur District[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, some of it could probably be merged with Template:Thrissur district Frietjes (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Toronto hospitals[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Todd Field awards[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fork of awards already listed in Todd Field Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-SSA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 07:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-SEC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 07:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-PHS[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 07:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-NEA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 07:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment; there's a few dozen templates that seem all to be replaceable by {{PD-USGov}}. I see you've nominated four of them. Should we perhaps consider them as a group? (Unlike {{PD-USGov-NEA}}, many of them are in use; but that can be cleaned up by bot.) TJRC (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USTop20s[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following the deletion of the list articles in this template, it no longer serves any navigational or functional purpose. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:German World War II jet aces[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template redundant to List of German World War II jet aces, which contains the same information. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of Great powers by date[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Letran Knights current roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date and almost all redlinks and generally duplicates the roster in the article. Frietjes (talk) 20:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BC Prienai[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, out-of-date, and duplicates BC Prienai#Current roster Frietjes (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern Rock Radio Stations in Wisconsin[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. , template was moved and expanded Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only three links, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep or rename as "Template:Rock Radio Stations in Wisconsin" if there are other Wisconsin rock stations which are not modern rock. Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern Rock Radio Stations in Louisiana[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only three links, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, I have added three more stations. Frietjes (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gender-neutral[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Chad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Shall be marked as subst only. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, deprecated since 2008 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a standard subst-only wrapper template that aids in the project tagging of articles. – Uanfala 13:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Daytime Emmy Award Outstanding Entertainment News Program[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East German Republic Day Parades[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, mostly redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, clearly being used. try using "what links here". Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now: If one follows Frietjes' snarky recommendation, one finds that, of the 10 links, most are there to discuss or maintain the template itself. There are only two actual uses. That said, its redlinks have some use as a reminder of related events, which has value both for the reader and for possible editors. Since the template was only created last May, there is a chance that the linked articles will be created sometime. — Sebastian 09:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Famines in India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HighDefMediaComparison[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 27. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 12:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TNA Albums[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

connects two articles, the rest are redirects Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Agricultural Universities in India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are 73 official Agricultural Universities in India, (see List of agricultural universities in India) and this does not list them all, nor is it feasible to list them all. It does list many which are not official. In other words, it is pointless as a nav template. Muhandes (talk) 22:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Tanzania[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Shall be marked as subst only. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaced by other templates Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a useful wrapper template (that appears to be meant to be substed). – Uanfala 10:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NSF institutes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 10:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template duplicates the content of the 'American mathematics' template, which is more general and provides more information about mathematics organizations in the US. Blueclaw (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Surrealism[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective and selective navbox. Best left for category navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep important information about an important subject. Useful in research...Modernist (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are over 200 artists in Category:Surrealist artists. Unless this navbox includes all of these, then it is subjective and selective. However, including all surrealist artists in a navbox like this is impractical. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excuse me? By what logic would you have us remove blue linked surrealist artists? Your premise is essentially wrong...Modernist (talk) 15:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for removing the red links by the way...Modernist (talk) 16:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inclusion isn't subjective; most qualify in a very widely known and long lived artistic movement that encompasses visual art, cinema, literature, theater and other forms of communication...Modernist (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    so everyone in Category:Surrealist artists? Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Frankly most inclusions in Template:Surrealists that I worked on about 6 years ago were indeed artists, be they poets, writers, painters, cinematographers, etc....Modernist (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep. All are well-known by art historians, and many to the general public. Definitely better now without the redlinks. However, I would tend to add sections to the template, much as Template:Cubism, e.g., Leaders of the movements (i.e., Dalí, de Chirico, Ernst, Magritte, Masson, Klee, Miró), important works, influences, major writings. Coldcreation (talk) 20:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as long as something similar to Coldcreation's proposal is implemented. This template should not be just an index of surrealist artists. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:19, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reasonable, thanks for removing those...Modernist (talk) 10:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep, per comments above, per important artistic movement, per "huh?", per 'Baby=Bathwater', and per expand it as much as needed to include all important or pertinent paintings. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mountains of Montana[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 26. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_19&oldid=1138373607"