Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 2004–05 CBA season#Divisional Championships and 2004–05 CBA season#Playoffs Frietjes (talk) 21:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 1995–96 CBA season#Regular season standings and 1996–97 CBA season#Regular season standings. Frietjes (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 1995–96 CBA season#Relegations, 1996–97 CBA_season#Relegations, 2002–03 CBA season#Relegations, 2002–03 CBA season#Playoffs Frietjes (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 1968–69 Football League#Second Division Frietjes (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, sprawling, poorly formatted Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no proof that this is a site worth linking to Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration in question is long defunct, these templates are no longer needed Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (appears to have been replaced by Template:Natural resources) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, blatant misuse of template space Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, just transcludes a few pictures Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. See also Parrillas One#Current squad Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, mostly redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, mostly redlinks and TBDs Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused attribution template Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of {{POV}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN, links only 3 articles Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Spencer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused outline template. We can format articles much better than this now. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 2012 AFC Cup group stage#Group_A, 2012 AFC Cup group stage#Group_B, 2012 AFC Cup group stage#Group_C, 2012 AFC Cup group stage#Group_D Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, incomplete, and if it were complete it would duplicate 2012 Wellington Sevens#Pool stage Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, empty, and would duplicate content found in 2012–14 European Nations Cup Second Division Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates content found in 2012–14 European Nations Cup First Division Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates content found in the main article Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates content found in this section of the main article Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of Template:World trade Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and ancient warning template, we have better ones now Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused warning from 2005, we have better ones now Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains no links Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:39, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, links to a long since abandoned case from 2011. No longer needed. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to User:UBX/Ngee Ann Polytecnic Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has been around since 2007 but has never been used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:EXISTING and WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains no links Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, just transcludes a hatnote and a commons link, neither of which requires its own template Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, not needed
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly massive Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, says "This template is not to be used until all legal issues are resolved." but then points to mostly defunct or redlinked pages, so it's clear that this is no longer an issue. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge. Primefac (talk) 21:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:US Presidential Administrations with Template:US Presidents.
Should we merge the navboxes on U.S. presidents and presidencies according to Draft:US Presidents navbox?

A merge of those largely-overlapping templates has been discussed several times, but no consensus was found on how the merge product should look. When closing the previous merge discussion, it was suggested to hold a debate on the proposed design of the merged template, and then re-nominate when a "final product" is agreed. The new draft design has now been refined and endorsed by RfC, so it's time to re-nominate. — JFG talk 07:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC) — JFG talk 07:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Design choices have been settled in the RfC; this discussion must focus on deciding whether the merge improves the encyclopedia for the benefit of readers. — JFG talk 23:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional Support Although my only reservation is with the inclusion of the U.S. Coat of Arms in addition to the Seal of the President. I think just the seal is necessary.--Jacob51515 (talk) 01:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Following two requests, I have now removed the Coat of Arms from the draft. — JFG talk 23:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments I agree that the CoA needs to be removed from the proposed design. I disagree that these two existing templates are "largely-overlapping", as one navigates between biographical articles about the men who served as POTUS, and the other navigates between U.S. presidential administrations. Also, in addition to there being "no consensus" in previous discussions concerning "how the merge product should look", there was no consensus as to whether or not the merge should happen at all. I myself am not totally convinced that it should. Drdpw (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Drdpw: The combined navbox allows easy navigation among the presidents and their administrations; this is more useful to readers; a glance at template histories shows that there was a single navbox for years, and they were split off relatively recently. I suspect that the split versions were the result of unsatisfactory design or layout; an issue now addressed. — JFG talk 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, that was not the case. The need/justification for a separate "administrations" navbox only came about 8/10 months ago when several new presidential administration articles were developed (only 17 existed at this time last year) and after several editors reached a consensus last December that there should be separate "personal-biographical" and "administration" navboxes (see here). Drdpw (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Usage note: On each president's page, both navboxes are listed, so the overlap is plainly demonstrated. In addition, the templates are often drowned in the middle of a dozen other navboxes for various topics related to the individual's prior career or his roles in international bodies. If the templates are merged, I would advocate displaying that navbox prominently above the collapsed list of "lesser" navboxes. So a typical president's bottom of the page would have his personal navbox and the navbox about all the presidents, then a collapsed list of the other relevant navboxes. — JFG talk 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@JFG:, I took a look and did not find what you state above. I found no instances where a "US Presidents" navbox was on a president's admin-article page, and found only one instance where a "US Presidential Administrations" navbox was on a president's bio-article page (and I removed it). The two templates are placed on appropriate pages and fulfilling their functions well, as is the "United States presidential inaugurations" navbox, which I took a look at as well, as it's interconnected with the 2 under discussion here (and also with no overlap). BTW, I concur with you that there are too many navboxes crammed into the "Articles related to ..." shell on the presidents' bio-article pages; however, as the administrations navbox is not among them, that's really a separate issue to be discussed elsewhere. Drdpw (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Drdpw: OK,my bad, I must have drowned myself in all those navboxes… thanks for reviewing the articles. I still believe a merged template is more useful to readers than separate ones. — JFG talk 03:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Nice design, but I see no compelling reason to merge two well-functioning, clear and concise navboxes, one that navigates between presidential administration articles and another that navigates between president bio articles. Further, merging these two templates runs counter to the guidance provided at WP:Navigation template, which encourages developing smaller templates on sub-topics when the broader topic is large. Navboxes should be simple and succinct, which the proposed merged navbox is not. Drdpw (talk) 01:36, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 23:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).