Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 19 December 21 >

December 20[edit]

Template:Rishtey (TV series)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This navigational template is for a reality television series and consists of four links: the series and three season articles, but the three season articles have been merged with the the series for seven years, so the navigational template is used only once and navigates nowhere. Aspects (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Completely useless. Nigej (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Bar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Graphical timeline has been converted to lua in May and these template components of it are unused and unneeded anymore. Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Transwiki to Templates.Wikia and if there is some other MediaWiki template coding repository, along with the old version of {{graphical timeline}} ; and to Wikiversity as a how-to-code MediaWiki Templates subject -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Vacant/block and other unused US political party shading templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

US political party shading templates that no longer have any transclusions after migrations to {{Political party}}. No transclusions or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Churu weatherbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused duplicate of Churu, Rajasthan#Climate, Clones, County Monaghan#Climate, Damoh#Climate, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, as unused duplicates. Nigej (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rubio16[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Th-rail-color and other unused/orphaned rail templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced and orphaned as part of the migration to {{Adjacent stations}}. If one or more of these templates has been nominated in error because its name is similar to the train color/lines/stations/style templates, I will be happy to remove it from this nomination. If any of these templates were created with the intention of using them but editors haven't gotten around to it yet, {{Adjacent stations}} should be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most were created pre-AS, so I presume this is just housekeeping at this point. Simple delete. Mitch32(sail away with me to another world.) 22:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. The navbox contains only one link to a possibly associated person, and that person's article contains an unsourced claim of affiliation with this organization. There is not enough content here to support a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. The parent article exists but doesn't use the template. Nigej (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warner Bros. Discovery[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Duplicate of {{AT&T}}. Would be speedy T3, but that was made obsolete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rutgers Biomedical[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Appears to be better served by {{Rutgers University}}, which is used in the articles listed in this navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Time between[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Shirt58 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to do math incorrectly, assuming that all months are 30 days long. Appears to duplicate (poorly) the functionality of {{Days since}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete More like {{Age in days}} I think but, as noted, gets the wrong answer. And it also misses leap years. Nigej (talk) 16:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/UP left/main and other orphaned S-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused S-line templates with over one year since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use Template:Adjacent stations. Also see this recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Photosensitivity warning[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to violate Wikipedia:No disclaimers. If this template is useful in an article, it should be applied to that article, and a discussion can be had there about whether the disclaimer, or the potentially harmful content, should be present in the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this disclaimer doesn't seem to fit the No disclaimers type disclaimers, since it isn't about editorial content per se. Though it does fit under potential legal consequence no disclaimer -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Pokemon seizures should probably have this warning if it were to be implemented. As hundreds of children ended up in hospital with photosensitive epileptic seizures from the original incident. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Around 3% of people with epilepsy are photosensitive. [1], translating to ~100k people in the United States. In comparison, around 9 million people in the US have PTSD [2] (3,000x as many). And yet, we do not have such disclaimers for PTSD triggers. A similar argument could be made for phobias, gore, etc. But we do not have disclaimers for these things, because we are an encyclopedia. We present the information in a matter of fact way, without any editorialization. If we have such disclaimers for things like this, the number of disclaimers necessary becomes quite large and unwieldy. I do not think it improves the state of the project. At the same time, we probably should not have lots and lots of flashing gifs, as these are also unencyclopedic. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the WP:No disclaimers guideline. Crossroads -talk- 23:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I disagree with the notion that having this template is a violation of WP:DISCLAIM. From my understanding of that policy, it deals with warnings about the validity and/or vulgarity of written content in articles which can be edited at any time. The policy's page points out that such disclaimers on specific articles are unnecessary because the general disclaimer can already be found on every page. However, I think that there is a major difference between potentially misleading/offensive content and videos which could trigger negative physical effects in people with epilepsy. Having specific disclaimers about the latter is not something that I can say I am against when I do not see it as the same type of disclaimer which the disclaimer policy speaks against. And while it is true that this template is not currently used anywhere, there are definitely some articles in which it could be used; one example off the top of my head is Dennō Senshi Porygon, which has a video in its infobox that this template would apply to. Overall, I do not see the existence and/or usage of this template as something which does more harm than good, nor do I agree that it goes against any policies, so I cannot support deleting it. --Zander251 (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldies Radio Stations in North Dakota[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empty navbox with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern Rock Radio Stations in Montana[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Links to only two articles, each of which uses more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern Rock Radio Stations in Mississippi[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empty navbox with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Arkansas[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Contains a link to only one article, which uses three more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Daytime-only radio stations in Vermont[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Contains a link to only one article, which uses two more complete navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Contemporary Hit Radio Stations in Delaware[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Links to only one page, which uses the better navbox at {{Wilmington DE Radio}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Maryland[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be better covered by {{Contemporary Hit Radio Stations in Maryland}}, which has all or nearly all of the links in this template. Merge with that template, or delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Overly specific. Nigej (talk) 18:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sinhalese people[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation. Last substantive edit was in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2010 West Coast Eagles squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A single-use roster template. Should be substituted on the 2010 West Coast Eagles season article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. Single use and no other plausible uses. Nigej (talk) 19:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SIMI[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:OR. This is a completely made up template cobbled together with unrelated names added here without any basis. None of these names added in the template find a mention in the main article Students' Islamic Movement of India. The template had been blanked in past which I believe was an attempt for deletion. Usage on some articles also violates WP:BLP Venkat TL (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/People's Action Party[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Singapore political party shading template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Nowoczesna[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Poland political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Philippines political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Brazilian Social Democracy Party[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Brazilian political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/New Progressive Party (Puerto Rico)/color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Puerto Rico color template. Gonnym (talk) 13:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colored box wd[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template without documentation and no incoming links. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colorts[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of Template:Colort (which is used on articles such as List of colors: A–F). Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Color wheel comparison[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color wheel table. Only place that could fit is Color wheel. If consensus is to add it to that article then it should be subst and deleted. I however personally think the color styling on this table doesn't look good so I'm not proposing adding it. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't see substitution as a solution because it doesn't fit the Color wheel article. Very little relevance in my view. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dates for Easter[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 12. Sandstein 13:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Legacy Broadcasting[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most stations have been resold within the last couple of years. And with one station left in the group, there's no need for this template. Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I added a former section, so I think it still has value. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Difficult to see that it's really any use as an aid for navigation, given the other content. Nigej (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Smallcaps all/styles.css[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Should users decide to implement this for use in {{Smallcaps all}}, please feel to contact me for restoration. ✗plicit 11:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, this template is not used. Q28 (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've created, validated and proposed {{Smallcaps all}} to use this TemplateStyle page, but no one willing to do. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Great Brightstar could you explain the issue? Pinging also @Izno to this. Gonnym (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I just got new implementation based on TemplateStyles, and followed discussions at its talk page, however no one have interest to apply in the end. --Great Brightstar (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fmbox/styles.css[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this is not used. Q28 (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per cmbox, ombox, imbox, and tmbox. Module:Message box/styles.css and Template:Ambox/styles.css should probably also be deleted for the same reason. Gonnym (talk) 14:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Na/bgcolor[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is not used`` Q28 (talk) 05:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The idea behind this seems like a valid one, to allow legends to use the color used in these templates without these two values going out of sync. I'm voting delete however because two reasons. The first is that this system is just not being used, so keeping it is meaningless. The second is that the entire "Table cell" system in my opinion is poorly designed. They are all almost identical templates, with variations seem to be more accidental than by design. These would work much better as a single template and in turn extracting the color would not need duplicate templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SIRT[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not used and ... Q28 (talk) 05:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SOTD/2011-05-11[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that this template is not used. Q28 (talk) 05:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Wikipedia needs a Featured Sound project. This dates from the time Featured Sounds were about to get on the Main Page, but, despite widespread agreement to do so, the admins who said they'd sort it never did, and that... was project killing.
...I don't even know anymore. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 19:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reşiţa Demographics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is not used because the template is used only on one page and has been replaced. Q28 (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense to keep only one template, and not both, I feel the one used on the page, just with the plotine is not as good as this one with the bars that we propose for deletion. On this one with the bars you can clearly see the numbers of each year. The one with the plotline makes sense when you have 30-100 entries. Anyway, I will let you choose, I am not that bothered. TudorTulok (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Should be substed into an article if it's any use. Nigej (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RSR[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used since template was created. Q28 (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IntFixCal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 27. ✗plicit 11:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LASTDECADE[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. This can be undeleted if someone finds a use for it. From the history, it looks like it may have been created for {{Navseasoncats}} which now uses LUA. If anyone needs to recreate it, the content was {{#expr:((({{#time:Y}}/10)-1.5) round 0)}}0 which returns the numeric value of the previous decade without the trailing "s". Similar, templates included {{NEXTDECADE}} (now deleted) and {{CURRENTDECADE}} (which has almost the exact same code). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have a need for this right now and can be recreated, but other templates currently can replace their functions. Q28 (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep/out of process — I made this template out of necessity, and used it somewhere. Someone has removed its use prior to TfD'ing, and I don't have the time to remember/figure out where it was.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  11:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • And I suspect this situation is similar to the other LAST-X TfDs, as it seems very suspicious that all of a sudden none of them are in use.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  11:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some others were nominated on WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 18 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LASTWEEKDAYABBREV[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is corrupt and cannot be used for any purpose. Q28 (talk) 05:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused. Not sure what the nominator means the template is corrupt. Doesn't look like the template is malformed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've fixed the incorrect template coding {{#time:D|-1 day}} ( Fri ) ; though the template has been unused since creation because the code was broken -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject The Beatles/hide[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is no longer in use. This should be the last unused /hide template. Q28 (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox space programme[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Infobox space program. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox space programme with Template:Infobox space program.
The only meaningful difference between these two infoboxes is the different spelling of "program/programme" in the "Program history" subheader. Couldn't the implimentation of different spellings be way, way, way more efficently achieved by simply implimenting a switch of some kind in the space program infobox instead? Something like... Progra{{#if:{{{programme|}}}|mme|m}} history? — Molly Brown (talk) 05:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_20&oldid=1065231164"