Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 20 December 22 >

December 21[edit]

Template:Istanbul Metro M2 M11 style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. The templates require using the S-line format that has since been or is being replaced by Module:Adjacent stations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused and created by a now blocked user which means that it will more than likely stay as such. Gonnym (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Underscore title[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used anywhere. Probably a test creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused and created by a now blocked user. Would seem that in the rare cases this might be used we can use DISPLAYTITLE directly. Gonnym (talk) 17:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UKPP[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, lots of disambiguation links in the documentation, no incoming links. If it was ever used, it appears to have been orphaned by the conversion of political party templates to {{Political party}}. Note that this template has many unused subpages as well. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as creator – a failed experiment of mine that really should have been kept in draftspace, and superseded by {{Political party}} in any case. PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 19:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    PinkPanda272, thanks for the comment. If you add {{db-g7}} (copy and paste, including the braces) to the top of the template page, that will allow for speedy deletion and reduce the administrative burden on the admins to patrol this page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OT color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Oslo Tramway templates. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Trams in Oslo. Gonnym (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

LOM-Treno s-line templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations system. Frietjes (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Alexa[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Alexa rankings were removed from {{Infobox website}} in October 2020 following a very snowy RFC about their inclusion, so this template and module are no longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both per nom. With all respect to RexxS, calling these "no longer useful" is a large understatement. We shouldn't have included these rankings when we did, and now we don't. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 22:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wiki missing[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. Only two edits in 2010 and 2012. Content is just a wikilink created by 1=. The project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles appears to be perfectly happy with regular links, which are easy to copy/paste and to understand when you are looking at the wikitext. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikimediaForHorror[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No substantive edits since 2006. Has more maintenance edits (7) than actual content edits (4). – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Raja Yoga[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be content suitable for only one article, Raja Yoga. This was apparently the subject of some edit warring back in 2007 when it was created, and consensus appears to have settled on not using it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ragin' Cajuns football uniform[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Only edits were creation in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Maybe some failed/aborted attempt. Nigej (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disrupted discussion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 28. Izno (talk) 23:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Batavia Muckdogs roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. For the first two, the only place that these rosters would be useful is in Batavia Muckdogs and Burlington Bees, respectively, and there is a roster locally in those articles. The same goes for the rest of these rosters for low-level minor-league baseball teams in the US. The only possible place for these rosters is in a single article, and they are not used there. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Seems that the rosters are now simply in the articles, which is indeed a much better approach. Nigej (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chembox removeInitialLinebreak[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused by redesign, deprecated 2015. As a Chembox subtemplate, it would only be called from main template {{Chembox}}, and so no public calls anyway. From {{Chembox}} maintenance, I'd say technical & uncontroversial. DePiep (talk) 05:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination and nominator who is the creator. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dutch labelled[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. One incoming link from a 2007 talk page. It was once used at Dutch people, but it was removed in 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Démographie canton2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only substantive edits were creation in 2009. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duplicate file info[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No current transclusions. Page was apparently used by a bot that has not edited since 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I operated that bot- delete it! Staecker (talk) 17:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Staecker. Feel free to add {{db-g7}} (copy and paste, including the braces) to the top of the page to enable speedy deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:No Copy to Wikibooks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 28. ✗plicit 04:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Copy to Meta[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 28. ✗plicit 04:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:InterTransWiki[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except as an example in the 2009 thread requesting its creation. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and use. There are numerous non-English articles written onto English Wikipedia, all of those should be tagged with this to move off to their respective proper language Wikipedias. All of those {{not English}} tagged articles that are completely not English should be accompanied by this template. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That isn't how articles in other languages are handled here. See WP:Pages needing translation into English. If someone wants to transwiki the original non-English version to another language's Wikipedia during the grace period given for translating it here into English, they can. When the grace period here ends, the article is deleted. It isn't left here in the other language with this tag marking it in case somebody, some day, decides to try transwikiing it. The tag itself acknowledges that the article may not even be acceptable to the other Wikipedia. Then what? Largoplazo (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the purpose it would serve is inconsistent with the way non-English articles are actually handled here. Largoplazo (talk) 04:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question (and leaning delete): is there actually a system here on en.wiki of editors watching transclustions of this template and actively moving articles? If there isn't then using this template is pointless. Gonnym (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TWCleanup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used anywhere meaningful, only in Wikipedia:Template index/Moving, and no possibility of further use since Wiktionary has rejected transwikis. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there are multiple transwiki templates for Wiktionary. If every language of Wiktionary reject transwikis, then they should be bundled. If some non-English wiktionary accepts transwikis of defintions written not in English, then the templates should be adjusted to accept the language of wiktionary involved, and kept. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because I imagine anybody who's savvy enough to have transwikied an article elsewhere from here also has a pretty good idea of how to address the article here afterwards, rather than being completely at a loss and feeling the need to leave the next steps up to others. Largoplazo (talk) 04:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Division of Lyons InteractiveMap[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Last edit in 2018. It appears that these are an abandoned experiment intended to be used in articles such as Division of Braddon, but the consensus appears to be that normal images are preferred there. See also this December 2021 TFD that discussed similar maps of Tasmanian regions. If these are kept for some reason, only one of each duplicate should be kept. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I have added the two Tasmania map templates since the above comment was made. I neglected to include them in the initial nomination; the rationale is the same. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. Nigej (talk) 10:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PartofWPGHANA[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused Q28 (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added CSD G7 to speed up the process.Moxy- 02:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pic of the day/Today[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, It could be an experiment in 2011. Q28 (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Moldova/Task force categories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page has not been used since it was created. Q28 (talk) 00:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Wikisource/Category[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we know that this template is no longer in use. Q28 (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_21&oldid=1062518975"