Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 21 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 23 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 22[edit]

06:17:00, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Klinton Edvan[edit]


i literally know English, Don't worry about it. please tell me about rejected my article. what type of notability you want. i didn't get you, please describe me in details, what do you want to see in my article or what has to be removed in my article. when you got any error in article please tell me in brief where's the error in that and how will overcome from that? please help me. i really want to write a same article because i want to show his journey for all readers... --Klinton Edvan (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Klinton Edvan (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:YFA, WP:NBIO. Do not demand for explanation without reading anything. I do not care whether you want it to be published or not, but whether is suits Wikipedia or not, after all this is the 5th most popular website in the world and we have strict content policies according to Alexa. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:33:46, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Your suraj[edit]


Please keep my article as a stub if it can't be put as an article.

Your suraj (talk) 06:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Your suraj: - hi there. The opening line of a stub's definition is "A stub is an article deemed too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject". As you can see, stubs are still articles. As such, it is still necessary to meet the minimum corporate notability requirements. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:37:16, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Swiss cottage 75[edit]


Swiss cottage 75 (talk) 06:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:24:34, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Sportsfan018[edit]

Hello this is my first page so apologies if I am not doing the right thing. The reviewer thegooduser declined my submission with the reason that it does not show significant coverage. Does that mean it doesn't have more sources or the subject is not significant enough for a wiki page? The reason I created the article is because i didn't find a page for it and thought to add to the wikipedia with the entry. Can you help expand on what is needed to get this published please? Thank you Sportsfan018 (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Articles need to have enough secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Your draft fails WP:GNG and WP:NCOMIC. Please take some time clicking into the links and familiarize yourself with our content policies. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:35:36, 22 January 2019 review of submission by BalaKPN[edit]


I am entering a new company common data. so i dont have secondary details pls advice how can i proceed

BalaKPN (talk) 07:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BalaKPN. If there are no independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the topic, then you are not allowed to write an article about it on Wikipedia. See WP:WHYNOT for more information. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:58:59, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Nirupammathur[edit]


Nirupammathur (talk) 10:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miraj Group. I've been trying to submit the information that I found about Miraj Group. Previously it got rejected because the language was bit advertising type. Next I tried making it in the sandbox and wen't on to get a review that where am I lacking, but again my article in Sandbox got rejected. I've worked and wrote it according to Wikipedia guidelines, still it gets rejected.

 On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Nirupammathur#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nirupammathur: Thank you for your response on your talk page. The subject of Draft:Miraj Group may be notable, but the draft fails to show that it is. It cites only two sources, and one of those (likely a press release) is about an insignificant industry award. The second source is better, but is really about Miraj Cinemas, and says little about the parent company. It is cited in the draft in support of the statement, "Latest Miraj Group has started its cinema division through its company Miraj Entertainment Ltd." The corporate structure would be a good thing to include in a Wikipedia article, but the Economic Times doesn't mention Miraj Entertainment at all, so that statement is not supported by the source. Most of the draft is not supported by sources.
On top of the notability and verifiability problems, the draft gives undue weight to the company's philanthropy, and there are significant problems with the grammar, style, and tone of the submission. If English is not your first language, you may feel more comfortable contributing to another language variant of Wikipedia, such as Hindi, or one of the many other languages of South Asia. See meta:List of Wikipedias for a complete list of choices. All in all, I suggest you focus on your schoolwork rather than editing Wikipedia. If you do edit, it's better to gain experience by making smaller edits to existing articles for a considerable while before you try to create a new article. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:21:20, 22 January 2019 review of draft by LHamstig[edit]

can a 'reliable source' be a website page of the company which the article is based on? Thanks

LHamstig (talk) 13:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. It would be a primary source. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 13:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:31:10, 22 January 2019 review of draft by LHamstig[edit]


I have problems having my article approved, stating it 'reads more as an advertisement than an encyclopedia entry'. Any advice on how I can proceed?

LHamstig (talk) 13:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For a start remove every instance of the word solution ie as in "business specialising in digital navigation and compliance solutions" it has no place in a Wikipedia article. Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:04:10, 22 January 2019 review of submission by Mickmonaghan343[edit]


Mickmonaghan343 (talk) 23:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Guys I am putting this page up for review again, it has been delayed by a previous person being banned and my version being draft two. Aside from that i feel he does comply with wp music under section 4 of notable touring artist, i have added his references of his current canadian and american tour and referenced independant sites that mentioned his tour and i did the same in europe, I am in the process of finding articles about his music too that are independant but hopefully you will consider this, I am confused at how he can have a german wiki page but not an english one. thanks michael

@Mickmonaghan343: I think this artist could meet the WP:MUSICBIO criteria. However you need to remove any material that you can't provide a reliable source for, per WP:V, and you need to remove any promotional language. See WP:PUFFERY. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_January_22&oldid=880567689"