Wikipedia:WikiProject Contributor clean-up/Qworty/Edits 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles 1 through 20[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article is alright; Qworty's edits were genuine vandalism reversion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is fine. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now deleted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was one of Qworty's hatchetjobs. User:Lastitem may be a Qworty sock - it added negative material in 2010 [1] that was gradually whittled away, then readded by Qworty in 2012 almost verbatim [2]. However, it seems to be reasonably NPOV right now and none of Qworty's edits currently stand. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreed with redirect. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Material has since been removed/reverted. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One small cleanup made - if anyone cares to review it, [3] - article is otherwise fine with most of Qworty's edits long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This one is well handled by now.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have already been reverted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Had already been reverted - Seth Kellerman (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article is okay - see Talk:John McCain presidential campaign, 2008#Qworty for more. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was/is a puff piece about an author Robert Clark Young apparently liked. I've proposed it for deletion for reasons explained in the PROD nomination. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since removed. Note that I was involved with this dispute at the time. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war. Changes since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Large scale removal of content. Since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted by Alf. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 21 through 40[edit]

Section complete - Mangoe (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, all POV editing long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. B. Stoddard. Seth Kellerman (talk) 22:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion closed as no consensus; article stubbified. Note that most of the article was unsourced puffery. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Qworty removed much content from this article but in this case his edits seem to have been according to policy. No problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At AfD Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, but there is essentially nothing left of the original Quorty version. Mangoe (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been almost completely rewritten since these changes. Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All seems to be alright with this article. HOWEVER, 123.224.94.138 should be investigated as a possible Qworty sockpuppet. 123.224.94.138 very insistently fought to keep material that Qworty introduced. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All edits overwritten.--Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No real issues in his edits. The article's still a bit of a mess tho. Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of his problematic edits had already been overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, No violation--My76Strat (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Was unsourced editorializing, removed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done - a potential issue with the article posted to the article's talk page. Seth Kellerman (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 41 through 60[edit]

Section complete - Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Has since been turned into a redirectBrustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Brustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. Qworty's edits were removing genealogical info (which has since been restored) and nominating it for deletion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • No current problems. Most of his editing was copyediting, and the rest of it no longer relevant as the case has been updated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can't say there's no problems here because it looks like the article has been whitewashed since Qworty's edit, but there are no current Qworty-related problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty went to war to try and make the article as derogatory as possible, but by now the article is informative and well balanced; none of his edits remain. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article seems to be in alright shape at this time. Quorty's edit was a violation of WP:UNDUE, but that error has been fixed over the years. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. A majority of the edits were POV-pushing, but were reverted by others at the time. The last dozen edits were constructive grammatical fixes. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems - his edits to this article were generally constructive. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edits were more-or-less harmless original research, and all have been deprecated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three unproblematic sourced edits from 2008-09, all of which seem to be long deprecated from the article. Carrite (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest edit deprecated, several edits reverted. One long deletion stands, arguably it was peacock material touting who used this self-publishing press. Qworty was a content warrior in attempting to label the subject a "vanity press" rather than a "self-publishing company." The tendentious phrasing does not appear in the article as of today, thus I believe there is no lasting damage resulting from Qworty's editorial participation here. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 61 through 80[edit]

Section complete - Ceronomus (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty nominated it for deletion, the discussion was closed as Keep. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Appears to have been legitimate cleanup of promotional language. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clear bias shown by QWORTY, but has already been corrected Ceronomus (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • QWORTY edits already fixed by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some lingering issues found and fixed Ceronomus (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 81 through 100[edit]

Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 101 through 120[edit]

Section Complete Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Unfortunately, most of this content could not be restored because it was primarily OR. Viriditas (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was (and still is) a mess, but Qworty's edits were according to policy. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 121 through 140[edit]

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit is valid and still in place. No problems here. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, closed with no consensus. Article still remains. No further issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original article proposed for deletion by Qworty in 2008 and deleted after its second nomination.Removed 28 Mar 2014 by Scottywong. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Section about alleged professional misconduct later removed after what looks to have been a frenzied edit war that did not involve Qworty. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed [4]. - Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 141 through 160[edit]

Articles 161 through 180[edit]

  • Edited section, "Contemporary forms of tribalism" already removed as speculative. No remaining issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 181 through 200[edit]

  • All traces of QWORTY's edits long since removed Ceronomus (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited section (Cultural References) later removed from article. No conflict Ceronomus (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Damage by QWORTY repaired by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 201 through 220[edit]

Articles 221 through 240[edit]

Articles 241 through 260[edit]

Articles 261 through 280[edit]

  • No problematic edits made. Page has subsequently greatly evolved anyhow. Ceronomus (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 281 through 300[edit]

Articles 301 through 320[edit]

Articles 321 through 340[edit]

Articles 341 through 360[edit]

Articles 361 through 380[edit]

Articles 381 through 400[edit]

Articles 401 through 420[edit]

Articles 421 through 440[edit]

Articles 441 through 460[edit]

Articles 461 through 480[edit]

Articles 481 through 500[edit]

Articles 501 through 520[edit]

Articles 521 through 540[edit]

Articles 541 through 560[edit]

Articles 561 through 580[edit]

Articles 581 through 600[edit]

Articles 601 through 620[edit]

Articles 621 through 640[edit]

  • FYI: There were WP:COI problems with this article (which did not involve Qworty), though rather than simply reverting to the old sourced version, Qworty deleted most of the content. I've essentially reverted to a pre-COI version and incorporated some of the (non-COI) subsequent edits. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660[edit]

Articles 661 through 680[edit]

Articles 681 through 700[edit]

All checked, nothing changed. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was one potentially questionable edit here but the section has since been deleted anyway. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 701 through 720[edit]

Articles 721 through 740[edit]

Articles 741 through 760[edit]

Articles 761 through 780[edit]

Articles 781 through 800[edit]

Articles 801 through 820[edit]

Articles 821 through 840[edit]

all checked; no issues. Mangoe (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 841 through 860[edit]

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 861 through 880[edit]

All minor or uncontroversial Mangoe (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 881 through 900[edit]

Articles 901 through 920[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation, grammar. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed some unsourced content. Some since returned. Seems fair enough. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed a review as COI. Rewrote, expanded and replaced. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, layout. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 921 through 940[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed unsourced content. Subsequently sourced and returned. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reorganised list. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. Removed some content on reasonable grounds. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 941 through 960[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization, punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Changed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, date change. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tense. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed nn name. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrectly removed name, since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 961 through 980[edit]

section completed. Mangoe (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage fixes. Mangoe (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage tweaks. Mangoe (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 981 through 1000[edit]