Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review

Aviation Project‑class

	Aviation portal This page is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Aviation Peer Review[edit]

A-class review instructions say that an article only gets 4 days for review. Do we consider revising? There aren't enough people involved in reviewing right now. Perhaps we post a notice on the Project and task force talk pages? --Born2flie (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I aggree. I changed it to 'a sufficient time' for now, until it gets more active here. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powered hang glider[edit]

Hello, I have sumbitted the Powered hang glider article for peer review. I'd like to hear feedback in order to raise its quality status from B-Class to A-Class. Thanks!BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New process[edit]

I know WP:Aviation mirrored the WP:MILHIST peer review process, but I wonder if a process similar to the GA-Class review process might work better. The review takes place on the article's talk page, and becomes a part of the history of that article, rather than an out of sight process that is often neglected. It might also entice more editors to take part if they see it happen more often, and each review becomes an ad hoc advertisement for the process. Just some thoughts. --Born2flie (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review request for General aviation in the United Kingdom[edit]

Not sure what has happened here. I followed the procedure for adding a PR request, and whilst the note shows, the title doesn't. Anyone able to help?--FactotEm (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Idiot at the keyboard here. --FactotEm (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nominations section[edit]

Since the bot is not updating Template:WPAVIATION Announcements now, can we list the GA reviews in a section on the pee review page, say below the "Non-article featured content candidates" section? Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out by User:Nimbus227, the announcements template data comes from WP:WikiProject Aviation/Article alerts and can be updated manually. So adding GA reviews on this page is not that critical. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted - a topic specialist for a FAC review[edit]

Imperial Gift is currently under review as a Featured Article Candidate. The two reviewers who have weighed in so far are not topic specialists on military or aviation topics. The article covers events in a number of British Empire countries in the immediate post First World War period. The British government donated large numbers of aircraft and related equipment to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa and India. The donations led to the foundation of four national Air Forces. I am the nominator of the FAC and the major contributor to the article. (This request for assistance has also been posted to WikiProject Military History.) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]