Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disability/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Self advocacy movement

There's a huge lack of articles about the self advocacy movement. including the fact that the page for self advocacy movement doesn't even clarify what kind of disability advocacy it is. I'd like to work on this project, there's some really good sources like https://mn.gov/mnddc/ada-legacy/ada-legacy-moment17.html and https://publications.ici.umn.edu/impact/33-1/self-advocacy-as-a-movement. As well as some articles that should be fleshed out like Roland Johnson. I'm new to editing wikipedia, so I'd appreciate help and expertise with that. Also working on this draft: Draft:Self Advocates Becoming Empowered

Catchant (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Good goal for the new year! Sounds like you're looking at some good sources. Penny Richards (talk) 04:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

@Catchant I've just had the pleasure of reviewing and accepting your draft. I have no concerns about your competence as a Wikipedian if you continue writing to the same standard. Welcome to WikiProject Disability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

It's my (as yet fairly uninformed) impression that self advocacy originated (in the US at least) in parallel with the independent living movement. I agree with Penny Richards about your good sources, they are the bedrock of good articles. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Ola Abu Alghaib

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at Ola Abu Alghaib and maybe help clean things up a bit. I came across the article as WP:HD#Issues templates posted on this article and did a bit of cleanup myself, but it probably needs some more. One thing that seems to be an issue is WP:SURNAME, but I'm not sure whether "Ola" is the subject's given name or family name. In addition, based on this edit, I'm guess that the IP asking for help at the Help Desk as well as probably some others who edited the article recently have a WP:COI: one such account Veronikacuesta was even blocked for violating WP:PAID. So, it would be nice to have some more on eyes on it just in case things start to get a little out of control. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Category:Wikipedia autism

 You are invited to join the discussion at Category talk:Wikipedia autism#Renaming, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 18:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 23

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 23#Category:Wikipedians with ADHD, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 08:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Disability in Ancient Greece

I came across what looks like a fairly decent source about disability policy/politics in ancient Athens. Who knew that social security for disabled citizens has been a contentious issue for so long!

• Kudryavtseva, Tatyana V. (2022). "Lysias's Speech On the Refusal of a Pension and Athenian Citizens with Disabilities". Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History. 67 (1): 102–112. doi:10.21638/11701/spbu02.2022.107.

I hope someone would find this useful. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Judith Heumann has died

I'd like to propose that we make an effort to get the article up to at least GA standard as soon as possible. It is currently rated C-class. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

It's B now. That's probably enough to propose it for Recent Deaths? Penny Richards (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Eddie Izzard

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Eddie Izzard#Requested move 15 March 2023 , which is within the scope of this WikiProject. The topic of the discussion is on moving the article due to Izzard's recent name change. Note, I'm making this notification manually as the RM doesn't seem to have been added to the alert list by the bot. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Time for another collaboration with WiR

I have posted a suggestion at WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Ideas#Disability that we have a collaboration with them. It's been quite some time since we last did something like that, so please participate in the discussion there. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023 WiR collaboration

A month-long collaboration with Women in Red will take place during May 2023. Full details are at WP:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/268. Please sign-up there. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Sanity check for notability please

I've started a draft about a subject who I follow quite closely on social media. Consequently I'm not really sure I'm able to fairly and neutrally evaluate the sources I have gathered. Please take a look at the sources I've listed at Draft:Chelsie Hill to see if she is clearly notable. (BTW This is part of the WiR collaboration for May 2023 that I have mentioned above.) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't usually do BLPs, so I'm a little outside my realm with this one. I do think the bio would have a stronger claim to notability with some examples of the impact Hill's foundation has had. (It's not unusual for folks to start foundations, but a lot of those foundations never really do anything notable.) It looks like you have a number of good sources, so I'd wring those through for useful details, and see if they add up, or if it's still a WP:TOOSOON. Penny Richards (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Her TV credits might also help bolster the notability claim. Penny Richards (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Also, she isn't possibly the young woman in blue in the front row of this flashmob from 2016, is she? If so, I've danced with her. (My son and I are in the mob part of the flashmob.) Penny Richards (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

No, now I look closer, I think that's Mia Schaikewitz. Still, it's a small world, now I'm wondering if I've met Hill. Penny Richards (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Looks good to me—plenty of coverage specifically devoted to her, appearing in a variety of outlets and sustained over the span of years. Thanks for the WiR contribution! Innisfree987 (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Deprecated language in citations in UK honours lists

There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals/Archive 7#Deprecated language in citations for UK honours about whether citations should be updated to today's language, eg changing the 1980 "For service to the disabled." to "For service to disabled people." Members of this Wikiproject may have a view: please comment there. PamD 17:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Accessible image

The article Accessible image has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

attempted to find sources unsuccessfully; not verifiable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

After reviewing the very limited sources in the entry, I deprodded but also redirected to accessibility. If anyone is able to write up a better entry, you have my support. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:28, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:NaviLens

I recently created NaviLens with a translation of the Dutch article. The company makes QR codes to assist visually impaired people. Any help with expansion would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Bay Area Nonprofit Article For Submission

Hello everyone! I was wondering if anyone involved in the disability space would review this article for submission. It’s about Creativity Explored (CE), a nonprofit in San Francisco that hosts a day program for developmentally disabled adult artists. Located in the Mission District and Potrero Hill, CE functions as a studio-based collective, currently offering over 130 artists art supplies, training, exhibition and sales opportunities. I am an AmeriCorps VISTA in Community Development serving at CE so I wanted to disclose that and welcome any notes on bias and/or promotion that is inappropriate. That being said, CE is a 40 year old nonprofit that has a strong nuclear community and is a proud part of the broader disability community. I’d appreciate any time you take to look the article over and provide feedback, thank you! GeorgiaMKC (talk) 16:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

FAR for Digital media use and mental health

I have nominated Digital media use and mental health for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Laurentia Tan

Laurentia Tan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 02:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

FAR for Reactive attachment disorder

User:Buidhe has nominated Reactive attachment disorder for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Physical therapy#Requested move 29 December 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Physical therapy#Requested move 29 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Mobility of amputees

I'm not sure this is the best place to ask this, but thought I'd give it a shot. I'm a bit bothered by a sentence in Wiseguy (TV series) concerning the fictional character Daniel Benjamin "Lifeguard" Burroughs: "Daniel is a double-leg amputee, but is remarkably mobile in his wheelchair; he is also mobile with a pair of prosthetic legs." I thought this was the norm for amputees, to the extent that an amputee being unable or unwilling to use a wheelchair or prosthetics would require explanation. Am I mistaken, or is it appropriate to excise everything in this sentence which follows "amputee"? Martin IIIa (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

I don’t know the show but would, "Daniel is a double-leg amputee who uses a wheelchair as well as prosthetics" work? I agree that the "remarkable" bit seems gratuitous. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, that looks great to me. I'll go put it in the article. Martin IIIa (talk) 23:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)