Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

I started the WP:WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary and I am having difficulty with finding new members to contribute to pages pertaining to the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary.

I am of the opinion that the creation of the following articles would be beneficial: History of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, Notable United States Coast Guard Auxiliarists, Awards and decorations of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps, Director of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary National Commodore, Missions of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary National Executive Committee, and the Coast Guard Auxiliary Association.

Expansion/improvements to these pages:United States Coast Guard Auxiliary and Uniforms of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary would also help.

Any assistance to support this project will be greatly appreciated. COASTIE I am (talk) 13:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

List of police complaints authorities

I've just converted the former Police Complaints Authority disambiguation page into a new List of police complaints authorities. I'm sure there are articles I've missed off the list because I was unaware of them and there may be some entries that I've misunderstood and don't belong. Please can you evaluate, correct, expand and improve. Thanks. Thryduulf (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Law Enforcement vs Law enforcement

Just noticed this issue with several law enforcement related articles and category pages. This project capitalizes the 'E' in enforcement, however there is a mix of capital 'E's and lower-case 'e's when people are adding templates to articles and even when creating category pages. I posted a comment about this at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters where this is currently several on-going discussions related to this. The comment I posted is here. FYI - ^theWOLFchild 23:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Trump administration family separation policy

There is a discussion at the Trump administration family separation policy talk page found here that members of this project might be interested in taking part in. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 03:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Lists of officers killed in the line of duty

Does WPLE have a specific guideline regarding the adding of content related to officers, etc. killed in the line of duty to police department articles. I've seen some examples like Los Angeles Police Department#Fallen officers, New York City Police Department#Fallen officers and Houston Police Department#Fallen officers where there's a combination of prose and table of "causes of death", etc. and even just prose like in Chicago Police Department#Fallen officers, but lists of individual officer killed are reserved for WP:SALs like List of Los Angeles Police Department officers killed in the line of duty. I came across Royal Canadian Mounted Police#Fallen Members after seeing Talk:Vancouver Police Department#Fallen Members and I'm wondering whether it would be better to WP:SPLIT that list of names off in to its own article or if it's OK as is in the main article about the RCMP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dubeau

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dubeau. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Making law enforcement unit template

I've been in a discussion with a Wiki user or two (Currently dormant) to have a law enforcement user infobox propped up in order to have it used for law enforcement units only. Currently drafting it now. Ominae (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Criminology Course Assignment

I am designing my Senior Seminar in Criminology course this Fall to include a group assignment in which students take one section of an article on policing and work to improve it. Any suggestions for target articles, sub-sections, etc would be appreciated.

We will be working through the WikiEdu.org program, and I believe you can see a link to the course on my User page. DoctorKarpiak (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

My MA level class has decided to work on the topic of "Police Culture," which has been a central concept in much of the Police Studies literature. The questions now is whether it should be its own stand alone article or whether it should be a section of another article. How do "stubs" work? DoctorKarpiak (talk) 04:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Notability guidelines

Hi - are there any notability guidelines for articles in this project? Fob.schools (talk) 09:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Scope section

The Scope section on the project page only displays a question mark ie:

• ?

Does this mean the project has no scope or it hasn't been settled? What is the status of the page Wikipedia:WikiProject_Law_Enforcement/Scope? It would be helpful if a brief list appeared on the main project page so that contributors could get a general understanding of what the project will and will not cover. Or has the page been vandalized? - 210.86.69.177 (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox FBI Ten Most Wanted

Template:Infobox FBI Ten Most Wanted has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox criminal. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jay D. Easy (talk) 04:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Wanted poster, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Law enforcement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Law enforcement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Law enforcement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:38, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Anyone still around from WP:LE for article assessment

There's another and I made major edits to some article that can use a set of eyes on. Ominae (talk) 06:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Law enforcement

I am a student at the University at Albany, I am interested in expanding on maritime law enforcement in the United States Zacharysoto96 (talk) 03:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

No-go area

• No-go area (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Hello, the above article is currently undergoing discussion on the talk page. Your input would be appreciated! Elizium23 (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

RfC on political party of David Clarke (sheriff)

Please see here: Talk:David Clarke (sheriff)#RfC on political party. Your opinion is appreciated. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 01:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Content dispute

The input of others would be appreciated at Talk:Police use of deadly force in the United States#Addition of content. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

RfC on Killing of Rayshard Brooks

Please see here: Talk:Killing_of_Rayshard_Brooks#RfC:_Including_criticisms_of_the_DA's_decision_to_charge_ahead_of_the_GBI_investigation. Your input is appreciated. FirstPrimeOfApophis (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

New infobox law enforcement unit - feedback

I've created a new infobox Template:Infobox law enforcement unit for use on units that make up a law enforcement agency. I am seeking feedback on the design specifically the data fields. Editors had been trying to make do with either Template:Infobox law enforcement agency or Template:Infobox military unit for law enforcement unit articles. The infobox data fields are a combination of relevant data fields from the two infoboxes. The infobox has a one new data field subunits that can be used for example for sections or teams of a unit. The infobox has a similar layout as Infobox military unit including the colour.--Melbguy05 (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Forensic science

There is currently a proposal to start a new WikiProject for Forensic science. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Forensic science for anyone who is interested, thanks. Jerm (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Update to peer review page

Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Peer review) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews.

The new instructions use Wikipedia's general peer review process (WP:PR) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too.

The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Wikipedia peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members.

I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{u|Tom (LT)}}) in your response.

Cheers and hope you are well, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Neutrality of Spokane Police Department article

I started a conversation here on the SPD talk page about how to incorporate the Death of Otto Zehm into the article while maintaining balance. As always, your input is welcome. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Adding Cory Burkus

you guys need to add Cory Burkus the police officer. ArekSmith (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

"you guys" "you guys need to". *sigh*.

Wikipedia editors are not The Other. Wikipedia is made up of volunteers, we are all people who create content and who collaborate and who come to an agreement about that content by gaining a consensus. So all the editors edit and contribute according to their interests working within WP rules/guidelines/the 5 Pillars/principles. To say that a WikiProject needs to add a single individual is basically saying a group made up of volunteers must do something. Because you want it to be so. I'm sorry but it doesn't work that way around here.

So there are questions: No indications from yourself about who or what this Cory Burke is. Is this Cory Burke notable enough for an article? He seems to be a police officer, but looking at Google search results I see no clear evidence of notability (plus general notability guidelines come into play as well). So, where are you thinking this person should be added? If he's not notable enough for an article, why should he be added and where? In the interest of keeping this discussion complete I do need to mention that Draft:Cory Burkus is being considered for deletion, see the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cory Burkus. Shearonink (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Lexipol Article Updates

Hello editors, I'm User:Mchilds72, an employee of Lexipol. Because of my paid conflict of interest, I am looking for help from interested volunteers in the community to discuss and implement improvements to the current entry for Lexipol. You can learn more about me at my user page, and see my disclosure at Talk:Lexipol where I will make suggestions and provide resources for editors, but I will not edit the article myself. I have just posted an initial request for editors' review, specifically in hopes of improving the article's current sourcing. I have provided suggestions and welcome feedback from reviewing editors. I hope that posting here is an acceptable way for me to capture the attention of interested editors and collaborate together. If interested, please review my full request about sourcing updates here. Thanks! Mchilds72 (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Security guard § Maurice Novoa photos

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Security guard § Maurice Novoa photos. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

NYPD

More input is requested at New York City Police Department, and in particular at this and this RfC on Talk. Crossroads ^-talk- 06:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

LAPD

Comments are needed at Talk:Los Angeles Police Department#RfC: Should misconduct be mentioned in the lead?. Crossroads ^-talk- 23:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Merger proposal input request

Project Merge has received a request to merge Mosaic_theory_(litigation) and Mosaic theory of intelligence gathering into the Mosaic theory (Fourth Amendment) article on 19 February 2021. I believe merge order is negotiable. Reason: From looking at the pages, they seem like WP:CONTENTFORKs that all deal with the US legal system from slightly different perspectives. Since two of them are of a decent length, it seemed like a non-trivial merge that should be discussed before. Discussion is >>>HERE<<<. GenQuest ^"scribble" 06:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion about UK chief constable notability

Any feedback you have would be very welcome here - Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Q_about_chief_constables. Thanks in advance. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Lexipol Article Updates

Hello editors, I'm User:Mchilds72, an employee of Lexipol. Because of my paid conflict of interest, I am looking for help from interested volunteers in the community to discuss and implement improvements to the current entry for Lexipol. You can learn more about me at my user page, and see my disclosure at Talk:Lexipol where I will make suggestions and provide resources for editors, but I will not edit the article myself. I recently posted an edit request for editors' review, specifically in hopes of improving the article's Public Reaction section. I have provided suggestions and welcome feedback from reviewing editors. I hope that posting here is an acceptable way for me to capture the attention of interested editors and collaborate together. If interested, please review my full request about sourcing updates here. Thanks! Mchilds72 (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

List of British police officers killed in the line of duty

Please can somebody keep an eye on List of British police officers killed in the line of duty? An IP editor is pushing a POV that has nothing to do with the subject of the article. I don't want to go 3RR.

Details here: 41.92.6.184 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Protests in Minneapolis regarding the trial of Derek Chauvin#Requested move 15 November 2021

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Protests in Minneapolis regarding the trial of Derek Chauvin#Requested move 15 November 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SkyWarrior 02:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Request for comment at Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack

A request for comment that may interest members of this project is occurring at Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack § RfC: Should the following categories be kept?

The question being posed is: should the article stay in the following categories? Category:Terrorist incidents in the United States in 2021, Category:Rebellions in the United States, Category:Coups d'état and coup attempts in the United States. ––FormalDude ^talk 03:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Work begins on the 'Law Enforcement' article

Hello all, I have begun working on the Law Enforcement article. After the portal was deleted, this page has been neglected and only touched by students working education projects. I'm hoping we can turn it into something significant by following the Law Enforcement outline.
KhiVoh (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Killing of Amir Locke

There is a discussion at Talk:Killing of Amir Locke#More removal of sourced content, regarding the amount of background detail that should be added about the shooting. The input of others would be appreciated. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

An article of interest to the project - Vapor wake canine — has been proposed for merging with Detection dog. Project members are invited to participate at the merger discussion

Annwfwn (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Oris Buckner

Oris Buckner, who helped shine a light on abuses committed by the New Orleans Police Department, has died. Thriley (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Neutrality

Ironically, the section talking about neutrality is not very neutral. Instead of saying "This means that they must not be written from a liberal perspective that is unsympathetic to cops..." You could just as easily say "This means that they must not be written from a conservative perspective that is sympathetic to cops, if not full of positive bias towards them, or from the opposite perspective."

IMO you should just get rid of the sentence. It uses US culture war terminology in what's supposed to have a neutral, global perspective. Sativa Inflorescence (talk) 14:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

List of LASD deputy gangs merger proposal

See Talk:Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department#Merger proposal (List of LASD deputy gangs). Endwise (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2020–2023 United States racial unrest#Requested move 3 January 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2020–2023 United States racial unrest#Requested move 3 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. echidnaLives - talk - edits 10:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Winnipeg Police Service

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To avoid any futher dilution of the discussion, please read what is discussed below but continue with any further comment at Talk:Winnipeg Police Service#Criticism. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

---

I would appreciate if editors familiar with police department articles could assist at Winnipeg Police Service. An editor has reverted an edit to the "Criticism" section which appears WP:UNDUE, WP:IMPARTIAL, and poorly source. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I took a look at the material in question and personally think it's mostly OK. Some of the language could be toned down a little, e.g. "In 2022 and 2023, the Winnipeg Police Service faced widespread criticism" could drop the word "widespread"; and "The allocation of Winnipeg’s municipal budget towards the Winnipeg Police has drastically increased since the year 2000. While the Winnipeg Police consumed 17 percent of the City’s total operating budget in the year 2000, by 2020 this had risen to over 25%" could be improved by shortening to "The allocation of Winnipeg’s municipal budget towards the Winnipeg Police has increased from 17% since the year 2000, to 25% in 2020." Furthermore, the section on Justice 4 Black Lives Winnipeg's petition could benefit from some independent references acknowledging its creation, or better still any results / response from the authorities. But otherwise, the section uses a number of local and national sources that seem reliable - and I did search WP:RSN and WP:RSP. Conclusion - it needs some wordsmithing and a couple of additional references but I don't think the whole section merits deletion. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Part of the article is sourced by the following, which I had to list using "nowikis" because one or more are blacklisted:

• https://winnipegpolicecauseharm.org/blog/history-of-wpch/ - personal blog called "Winnepeg Police Cause Harm".
• https://twitter.com/WpgPoliceHarm/status/1632444277769793539 - Twitter feed from "Winnepeg Police Cause Harm".
• https://www.change.org/p/the-city-of-winnipeg-justice4blackliveswinnipeg-s-demands-to-make-winnipeg-safe-for-all-bipoc - an online petition.

And the conclusions reached from the reliable sources seem a WP:SYNTH. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

And after removing the blacklisted sources, Twitter feeds and biased blogs...my edits were reverted by User:10mmsocket. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes they were. You came here for advice and to see consensus and then go ahead and revert a bunch of content without waiting for replies either from me or from other people. It's not a race. It's not a problem that needs to be solved now, this evening, or even this week. Gaining consensus leads to better quality outcomes. Give it time. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your revert added back a blacklisted link. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Like I say, give it time. Let others comment. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the one offending blacklist URL. Now the page has been fully protected for 3 days so there's can't be any more edit warring. Either bring others to a discussion here or better still, as you clearly don't like the one answer you got here, start a new discussion on the article's talk page setting out your opinion. 10mmsocket (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

If another editor is able to look at the edits I made to fix this train wreck before it was reverted, I would appreciate your feedback about whether they were an improvement. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

For the record, @Magnolia677 is not being accurate when they call WPCH a "personal blog." It is a community organization that regularly engages in civic life in Winnipeg and regularly presents at the city council meetings. Also, the WPCH article that's been linked to is accurate, and is written by James Wilt, an established journalist with bylines at many respected news outlets including The Narwhal, Vice News, Canadian Dimension, The National Observer and the Edmonton Journal, and has published books with Penguin Random House. Magnolia677 might disagree with criticism of the Winnipeg Police Service, but the idea that the sources are inaccurate or not reflective of public discourse around the Winnipeg Police Service is just flat-out wrong and betrays that the user is either completely uninformed about this topic, or has an axe to grind about this particular topic. Either way, I don't think they should be allowed to make any further edits on this page. Thomaspashko (talk) 03:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@AOB9 just added this comment at Talk:Winnipeg Police Service "The Justice 4 Black Lives petition was released shortly before a peaceful protest at Manitoba legislature. "The group believes many local communities and grassroots organizations could take over the legal responsibilities of police" . I believe this section does a good job at summarizing the demands of the petition." I believe AOB9 is correct. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

I have started a discussion about the source "WPG Police Cause Harm" at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#WPG Police Cause Harm. --Magnolia677 (talk) 17:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Information needed to create an article about Turkish marketplace and neighbourhood guards

Hi,

Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Are_Turkish_marketplace_and_neighbourhood_guards_(Çarşı_ve_mahalle_bekçileri)_the_same_unit_as_night_eagles_(gece_kartalları)?.

Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 02:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Murder of Maxwell Confait Move Discussion

There's a move discussion at Talk:Murder of Maxwell Confait, which belongs to this WikiProject. The question is whether the recently updated MOS:GENDERID policy suggests that Confait should principally be referred to as Michelle. Any thoughts (especially by persons able to do research!) would be greatly appreciated.--Jerome Frank Disciple 00:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to CfD

You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 29#Category:Defensive gun use. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Input requested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasonableness

Your input at this deletion request, which I believe falls under the scope of this WikiProject, would be very much appreciated. GnocchiFan (talk) 13:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2019–2021 Iraqi protests#Requested move 21 September 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2019–2021 Iraqi protests#Requested move 21 September 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 00:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Officer-involved shooting

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 30#Officer-involved shooting I think this would benefit from the views of people who know more about the subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Superpredator myth#Requested move 8 January 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Superpredator myth#Requested move 8 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Internal Troops#Requested move 12 January 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Internal Troops#Requested move 12 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)