Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Alpine skiers by century

I have proposed the deletion of Category:Alpine skiers by century and its sub-categories.

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_9#Some_sportspeople_by_century, where your comments would be welcome. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:20th-century ski jumpers

I have proposed the deletion of Category:20th-century ski jumpers.

See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 25#Category:20th-century_ski_jumpers, where your comments would be welcome. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Aerials

I noticed that there's no Aerial freestyle skiing/Freestyle aerial skiing/Freestyle skiing - aerials/Aerial skiing article... but the other Olympic disciplines (Ski cross, Mogul skiing) have individual articles...

70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I just created this, which tell me what you think of it?BLUEDOGTN 20:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Sports Notability

There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO#RFC:_WP:Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline. As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE. Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Alpine skiers by century

I have proposed the deletion of Category:Alpine skiers by century and its sub-categories.

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_9#Some_sportspeople_by_century, where your comments would be welcome. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:20th-century ski jumpers

I have proposed the deletion of Category:20th-century ski jumpers.

See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 25#Category:20th-century_ski_jumpers, where your comments would be welcome. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Aerials

I noticed that there's no Aerial freestyle skiing/Freestyle aerial skiing/Freestyle skiing - aerials/Aerial skiing article... but the other Olympic disciplines (Ski cross, Mogul skiing) have individual articles...

70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I just created this, which tell me what you think of it?BLUEDOGTN 20:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Sports Notability

There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO#RFC:_WP:Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline. As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE. Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Throughout 2010, many Wikipedia editors have worked hard to halve the number of unreferenced biographical articles (UBLPs) from more than 52,000 in January to under 26,000 now. The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons has assisted in many ways, including helping to setup a bot, which runs daily, compiling lists of all articles that are in both Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding/Unreferenced BLPs. Currently you have approximately 96 articles to be referenced. Other project lists can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects.

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. We've done a lot, but we still have a long way to go. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Ski articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Ski articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Skiing and Snowboarding articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Skiing and Snowboarding articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to help fill in Template:Student athlete by adding new articles or creating articles for redlinks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Your opinions and advice

A recently discussion Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Women's Sport. Your opinions and your advice are welcome. --Geneviève (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Skiing by Country

I would be interested in seeing more articles along the lines of the Skiing in Australia article which provides a history and outline of skiing in that country. I think the format is interesting and logical, but very few other countries are written up in this way. I'd be very interested in a Skiing in the United States, Skiing in France articles for example, but I don't have the knowledge to do it myself.Ozhistory (talk) 05:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

New indoor ski slope

LeisureDome, Weston-super-Mare is a proposed 240m indoor ski slope in south west England, which has just been granted planning permission - meaning it is highly likely to go ahead. I have added it to the scope of this project so invite anyone interested to improve the article, add an infobox, navbox, etc. --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 09:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles on downhill turns

I am in the process of adding a large number of articles on "gear that made a difference" in downhill. These include the Head Standard (metal), Strato (fibreglass) and VR-17 (torsion box) skis , Lange and Rosemont boots, and Look and Marker bindings.

These introductions in the 1950s and 60s radically changed the art of downhill. With each introduction, the skiers ability to roll the ski onto the edge improved, to the point where the sideways motion of the knee is now the main way to make the skis turn, the carve, where the sidecut shaping of the ski drives the turning motion. This is as opposed to the Christie, where the primary turning force is generated through sideways skidding of inner edge of skis over the snow.

So as a side effect of adding these articles, I ended up coming across a series of articles on downhill turn techniques, and if I'm not mistaken, they are completely misleading, if not downright wrong. These include the entire series of articles starting with Snowplough turn, through Stem (skiing) into Stem Christie and finally into Parallel turn.

In every reference I see even today, "Christie" refers to the skidding of the ski over the snow in order to generate sideways forces and cause the skis to turn. So even the classic Snowplough is, in effect, a form of Christie turn. At the other end of the scale, one can, of course, use the Christie technique to parallel ski - I did it for the better part of two decades, at least according to the definitions I was told.

In the articles, however, "stem" refers to the motion of the ski outward into the V, and Christie seems to be the same thing. Yet the Christie article definitely implies there is a difference, which I can't see when I read the descriptions. Finally, parallel turns are described solely as an edging technique, which is what I refer to as carving. By the definitions I've always used, there are four distinct main downhill turns:

  • Snowplough (really a type of Christie, but different enough to warrant a separate article)
  • Christie (with sub-sections on snowplough, stemming and paralleling)
  • Carving
  • Telemark

I'd like to gather comments on this, because as I see it the current articles appear to be very wrong. Or I'm very wrong. I'd like to see which is which.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:Ski Jumping World Cup seasons top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 04:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Dear members of the Skiing and Snowboarding WikiProject. This notification is sent from the Articles for Improvement team to let you know that the article SkiTrab, which has been tagged as part of the project, has been selected to receive a community improvement.

Users and members of the project that are willing to help, may do so in the article's entry on the Articles for Improvement page.

Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 05:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

IPC Nor-Am Cup

If you're interested in skiing, Wikinews:IPC Nor-Am Cup is home to where we're taking the first steps to get Olympic/Paralympic media accreditation for the Sochi Games. Wikipedia:Meetup/Denver and Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco 18 are two meetups related to this.  :) --LauraHale (talk) 06:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Olympic nordic skiing articles

FYI, {{Olympic Games Nordic skiing}} and every article on the template have been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 12:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

The AFDs can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 20 -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

RfC on the use of flag icons for sportspeople

An RfC discussion about the MOS:FLAG restriction on the use of flag icons for sportspeople has been opened at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. We invite all interested participants to provide their opinion here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

It has been proposed already in 2006 that article Lauberhorn would be splitted into two separate articles for the Alpine skiing races and the mountain. And I think that could be done also for the article Hahnenkamm, Kitzbühel. What's your opinion on that, do you support?

I support because currently it's like Wimbledon tennis championships would be included in the article about the Wimbledon district. On the other hand, seems that no Wikipedia has a specific article about the Lauberhorn mountain, if there's an article called "Lauberhorn", it's about the races. But many Wikipedias have spearate articles about Hahnenkamm mountain and the races. --August90 (talk) 13:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The resort has been approved and the mountain resort municipality chartered, even though it has no residents and nothing's been built yet......linking to the muni article; there doesn't seem to be a need for a separate resort article at this point; that day will come when it's been developed, as corporate info and skiing info probably should be separate from the municipal article.Skookum1 (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested moves

I have started two move requests on articles within the scope of this project: 1, 2. 88.88.165.222 (talk) 15:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


A discussion has started there about improving the article. Any help would be appreciated.Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Problematic "ski area" article

Bella_Coola_(ski_area) was just created, which I noted when it showed up on the Templates {{Ski areas and resorts in British Columbia}}......aside from having some bad geography (the Cascade Mountains in Canadian usage end at the Fraser, despite an older tradition of using them for the Coast Mountains as well), my problem is that this isn't really a ski area but more an advert for a giving company; should it just be retitled to the company name and deal with as a business article? Otherwise should this notion be used also for the dozens of other heli and snowcat operations about the province? Please reply on relevant section on WP:CANTALK.Skookum1 (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Portal:Sports is up for featured portal consideration

This is a courtesy message to inform the members of this project that I have nominated Portal:Sports for featured portal status. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Sports. The featured portal criteria are at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria. Please feel free to weigh in. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

skiing records?

Is there an article on skiing records? (Such as the points records of Maier and Maze, or other records, most wins, races, seasons, etc) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ErnaLowSki.jpg

image:ErnaLowSki.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

It has been renominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:ErnaLowSki2.jpg

File:ErnaLowSki2.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

It has been renominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello snow lovers! This old abandoned Afc submission was declined with the advice that the information be merged. Now it's about to be deleted as a stale draft. Is there information that should be saved, or should the deletion proceed? —Anne Delong (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

terms and wiktionary

Seems like there should be entries on wikt: for all these terms the commentators are spouting on Olympics coverage of skiing and snowboarding. Are any people up for adding them? -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear winter sports fans: This abandoned Afc submission will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable athlete, and should the article be kept? —Anne Delong (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

The athlete appears not to be notable. X-Games participation is not considered an automatic indication of notability (as an Olympic appearance would be). References, as the reviewer of the page notes, are not enough to pass [[WP:GNG}}/WP:BLP, etc. Suggest deletion. Ravendrop 09:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for checking that out. It's gone now. —Anne Delong (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear skiers: I found this abandoned Afc submission that appears to be about a notable coach. I plan to fix it up and move it into the encyclopedia, but since I have a little list of other old pages like this to do first, I thought I would post here in case someone who knows more about skiing would like to work on it. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Expanding the wikipedia universe of collegiate skiing

To all those racing fanatics out there, just looking to see who might be interested in starting a lot of the collegiate skiing wiki community from scratch? A good point to start is the expansion of the USCSA article and can branch out to creating articles for some of the better teams (all of them would be absurd and lack a lot of importance). Excited to hear from you guys, already loving this community! - Drew Baugher talk 16:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Somebody here must have a photo for the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk)

Hey @Anna Frodesiak: I just found an adequate photo on Commons that is applicable to the topic, hope its good enough/will suffice for the short-term while a proper photo is uploaded. - Drew Baugher talk 20:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Wonderful!! Thank you so much. I looked for ages at commons with no luck. Well done, my friend. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

update info available for Shames Mountain (Terrace BC)

Please see Talk:Shames_Mountain_Ski_Area#update_info_re_community_ownership.Skookum1 (talk) 05:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Request for Comment

There is a Request for Comment about "Chronological Summaries of the Olympics" and you're invited! Becky Sayles (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Importance of cross-country skiing to the project

I note that Cross-country skiing has received an importance rating of "High" within this project. Would someone in this project please address the importance rating of the newly-created Cross-country skiing (sport), which has been given an importance rating of "Mid" by User:Salvidrim!, someone not evidently a member of this project. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 16:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, I just put whatever seemed to make some sense when I created the page after a request at WP:AN, but I'm not intimately familiar with this WikiProject's rating scale, so feel more than welcome to reevaluate as needed. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  19:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your expertise, User:Salvidrim!! I'll await a sense of perspective in light of the project, here. User:HopsonRoad 21:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh no. XC-skiing is huge! Much larger than alpine/board/jump/aerial combined. Think about it. Much of the Northern tier has little mountainage... just hillage. Most folks live in the flatlands and can't get anywhere near a skilift or board arena. Plus it is free-ish for most peeps. Just step out the door, slap on the slippery slippers and get your mid-winter exercise in your own neighborhood. Like track&field, they have way more XC events, plus the biathlon with the ski-shoot-ski-shoot-ski profiles. Much of Scandanavia and all around the Baltic plus way back into the Russian Federation states go ga-ga (not Gaga) for the XC events. I'd vote "High" on this, unless you are just trying to make this an english language, west-oriented only article. –HacksawFW my edits
Not to worry, User:HacksawFW, Cross-country skiing and Cross-country skiing (sport) have been rated "Top importance" since 2014. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 14:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
I know. I just needed to vent on Sunday PM since nobody seemed to close this convo-thread out. Which I think we just did. Cheers - –HacksawFW my edits

redirecting minor summits and sundry (e.g. glaciers) to the host range...or to a ski area where applicable?

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geography_of_Canada#peaks_in_ski_areas.Skookum1 (talk) 07:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Ladies/Women

I have noticed that across various articles concerning the FIS Alpine Ski World Cup women are sometimes called women and sometimes called ladies (although consistently within the articles). As men are still called men (and not gentlemen), I think "women" should be used consistently across the topic. I don't know where else to place this suggestion. Input? Judith Sunrise (talk) 01:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I concur completely, since nowhere do the Olympic or FIS organizations use the word, "ladies," to describe their events—they use "women," exclusively. User:HopsonRoad 13:32, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Should someone (e.g. me) just go through the respective articles with crtl+F and change it and that's it or should I wait for more input and discussion? Judith Sunrise (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
There's been no controversy here, Judith. I"d say, be bold and go for it! User:HopsonRoad 17:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I see what you did there ;) . So far I changed the FIS_Alpine_Ski_World_Cup article and the 2011_Alpine_Skiing_World_Cuparticle as well up to 2015. Also the FIS_Ski_Jumping_World_Cup article, the 2014–15_FIS_Ski_Jumping_World_Cup article and the Mogul_skiing article. I wanted to write down here what I've done so far and will continue the work on another day. I only changed text mentions of ladies, not titles of references. Judith Sunrise (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
In 2019, the FIS formally announced that they were making a switch from Ladies to Women See Link: https://www.fis-ski.com/en/international-ski-federation/news-multimedia/news/new-fis-terminology-sees-women-replace-ladies They approved a joint proposal of the Gender Equity Working Group, the Sub-Committees for Ladies´ Cross-Country and Alpine Skiing, as well as the Athletes Commission to change the official FIS terminology from “Ladies” to “Women” - ONLY in the English language. This change does not apply for French or German, where the previous FIS terminology will continued to be used, mirroring the terminology of the IOC using: “Women, Dames, Damen”. --SneauXone (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Response: Women -> Ladies

Examples on FIS World Cup result and ranking lists with term Ladies used everywhere:
http://data.fis-ski.com/dynamic/results.html?sector=JP&raceid=4131
http://data.fis-ski.com/pdf/2015/AL/5059/2015AL5059SLR0.pdf
http://data.fis-ski.com/pdf/2015/JP/3840/2015JP3840WC.pdf
http://data.fis-ski.com/pdf/2015/CC/2338/2015CC2338QUA.pdf
http://data.fis-ski.com/pdf/2015/SB/7502/7502RLR0.pdf

You obviously don't follow FIS sport competitions. FIS officially uses terms Men and Ladies in all result and ranking lists of all sports (ski jumping, alpine skiing, cross country, snowboard...), simple as that. It would be great if you undo all your changes. If anything term women in subpages should be changed to ladies if bothers you that much. This is not Wimbledon.Sportomanokin (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The problem is, I follow them in German where it's "Damen und Herren" - ladies and gentlemen - which is consistent in itself. Judith Sunrise (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I comply unwillingly. BTW, what has any of this to do with Wimbledon? Judith Sunrise (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
You are both right. In 2019, the FIS formally announced that they were making a switch from Ladies to Women See Link: https://www.fis-ski.com/en/international-ski-federation/news-multimedia/news/new-fis-terminology-sees-women-replace-ladies They approved a joint proposal of the Gender Equity Working Group, the Sub-Committees for Ladies´ Cross-Country and Alpine Skiing, as well as the Athletes Commission to change the official FIS terminology from “Ladies” to “Women” - ONLY in the English language. This change does not apply for French or German, where the previous FIS terminology will continued to be used, mirroring the terminology of the IOC using: “Women, Dames, Damen”. [1] SneauXone (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Alpine Ski page

Hello folks, I was looking at the various pages related to ski turns and types, and noticed that there isn't actually a page for "parabolic skis" or even "alpine skis" at all... This is leading to some strange situations, like a huge amount of industry wide historical information being squirreled away on the Elan SCX page, when I think if you take a look at it, would be much more valuable in a general page. How hard will it be to just C&P most of that Elan page into a new page on alpine skis, or add to carve turn ? 208.100.172.164 (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

No article describes tube-lifts

Hi. I've read on WP re "tube-lifts", yet I can't see anywhere that describes them. Would anybody have time to remedy this?

Cheers, Trafford09 (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Infobox skier

A change was made a few hours ago to {{Infobox skier}} that changes the World Cup link from the FIS Ski Jumping World Cup to the disambiguation page FIS World Cup. Is this infobox only supposed to be used for ski jumpers, or is it for all skiiers? A quick sample of the articles the template is used on shows a good portion are ski jumpers, but some are from the other five disciplines. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 09:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)