Jump to content

Draft talk:Nawab of Atrauli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconIndia Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconBritish Empire NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconBritish Royalty NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconHistory Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

What's the difference between a Titular Ruler and a Ceremonial Ruler?[edit]

I am sure this is standard understanding amongst students of the region, or even of India, but making this distinction clear in the text would be useful. Found the following at https://brainly.in/question/1792153 and given it is an Indian website, it seems likely that the answer conforms to a broader Indian understanding. But, I'd like to be sure. It reads to me that Governors took over as the Titular heads of Indian states leaving the old Royalty as the Ceremonial heads, that titular heads have "in theory" power (everything is still done in the Governor's or Queen's name even if she just "takes the advice of _her_ government"), whereas ceremonial heads have just the ceremonial position and zero actual or de facto power.

Nominal head-

a. A nominal head is the Constitutional head of the country who represents the country but does not rule the country.

b. In a parliamentary form of Government, the President is not directly elected by the people, hence he remains the nominal head.

c. Nominal head, is the ceremonial head who stands at the apex of country's political system, all decisions are taken in his name. The decisions though are taken by the Prime Minister and his council members.

But a titular position is a position with just the title, but without the power or responsibilities that the position carries. A titular head is someone who is the official leader or ruler of a country without enjoying the power or the authority of the leader or the ruler. For example-

1. The queen of England is a titular ruler of the country. She just has the title of the queen without the power or the authority of a ruler of the country.

2. State Governors in India are titular heads of the state. They are Governors only for name but in reality they do not have the power or the authority to govern the state.