Jump to content

Marriage in the works of Jane Austen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Emma entered into three marriages: Jane Fairfax and Frank Churchill, Emma Woodhouse and Mr Knightley, Harriet Smith and Robert Martin (Chris Hammond, 1898).

Marriage is a major theme in the novels of Jane Austen, especially Pride and Prejudice. Offering a critical view of marriages of convenience—commonplace during her time—and even a satirical take on marriages driven by financial considerations, Austen provides her main characters with love marriages, the typical conclusion of fairy tales, 18th-century sentimental novels, and social comedies. However, in her works, love is “reasonable,” founded on esteem rather than passionate love. While love precedes money, feelings, and financial stability are harmoniously balanced.

In exploring this theme, Jane Austen remains grounded in the reality of her era, contributing in her way to the lively debates on the subject,[1] whether among conservative writers like Hannah More, Jane West, Hugh Blair, or James Fordyce, or advocates of women’s emancipation, such as Mary Hays and Mary Wollstonecraft. In the socially rigid Georgian society, women held precarious positions: unrecognized as independent subjects under common law, they were generally subject to male authority (father, brother, or husband) and financially dependent on them. Unless they had high social standing and significant personal wealth, unmarried women were socially devalued, as the status of a married woman was always superior to that of a spinster. Legally disadvantaged, women often saw property pass to a male heir. For most, a “good” marriage was the only way to secure or maintain an honorable societal place and avoid financial difficulties. Young women were thus encouraged to “hunt for husbands,” showcasing their beauty and accomplishments on the “marriage market” while prudently assessing the social status and financial stability of potential suitors.

Without openly criticizing the unfair situation women faced, Jane Austen developed a personal philosophy of the “good” marriage and the conditions necessary for it. As an astute observer of her time—and herself in the modest financial position (penniless) of most of her heroines[1]—she offers readers a mirror of her social class's behaviors, portraying numerous secondary married characters whose unions are judged from a feminine perspective. It is as though she sought to present every scenario available to a young woman of marriageable age and rank them: unions based solely on passionate love are not happy, and those of convenience, especially when driven by mercantile considerations, are little more satisfying. She also refutes two clichés about love in romantic literature: the idea of love at first sight and the impossibility of loving more than once.[2]

As the plot unfolds, the heroine embarks on a journey toward what will become, by the resolution, the ideal marriage: a union founded on mutual affection and respect, a deep yet rational attachment, emotionally and intellectually balanced but economically viable, with a man whose thoughts and tastes align with hers—someone she has had time to get to know and appreciate, regardless of social origin or financial circumstances.

The social importance of marriage for women

[edit]

“Single women have a dreadful propensity for being poor, which is one very strong argument in favor of matrimony.”[3]

The devaluation of unmarried women

[edit]
Being a governess is the only honorable job for a poor, well-educated young woman.

In all her novels, Jane Austen highlights the choice faced by women of the small gentry:[4] marry or remain dependent on their family. Marriage was often the primary way for women to gain independence, as under English law, unmarried women were legally under the control of their fathers or other male relatives.[5] However, in an era where the number of women exceeded that of men,[6] finding an acceptable suitor,[note 1][6] could become a significant concern.[7]

A woman's value was often judged by her “marriageability,”[8] and remaining single was generally seen as undesirable, especially for women without brothers or fathers to support them.[9] In Pride and Prejudice, the narrator mentions Charlotte Lucas's brothers being relieved at the thought that they would no longer need to support her financially[10] if she remained unmarried.[11] For many women of the gentry, marriage was essential to secure financial stability.[note 2]

Unmarried women, especially widows, faced a challenging reality.[9] Upon the death of their father, their resources were limited. They might find work as a governess or teacher if qualified, but these roles were often seen as subordinate and difficult. Other options, like being a lady’s companion or managing a brother's household, could come with challenges, including mistreatment or lack of respect. The lack of financial resources and the limited number of potential suitors often made it difficult for women to find a husband.[12][note 3]

"A poor old maid like Miss Bates runs the risk of being ridiculous and unpleasant" (C.E. Brock, 1909).

The social status of women was closely linked to marriage. When women gained the right to vote in parliamentary elections in 1918, there were proposals to exclude unmarried women, as they were seen as having failed to attract a mate.[8] The status of unmarried women was often considered inferior to that of married women, as seen in Pride and Prejudice, where Lydia, newly married to Wickham, proudly claims the position of her older sister Jane.[13] Similarly, in Persuasion, Mary Musgrove feels somewhat diminished when her unmarried sister Anne reclaims her seniority.[C 1][14]

Emma Woodhouse is the only Austen heroine who can consider remaining single without concern for her social status. She is wealthy, independent, and well-regarded in her community. With the freedom to manage her household as she pleases, Emma does not feel the need to marry. She believes that while poor spinsters might be looked down upon,[9] a wealthy one like herself would always be respected.[15] However, it is the vanity of Mrs. Elton, a married woman who takes precedence over Emma, that makes her briefly reconsider marriage.[16]

In Austen’s novels, marriage and financial security are often intertwined.[17] For women without personal wealth, marrying a man with means was essential.[note 4][18] Austen portrays her heroines’ emotional journeys toward resolving this issue, while also showing the realities of married life through secondary characters.[1]

Marriage: A source of financial security

[edit]

Marrying for financial security was a socially accepted norm, despite criticism from some writers like Mary Wollstonecraft, in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), and Jane West, in Letters to a Young Lady (1801), likened it to a form of "legalized prostitution."[19] In Pride and Prejudice, Elizabeth Bennet is shocked by her friend Charlotte Lucas's pragmatic approach to marriage, especially her decision to marry the foolish Mr. Collins.[20] Mrs. Bennet, on the other hand, is focused on the financial benefits of marriage for her daughters, viewing it through a material lens, much like her own marriage to Mr. Bennet, which she likely saw in terms of financial stability.[21]

For many people, a "good" marriage was primarily seen as one that offered financial advantages. In Sense and Sensibility, Willoughby is interested in Miss Grey’s wealth to maintain his lavish lifestyle.[22] In Mansfield Park, Maria Bertram is attracted to John Rushworth for his wealth. Similarly, in Northanger Abbey, General Tilney encourages his son Henry to court Catherine Morland, believing she is wealthy.[23]

Marriage also played a key role in strengthening the social and financial position of families. For example, Lady Catherine de Bourgh wants to marry her daughter to her nephew Darcy to solidify both families’ power.[24] Miss Bingley hopes her brother will marry Georgiana Darcy, aiming to improve the Bingleys' social standing. John Dashwood, in Sense and Sensibility, expresses disappointment when his half-sister Elinor marries Edward Ferrars instead of Colonel Brandon, whose wealth and estate he had hoped to gain access to.[25]

In Mansfield Park, Sir Thomas Bertram sends his niece Fanny to Portsmouth, hoping that being away from the comforts of Mansfield Park will make her more appreciative of Henry Crawford’s proposal,[26] which he sees as a good match due to Crawford’s secure income.

The financial expectations for marriage vary among characters. In Sense and Sensibility, Marianne Dashwood and Elinor Dashwood discuss their different views on what constitutes a suitable income for marriage. Marianne considers £1,800 to £2,000 annually as the minimum, while Elinor feels that £1,000 would be enough.[27] Their marriages reflect these expectations: Elinor marries Edward Ferrars and lives modestly, while Marianne marries Colonel Brandon and benefits from a larger income.

Lydia Bennet, on the other hand, is focused only on her romantic desires and does not consider the financial practicality of her marriage.[28] In contrast, the other women ensure that their marriages will provide a comfortable standard of living.

Marriage as a means of securing social status

[edit]
Charlotte Lucas deftly gauged her husband's social situation in the shadow of Rosings Park (Hugh Thomson, 1894).

In England at the time, a woman's social status was determined by her father before marriage and by her husband afterward.[29]

This is evident in Mansfield Park, where Fanny Price, raised as a poor cousin by her wealthy uncle, is constantly reminded that she is not part of the Bertram family.[30] It is only after the moral decline of Sir Thomas's daughters that he begins to appreciate Fanny and approves of her marriage to his son, Edmund. He had previously supported his eldest daughter’s choice to marry a wealthy but foolish man, seeing the match as a way to improve the family's position.[31]

In Emma, Frank Churchill's marriage to Jane Fairfax does not break social norms, but Harriet Smith, an illegitimate girl, gains respectability by marrying Robert Martin, a farmer.[32]

In Pride and Prejudice,[33] Charlotte Lucas views marriage as a way to improve social standing. She accepts Mr. Collins's proposal, weighing his income and connections as important factors.[note 5][34] Her pragmatic approach is criticized by Elizabeth but understood by Jane, who recognizes the security it offers Charlotte.[35][C 2][36]

While Jane Austen often uses irony in her portrayal of Charlotte, she does not overtly condemn her.[37]The social dynamics of the time made securing a comfortable marriage an essential goal for unmarried women.[38] For example, Miss Gardiner marries Mr. Bennet, a minor landowner, thus improving her social standing. Jane and Elizabeth Bennet continue this upward mobility by marrying wealthy men like Bingley and Darcy. Elizabeth, in particular, rises to a higher social position, but her status remains closely tied to her family's background as members of the landed gentry.[39]

The weight of family

[edit]
An ambitious mother may force her daughter into a forced marriage. Cartoon by Charles Dana Gibson (1902).

As Katrin Schmidt points out, "sons bring money to the family, while daughters only take it away," which is why families often have a say in marriage decisions.[40] Marriages can be discouraged or blocked if they are seen as unadvantageous. Jane Austen experienced this personally when her acquaintance Tom Lefroy was sent away by his family because they could not allow him to marry a woman without a fortune.[41][42] This theme appears throughout Austen's novels.[43] In Sense and Sensibility, Mrs. Ferrars disinherits her son Edward for not marrying an heiress.[44] In Pride and Prejudice, Lady Catherine de Bourgh tries to prevent her nephew from marrying Elizabeth Bennet, while Miss Bingley opposes her brother's marriage to Jane Bennet. In Northanger Abbey, General Tilney forbids his son from seeing Catherine Morland when he believes she is poor. In Persuasion, Lady Russell convinces Anne Elliot to break off her engagement to Frederick Wentworth, whose fortune is not yet secured.[23]

This theme is also explored in secondary plotlines. In Pride and Prejudice, Darcy prevents Wickham from accessing his sister Georgiana's dowry, and Miss King's guardian takes her to Liverpool to protect her from a fortune-seeker. In Emma, Frank Churchill hides his engagement to Jane Fairfax to avoid his aunt's disapproval. In Sense and Sensibility, John Dashwood expresses his disappointment with his brother-in-law Robert Ferrars for secretly marrying the penniless Lucy Steele, suggesting that had the family known, they would have tried to prevent the marriage.[45] The obstacles to marriage in these cases are primarily financial rather than social, as the lovers usually belong to similar social classes.

"'Am I to understand that you are considering refusing Mr. Crawford?' Sir Thomas asked in wonder, determined to overcome the resistance of his niece and ward, Fanny."

Sometimes, families might force marriages that benefit them, disregarding the feelings of the individuals involved.[43] This is seen in Colonel Brandon's youth, where his cousin Eliza was pressured to marry his older brother. Jane Austen generally avoids such tragic situations, focusing instead on social comedy.[46] For example, in Pride and Prejudice, Lydia Bennet’s marriage to Wickham, though forced for him, was desired by her and became necessary to protect the family’s reputation.[47]

The power of families to influence marriages is often portrayed as a threat to the heroine’s happiness. Sir Thomas Bertram wants Fanny Price to marry the wealthy Henry Crawford; Lady Catherine de Bourgh and her sister had planned their children's marriage from an early age; and Mrs. Bennet sees no problem in Elizabeth marrying Mr. Collins.[47] In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Bennet, the eldest daughter, might have sacrificed her happiness for the sake of her family's security if the heir to Longbourn had come before Mr. Bingley.[48][49]

In families with multiple daughters, a financially secure marriage for one can help support her sisters and mother.[44] This is especially important when there are no brothers and the estate passes to others. For example, Jane and Elizabeth Bennet help their younger sister Kitty improve her manners, and Mrs. Darcy contributes financially to assist the Wickhams.[50] Darcy also helps his brother-in-law in his career for Elizabeth’s sake, and Georgiana benefits from living near Elizabeth.[44][note 6]

Such family care is common in Austen’s novels, particularly among characters with kind hearts. Sir John Middleton welcomes Mrs. Dashwood and her daughters, renting them Barton Cottage for a low fee. Sir Thomas Bertram supports his Price nephews and hosts the eldest during his leave. The Musgroves assist their less affluent relatives, and after marrying Frank Churchill, Jane Fairfax helps her elderly relatives, Mrs. and Miss Bates.[51][52]

Examples not to follow

[edit]

Jane Austen's novels focus on the transitional period in a young woman's life when she moves from her parents' home to that of her husband, as described in Fanny Burney's Evelina.[53] Marriage at the time was seen as permanent,[54] so finding the right partner was crucial for securing a stable position in society.[55] However, if a woman sought happiness and wanted to preserve her moral integrity, she needed patience and courage, as Austen advised her niece, Fanny Knight, who was still single at twenty-five.[54]

There were many potential pitfalls in choosing a partner, and it often required strong resolve to decline a financially secure marriage, especially when the woman knew her future could be uncertain if she didn't marry. This is the situation faced by the three Dashwood sisters in Sense and Sensibility, the five Bennet daughters in Pride and Prejudice, and the Elliot sisters in Persuasion.

“Imprudent” marriages

[edit]

In the previous generation

[edit]
Mr and Mrs Bennet, after 20 years of marriage (Hugh Thomson, 1894).

Jane Austen often explores marriages based on first impressions, impulses, or youthful passion, showing how such unions can lead to dissatisfaction and difficulties for both the spouses and their children. For example, Mr. Bennet's attraction to Miss Gardiner, Frances Ward's impulsive marriage to Lieutenant Price, and Miss Churchill's marriage to Captain Weston all illustrate how unwise choices can affect the individuals involved.[note 7][49]

Mr. and Mrs. Bennet
[edit]

To highlight the components of a successful marriage, Austen contrasts them with poorly matched unions, such as the marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet in Pride and Prejudice.[21] Mr. Bennet is an intelligent man married to a frivolous wife obsessed with marrying off her daughters, driven by financial insecurity. Mrs. Bennet is delighted by her daughters’ marriages, regardless of the character of their husbands.[28]

The children of such ill-matched marriages often suffer, as scholar Paula Bennett points out. Mr. Bennet is detached and mocks his family, while Mrs. Bennet’s behavior embarrasses her daughters.[56] As Elizabeth observes, Jane’s disappointment is due in part to the actions of her parents. Their leniency also allows Lydia to act recklessly, nearly causing disaster. Mr. Bennet eventually acknowledges his role in Lydia's mistakes, while Mrs. Bennet blames others.[57] It is through the intervention of Darcy and Mr. Gardiner that Lydia's honor is saved and the family avoids disgrace.[58]

Other cases
[edit]

When lack of money is added to an unsuitable marriage, problems often emerge quickly and happiness is short-lived.[59] For example, in Mansfield Park, the Price family struggles with a modest income and poor living conditions. The father is coarse, the mother is overwhelmed, and the children are unruly. Fanny, upon returning home, faces the difficult reality of their situation.[60] Only through the help of their wealthy uncle, Sir Thomas Bertram, do the children have any hope for a better future.

In Emma, Austen describes Mr. Weston's unhappy first marriage. His wife, who came from a wealthy family, loved him but could never let go of her sense of superiority.[49] She pressured him to live beyond his means, leading to financial difficulties.[61] After her death, Mr. Weston was left with financial ruin and had to send their son to live with his uncle to help recover his fortune.[62]

Lydia's marriage

[edit]
Lydia is proud to show that at 16 she already has the enviable status of a married woman (C. E. Brock, 1895).

Lydia Bennet's impulsive attraction to Wickham nearly brings disgrace to her family and could have led to her downfall if circumstances hadn't forced a marriage.[63] Lydia is carefree and focused solely on enjoying herself, treating her elopement as a joke. She doesn't consider the consequences of her actions and views marriage as an achievement, regardless of her husband's character or financial situation. For Lydia, the status of being married is more important than any other factor.[64]

Lydia's naïveté and flirtatious nature lead her into a relationship with Wickham, a man who takes advantage of her innocence.[65] While she feels validated by the marriage, it is clear that Wickham is not genuinely committed to her, and over time, he will likely grow bored and seek other distractions.[64] Lydia, whose behavior mirrors her mother's, may eventually face the same disillusionment and selfishness as her mother once did.[66]

Marriages of convenience

[edit]

Marriages of convenience, arranged to satisfy family interests, remained the most common type during this period, not only among the aristocracy or heirs of estates.[67] These are conventional marriages, as marriage is considered a duty, and traditional in the sense that spouses fulfill the roles expected of them by society.[68] Such unions can be tolerable under certain conditions, with financial comfort being among the most important.

General cases

[edit]

For some young women, the status of being honorably married is more important than the character of the man they marry. In Sense and Sensibility, Mrs. Jennings arranges socially acceptable marriages for her daughters, providing generous dowries for Mary, the eldest, and Charlotte, the youngest. However, the couples are mismatched, as Elinor Dashwood observes “the strange unsuitableness which often existed between husband and wife.”[69] Sir John Middleton, a rural man with simple tastes,[70] shares little in common with his elegant but overwhelmed wife, except a mutual enjoyment of hosting guests. Mr. Palmer, intelligent but somewhat snobbish, marries a young, pretty woman who tends to see everything in an overly positive light, which helps him cope with her lack of depth.[71]

In Pride and Prejudice, Louisa Bingley’s dowry supports Mr. Hurst, a gentleman of little ambition, whose lifestyle revolves around eating, drinking, and playing cards.[72] These couples, though mismatched, find a balance that allows their marriages to function, with the women generally avoiding conflict with their husbands.[73]

In Persuasion, Charles and Mary Musgrove settle into a tolerable routine, appearing to be a happy couple.[74] Charles is practical and good-natured, while Mary tends to complain and quarrel.[75] Mary was Charles’s second choice; he had initially proposed to Anne Elliot. Jane Austen suggests that had Anne accepted, she would have greatly improved Charles’s social and intellectual position.[74]

In Mansfield Park, Jane Austen portrays both reasonably happy marriages of convenience (like those of Sir Thomas and Lady Bertram, or the Grants) and less successful unions. Mary Crawford comments on the marriage of the Frasers,[76] noting that it is “about as unhappy as most other married people’s.”[note 8] She also mentions her aunt, who was unhappy with her unfaithful husband and disliked the sea.[77] This marriage serves as a negative example for the young Crawfords, whose values have been shaped by their environment.[note 9]

The Charlotte Lucas case

[edit]
Being a minister's wife and living near Rosings Park was an interesting social promotion for Charlotte (C. E. Brock, 1895).

Marriage, in many ways, functions as a business arrangement where financial stability and social status take precedence. This is evident in the marriage of Charlotte Lucas and Mr. Collins, which can be seen as a "marriage of convenience." Charlotte marries him with a sense of practicality,[78] recognizing that marriage is the only viable option for a well-educated but financially disadvantaged young woman. She strategically redirects Mr. Collins’ attention toward herself, relieving Elizabeth of an unwanted proposal.[79] Charlotte enters the marriage with realistic expectations, while Mr. Collins marries out of a sense of duty, believing his new position entitles him to a wife.[34] Though both women are described as "amiable",[80] Charlotte’s motivations are grounded in securing a stable home, while Mr. Collins imagines he is in love.[40]

Charlotte's decision reflects a pragmatic choice many women faced—marriage as a means of social respectability.[81] She openly admits to Elizabeth that she is not motivated by romance, and while the narrator acknowledges her desire to secure a stable life, it also comments on the limitations of her situation.[82] Elizabeth, however, feels that Charlotte has sacrificed her personal values for practical gain.[79] She resists the idea that selfishness could be justified as prudence and refuses to accept that Charlotte's choice was based on anything but self-interest.[83][note 10]

From a different perspective, some critics argue that Charlotte’s decision was a sensible one given her circumstances.[82] For someone in her position, securing a marriage was a practical means of gaining independence and security. While Elizabeth’s future is more uncertain, Charlotte’s position, though modest, ensures a stable life.[82] Fanny Price, in contrast, faces even greater social challenges but refuses to accept a marriage for convenience.[84]

At the margins of the novel, Austen hints at a future for Charlotte that includes a gradual rise in social status. Through her marriage to Mr. Collins, she secures a more comfortable position, ultimately gaining a status similar, though lower, to Elizabeth’s.[85]

Marriages of convenience

[edit]

The Austen family loved charades, and one attributed to Jane Austen touches on this theme:[86]

You may lie on my first by the side of a stream,
And my second compose to the nymph you adore,
But if, when you've none of my whole, her esteem
And affection diminish — think of her no more![note 11]

"Such things are so common"

[edit]
Mr Elton is very pleased to have "conquered both love and fortune" in the person of Miss Hawkins (Chris Hammond, 1898).

Jane Austen disapproved of marrying for money,[87] but she also recognized that financial interests and mercantile motives were common in her society.[88] Her novels often feature marriages driven by wealth, such as General Tilney in Northanger Abbey and Mr. Elliot in Persuasion, both of whom married for fortune. General Tilney married Miss Drummont, who brought a large dowry, while Mr. Elliot married an heiress, carefully considering her fortune before committing.[89]

The cynical William Elliot's past is revealed to Anne by Mrs. Smith:[90] "He wanted to make his fortune quickly and was determined to do so through marriage." He wed a well-bred and well-dowered heiress, prudently ensuring the exact amount of her fortune before committing. Mrs. Smith adds that "such things are so common that when someone, man or woman, marries for money, if you live in society, you hardly notice it."

Austen also portrays characters who pursue marriage for financial gain. Wealthy women, like Caroline Bingley or Mary Crawford, see marriage as a strategic move, while poorer women,[91] like Isabella Thorpe, are desperate to find wealthy suitors but often fail. Mrs. Clay, an opportunist, tries to win the attention of Sir Walter Elliot’s heir, Mr. Elliot.

Lucy Steele is a skilled social climber, using flattery and manipulation to secure Edward Ferrars,[92] but when he is disinherited, she shifts her focus to his wealthier brother. Austen often criticizes such characters, portraying them as selfish and shallow, with futures filled with domestic strife.[note 12][25][93]

Other characters, like Miss Augusta Hawkins and Mr. Elton, are more focused on securing a match for their own social advancement.[94][95] Willoughby marries Miss Grey for her large dowry, and while he regrets losing Marianne Dashwood, he enjoys a degree of happiness in his marriage.[96][97]

Finally, characters like John Dashwood and Mr. Elton marry women who suit their ambitions, leading to relationships that, while based on convenience, appear superficially harmonious, similar to Charlotte Lucas’s practical marriage to Mr. Collins.[82][98]

The Maria Bertram case

[edit]
Hester Chapone's Conduct Manual gives advice on how to become a "good wife."

Maria Bertram in Mansfield Park is an example of someone who marries out of pride and spite.[23] She marries James Rushworth, a wealthy but foolish man, as a way to escape the constraints of her father’s estate, though the marriage does not provide the freedom she expected.[99] She soon becomes dissatisfied with him, feeling trapped in her new situation.[100] Her marriage, like that of many women in her time, is seen as a means of securing financial stability rather than emotional fulfillment.[note 13][101] The marriage ends in scandal, as she succumbs to her feelings for Henry Crawford, leading to social rejection.

In the era’s conduct books, such as Hester Chapone's Letters on the Improvement of the Mind, there were warnings about marriages based solely on financial gain or social status.[23] These books advised that such marriages would likely lead to disappointment and dissatisfaction. Authors like Thomas Gisborne[61] and Mary Russell Mitford highlighted how women were often encouraged to marry for wealth or social standing,[note 14][102] but this mindset could undermine the possibility of forming genuine, lasting relationships.[61]

Role models

[edit]

The married couples in Jane Austen’s novels are generally conventional and psychologically unfulfilled. However, she does provide a few examples of marriages that reflect her vision of a successful partnership.[103] These include the Gardiners in Pride and Prejudice, the Westons and, to some extent, John and Isabella Knightley in Emma, and the Crofts in Persuasion. These couples are portrayed as happy,[104] though not idealized, and serve as role models. Austen’s own parents, who loved each other,[54] likely influenced her depiction of these relationships, though such couples were probably rarer in real life.[80][73]

The Gardiners

[edit]
The Gardiners, here visiting Pemberley with Elizabeth, are a balanced couple (Hugh Thomson, 1894).

Jane Austen does not provide many details about the Gardiners' marriage, but it is clear that they have a well-balanced and happy relationship, in contrast to the Bennet couple.[105] They share mutual respect and affection, creating a harmonious home.[37] Their life is quiet and simple, yet they know how to entertain, as seen when they host Sir William, his daughter Maria, and Elizabeth, with activities like shopping and attending the theater.[106]

As spiritual guides to the Bennet girls, the Gardiners demonstrate responsible parenthood.[107] Mrs. Gardiner offers wise advice to her nieces, and Elizabeth turns to her for help when Lydia goes missing. Mr. Gardiner steps in to support Elizabeth, taking on the role of a father figure by leading her to the altar.[107]

The happy couples in Emma

[edit]

The Westons

[edit]

Emma begins with Mr. Weston’s second marriage,[104] which follows his recovery from a poor first marriage and the challenges of widowhood. With his newfound wealth and stability, he marries Miss Taylor, Emma's governess, offering her both a comfortable life and a respected position.[102] Mr. Weston is portrayed as a well-regarded, kind man who appreciates the qualities of his second wife, recognizing the benefits of a thoughtful and amiable marriage.[49]

Mr. Knightley humorously observes that Miss Taylor, having spent many years as a governess, is well-prepared for the duties of marriage, which require compromise. He also notes the practical benefits of her new situation, as she moves from being a dependent housekeeper to a respected, financially secure wife.[104][108][109]

The couple’s happiness is attributed to their maturity, compatibility, and shared values.[110] They are the only couple in the novel to have a child, a daughter, and Emma is pleased with the birth, hoping it will bring joy to both parents.[111] This depiction contrasts with the more pessimistic view of women’s lives in earlier literature, such as in Mary Wollstonecraft's works.[112]

John and Isabella

[edit]
While caring for their niece, John and Isabella's baby, Emma and Mr. Knightley rediscover their friendly bond (Chap. 12).

Emma Woodhouse’s older sister, Isabella, has been married to John Knightley for seven years. Isabella is a kind, affectionate woman, devoted to her family, while John is intelligent but pragmatic, occasionally brusque, yet values domestic life.[113] The couple shares a strong affection and has five children, whom they care for attentively. Their home in London is warm and welcoming, largely due to Isabella’s presence.[114]

Their domestic happiness serves as a contrast to the eventual resolution of misunderstandings between Emma and Mr. Knightley, leading to their own future happiness. Mr. Knightley sees qualities in Emma that set her apart from his sister Isabella, whom he views as similar to Emma but with certain shortcomings.[115][113][C 3]

The Crofts

[edit]

In Persuasion, two couples are depicted as particularly happy: the Harvilles and Admiral Croft and his wife. The Harvilles offer warmth and hospitality, while Admiral Croft and his wife exemplify a strong, supportive marriage.[116] Their relationship is presented as a model of companionship, where both spouses thrive, and their easygoing natures contribute to their happiness.[80] Mrs. Croft humorously remarks that others might not believe their quick engagement could lead to happiness, but their bond proves otherwise.[117]

Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth observe the Crofts and learn from their example,[118] especially Wentworth, who is challenged by his sister's traditional views on gender roles. Despite not being a romantic couple, the Crofts share a deep attachment and provide an image of happiness. Anne admires their relationship, finding the Admiral's kindness and Mrs. Croft's practicality particularly appealing.

Their partnership is marked by a balance of roles:[119] while the Admiral is unmethodical,[120] Mrs. Croft takes on tasks traditionally associated with men, showing practical skills and confidence in various situations.[75][119]

“Marital bliss"

[edit]

In Persuasion, the narrator notes that when two young people decide to marry, they will usually persist in their decision, regardless of their financial situation or other obstacles.[14] This theme is echoed by Elizabeth Bennet, who suggests that where there is affection, people often marry without waiting for ideal conditions, though she promises not to rush into such decisions.[121]

Portrait of the ideal husband

[edit]
The marriage proposal (circa 1815).

Jane Austen clearly defines the right partner for each of her heroines, often matching them based on similar character traits. For example, Jane Bennet and Charles Bingley share similar temperaments, while Elinor Dashwood and Edward Ferrars have aligned tastes and rational minds.[122] Some couples, like Fanny Price and Edmund Bertram, are bonded by mutual respect and shared values. Austen also highlights how relationships bring mutual growth, with the heroine balancing out her partner’s weaknesses and vice versa.

While the male characters may have their flaws, such as Darcy’s pride or Wentworth’s past, they often must evolve to win the heroine’s affection.[123] The age difference between couples typically hovers around six or seven years, though some heroines marry older men. Sometimes, the men take on a mentor-like role, as seen with characters like Henry Tilney and Mr. Knightley. This dynamic raises questions about why Austen often pairs her most intelligent heroines with men who may seem more like father figures.[124]

Austen’s heroines, being rational and intelligent, require husbands who can match their intellectual level, respect them, and support their development.[125] While they are not perfect and make mistakes, they learn from them, demonstrating that their intelligence and common sense make them deserving of love.[126][note 15]

Necessary elements

[edit]

Compatibility and delicacy of feelings

[edit]
Anything is better than a loveless marriage!
[edit]

“Oh, Lizzy! Do anything rather than marry without affection!” is Jane Bennet's heartfelt cry when she learns that her sister and Darcy have become engaged.[note 16] This “motto” is respected by Elizabeth, who rejected Mr. Collins' proposal and then Mr. Darcy's, by Fanny Price, who rejected Henry Crawford's, and by Anne Elliot, who refused Charles Musgrove.

"When he became aware of her fondness for him," Henry Tilney began to think seriously of Catherine (H. M. Brock, 1898).

In Jane Austen's novels, the heroines make choices based on affection and respect,[127] not economic reasons. A successful marriage, in her view, balances emotional connection and mutual esteem.[128] While characters may experience love, it is not immediate or based on intense passion but grows through shared understanding and respect.[note 17] For example, Edmund Bertram’s affection for Fanny develops over time, and Mr. Knightley realizes his feelings for Emma through jealousy.

Darcy initially dismisses Elizabeth but later finds himself attracted to her. Elizabeth rejects him due to his arrogance and self-importance, expecting more from a potential partner. She had already decided he was not the right person for her before he proposed.[129][130][131]

Jane Austen suggests that marriages based solely on physical attraction are unlikely to succeed.[126] In her novels, romantic desire is subtle, with the emphasis on moral and intellectual qualities rather than overt physical attraction. While characters like Willoughby, Wickham, and Crawford are charming, the more serious suitors—such as Mr. Darcy, Mr. Knightley, and Captain Wentworth—possess a strong, noble presence.[132] The characters express their emotions through conversation, often away from others, where they share their feelings and commitment.[note 18][note 19][133]

Love in Austen's stories develops slowly and often without the characters noticing at first. For example, Darcy describes his love for Elizabeth as something that grew gradually, without him realizing it until later. Similarly, Edward Ferrars only recognizes the depth of his feelings for Elinor after comparing her to Lucy Steele.[134][C 4][135]

The growth of love is often shown over time,[126] as the plot of the novels typically spans a year or more, allowing the characters to understand and appreciate each other.[132] Austen’s idea of true love is rooted in reason,[127] with characters acknowledging the qualities that draw them to each other, even if those feelings develop unexpectedly.[136][137]

Social and financial compatibility

[edit]

Jane Austen, who lives in a pragmatic, mercantile society, never fails, for the sake of realism, to point out the means of existence on which not the happiness but the material comfort of her heroines depends. While the girls often marry into their social class, with perfect, educated gentlemen as complex (intricate, as Elizabeth Bennet would say) and intelligent as themselves, whether landlords or clergymen, there are very few to whom she offers “fairy-tale” opulence.[138]

Sufficient income to live well
[edit]
A simple and unpretentious wedding, but one that promises "perfect happiness" for Emma and Mr Knightley. (Chris Hammond, 1998)

The wealth of young couples in Jane Austen's novels varies, but it is generally enough for personal happiness.[139] Some, like Elinor and Edward, have modest incomes, while others, like Captain Wentworth and Mr. Darcy, are significantly wealthier.[note 20][140][59][25]

While some characters start with smaller amounts, they often see an increase in wealth through marriage or inheritance. Overall, Austen’s characters have a wide range of financial situations, from moderate to very comfortable, but money is always presented as a factor in their well-being.[139][note 21]

A change in status
[edit]
By accepting Fanny as Edmund's wife, Sir Bertram recognizes her moral worth (C. E. Brock, 1908).

Elizabeth Bennet, Fanny Price, and Anne Elliot each experience a shift in social status through marriage. Elizabeth’s marriage to Mr. Darcy, while romantic, challenges social norms, as she marries above her class and he chooses love over social expectations.[141][51][142]

Fanny Price, coming from a lower middle-class background, adapts well to the values of the wealthy family she marries into. Anne Elliot, who initially faces a mismatch by marrying a man of lower social rank, ultimately finds that her husband, Captain Wentworth, has earned his fortune and is respected in society. In each case, marriage brings a change in social dynamics, but each woman navigates these shifts in different ways.[143][144][139]

Endogamy

[edit]
In Mansfield Park, Fanny and Edmund experience the transition from brotherly love to marital love (Hugh Thomson, 1897).

Marriage between cousins was relatively common during Jane Austen’s time, even in her own family. However, in her novels, only a few characters marry within their family, such as Henrietta Musgrove and Charles Hayter in Persuasion and Edmund Bertram and Fanny Price in Mansfield Park. While these marriages align with social expectations, many of Austen’s protagonists reject such unions. Elizabeth Bennet refuses to marry her cousin, Mr. Collins, and Anne Elliot declines to marry her cousin, Walter Elliot.[note 22][145][47]

Given the limited social circles in which these characters move, many relationships begin with close, sibling-like friendships.[145] For example, Emma Woodhouse marries Mr. Knightley, who has known her since childhood, and Elinor Dashwood falls in love with her brother-in-law’s brother. Similarly, Catherine Morland meets Henry Tilney through mutual connections, and Jane and Elizabeth Bennet marry men who happen to be in their region for the hunting season.[145]

Some marriages, like those of Anne Elliot and Louisa Musgrove, involve outsiders—sailors without strong ties to the local aristocracy.[146] However, Anne first meets Frederick Wentworth during his time in the area while awaiting a new command,[147] and Louisa becomes engaged to James Benwick after spending time with him during her recovery.[51]

Approach angles and outcomes

[edit]

In Jane Austen's novels, the approach to marriage differs. For some heroines, marriage is seen as a reward after enduring trials, but for others, it may feel more like a compromise.[148] For example, Marianne's marriage to Colonel Brandon and Jane Bennet's marriage to Charles Bingley are sometimes viewed as sacrifices rather than true fulfillment.[103][149]

Personal fulfillment

[edit]

What matters most for Austen's heroines is personal happiness, not social expectations.[150] Elizabeth Bennet rejects Mr. Collins’s proposal because she knows she wouldn’t be happy with him, and she also turns down Darcy's initial proposal.[151] Similarly, Fanny Price refuses Henry Crawford, feeling she could not be happy with him,[152] and Anne Elliot rejects Charles Musgrove because of her lingering feelings for Frederick Wentworth.[147]

Elizabeth is particularly clear about her desire for happiness based on her own values. When discussing marriage with Lady Catherine, she asserts that she will act in a way that ensures her own happiness, without being influenced by others’ opinions.[153]

Second chances

[edit]
Frederick Wentworth points out to Anne the letter he has just written to her.

Second chances are a common theme in Jane Austen’s novels. Darcy offers Elizabeth Bennet a second chance at love after he overcomes his pride.[154] Jane Bennet also gets a second chance when Bingley renews his interest in her, with Darcy’s encouragement. Similarly, Harriet Smith accepts Robert Martin’s proposal after initially rejecting him.[note 23][155][156][157]

The most notable example of a second chance is the relationship between Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth. After being persuaded to break off their engagement years earlier due to financial concerns, they are separated for eight years. When Wentworth returns, he is surprised to find Anne still unmarried, and he has not yet fully let go of his resentment. However, after reflecting on his feelings and observing Anne’s steadiness, Wentworth finally lets go of his bitterness and admires her more deeply. In the end, he proposes again, offering his love with greater sincerity than before.[158][157][159][160]

Second attachments

[edit]
Edward Ferrars fell in love with Elinor, while he had imprudently become engaged to Lucy Steele.

In many of Jane Austen's novels, characters experience love more than once, which contrasts with the view in sentimental novels of the time, where first love is seen as lasting forever. Marianne Dashwood initially believes second attachments are impossible, but over time, she becomes devoted to her husband after loving Willoughby.[161] Similarly, Elizabeth Bennet is initially attracted to Wickham,[162] then later develops feelings for Darcy.[163] Louisa Musgrove also shifts her affections from Captain Wentworth to Captain Benwick.[164][165]

Male characters in Austen's novels also experience multiple attachments. Edward Ferrars initially has a fleeting infatuation with Lucy Steele before falling in love with Elinor Dashwood. Colonel Brandon, after a past attachment to his cousin Eliza, falls in love with Marianne.[166] Edmund Bertram moves from being attracted to Mary Crawford to realizing his love for his cousin, Fanny Price. In Emma, Captain Weston remarries after the death of his first wife, and Harriet Smith moves from being interested in Mr. Elton to Mr. Knightley before eventually accepting Robert Martin’s proposal.[167] In Persuasion, Charles Musgrove shifts his attention to Mary Elliot after Anne Elliot rejects him, while James Benwick forms an attachment to Louisa Musgrove after the death of his fiancée.[164]

Fulfillment

[edit]

In marriage, a woman traditionally pledges loyalty and obedience to her husband,[note 24][168] giving up her legal identity and fortune in exchange for the status of a married woman.[169] Jane Austen, however, challenges this conventional view by suggesting that young people should follow their hearts when it comes to love. In Persuasion, she emphasizes that perseverance can bring couples together, and in Northanger Abbey, she suggests that even interference can strengthen a relationship.

Austen’s heroines do not conform to the traditional idea of silent, submissive wives.[126] Instead, their marriages are based on love, respect, and mutual trust, with both partners sharing an equal role in the relationship.[note 25] While Austen assures readers that these marriages will be happy, she refrains from detailing the day-to-day aspects of married life.[170]

The marriages in her novels often symbolize the formation of a new, supportive community.[171] For example, in Sense and Sensibility, a community forms around the Brandons and Ferrars, while in Pride and Prejudice, the Darcys and Bingleys create a close-knit group in Derbyshire. living less than thirty miles apart and intimately involving the Gardiners in their lives. Similarly, Mansfield Park shows the strengthening of family bonds, and in Emma, marriage enhances community ties in Surrey. In each case, the strength of the unions is reinforced by friendships within their community, which is typically centered around traditional estates.[51][172]

Anne Elliot, in Persuasion, is the exception, as she marries Frederick Wentworth, a naval officer with no land-based ties. This marks her departure from the stagnant social class of the landed gentry. She embraces a new community within the naval world, which becomes her chosen family.[51]

See also

[edit]
[edit]
  • "Loveless Marriage". Austenette Worlds. 2009.
  • "Woman in Love". Austenette Worlds. 2009.
  • "Elizabeth's Love for Darcy: Holy Matrimony". Austenette Worlds. 2009.
  • "Marriage and the Alternatives: The Status of Women". Republic of Pemberley.
  • Easton, Celia (2009). "The Sibling Ideal in Jane Austen's Novels: When Near Incest Really is Best". JASNA.
  • Hansen, Serena (2000). "Rhetorical Dynamics in Jane Austen's Treatment of Marriage Proposals". JASNA.

Notes and references

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ In Jane Austen's time, 25% of gentry girls remained unmarried, and rarely by choice.
  2. ^ The financial problem obviously does not arise for those who have a personal fortune, like Emma Woodhouse ("beautiful, intelligent, and rich"), or Georgiana Darcy (£30,000 dowry).
  3. ^ That is to say, from the same social background. Thus the Austen family is linked to about ten close families, such as the Digweeds of Steventon, the Biggs of Manydown or the Lefroys of Ashe.
  4. ^ The problem is exactly the same for younger sons, who are financially penalized by the strictness of birthright but want to maintain their rank, like Colonel Fitzwilliam, who, at over 30, is single: "Younger sons cannot marry where they like," he tells Elizabeth Bennet. He thus makes it clear to her that he likes her enormously, but that she is too poor for him to consider marrying her.
  5. ^ They are not specified by the narrator, however. She only mentions a "good house, very sufficient income."
  6. ^ That is, by saving on the financial envelope allocated by his marriage contract for his personal expenses (pin money).
  7. ^ Jane Austen wrote in an 1800 letter to Cassandra about the marriage of the wealthy Miss Sawbridge to a poor tutor, Mr Maxwell, writing that she must have been head over heels in love to accept such a penniless suitor.
  8. ^ It was, in her opinion, an "interesting" marriage for the twenty-five-year-old Janet Ross, "because he was rich and she had nothing." The much older husband, however, was "grumpy and demanding," in her opinion, but for Edmund Bertram Mrs Frazer was a cold-hearted, vain woman who had married him only for his money. ("Mansfield Park (Chap. 44)". pemberley.com.)
  9. ^ When Admiral Crawford, after the death of his wife, moves in with his mistress, Mary comes to live in Mansfield, with her sister, Mrs Grand, the pastor's wife.
  10. ^ In Jane Austen the word principle usually means religious principle, recalls Austenette Worlds.
  11. ^ The answer is Bank and Note, hence Banknote.
  12. ^ Sterling insignificance. The play on words created by the use of the adjective sterling (excellent) in the oxymoron, which recalls the name of the currency, the pound sterling, is untranslatable.
  13. ^ Mary assumes that this marriage is, as in ancient tragedies, the sacrifice made so that her father may return safely from his voyage to the Antilles. Edmund affirms "with a serious smile" that there is no sacrifice but free choice, Mary replies that, naturally, "she has done only what every young woman would have done." ("it does put me in mind of some of the old heathen heroes, who, after performing great exploits in a foreign land, offered sacrifices to the gods on their safe return." "There is no sacrifice in the case," replied Edmund, with a serious smile; "it is entirely her own doing." "Oh yes I know it is. I was merely joking. She has done no more than what every young woman would do").
  14. ^ The Austens knew Mary Russell, the mother of the woman of letters, not pretty but well-endowed, prey to the charming and very spendthrift George Mitford, who very quickly devoured his wife's dowry.
  15. ^ "Looked up to him as a superior": this is what Mr Bennet says to Elizabeth, when she announces her engagement to him.
  16. ^ "Anything is to be preferred or endured rather than marrying without affection" Jane Austen wrote to her niece Fanny Knight on November 18, 1814.
  17. ^ The narrator admits: "his affection originated in nothing better than gratitude, or, in other words, that a persuasion of her partiality for him had been the only cause of giving her a serious thought." She acknowledges that this is "new, in romantic fiction at least, even horribly degrading to the dignity of the heroine" (who is forbidden by social conventions from making the first move).
  18. ^ Modern readers, accustomed to romantic statements and more direct language, often have difficulty understanding Jane Austen's discretion in confession scenes, explains Hansen (2000).
  19. ^ In this regard, Tony Tanner recalls that, according to Freud, "blushing is a kind of slight erection of the head."
  20. ^ Anne, who is about to turn thirty, receives from her parents, General Mathiew and his wife Lady Jane Bertie, an annual allowance of £100 and James, of the Leigh family, the vicarage of Cubbington in Warwickshire, which brings in £200, and "it is hardly necessary to add that this income is insufficient."
  21. ^ The pay of a senior officer in the Royal Navy on active service does not exceed, at best, £400 per annum. See Pay and half-pay of a captain.
  22. ^ Marriage between first cousins, admitted by the Anglican Communion, was estimated in 1875 by George Darwin at 3.5% in the middle class and 4.5% in the aristocracy. In countries with a Catholic tradition, a dispensation from the Pope is required to contract such a union, considered by some communities to be incestuous.
  23. ^ Robert Martin is an "interesting" character for Mona Scheuermann. He is only a farmer, a commoner, but, in his social category, he is as perfect as Mr Knightley is in his: full of good sense, intelligent, serious, he also has great qualities of heart; he is, says Mr Knightley who appreciates him very much, "an excellent young man, both as son and brother" ("He is an excellent young man, both as son and brother").
  24. ^ In the words of the Anglican marriage liturgy, the man promises to "love her, comfort her, honour, and keep her in sickness and in health", while she promises first and foremost to "obey him, and serve him, love, honour, and keep him in sickness and in health."
  25. ^ In each marriage, love, esteem, compatibility and mutuality, capability and respect – and equality, Swords (1988).

Original quotes

[edit]
  1. ^ ”She had something to suffer, perhaps, when they came into contact again, in seeing Anne restored to the rights of seniority.”
  2. ^ ”Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance […] and it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life.”
  3. ^ ”There was too much domestic happiness in his brother's house; woman wore too amiable a form in it.”
  4. ^ ”I purposely abstain from dates on this occasion […] I only entreat everybody to believe that exactly at the time when it was quite natural that it should be so, and not a week earlier, Edmund did cease to care about Miss Crawford, and became as anxious to marry Fanny as Fanny herself could desire.”

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Jones (2009, p. 1-5)
  2. ^ Austen, Jane (2003). Sense and Sensibility. Penguin Classics. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-14-143966-2.
  3. ^ Austen, Jane (1816). "Lettre à Fanny Knight". Pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  4. ^ Brooke (1999, p. 162)
  5. ^ Gillooly (1999, p. 9)
  6. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 173)
  7. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 351)
  8. ^ a b Gillooly (1999, p. 10)
  9. ^ a b c Jones (2009, p. 174)
  10. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 352)
  11. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 22". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  12. ^ Jones (2009, p. 175)
  13. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 51". Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  14. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 24". Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  15. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 38". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  16. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 38". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  17. ^ Swords, Barbara (1988). ""Woman's Place" in Jane Austen's England (1770-1820)". JASNA.
  18. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 33". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  19. ^ Jones (2003, p. 20)
  20. ^ Schmidt (2008, p. 4)
  21. ^ a b Scheuermann (1993, p. 213)
  22. ^ Jones (2009, p. 58)
  23. ^ a b c d Jones (2009, p. 142)
  24. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 129)
  25. ^ a b c Austen, Jane (1811). "Sense and Sensibility, chapter 50". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  26. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 37". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  27. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 85)
  28. ^ a b Scheuermann (1993, p. 214)
  29. ^ Jones (2003, p. 17)
  30. ^ Sutherland (2003, p. 12)
  31. ^ Sutherland (2003, p. 27)
  32. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 54". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  33. ^ Schmidt (2008, p. 2)
  34. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 15". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  35. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 6". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  36. ^ Jones (2003, p. 27)
  37. ^ a b Gast (2007, p. 14)
  38. ^ Myer (1997, p. 61)
  39. ^ Jones (2003, p. 28)
  40. ^ a b Schmidt (2008, p. 3)
  41. ^ Myer (1997, p. 54)
  42. ^ Jones (2009, p. 11)
  43. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 22-23)
  44. ^ a b c Jones (2009, p. 20)
  45. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 80-81)
  46. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 124)
  47. ^ a b c Tanner (1975, p. 129-130)
  48. ^ Graham (2008, p. 83)
  49. ^ a b c d Jones (2009, p. 10)
  50. ^ Zwinger, Lynda Marie (1991). Daughters, Fathers, and the Novel: The Sentimental Romance of Heterosexuality. Univ of Wisconsin Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-299-12854-8.
  51. ^ a b c d e Graham (2008, p. 119)
  52. ^ Jones (2009, p. 21)
  53. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 56)
  54. ^ a b c Myer (1997, p. 63)
  55. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 68)
  56. ^ Bennett, Paula (1993). "Family Plots: Pride and Prejudice as a Novel about Parenting". Approaches to Teaching Austen's Pride and Prejudice. New York: MLA. p. 134-139.
  57. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 47". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  58. ^ Martin (2007, p. 67)
  59. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 144)
  60. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 39". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  61. ^ a b c Jones (2009, p. 143)
  62. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 2". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  63. ^ Carroll (2004, p. 211)
  64. ^ a b Auerbach (2004, p. 141)
  65. ^ Kaplan, Laurie (2005). "The Two Gentlemen of Derbyshire: Nature vs Nurture". JASNA. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  66. ^ Graham (2008, p. 85)
  67. ^ Jones (2009, p. 1)
  68. ^ Jones (2009, p. 2)
  69. ^ Austen, Jane (1811). "Sense and Sensibility, chapter 21". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  70. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 88)
  71. ^ Jones (2009, p. 147)
  72. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 8". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  73. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 123)
  74. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 6". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  75. ^ a b Auerbach (2004, p. 242)
  76. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 36". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  77. ^ Brooke (1999, p. 168)
  78. ^ Moler, Kenneth (1989). Pride and Prejudice: A Study in Artistic Economy. Boston: Twayne Publishers. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-8057-7983-7.
  79. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 22". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  80. ^ a b c Jones (2009, p. 16)
  81. ^ Morrison (2005, p. 128)
  82. ^ a b c d Caywood, Cynthia (1984). "in "Sisterhood and Friendship in Pride and Prejudice: Need Happiness Be "Entirely a Matter of Chance"?"". In Hargrove, Anne C.; Magliocco, Maurine (eds.). Pride and Prejudice and the Belief in Choice. Macomb: Western Illinois University Press. p. 34. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  83. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 24". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  84. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 188)
  85. ^ Massei-Chamayou (2012, p. 94)
  86. ^ Austen, Jane (2009). Catharine and Others Writings. Oxford World's Classics. p. 245. ISBN 978-0-19-953842-3.
  87. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 336)
  88. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 101)
  89. ^ Austen, Jane (1817). "Northanger Abbey, chapter 9". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 9, 2025.
  90. ^ Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 21". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  91. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 5". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  92. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 110)
  93. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 78)
  94. ^ Jones (2009, p. 17)
  95. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 22". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  96. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 118)
  97. ^ Brooke (1999, p. 171)
  98. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 79)
  99. ^ Brooke (1999, p. 178)
  100. ^ Sutherland (2003, p. 36)
  101. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 11". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  102. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 9)
  103. ^ a b Martin (2007, p. 71)
  104. ^ a b c Scheuermann (1993, p. 222)
  105. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 25". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  106. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 27". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  107. ^ a b Martin (2007, p. 46)
  108. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 226)
  109. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 5". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  110. ^ "Emma (analyse ch. 52-55)". SparkNote. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  111. ^ "Emma, chapter 53". pemberley.com. 1815. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  112. ^ Scheuermann (1993, p. 176)
  113. ^ a b "Emma, chapter 11". pemberley.com. 1815. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  114. ^ Kaleque, Abdul (2005). "Jane Austen's Idea of a Home". JASNA. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  115. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 49". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 8, 2025.
  116. ^ Brooke (1999, p. 169)
  117. ^ Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 10". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  118. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 241)
  119. ^ a b Massei-Chamayou (2012, p. 165)
  120. ^ Hall, Tina (1993). "Persuasive Pairs". JASNA. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  121. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 26". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  122. ^ Auerbach (2004, p. 112-113)
  123. ^ Stovel, Bruce; Gregg, Lynn Weinlos (2003). "The Talk in Jane Austen". Association of Canadian College and University Teachers of English. 29 (1–2): 179. doi:10.1353/esc.2003.0023. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  124. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 55". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  125. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 118)
  126. ^ a b c d Jones (2009, p. 4)
  127. ^ a b Tanner (1975, p. 134)
  128. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 133)
  129. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 109)
  130. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 34". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  131. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 361)
  132. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 15)
  133. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 131)
  134. ^ Austen, Jane (1811). "Sense and Sensibility, chapter 49". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  135. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 48". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  136. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 60". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  137. ^ Harris, Julia (2010). "Elizabeth's Love for Darcy: Holy Matrimony". austenette.wordpress.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  138. ^ Bander, Elaine. "Neither Sex, Money, nor Power: Why Elizabeth Finally Says "Yes!"" (PDF). JASNA. Retrieved January 10, 2024.
  139. ^ a b c Heldman, James (1990). "How Wealthy is Mr. Darcy – Really?". JASNA. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  140. ^ Le Faye, Deirdre (2004). Jane Austen, a family record. Cambridge University Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-521-53417-8.
  141. ^ Jones (2003, p. 23-29)
  142. ^ Ballester, Isabelle (2009). Les nombreux mondes de Jane Austen [The Many Worlds of Jane Austen] (in French). Lyon: Les moutons électriques. p. 101. ISBN 978-2-915793-80-2.
  143. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 143)
  144. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 228)
  145. ^ a b c Easton, Celia A. (2009). "The Sibling Ideal in Jane Austen's Novels: When Near Incest Really is Best". Persuasions : The Jane Austen Journal On-Line. 30 (1). Williamsburg. ProQuest 2309791217. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  146. ^ Beer, Gillian (2003). Persuasion: Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Gillian Beer. Penguin Classics. p. 26. ISBN 9780141439686.
  147. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 4". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  148. ^ Graham (2008, p. 115)
  149. ^ Tanner (1975, p. 100)
  150. ^ Graham (2008, p. 120)
  151. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 19". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  152. ^ Austen, Jane (1814). "Mansfield Park, chapter 32". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  153. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 56". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  154. ^ Austen, Jane (1813). "Pride and Prejudice, chapter 58". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  155. ^ Scheuermann (1993, p. 226)
  156. ^ Austen, Jane (1815). "Emma, chapter 8". permberley.com. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  157. ^ a b Jones (2009, p. 32)
  158. ^ Austen, Jane (2011). "Persuasion. Préface de Christine Jordis" [Persuasion. Preface by Christine Jordis]. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (in French). 68: 205-207. ISBN 978-2-07-043956-0. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  159. ^ Austen, Jane (2011). "Notice de Persuasion by Pierre Goubert, coll. Folio classique" [Persuasion Notice, Folio Classic collection]. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (in French). 68: 205-207. ISBN 978-2-07-043956-0. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  160. ^ Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 23". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  161. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 99-100)
  162. ^ Goubert (1975, p. 217)
  163. ^ Graham (2008, p. 109)
  164. ^ a b Austen, Jane (1817). "Persuasion, chapter 18". pemberley.com. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  165. ^ Kramp (2007, p. 71)
  166. ^ Kramp (2007, p. 66)
  167. ^ Kramp (2007, p. 120)
  168. ^ "The Form of Solemnisation of Matrimony". Républic of Pemberley. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  169. ^ Jones (2009, p. 3)
  170. ^ Scheuermann (1993, p. 217)
  171. ^ O'Toole, Tess (1993). "Reconfiguring the Family in Persuasion". JASNA. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  172. ^ Scheuermann (1993, p. 220)

Bibliography

[edit]