This module is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
This module is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Would someone look into the above request? Perhaps Vanamonde93? Thanks, DeluxeVegan (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DeluxeVegan: The old map, so far as I can see, only highlights the parts of the erstwhile kingdown of Kashmir that are currently administered by India. The new one also highlights the other parts; and I'm wondering why, and if the coloration is appropriate. I don't want to make a switch until that concern has been addressed. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but this Module isn't used to discuss the history of Kashmir, is it? My understanding is that this is for locations within the erstwhile state (now within the union territory). As such information outside its boundaries is extraneous. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Prior to the J&K reorganisation, the entire Kashmir region was claimed by India under a single administrative division. This map shows both the official and de-facto boundaries of the new union territory. --RaviC (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@RaviC: Perhaps you could upload a new file depicting only the de-facto boundaries for the purpose of this module? Sorry if I seem to be asking too much. Thanks, DeluxeVegan (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The previous version of the module made no distinction, in color, between Pakistan, China, Azad Kashmir, Aksai Chin, and so forth. This one differentiates them. I'm not saying it's necessarily incorrect; but replacing the old file with RaviC's current version would require a talk page consensus at the very least; whereas one which merely redraws the boundaries could be used without further ado. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "India Jammu and Kashmir location map UN view.svg" to "India Jammu and Kashmir location map.svg" Soumya-8974 (he)talkcontribssubpages 07:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This map covers way to much territory for just doing the territory of Jammu and Kashmir as a Union Territory. We can use File:India Jammu and Kashmir UT adm location map.svg instead which still shows the territory as disputed but does not show the entire disputed Kashmir region - we already have a map for the full territory here. C1MM (talk) 06:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template-protected edit request on 11 July 2022[edit]
User:Paine Ellsworth, this edit leads to [[1]] getting changed to disputed status, as the map is changed by a user on commons. Undo this change, as it unnecessarily leading to conflict, where I have reverted the changes. Only Indian side of Kashmir map is now shown as striped as disputed, while Pakistan side as seen in Muzaffarabad is shown as undisputed, this is a biased narrative. Crashed greek (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Actually, that is a mistake on my part by not showing the correct disputed for Azad Kashmir map. I will correct that. I am surprised no one has already flagged it. The File:India Jammu and Kashmir UT adm location map.svg is still usable. C1MM (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have stopped edit warring, I have uploaded the pic as a new file, as I have been informed that 3RR doesnt apply in commons. However, the bigger map in this module had not marked the area as disputed, which stayed for all these years in all the articles. Crashed greek (talk) 08:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Commons' upload-warring is covered by the c:Commons:Overwriting existing files guideline, which does say When in doubt, or to resolve inter-user conflicts, upload as a new file. Now we must try to find a meeting of the minds, because it must always be remembered that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a battleground. Thanks again!P.I. Ellsworth , ed.put'r there 16:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the 
Done. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 02:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:India_Jammu_and_Kashmir_UT_adm_location_map.svg){kind=link}
