Talk:2018 Turkish general election
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2018 Turkish general election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Two infoboxes
[edit]Hi @Charles Essie and Number 57: what is your opinion for having 2 infoboxes for one election ? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's not uncommon and I have no particular objections. However, I do think it would be better to have a combined infobox that set out both the presidential candidates and seats won in the parliamentary vote (this is how it's done on fr.wiki). The best I've seen on en.wiki is the attempt at Costa Rican general election, 2010. What I'd like to see is something that combines {{Infobox election}} for the presidential candidate at the top and {{Infobox legislative election}} for the parliamentary result at the bottom. Number 57 22:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The template {{Infobox legislative election}} faces opposition on virtually all major election pages where it has been used. For the same reasons that have been cited by other users before, I will not support its use here. It is essentially a redundant template altogether, since an extremely similar layout is already used for the main results summary table in the middle of the article. Party colors and leader portraits are helpful for casual readers, and should be retained in the election infobox at the top of the article.
- That being said, I believe we should stick with two infoboxes; the recent volatility of the Turkish system, and the fact that the transitional laws of the Turkish government have not all yet been passed, effectively mean that we could in the foreseeable future have pres. and parl. elections happen on separate dates. So there is little point in experimenting with merging the two infoboxes, since that could very well end up only applying to a single article or two. Consistency is therefore an important factor to consider, too. — Μαρκος Δ 20:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Going back to three-article solution
[edit]I believe the above dilemma can be resolved by going back to having three articles for this election cycle, namely 'Turkish parliamentary election, 2018', 'Turkish presidential election, 2018' and 'Turkish general election, 2018' This is exactly the same format used for the United States (for example, see United States elections, 2016. The 'Turkish general election, 2018' article, just like the format used for US elections, would essentially be a disambiguation article offering short explanations of who won each election and providing links to their respective article for further detail.
I only say this because even at the moment (literally one day since the election was announced), the article is already overcomplicated due to having to deal with two separate elections at once. Once the campaign is fully underway, it's going to get much worse and we're going to most likely have to separate them anyway. Nub Cake (talk) 21:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with the reasoning. David O. Johnson (talk)
- I also generally disagree with the consolidation of presidential/legislative election articles on Wikipedia, especially in Latin America, and I also agree with the above. Mélencron (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Here are the relevant steps on the process :[1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't believe the "general election" article is needed following the split. It should probably just be redirected to the parliamentary election article. Number 57 03:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Number 57; if we split up legislative and presidential elections, then there is no need for a third "general election" article. — Μαρκος Δ 11:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't believe the "general election" article is needed following the split. It should probably just be redirected to the parliamentary election article. Number 57 03:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Here are the relevant steps on the process :[1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
@Leftwinguy92, Charles Essie, Μαρκος Δ, Mélencron, David O. Johnson, and Nub Cake: I am agree with the three article. It is important to have a desambiguation page. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, there's not need for an extensive disambiguation page. We should just use a standard one, like this one. Otherwise we would just be repeating ourselves and duplicating content for no reason. — Μαρκος Δ 13:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree. What happened in 2015 was two separate elections on separate dates. These two take place on the same day so it’s a general election more similar to the upcoming election in the United States. Charles Essie (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Then at the very least we should limit this "general election" article to actual results only; we shouldn't go into details on the candidate selection process and campaign. That would, again, just be duplicating content for no reason. — Μαρκος Δ 15:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Can people comment on Talk:2023 Turkish general election#Delete this page? Beshogur (talk) 17:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then at the very least we should limit this "general election" article to actual results only; we shouldn't go into details on the candidate selection process and campaign. That would, again, just be duplicating content for no reason. — Μαρκος Δ 15:04, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree. What happened in 2015 was two separate elections on separate dates. These two take place on the same day so it’s a general election more similar to the upcoming election in the United States. Charles Essie (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Main parties
[edit]@Leftwinguy92, Charles Essie, Μαρκος Δ, Mélencron, David O. Johnson, and Nub Cake: I think we should add the main parties for the legislative eleciton. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean Nub Cake (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Nub Cake: here we should add the parties. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- I would recommend waiting until we know which ones are actually contesting the election. Nub Cake (talk) 08:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Nub Cake: And now ? Could we add it ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean Nub Cake (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Results by majority of votes in each province (top) and district (bottom)
[edit]Wouldn't it be useful to have a map indicating the (Results by majority of votes in each province (top) and district (bottom)), be made of the combined total of the Alliances that ran, 1. People's alliance 2. Alliance of Nations and 3. HDP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oceansoultandt (talk • contribs) 15:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- I second this. In canakkale, antalya and mersin, millet won more votes but akp won the most in terms of parties. This is an unfair representation. Maps should be by ittefak rather than by parti Masterpha (talk) 08:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Merge with Presidential and Parliamentary elections page
[edit]Merge with the page of Turkish presidential and parliamentary elections which held on 24 June 2018.
- Strongly Support, the presidential and parliamentary elections held the same day, President Erdogan also is the leader of the AK Party. See as Taiwan general election, 2016 on 16 January 2016. Presidential and legislative elections held on the same day, and Tsai Ing-wen is the leader of the Democratic Progressive Party.Paul Lincoln (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)